Interim Facilities Report Quincy Public School District #172 September 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Closure/Consolidation Composition of School Closure Committee (SCC) Closure/Consolidation Criteria Timelines.
Advertisements

MULTIPLE PROFESSIONAL REVIEWS DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS Architectural and engineering review identifies building code and accessibility repairs needed. ($750,000.
February 16, Tonight’s Agenda  Review Assets and Challenges From Last Meeting  Review Necessary Assumptions  Look at Possible Considerations.
“Children First!” ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT “Children First!” PROPOSITION P.
Student Achievement Is on the Rise Our District provides a quality, well-rounded education for students Student achievement on statewide exams has steadily.
NEW PALTZ CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan – Progress Report Summary.
 Board of Trustees - Reviewed and prioritized the needs from previous MISD facility assessment and programmatic changes in curricular and extracurricular.
FACILITY PLANNING October 1, :00 PM – Raymond School Tour 6:30 PM – Interactive Workshop Raymond Community Workshop.
INTRODUCTION : Throughout history The family is the first and best teacher in the community. And has a big role in the upbringing of.
Raymond School District Raymond School Facility Assessment Executive Summary September 16, 2013 Eppstein Uhen Architects Eric Dufek, Senior Design Architect.
 Mechanical  Electrical  Safety/Security  Video surveillance  Fire safety  Access control  Enhanced Programming  Roofing/Structural/Site Work.
PINOLE VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL FACILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING December 13, 2011.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS State of Our School Building 1 DRAFT.
RENOVATION & ADDITION OPTIONS TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NORTH TORONTO COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE REDEVELOPMENT STUDY.
Dover High School Locally Funded Initiatives (LFI’s) Community Discussion Wednesday, May 4, 2011.
UNIT 5 REDISTRICTING COMMUNITY FORUM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
WJJ Middle School Facility Study Tri Board Meeting February 5, 2015.
Industrial Heating & Piping Co. Madawaska School Department Energy upgrades to the heating system at the Madawaska High and Middle School.
Superintendent’s Recommendations for District Improvement Related to Facility Needs VICTORIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
SHARON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 1 of 18. SHARON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 2 of 18 OPTION 1C – New Building on Case Avenue Site  Building Grades: K-6.
Parent Partner Program
The ABCs of Facility Studies in the 21 st Century: It’s More Than Just Numbers Carol S. Cash, EdD, Clinical Associate Professor, Virginia Tech Travis W.
Facilities Advisory Committee Preliminary Feasibility and Cost Study April 2012.
BVUSD Facility Workshop September 17, Board Policy-BP 7110 The Board of Trustees recognizes the importance of long-range planning for school facilities.
TML: 2012 and Beyond thomasmemoriallibrary.org. TML: 2012 and Beyond thomasmemoriallibrary.org Thomas Memorial Library Library Improvement Program An.
Where We Are, And How We Got Here Somersworth School District November 27, 2007.
Overview of HMS Facility Planning Educational Specifications Committee November 16, 2005 Educational Specifications Committee November 16, 2005.
New Configuration Public Hearing May 15, 2008 Superintendent Terry E. Shoemaker.
Raising the Bar for DCPS School Facilities Best Practice in PK-12 Educational Facility and Capital Planning.
