High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: 84.287) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Advertisements

A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
21 st CENTURY COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERS 2008 BIDDER’S Workshops.
Alaska Native Education Program (ANEP) Technical Assistance Meeting September 2014 Sylvia E. Lyles Valerie Randall Almita Reed.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
Sam Lopez, NPD Program Manager, OELA
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as reauthorized by The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Benefits to Private School Students and Teachers.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Arts in Education National Grant Program (AENP) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Improvement Programs.
2010 Magnet Schools Assistance Program Pre-Application Meeting March 26, 2010 U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office.
Introduction to Enhancing Education Through Technology Charles LovettJohn Bailey February 2002.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Centers for International Business Education—Technical Assistance.
ORC TA: Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Grant Program HRSA U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Health Resources & Services Administration.
School Leadership Program Pre-Application Slides United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Webinar April 19, 2011 HazMat Grant Program: HMEP Application Guidance Overview and Explanation of the Sample Application for the HMEP Grant Program for.
The Early Reading First Program CFDA # A and B Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Parent Summit 02/21/2014 SAISD Federal Programs Dept. Barbara.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
Overview of the FY 2010 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey 1.
Overview Slides March 13, 2012 Q&A Webinar i3 Development Pre-Application Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Professional Development for Arts Educators Program (PDAE) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Improvement.
Arts in Education Model Development and Dissemination Grant Program (AEMDD) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
School Leadership Program Pre Application Meeting March 31, 2008 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived Information.
School Leadership Program Pre Application Meeting February 19, 2010 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived.
Full-Service Community Schools Pre-Application Meeting June 17, 2010 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Note: These.
Predominantly Black Institutions Program CFDA: A FY 2015 PREAPPLICATION WEBINAR Washington, DC July 14, :00 AM. – 12:00 PM, EDT July 14, 2015.
National Center for Information and Technical Support for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities (NCITSPSD) NCITSPSD Technical Assistance Workshop Orientation.
Nuts and Bolts of the Title II, Part A Application Virginia Department of Education Coordinators’ Academy July 22 – July 24, Coordinators' Academy.
Implementing School Plans in ePlan
NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 1) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives Carol M. White Physical Education Program CFDA # F.
FULL-SERVICE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS PRE-APPLICATION WEBINAR (MAY 21, 2014)
QUALITY OF THE MANAGEMENT PLAN 15 Points (recommend 5 pages)
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 2) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
Full-Service Community Schools Pre-Application Meeting March 12, 2008 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived.
OFFICE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (NPD) NPD Grant Competition Webinar 2: GPRA & Selection Criteria January.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
TITLE X, PART C MCKINNEY-VENTO ACT The McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act Grant Application FY Office of Federal Programs March 9 th, 2016.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Federal Programs Department Parent Summit March 10, 2016.
Briefing: Interdisciplinary Preparation for Personnel Serving Children with Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity Needs CFDA K Office of.
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Presentation transcript:

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008 Pre-Application Technical Assistance Teleconference July 28, 2008 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived Information

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Agenda  Welcoming Remarks  Program Purpose and Overview  Eligibility and Absolute/Invitational Priority  Selection Criteria  Application Requirements  Narrative and Budget Instructions  Award Information  Reporting Requirements  GPRA Performance Measures  Application Submission: Grants.gov  Further Questions and Contact Information

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Purpose & Program Overview  The purpose of the High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration competition is to encourage partnerships between supplemental educational services (SES) programs and 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21stCCLC) projects in order to increase the academic achievement of low-income students in Title I schools who are at risk of not meeting challenging State academic standards.  The Supplemental Educational Services (SES) and 21 st Century Community Learning Centers (21stCCLC) programs are both authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended, by the No Child Left Behind act of 2001 (ESEA).

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Eligible Applicants  Applicants must be current recipients of 21stCCLC local grants that will provide services in the school year and that (1) apply in partnership with one or more State-approved SES providers able to serve students in the grantee's LEA in the school year, (2) serve students in an LEA that is identified by its State as in need of improvement or corrective action during the or school years, and (3) serve students enrolled in at least one Title I school identified as in need of improvement, corrective action, or restructuring during the or school years.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Absolute Priority To meet this absolute priority, the proposed project must be designed to: Serve as a national model that provides innovative approaches to after-school services by coordinating the academic services offered by SES programs with the after-school services offered by 21stCCLC programs. Provide or coordinate intensive academic after-school services to students who attend a Title I school in the LEA that is in its second year of improvement, in corrective action, or in restructuring, under section 1116 of the ESEA. Increase the number of students in the LEA receiving academic after- school services designed to improve their academic achievement. Provide or coordinate academic after-school services that are consistent with the instructional program of the LEA served and aligned with the academic standards of the State in which the LEA is located. Collect data on student eligibility, enrollment, and participation in the academic after-school services provided by the project, as well as pre- and post-intervention test data.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Invitational Priority (1) Academic After-School Services for High School Students To meet this priority, the proposed project must be designed to provide after-school services aimed at improving the academic achievement of high school students. (2) Faith-Based and Other Community Organizations as SES Providers To meet this priority, the applicant must include as a partner one or more SES providers that are faith-based or other community organizations.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Selection Criteria  Quality of the Project Design  Adequacy of Resources  Quality of Management Plan  Quality of Project Evaluation

