Measuring Ethical Goals of Research Oversight Holly Taylor, PhD, MPH Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Berman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

A Process of Quality Improvement: Informed Participation and Institutional Process SACHRP March 27, 2008 Nancy Neveloff Dubler Director Center for Ethics.
Phase O Trials: Ethical Considerations Holly Taylor, PhD, MPH Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Berman Institute.
The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Conflict and Consent: Managing Disclosure in Human Subjects Research University of Miami Human Subjects Research Office Conflict of Interest Symposium.
Human Subjects Protection: Creation and Maintenance of an IRB Regulatory Requirements & Recommendations 45 CFR part 46 Freda E. Yoder Office for Human.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “CUMC’s New Progressive Policy For Adverse Event Reporting” April 13, 2004 George Gasparis Andrew Wit, Ph.D.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Introduction to Research
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
Large Phase 1 Studies with Expansion Cohorts: Clinical, Ethical, Regulatory and Patient Perspectives Accelerating Anticancer Agent Development and Validation.
Ethical Principles of Human Subjects Protection
Human Subject Research Ethics
PRESENTING A PROTOCOL AN IRB INFOSHORT FEBRUARY 2013.
Multnomah County Health Department ►Essential Services ►FDA Food Standards ►PACE Tools for Food Program Excellence Lila Wickham March 17, 2004 ♣
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
Valid Informed Consent Education Pilot Project 2 nd Annual Nursing Research & Evidence-Based Practice Symposium Sandra Knowlton-Soho, MS, RN Sara Simeone,
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
PART II – Management Audit: Basic Standards, Values and Norms Shared by Pratap Kumar Pathak.
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Recommendations from the Subcommittee on the Inclusion of Individuals With Impaired Decision-making in Research (SIIIDR) March 27, 2008 David H Strauss,
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Ethics in Quality Improvement Quality Academy Cohort 6 Melanie Rathgeber MERGE Consulting.
The Role of IRBs and Ethics Susan Kornetsky, MPH Children’s Hospital, Boston.
Effectiveness in Review & Oversight of Human Subjects Research Steven Joffe, MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Pediatrics.
The Global Health Network Marijke Geldenhuys 19 September 2014 Adhering to the GCP Principles.. what does that even mean?
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
TERRENCE F. ACKERMAN, PH.D. PROFESSOR OF BIOETHICS CHAIR, UTHSC IRB.
The ethical conduct of research with human participants Nancy E. Kass, ScD Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems Shan He IPHIE 2010.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
Applicability of principles Reidar K. Lie, MD, PhD Department of Clinical Bioethics, NIH and University of Bergen, Norway.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Cultural Competence Considerations [and other alliterations] in International Research IRB 2 Continuing Education March 10, 2015.
+ UW-Stout IRB News from the IRB New protocol form New online training New certification New staff.
Evaluation Research Dr. Guerette. Introduction Evaluation Research – Evaluation Research – The purpose is to evaluate the impact of policies The purpose.
Elements of Ethical Review of Study Documents Dr.C.H.Shashindran Director-Professor & Head Department of Pharmacology JIPMER.
BEST PRACTICE PORTAL BEST PRACTICE PORTAL project presentation to the Scientific Committee Ferri et al Lisbon, 16th July 2010.
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
OHRP’s Compliance Oversight Procedures
Legal Responsibilities for Studies Conducted or Supported by HHS Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Part II, Conflict of Interest and IRB Noncompliance J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
IRB Presentation to the Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of the FDA regarding “Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Test in Disorders of Puberty”
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
The Importance of Ethical and Human Rights Issues in Global Health
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
Anna C. Mastroianni, JD, MPH
Good Clinical Practice
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Health Information Security and Privacy Collaborative (HISPC) Overview
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Ethical Principles of Research
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
HHS Reporting Requirements and Adverse Events
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Ethical Goals of Research Oversight Holly Taylor, PhD, MPH Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Berman Institute of Bioethics Johns Hopkins University

Overview Background Measuring Ethical Quality Ethical Goals of Research Oversight

Background Suspension of human research protections programs Attention to regulatory compliance –Diverting attention from ethics? Failure to manage conflicts of interest –Lack of confidence among investigators

Background Empirical Research on IRBs –Lack of consistency in reviews of same protocol by multiple IRBs –Variation in implementation of Federal policy –Summaries of regulatory compliance violations Does variation in review and outcomes indicate differences in ethical quality of review?

Measuring Ethical Quality Review of research proposal documents related to IRB review (ACHRE 1995) Assessment of ethical quality –Ranked sets of documents from 1 (no ethical concerns) to 5 (serious ethical concerns

Measuring Ethical Quality Concerns identified among sets ranked ≥ 3 –Factors likely to: affect adequacy of subject understanding affect voluntariness of decisions –Approaches to inclusion of subjects with limited decision-making capacity All studies ranked as 4 or 5 were proposals that would expose subjects to more than minimal risk Retrospective assessment of completed proposals

IRB Review in Context Administrative Review PI and Study Team Department Peers IRB Staff Committee IRB Staff Committee IRB Review Continuing Review Scientific Review Research Proposal

Ethical Goals of Research Oversight Scientific merit/value of proposed research Identification and assessment of risk to subjects/society Identification and assessment of benefit to subjects/society Acceptable risk/benefit ratio Fair approach to selection of subjects Adequate informed consent process Adequate mechanisms for respect of enrolled subjects (Faden et al 1986; CFR; Meslin et al 1994; Miller et al 2000; Emanuel et al 2000; King et al 1999, Beagan et al 2005)

Ethical Goals of Research Oversight How do we convert these concepts into a valid and reliable measure? –Explore meaning and definition of quality –Bring experts in measurement of quality together with experts in IRBs and research ethics Develop working definition of ethical quality in conduct of human subject research Identify most appropriate targets for measurement Develop preliminary measures –Solicit feedback from relevant stakeholders –Test feasibility of measure

Conclusion Measure of ethical quality –Human Subject Protection programs Local effectiveness Cost/benefit analysis Evidence-based changes in policy –Social Scientists Assessing innovative interventions