Master Plan SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Site Aerial Grade School High School Middle School Athletics Multi-Purpose.
Discussion and Possible action on the historic designation by the City of Laredo Landmark Board on certain LISD Schools.
Westwood Elementary School San Diego, California Elementary School Lighthouse Renovation NTD Architecture 2008 Exhibition of School Planning and Architecture.
Jan 31, 2005 Community Update. Jan 31, 2005 Thanks to the voters… Measure R passed with over 63% of the vote $3.87 billion for “the Safe and Healthy Neighborhood.
$18 million bond Construction of new Junior High campus Construction of safety improvements at Elementary School campus  Storm Shelter  Fire Safety.
Designing and Programming Schools As Community Learning Centers Firestone/Litchfield Community Learning Center Community Update September 27, 2011 Community.
Klein High School Original building built in 1963 Move KHS to HS #5 in 2011 Move back to renovated KHS in 2013.
Lincoln Consolidated Schools Citizens Steering Committee Bond Issue Final Recommendation Board of Education Meeting October 18, :00 p.m.
High Performance Schools Benefits of a High Performance School Higher Test Scores. A growing number of studies are confirming the relationship between.
CALEXICO HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION / EXPANSION PROJECT STATUS REPORT # 1 Superintendent David Alvarez Board Members Gloria J. Rodriguez, President Jaime.
West Sylvan Enrollment and Capacity
Ridgefield School District Capital Facilities Plan March 9, 2010.
Science Complex Renovation Science, SR I, and Fleming Board of Regents Administration & Strategic Planning Committee April 28, 2008.
Focus Areas Learning environments that meet the needs of today’s learners Safe and secure buildings and grounds Improve district infrastructure.
OCTOBER 15, 2015 SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION & REDISTRICTING Dr. Karen M. Couch, Superintendent Ron Kauffman, RK Educational Planning, LLC.
Maintenance & Operations Replacement Levy and School Improvements Bond Election Day: February 9, 2016.
Cainhoy-Daniel Island Community Committee Recommendation to the Superintendent January 4, 2014.
FACILITIES MASTER PLANNING Committee Data and Findings.
White Hill Super Sub FPAC Report. White Hill Team Structures Curriculum Personalization Targeted Academic Intervention Shared Best Practices Curricular.
HILLSBORO COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 3 HILLSBORO COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 3 HILLSBORO, ILLINOIS High School Building Project.
Option 1 New Construction (10,000 Square Feet) – Secure Entrance / Administrative Offices – Lobby / Connection to Greeno Building – Weight Room Renovations.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
District Local Planning Committee Orientation Part 2 Trimble County Schools Kentucky Department of Education Division of District Support - District Facilities.
Wahoo Public School District Facility Planning Update April 18, 2016.
Quincy School District’s Vision For the Future Election Day: February 9, 2016.
SCHOOL #1 BALLOT QUESTION AND PROPOSAL Fall, 2016.
Walters Middle School Conversion STEAM Magnet Proposal
How School Design Impacts Education
Community Meeting, July 18, 2016 Update Designs and Phasing
Cornwall Central School District
UPDATE: 8/8/2011 Batavia City School District
School #1 Ballot Question and Proposal
Iron Forge Educational Center: U. S
UNION GROVE ELEMENTARY REFERENDUM
Raising the Bar for DCPS School Facilities
Capital Planning Advisory Group April 11, 2018
CV Futures Task Force Report May 8, 2017
Update to Board of Trustees: November 9 FAC Meeting
T.R.U.E. Survey: INPUT ON SCHOOL RECONFIGURATIONS March 2019
Chimacum District Facility & Program Plan
Zumbrota-Mazeppa School District Community Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

