PROTECTFP6-036425 Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation in a Regulatory Context PROTECT An EC Co-ordinated action.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Available Techniques (BAT)
Advertisements

Numerical benchmarks: proposed levels and underlying reasoning
PROTECTFP PROTECT: First Proposed Levels for Environmental Protection against Radioactive Substances Definitions, Derivation Methods to Determine.
 Progress with the revision and consolidation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive Stefan Mundigl European Commission DG Energy and Transport.
PROTECT FP CEH SSI IRSN NRPA (+ UMB) EA Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation in a Regulatory Context.
Release of Patients Treated with I-131: An Update Michael Fuller Team Leader Medical Radiation Safety Team U.S. NRC.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
PROTECTFP CEH, UK (Co-ordinator) SSI, Sweden IRSN, France NRPA, Norway EA, England & Wales.
IAEA EMRAS II : background and introduction. Environmental Modelling for RAdiation Safety (EMRAS II) General aim of programme To improve capabilities.
1 ESS Approach to Quality The revised Code of Practice and the new Quality Assurance Framework UN Statistical Commission's Learning Centre on National.
The Revision of the Waste Framework Directive Key suggested amendments by the Rapporteur.
“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.
IAEA plans with respect to environmental protection EC PROTECT Workshop Oslo, Norway, 28–30 January 2008.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Radiological protection of the environment from an NGO perspective Simon Carroll SESSION 9: Environmental Protection.
Environmental Protection Waste Safety Section, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
GEOSAF-Meeting F. Boissier, S. Voinis, S. Barlow Operational Safety- IGSC Expert Group on Operational Safety (EG-OS) DMR/DIR/ May 2014, Vienna.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Proposed Regulated Waste Framework Julian Chan - EHP.
NEXT Lessons Learned from Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014, Brussels Fernando Franco, Spanish Nuclear.
CGMS Secretariat, CGMS-40, 6 November 2012 v1 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Type of actionActions at CGMS-39 ClosedComments Actions.
PROTECTFP Derivation of Environmental Radiological Protection Benchmarks an overview
PROTECTFP PROTECT Questionnaire Responses Jo Hingston.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 2 Conceptual.
Market Design of SE Europe: Reflections from the 3rd Forum on the Way Forward 6 th Permanent High Level Group Meeting Athens, 07 December 2003.
Railway Safety Commission An Coimisiún Sábháilteachta Iarnróid The Management of Third Party Generated Risk in Ireland International Railway Safety Conference.
Improve nuclear safety and reduce environmental impact – international and national practice Roundtable “Environmental Safety: Scientific and Technical.
BSBPMG505A Manage Project Quality Manage Project Quality Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit Code BSBPMG505A.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
Radiological Protection of the Environment: Current CRPPH Activities Dr. Ted Lazo Deputy Head Radiation Protection and Radioactive Waste Management Division.
1 st Workshop on issues and trends arising from the European IRRS missions Findings and Conclusions A.Munuera Brussels, 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014.
IDARI Workshop, Tartu, June 2005 NUI Galway Work Package 4 Administration Lorna Ryan The IDARI project is financed under the FP5 Quality of Life and Management.
NotificationNotification. Notification Objectives To understand the need for the Regulatory Authority to identify and locate radiation sources through.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Planned activities for 2016 on better implementation and better regulation in the field of environment policy Make It Work Conference 10/11 Dec 2015 DG.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
SITEX WP2.1 NEEDS FOR TECHNICAL GUIDANCE F. Lemy - F. Bernier - 1GEOSAF II TM – SITEX WP2.1 – 28/05/2014.
PROTECTFP Recommendations of Work Package 1 David Copplestone.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
ZeroWIN 3 rd general meeting Southampton, 5-8 July 2010.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
> 1 ACP S&T Grant Contract N° FED/2009/ Introducing WP6 Monitoring & Quality control Objectives, actions, procedures Dr Sarah Bracking.
Phillipa Silcock Using and discharging conditions.
Project Quality Management
5th Follow up Committee Meeting HIVA-KUL, 6th October 2009
CRE8TIVE KO Meeting, Rome Italy Quality Assurance
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
MODULE 2 INTRODUCTION TO GOVERNANCE AUDIT
Setting Actuarial Standards
Training Courses for RPOs
TOPICAL TRAINING SESSION TENORM
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
Presentation to the EPREV Lessons Learned Workshop
CHEMICAL ACCIDENTS Programme
Regulatory Infrastructure and Transport Safety Section
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Plenary Meeting of the Network on  Environmental 
Changed 3rd to next Dean Leverett Graham Merrington
Optimisation in Operational Radiological Protection
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
Presentation transcript:

PROTECTFP Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation in a Regulatory Context PROTECT An EC Co-ordinated action

PROTECTFP Overall objectives To evaluate the practicability and relative merits of different approaches to protection of the environment from ionising radiation. To compare these with methods used for non-radioactive contaminants, particularly on the adequacy with respect to the European framework defined for chemicals. This will provide a basis on which –the EC could develop protection policies and revise its Basic Safety Standards, –We can develop a fruitful collaboration with, and constructive input into, current ICRP and IAEA task groups.

