Innovation You Can Count On™ 1 Payload Integration Wendi Otto Systems Engineer, Pegasus and Taurus Launch Vehicles October 4, 2007 All Information Approved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Advertisements

S Y S T E M S E N G I N E E R I N G.
Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
1 Chapter 2: Product Development Process and Organization Introduction Importance of human resources: Most companies have similar technology resources.
Charles Nola Lisa Blue June 21, 2006 Charles Nola Lisa Blue June 21, 2006 Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) Upper Stage Avionics & Software Acquisition Planning.
Chapter 3 Project Initiation
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
14/06/20151 MORE Requirements seen from ESA Pedro Pablos 1 st MORE Team Meeting 27 Febrero 2007.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT DEFINITIONS AND CONCEPTS QUALITY MANAGEMENT TOOLS QA / QC PROCESS COMPUTERS AND PROJECT QUALITY.
SE 555 Software Requirements & Specification Requirements Validation.
Project Management Session 7
Systems Engineering Management
Defining the Activities. Documents  Goal Statement defines why helps manage expectations  Statement of Work what gets delivered defines scope  Software.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Engineering Systems of.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Process Engineer’s Role in Project Management Dr Abdullah Malik.
OHT 4.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 Software Quality assurance (SQA) SWE 333 Dr Khalid Alnafjan
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
S/W Project Management
System Implementation. System Implementation and Seven major activities Coding Testing Installation Documentation Training Support Purpose To convert.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
From Research Prototype to Production
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
Verification by test and quality assurance
SENG521 (Fall SENG 521 Software Reliability & Testing Software Product & process Improvement using ISO (Part 3d) Department.
Requirements Engineering CSE-305 Requirements Engineering Process Tasks Lecture-5.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
LSU 01/17/2006Spring LaACES Schedule For the semester and the next few weeks.
ECE445: The Design Review Raj Vinjamuri February 3, 2014.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
TESTING LEVELS Unit Testing Integration Testing System Testing Acceptance Testing.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
Project quality management. Introduction Project quality management includes the process required to ensure that the project satisfies the needs for which.
CHAPTERS 2&3 Engineering Majors 1 ELEC 104, Fall 2010 Dr. McKinney.
ETM 5131 – Capstone II Re-Development of New Component Implementation Process – Results By Scott Moeller.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
Requirement Engineering. Recap Elaboration Behavioral Modeling State Diagram Sequence Diagram Negotiation.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
Statistical process model Workshop in Ukraine October 2015 Karin Blix Quality coordinator
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
CINEMA System Engineering
Software Requirements
IS442 Information Systems Engineering
Defining the Activities
Systems Engineering Management
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Integration and Test Organization Chart
Project Management Process Groups
CS/EE/ME 75(a) Nov. 19, 2018 Today: Prelimnary Design Review Homework.
PSS verification and validation
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Project Management Unit #2
Software Reviews.
Presentation transcript:

Innovation You Can Count On™ 1 Payload Integration Wendi Otto Systems Engineer, Pegasus and Taurus Launch Vehicles October 4, 2007 All Information Approved for Public Release.

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October What is a Payload? ●Payload: Any mission-specific hardware or software  Any customer provided hardware or software for which the service is being supplied  For a spacecraft, the “payload” is usually the instruments, sensors, or something less tangible  For a launch vehicle, the “payload” is the spacecraft Spacecraft PayloadLaunch Vehicle Payload

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October What is Payload Integration? ●Payload Integration: Incorporating the payload items (hardware or software) into the standard vehicle ●For every mission, an integration team is created with representatives from all customer and contractor organizations  Technical team is made up generally of representatives with “big-picture” knowledge of their particular component  Integration team pulls on knowledge from all organizations and disciplines to ensure that all payload needs are met  An integration team is always present at various times during the life of a program, with additions as contracts are awarded  Launch vehicle integration teams generally start about two years prior to expected launch ●Payload integration is considered a responsibility of either Systems Engineering or Integration and Test (I&T)  Relies on experience, expertise, and the ability to learn from past mistakes  Integrators play a dual role: being the voice of the payload and the voice of the vehicle

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Phases of Payload Integration ●Phase 1: Learn Your Payload ●Phase 2: Define Requirements ●Phase 3: Design the Interface ●Phase 4: Build and Implement the Interface ●Phase 5: Test, Test, Test ●Phase 6: Operations

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Learn Your Payload ●First few months (or more) is the time to learn about and understand the payload  For a spacecraft, this starts during the initial proposal process  Extremely involved process as the spacecraft’s purpose is to run the payload  For a launch vehicle, this starts after contract award (generally around spacecraft PDR time)  In depth knowledge can be limited to interfaces of interest ●Understand the payload purpose, objectives, and mission ●Understand what is critical, what is needed, and what is wanted ●Understand the most important items and what can be traded

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Define Requirements ●Take the payload’s needs and wants and turn them into verifiable requirements ●Requirements are documented in Interface Control Documents (ICDs)  Usually consists of a main document and a series of mechanical, electrical, and/or software subdocuments  ICDs, when used together, should completely define the interface to be provided  Approved by all customer and contractor parties ●What is a requirement?  A statement of need  Defines what the product must achieve  Communicates expectations ●Why are requirements important?  Identifies required functionality  Guides design decisions and helps prioritize work to be done  Completion shows that the final product will meet mission goals