Interim Facilities Report Quincy Public School District #172 September 25, 2013

Data Gathering

O Demographic Info O Enrollment Projections O Capacity Analysis O Building Data Record O Operating Costs O Renewal & Replacement Schedule O Research on Facilities Condition & Student Performance

Defining Capacity O Building Planning Capacity O student enrollment that a school can best serve while fully utilizing its physical facilities. O combination of factors: O the number of teaching stations available, O the area of auxiliary spaces, and O the adopted program for a school of that level. O Capacity number is used for planning proposes, O enrollment boundaries O building utilization levels. O Each individually facility may be capable of handling physically many more students than its planning capacity, O The Planning Capacity is a practical capacity that provides for an easily understood and comparable number between facilities, as well as, providing an optimal operating size.

Defining Capacity - Elementary O Defined simply as 25 students per classroom multiplied by the number of classrooms O Classroom Size Factor O Reduced by 2 students with an average classroom size below 750 square feet O Reduced another 1 student if the average classroom size is below 650 square feet. O For example, building has 15 classrooms; the Planning Capacity would be 375, (25 x 15). If the room sizes were 725 sq. ft, the capacity would be 345, (23 x 15).

Defining Capacity – Junior High School O The Junior High capacity is defined utilizing 150 students for every four classrooms and one science lab. O Additionally, there is a minimum of one Art and Life Skills labs for every 750 students. O Each Junior High will have a band room, general music/vocal room, O Three rooms for special service programs

Defining Capacity – High School O High School capacity is defined as 175 Students for every four classrooms and one science lab. O One Art, Life Skills and Tech Arts Areas/Labs per 800 students. O Other areas are required and are determined by the curriculum and extra-curricular activities. O band and vocal music facilities O performing arts areas O athletic facilities. O Six classrooms for special service programs.

Capacity Analysis

Building Information O Building Data Record O Building Age & Square Footage O Construction Timeline O Demographic Information O Enrollment O Free and Reduced Lunch O Information on Program Spaces O Information on Building Systems O Technology O Major Projects O Floor Plans O Aerial Site Plan O Attendance Map

Operating Costs

Renewal & Replacement Schedule

Facilities Conditions and Student Performance O Studies support educators common sense - Students do better when they: O Hear well O See well O Are not packed into small spaces O Noise is not distracting O Lighting is good O Air Quality is good O Heat and cooling are balanced

Facilities Conditions and Student Performance O Educational Delivery O Milwaukee study suggest facility conditions have stronger affect on performance than other factors, such as family background, socio- economic status, attendance and behavior O Indoor Air Quality O About 40% of schools report unsatisfactory environmental conditions

Facilities Conditions and Student Performance O Temperature & Ventilation O Good ventilation systems are effective in keeping toxic and nuisance materials out of the air. O Acoustics O Studies have linked student hearing problems with being held back a grade O Lighting O The visual environment is one of the most important factors in learning, affecting mental attitude, class attendance, and performance

Facility Appraisal

Appraisal Instrument O An Appraisal Guide for Older & Historic School Facilities O Developed by The Council of Educational Facility Planners International O A tool to evaluate the physical condition and educational adequacy of older and historic school facilities, and is designed to engage a broad audience in the appraisal process.

Appraisal Criteria O Educational Adequacy O Educational Environment O The School Site O Building Safety and Security O Structural Condition and Electrical & Mechanical Systems O Plant Maintainability

Appraisal Team O Team Members O Bill Sanders – QHS O Mike Carter – Klinger & Assoc. O Todd Moore – Architechnics, Inc. O Dave Schlembach - Poepping, Stone, Bach & Associates, Inc. O Dan Nutt – QPS Maint Dept O Dane Barnes – QPS Maint Dept O Dennis Peters – QPS Maint Dept O Rick Selsor – QPS Maint Dept O Rick Owsley – QJHS O Joel Murphy, Facilitator – QPS

Initial Findings

O “Great Schools”, not so Great Facilities O “A good teacher can teach anywhere” O Physical Structure is limiting the learning experience O No Facility Rated higher than Satisfactory O Only one Elementary was rated Satisfactory O 7 out of 12 of our active facilities were rated Borderline O Grade Alignment out of sync with current practices

Initial Findings O Smaller Elementary Schools generate some operational inefficiencies O Large Intermediate School causes logistical and operational issues O Small Elementary & Intermediate Classrooms – Avg 750 Sq Ft O Undersized Gym & Cafeterias O Multiple Lunch Periods O Limited PE Activities O Relationship between spaces limiting O Restrooms located only on one floor O Movement restricted by Multi-Leveled buildings O Old and outdated Building designs limiting programs O Lack of Specialized Learning Areas O No Art Rooms O Music taught in converted classrooms or other spaces

Initial Findings O Library well undersized O Technology Access Limited O Computer Labs small or lacking O Low computer to student ratios O Space for teacher resource areas limited O Administrative Spaces very limited

Initial Findings O Most Elementary sites too small, lack adequate open space and parking O Most Elementary sites too small to allow for expansion of building O Vehicular & Pedestrian Traffic patterns not separated O Site Ingress/Egress Issue at Elementary sites O Bus Drop Off Areas O Parent Drop Off Areas O Staff/Visitor Parking