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Selection Criteria Quality of the Project Design (up to 35 points). In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the extent to which the proposed project consists of a comprehensive plan that includes a description of:  The demonstrated need to be met, including the academic and after- school needs of the students, schools, and LEAs to be served.  The objectives and expected outcomes designed to address the need described under paragraph (b)(i) of this selection criterion.  The after-school academic services to be provided or coordinated by the applicant and its partner entities, and the extent to which those services will meet the requirements of the absolute priority described in this notice.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Selection Criteria Adequacy of Resources (up to 15 points). In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:  The adequacy of the instructional program to be provided to students, including the extent to which the program is intensive, research-based, consistent with the instructional program of the LEA served, and aligned with State academic standards.  The relevance and demonstrated commitment of each partner in the proposed project to the implementation and success of the project.  The extent to which costs are reasonable in relation to the number of persons to be served and services to be provided.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Selection Criteria Quality of Management Plan (up to 25 points) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing project tasks. The adequacy of the management plan in explaining the planning, coordination, implementation, management, and oversight services that the applicant and its partner entities will provide or coordinate for the proposed project, including an explanation of the role of the 21stCCLC grantee, LEA, SES provider(s), school principals, teachers, other partner entities, parents, and members of the community in the proposed project. The extent to which the time commitments of the project director and other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed project.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Selection Criteria Quality of Project Evaluation (Up to 25 points)  Sets out methods of evaluation that include the use of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and qualitative data to the extent possible.  Will provide timely and valid information on the management, implementation, and effectiveness of the project.  Will provide guidance on or strategies for replicating or testing the project intervention in multiple settings.  Meets the evaluation criteria specified in paragraph (5) of the absolute priority.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Application Requirements All applicants must submit the following information in order to be considered for funding:  A list of partner entities, including one or more State-approved SES providers that meet the eligibility requirements, that will assist the applicant in coordinating or providing services.  A memorandum of understanding between the applicant and all partner entities that (i) describes the activities that each member of the group plans to carry out and (ii) binds each member of the group to every statement and assurance made by the applicant in the application, as set forth in 34 CFR (b).  A comprehensive plan that describes the design of the proposed project  A description of—  the resources that will be used for the proposed project;  the applicant’s plan for the management of the proposed project, including planning, implementation, and oversight; and  the applicant’s plan for the evaluation of the proposed project.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration  Please include a Table of Contents.  The Program Narrative should first include, in detail, the responses that addresses the absolute priority and, if the grantee chooses, the invitational priorities. The response to these priorities should be properly labeled and attached as a separate document and submitted at the front of the actual program narrative.  The Program Narrative should also include, in detail, the responses that address the program selection criteria. Instructions for Program Narrative

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Instructions for Budget Narrative  Applicants should prepare and submit one three-year budget summary using Form 524 and one three-year budget narrative. These budgets need to be attached in the Budget Narrative Attachment Form.  The Budget Narrative presents an itemized breakdown of the applicant’s financial plan for carrying out the project activities and services for three-years.  Applicants should describe how all costs will support project activities and services, as well as, the number of participants to be served. Make sure all costs are adequately explained as your budget will be thoroughly reviewed by HQ-SES and After-School staff.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Award Information  Estimated Available Funds: $5,000,000  Estimated Range of Awards:  $500,000 - $1,300,000 for a three-year project period  Estimated Average Size of Awards: $900,000 for a three- year project period.  Maximum Award: $1,300,000 for a three-year project period  Estimated Number of Awards: 4-6.  Project & Budget Period: Up to 36 months

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Reporting Requirements  Annual Performance Reports—annual performance reports are required and you must provide the most current performance and financial expenditure information for that performance and budget year.  Program Performance Measures—program performance measure information are required to assist the Department in measuring the performance of the program, as well as performance on project- specific indicators submitted in your project design.  Final Report—a final report is required in order to close out the grant in compliance with ED requirements.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration GPRA Performance Measures The Secretary has established three performance indicators for this competition:  HQ-SES and After-School Performance Measure ONE : The number of eligible students who enroll in 21stCCLC and SES programs at grantee sites. HQ-SES and After-School Performance Measure TWO : The number of enrolled students who complete full programs of service at grantee sites.  HQ-SES and After-School Performance Measure THREE : The percentage of enrolled students, including the lowest achieving students, who improve their academic performance on their State assessments in reading or mathematics.

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Grants.gov 1.Register early 2.Use the application checklist 3.Submit your application early 4.Verify submission is OK 5.If you resubmit an application, the most recent submittal will be logged as the official application submittal For technical assistance on Grants.gov, contact the Grants.gov Customer Support at:

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Further Questions

High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services and After-School Partnerships Demonstration Contact Information Program Manager: Michelle Johnson Armstrong Telephone: (202) Program Website: mo/index.html