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Define Requirements (cont.) ●What makes a good requirement?  Clear, concise, and unambiguous  States a single result  Specifies functionality – not implementation  Attainable  Verifiable  Clear assignment of responsibility ●Bad Requirement: Launch vehicle hardware must be clean.  Does not specify hardware to be cleaned, the level of cleanliness, or how the cleanliness will be verified ●Good Requirement: Launch vehicle hardware surfaces within the fairing encapsulated volume shall be cleaned to VC-HS+UV level per JSC-SN- C-0005D.  Specifies the exact surfaces to be cleaned, gives a level of cleanliness, and points to a document that describes verification

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Types of Requirements ●Requirements can be written for:  Any flight subsystem or non-flight provision  Either the payload or the vehicle ●Requirement categories include:  Mission Design  Orbit Requirements  Mission Operations  Separation Dynamics  Special Maneuvers  Mechanical Interfaces  Coordinate Systems  Fastener Patterns and Tolerances  Critical Dimensions  Isolation Mounting  Mass Properties  Electrical Interfaces  Command, Telemetry, or Pyro Connections  Wire Diagrams and Interface Connector Pin-Outs  Connector Types Spacecraft Subsystems

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Types of Requirements (cont.) ●Requirement Categories Include (cont.):  Software Interfaces  Command, Telemetry, Communications Formats and Protocols  Contingency Operations  Environments  Vibration  Shock  Acoustics  Pressures  RF  Thermal and Humidity  Contamination  Operations  Facility Requirements for Integrated Activities  Provisions of Non-Flight Hardware (GSE)

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Requirements Verification ●All requirements must be verifiable! ●Four classically accepted verification methods  Inspection  Examination of documentation or direct examination of the attribute  Examples: review of vendor documentation, inspection records, etc.  Analysis  Using generally accepted analytical techniques to show proper results or margins  Examples: GN&C orbit analyses, separation simulations, loads modeling, etc.  Test  Operation of all or part of the system under controlled conditions to determine that quantitative requirements have been met  Examples: electrical interface verifications, vibration testing, etc.  Demonstration  Operation of all or part of the system under controlled conditions to determine that qualitative requirements have been met  Examples: target testing, component fit checks, etc.

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October The “V”

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Design the Interface ●With the requirements documented, determine the appropriate implementation with the following considerations:  Satisfy the Requirement  Verification Method (especially inspection and test)  Consider last-chance verification for inspection  Consider test setups, procedures, and practices  No configuration changes after final verification  Cost and Schedule  Budget constraints or long-lead items  Flight History  Implement the same or similar designs that have been used previously  Signification deviations could require a new qualification  Ease of Implementation  Time = $$$  Safety  All designs must be approved by internal, customer, and Range safety organizations  Budget Constraints  Mass and power budgets are controlled by Systems Engineering and delegated over all subsystems  Subsystems have other budgets such as RF link, propellant, computer processor, etc.

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Design the Interface (cont.) ●Designs implemented for payload items are subject to customer reviews ●Typical reviews include  Mission Unique Requirements Review (MURR)  Present complete listing of payload requirements to ensure all parties are working to the same expectations  Mission Unique Preliminary Design Review (MUPDR)  Top level design for payload provisions to demonstrate that requirements can be met  Mission Unique Critical Design Review (MUCDR)  Detailed design for payload provisions to show satisfaction of all requirements before procurement or manufacturing of hardware  Mission Unique Systems Acceptance Review (MUSAR)  Final review of all as-delivered and tested hardware to show readiness for launch

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Build and Implement Interface ●For procured components (from outside vendors)  Write subrequirements documents, hardware specifications, and contractual statements of work  Track progress of hardware and complete periodic verifications as required  Accept hardware when complete ●For manufactured components (made internally)  Ensure that manufactured hardware meets requirements through all stages of build process  Test all items at component level prior to acceptance of item ●All components or subsystems must be verified at the subsystem level prior to installation into a larger system

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Sample Spacecraft I&T Activity

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Test, Test, Test ●“Test as You Fly, Fly as You Test”  A slogan born from 50 years of long, heartbreaking history  All tests should directly verify the item at hand in a flight configuration  No functionality should be unverified at time of flight  No science experiments on flight hardware ●Test and/or demonstration are the best verifications possible because actual functionality under the appropriate conditions has been shown  As many requirements should be test verified as possible  Some Military and NASA standards define the types of subsystems that require test and the margins associated with these testing  However, overall test scenarios are constructed on a Program specific basis depending on the needs of the vehicle  Payload interface items are included in baseline vehicle testing ●Testing should start at the lowest possible subsystem level and occur at each level of system build-up  Want to catch issues as early as possible with minimal chance of bringing down another system

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Sample Spacecraft Test Flow

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Operations ●To demonstrate flight readiness, all requirements must be checked off as verified by the designated method ●End of payload integration is capped by a series of internal and customer reviews to evaluate results ●“Operations” are planned well in advance, but this phase technically begins when the flight hardware integration and testing is complete ●Ground Operations  Payload processing and transfer to launch site  Transport and/or Pad Operations  Pre-flight preparations ●Flight Operations  Definition of launch constraints  Definition of launch checklist steps  Remove before flight items and flight closeouts ●The payload integrators goal: get a payload to launch day with the highest possible confidence in the interface provisions

Payload Integration All Information Approved for Public Release 04 October Wendi’s Unwritten Rules of Payload Integration 1. You can not defy the laws of physics 2. Mistakes will be made 3. Details will be forgotten until the worst possible time 4. Tempers will flare 5. Payloaders will never let go