Assessment criteria: Identification of key elements in the given paper, with reference to theories of learning; An evaluation of the trustworthiness of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Participant Observation
Advertisements

TOOLS FOR LEARNING ABOUT BEHAVIOR IN ORGANIZATIONS
質 性 研 究 Ma1c0112 林芳億. How is trustworthiness established Trustworthiness is established in a naturalistic inquiry by the use of techniques that provide.
Main Criticisms of Qualitative Research
Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.
Reviewing and Critiquing Research
3 Standards for Sound Applied Linguistics Research  The qual–quant not only provides an interactive continuum useful for characterizing applied linguistics.
Reliability, Validity, Trustworthiness If a research says it must be right, then it must be right,… right??
SOWK 6003 Social Work Research Week 4 Research process, variables, hypothesis, and research designs By Dr. Paul Wong.
Issues and Challenges around Appraising Qualitative Research
Introduction to Communication Research
Educational Research: Action Research in Schools
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Research Methods for Computer Science CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Dr. Pettey CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Dr. Pettey.
Reliability & Validity Qualitative Research Methods.
Chapter 14 Overview of Qualitative Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Case Study Research: A Primer Mark Widdowson, TSTA (P) University of Leicester.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology. Objective 1.7 Explain the importance of Credibility in Qualitative Research.
Qualitative Research.
1 Document-based inquiry skills Dutt-Doner, Cook-Cottone, Allen, & Rech-Rockwell (2003) using the Library of Congress’s Primary-Source Documents Part II.
Validity & Reliability Trustworthiness
Comprehensive Exam Review
Qualitative Methods for Health Program Evaluation
Qualitative Research and Decision-Making
Chapter 24 Trustworthiness and Integrity in Qualitative Research
Chapter 11: Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research Design
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
School-Based Action Research. Action Research Type of practitioner research. Type of practitioner research. Used to improve the one's practice. Used to.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
1 Research Paper Writing Mavis Shang 97 年度第二學期 Section III.
Basic Qualitative Strategies Cap Peck, Research Question Beginning with less specific research questions Start with interests and a sense of the.
TRUSTWORTHINESS OF THE RESEARCH Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şehnaz Şahinkarakaş.
13. External Validity What is meant by the external validity of a research design? How is research limited in regard to generalization to other groups.
Issues in Validity and Reliability Conducting Educational Research Chapter 4 Presented by: Vanessa Colón.
Truth value - credibility Applicability - transferability
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Qualitative research methodology
Anatomy of a Research Article Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions.
JS Mrunalini Lecturer RAKMHSU Data Collection Considerations: Validity, Reliability, Generalizability, and Ethics.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 5 Validity in Experimental Research.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 3 Experimental Research Paradigm and Processes.
Educational Research Chapter 14 Overview of Qualitative Research
PSY 219 – Academic Writing in Psychology Fall Çağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Department of Psychology Inst. Nilay Avcı Week 9.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology.  Qualitative research is designed to reveal a specific target audience’s range of behavior and the perceptions.
Qualitative Research: How Can it Be True if There Aren’t Any Numbers?? The Quest of the Curious Skeptics Continues.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 20 Enhancing Quality and Integrity in Qualitative Research.
Current State of the Research –Use summarizing, defining, argumentation, analytical skills Recommended Future Research –Mainly analytical skills Analysis.
Analyzing & evaluating qualitative data Kim McDonough Northern Arizona University.
Chapter 19 Qualitative Research. Chapter Outline Contrasting characteristics of qualitative and quantitative research Procedures in qualitative research.
Qualitative Validity and Trustworthiness
CRITICALLY APPRAISING EVIDENCE Lisa Broughton, PhD, RN, CCRN.
7/2/20161 Grounded Theory Saleema A. Gulzar MScN, BScN, BA, RN.
Evaluating Qualitative Study Leili Salehi Health education & Promotion Department Public health School Alborz University of Medical Sciences.
Elizabeth Visedo Independent Scholar ICQI Fri041
Reliability and Validity in Research
ED4001 Education for Change
ED4001 Education for Change
The Research Process: Sport Coaching
Dealing with Validity, Reliability, and Ethics
Analyzing Qualitative Data
Academic Rubric Slides
A Bit More About Qualitative Analysis
Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research
Qualitative research methodology
Qualitative vs. Quantitative research
Style You need to demonstrate knowledge and understanding beyond undergraduate level and should also reach a level of scope and depth beyond that taught.
Overview of Qualitative Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Introduction to Qualitative Research
Presentation transcript:

Assessment criteria: Identification of key elements in the given paper, with reference to theories of learning; An evaluation of the trustworthiness of the research; A discussion of the implications of author’s conclusions for education; Correct HARVARD referencing; Use of Academic English.

Trustworthiness The aim of trustworthiness in a qualitative inquiry is to support the argument that the inquiry’s findings are “worth paying attention to” (Lincoln & Guba, 1985, p.290). This is quite different from the conventional experimental precedent of attempting to show validity, soundness, and significance. The aim of trustworthiness in a qualitative inquiry is to support the argument that the inquiry’s findings are “worth paying attention to” (Lincoln & Guba, 1985, p.290). This is quite different from the conventional experimental precedent of attempting to show validity, soundness, and significance.

In any qualitative research, four issues of trustworthiness demand attention: credibility, credibility, transferability, transferability, dependability, and dependability, and confirmability. confirmability.

Credibility - confidence in the 'truth' of the findings Credibility because of Prolonged Engagement Prolonged Engagement Definition Spending sufficient time in the field to learn or understand the culture, social setting, or phenomenon of interest. See This involves spending adequate time observing various aspects of a setting, speaking with a range of people, and developing relationships and rapport with members of the culture. Development of rapport and trust facilitates understanding and co-construction of meaning between researcher and members of a setting.

Transferability is the degree to which the findings of this inquiry can apply or transfer beyond the bounds of the project.

Dependability - showing that the findings are consistent and could be repeated e.g through External audits Definition External audits involve having a researcher not involved in the research process examine both the process and product of the research study. The purpose is to evaluate the accuracy and evaluate whether or not the findings, interpretations and conclusions are supported by the data. The Positive Aspects of External Auditing External audits are conducted to foster the accuracy or validity of a research study. External audits provide an opportunity for an outsider to challenge the process and findings of a research study. This can provide: an opportunity to summarize preliminary findings an opportunity to assess adequacy of data and preliminary results important feedback that can lead to additional data gathering and the development of stronger and better articulated findings

Confirmability – This means that researchers must take steps to demonstrate that findings emerge from the data and not from their own predispositions or researcher bias i.e. that a degree of neutrality exists – How have the authors in the article addressed the issue of confirmability? See