PROTECTFP Detailed objectives To evaluate current regulatory approaches in different countries to the protection of the environment from both radioactive substances and chemicals and to determine how end points of protection are currently applied within the different regimes; To identify differences and similarities between the approaches used for protection of the environment from chemicals and radiation; To make recommendations for generating common approaches to the protection of the environment bearing in mind any broader environmental protection objectives. To evaluate the practicability of existing and developing approaches To consider the acceptability and relevance of current approaches compared to the needs of industry and regulators and the different situations it may need to address To test available approaches against any relevant ICRP recommendation or outputs from PROTECT To assess the availability, usability and transparency of available approaches to groups other than those involved in their development To derive an extended set of numerical target values and their derivation methods, designed to assure compliance to environmental protection goals that resonate with protective goals for releases of hazardous substances in general, and to assess the implications for society at large.

PROTECTFP Objectives of WP1 (Part 1) Consult widely with industry and regulators to review regulatory approaches to chemical and radioactive substances. Emphasis on: Regulatory instruments Procedures Underlying principles Criteria What is on the horizon (policy development)?

PROTECTFP Objectives of WP1 (Part 2) Identify similarities and differences in approaches between chemicals and radioactive substances What are the endpoints for chemicals and radioactive substances? To make recommendations for generating common approaches to the protection of the environment

PROTECTFP WP2: Objectives To evaluate the practicability of existing and developing approaches To consider the acceptability and relevance of current approaches compared to the needs of industry and regulators and the different situations it may need to address To test available approaches against any relevant ICRP recommendation or outputs from WP3 To assess the availability, usability and transparency of available approaches to groups other than those involved in their development

PROTECTFP WP2: What we’re going to do Evaluate approaches to assess: –Practicability in regulatory context –Fitness for purpose/robustness –If they meet aspirations of regulators/industry identified by WP1 –Relative merits –‘Cost’ –Accessibility to groups other than those involved in development –Overlap & difference with chemical assessment tools Help WP3 evaluate benchmarks

PROTECTFP WP3: Objectives ” derive and propose numerical target values for an extended list of ecological targets and protection levels, designed to assure compliance with environmental protection goals that resonate with protective goals set up for releases of hazardous ubstances in general, and to assess the implications for society at large”

PROTECTFP WP3: Four work areas The appropriate level of protection of the environment against ionising radiation Derivation of numerical target values Analysis of implications of derived values for practices Interaction with regulators, industry, NGO’s and other experts

PROTECTFP Workplan

PROTECTFP Deliverable dates WPDeliverableDraftDue 1D3: A review of approaches to protection of the environment from chemicals and ionising radiation – requirements & recommendations for a common framework Nov 07 2D4: Evaluation of the practicability of different approaches for protecting the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context and their relative merits Jul 08 3D5: Aims and associated secondary numerical targets, for protecting biota against radiation in the environment A: Recommendations for further actions B: Proposed levels and underlying reasoning C: Records of end users’ views on feasibility of proposed targets Jan 08 Sept 08

PROTECTFP Meeting dates CountryHostMonthExpert groupsObjective UKCEHOct. 2006NoKick-off meeting UKEAMarch 2007Regulators: nuclear & non- nuclear WP1: Discuss regulatory approaches and requirements ViennaCEHJune 2007Tool developers & usersWP2: Define approaches available & agree evaluation exercises OsloNRPAJan. 2008Tool developers & usersWP2 (+WP4): Discuss outcomes & implications of evaluation exercises FranceIRSNMay 2008Regulators, industry, NGOs, scientific experts, tool developers WP3 (+WP2): Consultation with external experts & presentation of different approaches to wider audience NorwayNRPAJune 2008NoFUTURAE meeting with representation by PROTECT WP leaders LancasterCEHAug. 2008NoFinalise D5

PROTECTFP Website (on CEH pages) Will produce a newsletter circulated to all interested parties after this WP and at ‘interesting’ intervals throughout project