Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Family Engagement Tool Orientation The Family Engagement Tool is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute.
The Big Apple (core and all!) Arts School Network New York City October 2013.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Hiring & Evaluating the Library Director Presenters: Dora U. Sims, Trustee, Birmingham Public Library Trustee at Large, United For Libraries Board Assisted.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Performance Management
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Grantwriting. Types of Grants Foundation Grants HancockREADS Grants Hancock Education Fund Grants.
© 2003 IBM Corporation July 2004 Technology planning for not-for-profit organizations IBM volunteer name Title, organization.
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
OPERATIONAL PLAN OVERVIEW Office of Planning and Budget Division of Administration State of Louisiana October 2006.
P arent I nvolvement A nalysis? The Parent Involvement Analysis is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute What is.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Data and Fiscal Management Monthly Webinar June 2, /27/20151.
Using Assessment Results Presentation for Texas Association for Institutional Research March 1, 2007 Howard College Barbara Brumley Institutional Effectiveness.
Interim Executive Director June  Financial Management Practices Audit Results Fiscal Year Audit Results Fiscal Year Internal.
Creating Pathways for Education, Career and Life Success Webinar: Developing a Pathways Plan January 18, 2013 Facilitated by Jeff Fantine, Consultant.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools.
PREPARING REPORTS CoB Center for Professional Communication.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Working Group Training Compiling Evidence for a Successful Chapter LaMont Rouse, Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Primary Functions of Program Directors Leadership Curriculum Management and Coordination Coordinate Program Assessment Marketing, Recruitment and Admissions.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Draft Transition Plan for the Transfer of the Drug Medi-Cal Treatment Program Fourth Series: Stakeholder Meetings Department of Health Care Services Department.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 8, 2011.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Internal Control Process at Geneseo. Objectives Understand the objectives of effective internal controls Describe Geneseo’s internal control program Accurately.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Reporting the Course level RWR Assessment data
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Sam Houston State University
Program Review and Accreditation
Overview of Updated Proposal and Reporting Guidelines
Program Review Workshop
Completing your Program Review
Assessing Administrative and Educational Support Services
Sam Houston State University
Strategic Enhancement
Fort Valley State University
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance

Goals of the Presentation ■ How the review process works ■ Review of the Process & Guidelines ■ Preparing Your Department Review Binder ■ Gathering Evidence of Success ■ Questions and Answers

Purpose of Program Review ■ Formally report on all goals and objectives ■ Gather evidence to support your accomplishments ■ Identify opportunities for the future ■ Create a shared vision with your team ■ Affirm what you do ■ Prevents Mission Creep (and draft)

Why Have Program Review ■ Middle States wants “clear and compelling evidence” of a system of self improvement ■ It shows accountability to other primary constituents: Board of Trustees, parents, students, Cedar Crest Alumni, regional employers, etc. ■ Proves that we are committed to excellence

Program Review Process (Simplified Version) ■ Completed copies go to the Office of Assessment and the Assessment Committee; ■ The Office of Assessment & the Assessment Committee provides feedback; ■ The final version of the review document is then sent to the Provost who will then affirm the conclusions, etc. ■ Suggestions that have budgetary impacts are then built into future budgeting cycles

Time Line ■ Program review process is initiated by the Provost in September. ■ Departments under review are orientated to the process in September/October ■ Collect information from October – December ■ Build your report from January – March ■ Submit your report on or before April 1st

Time Line ■ Interview with the assessment committee occurs in April/May ■ Assessment committee affirms your report and recommendations to the Provost by May 30 th. ■ The Provost produces a short report to the President and Board of Trustees during the summer. ■ Suggestions that have an impact on the budget are included in the upcoming year’s fiscal planning model.

Section 1: Mission, Goals & Objectives ■ Include in the binder the current mission statement. -- Long mission statements are usually wrong mission statements ■ In a paragraph or 2, explain how your department supports the mission of the College (note: Use the annual assessment report form for assistance) ■ Goals and Objectives should be limited to 4 to 6. (Representative but not necessarily exhaustive)

Section 2: Major Functions & Services ■ List the major functions and services within the unit ( hint: look at job descriptions) ■ List services and functions which could exist. Briefly describe why they don’t exist. ■ Draw a flow chart that shows how your organization operates (keep it simple but representative)

Section 3: Goals and Objectives ■ Using your last 3 to 4 assessment reports, provide data for each goal and objective found in those reports. ■ Closing the Loop with the Data * In bullet format, describe any modifications you’ve made because of the data. * How have operations been improved? * What lessons have been learned?

Section 4: Forms, Surveys, Policy Manuals ■ Collect all tools used to gather data, rate employees, complete work, etc. (make sure they are blank) ■ Describe any ongoing support used from the data system that helps with measuring the unit’s progress (Example: Admissions might use applications as a way to measure progress) ■ Trying to prove that there is tools for gathering evidence and producing work.

Section 5: Personnel & Org. Structure ■ Provide a list of all full-time personnel and their official title in the unit (place a date on it) ■ Provide the latest resumes for all mid- and upper-level administrators ■ List any long-term part-time personnel in the unit (longer than 5 years) ■ Provide an organizational chart

Section 6: Facilities & Equipment ■ Describe the adequacy of your current facility (1 page) ■ Describe the adequacy of your current equipment inventory (computers, software, etc) (1 page) ■ List and describe any needs in these areas. Please prioritize!

Section 6: Facilities & Equipment ■ Describe the adequacy of your current facility (1 page) ■ Describe the adequacy of your current equipment inventory (computers, software, etc) (1 page) ■ List and describe any needs in these areas. Please prioritize!

Section 7: Planning & New Initiatives ■ List and describe any significant plans that will be undertaken in the next 3 years (2 to 3 pages) ■ List and describe any significant new initiatives in the next 3 years

Section 8: Summary & Recommendations ■ Summarize the main elements of the report (2 to 3 pages) ■ Summarize your overall recommendations of the department and any changes that you see moving forward. * You can place these into bullet format if you’d like.

Section 9: Resources ■ Indicate what new resources you will need in the next three years. ■ Indicate how it will help the department ■ Justify the request by linking it to your mission, goals and objectives.

Section 10: Other ■ Create a “brag” sheet that demonstrates some of your work. Include: ■ Programs of events ■ Flyers ■ Other distributed materials ■ Actual results from surveys

Working Tips ■ Divide the Labor (this should be a team exercise) ■ Work smart ■ Hold internal monthly update meetings ■ Find consensus when identifying needs and resources

Contact Information: LaMont Rouse