Initial Findings O Inability to meet ADA Requirements w/o extensive work O Deterioration due to ages of facilities O HVAC Inadequate O Fresh air exchange O Individual AC Units O Efficiency of older equipment O Poor Energy efficiency O Electrical system is unable to accommodate additional technology in classrooms O Trying to maintain 100+ year old buildings O Maintaining “temporary” facilities O Building systems “tired”, needed major upgrades

Initial Findings O Inability to meet ADA Requirements w/o extensive work O Deterioration due to ages of facilities O HVAC Inadequate O Fresh air exchange O Individual AC Units O Efficiency of older equipment O Poor Energy efficiency O Electrical system is unable to accommodate additional technology in classrooms O Trying to maintain 100+ year old buildings O Maintaining “temporary” facilities O Building systems “tired”, needed major upgrades

Building Condition

Educational Adequacy O District Average – 60% - Borderline O Elementary & Intermediate - 56% -Borderline O Berrian, Ellington & Baldwin –Poor O Quincy Jr High School - 67% - Borderline O Quincy High School - 64% - Borderline O ACRSS & ABC Academy - 67%Borderline O ECFC - 80% - Satisfactory

Educational Environment O District Average – 67% - Borderline O Elementary & Intermediate - 65% -Borderline O Quincy Jr High School – 75% - Satisfactory O Quincy High School – 81% - Satisfactory O ACRSS & ABC Academy – 75%- Satisfactory O ECFC - 79% - Satisfactory

The School Site O District Average – 69% - Borderline O Elementary & Intermediate - 67% -Borderline O Quincy Jr High School - 77% - Satisfactory O Quincy High School - 82% - Satisfactory O ACRSS & ABC Academy - 76% - Satisfactory O ECFC – 75% - Satisfactory

Building Safety & Safety O District Average – 66% - Borderline O Elementary & Intermediate – 64% - Borderline O Quincy Jr High School – 70% - Satisfactory O Quincy High School – 75% - Satisfactory O ACRSS & ABC Academy – 79%- Satisfactory O ECFC – 82% - Satisfactory

Structural Condition and Electrical & Mechanical Systems O District Average – 65% - Borderline O Elementary & Intermediate - 61% -Borderline O Quincy Jr High School – 74% - Satisfactory O Quincy High School - 81% - Satisfactory O ACRSS & ABC Academy - 84% Satisfactory O ECFC - 83% - Satisfactory

Plant Maintainability O District Average – 64% - Borderline O Elementary & Intermediate - 61% -Borderline O Dewey - Poor O Quincy Jr High School - 64% - Borderline O Quincy High School - 78% - Satisfactory O ACRSS & ABC Academy - 80% Satisfactory O ECFC - 81% - Satisfactory

Next Steps Planning Parameters/Guidance Needed to Develop Recommendations Options to Address Finds Community Input Refining Options Develop Recommendations

Planning Parameters O Limiting Transitions/Grade Level Configurations O Current, 3 Transitions: K-3, 4-6, 7-9, O Other Models O K-5, 6-8, 9-12 – 3 Transitions O K-8, 9-12 – 2 Transitions O Historical Preservation

Planning Parameters O Site Ingress/Egress O Bus Drop Off Areas O Parent Drop Off Areas O Staff/Visitor Parking O ADA Compliance O Need for Specialized Spaces O Cafeteria O Gym O Library O Music O Art O Other

Planning Parameters O Technology O Infrastructure O Devices O Size of School O Small schools – More Buildings O Larger Schools – Less Buildings O Neighborhood Schools O Sustainability/Energy Efficiency – “Green Bldgs” O Alternate Use for Buildings

Options to Correct Findings O New Construction O Additions O Renovations O Building Replacements O Cost Estimates? O Tax Impact?

Next Steps O Community Dialog 1 O School Size O Grade Configuration O Neighborhood schools O Historic Preservation O Refine Facility Options O Community Dialog 2 O Rate/Rank Facility Options O Gauge Support O Final Report & Recommendation to Board

Questions