Introduction There are various theoretical concepts and skills that bioscience students need to develop in order to become effective at solving problems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Green IS in Teaching – Specialist or Generalist? C. Pattinson Leeds Metropolitan University N.A. Gordon University of Hull.
Advertisements

Centre for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching Supporting & Enhancing Online Teaching & Learning by Catherine Ogilvie Centre for the Enhancement of.
Supporting further and higher education Learning design for a flexible learning environment Sarah Knight and Ros Smith Pedagogy Strand of the JISC e-Learning.
Education and Sustainable Development Learning to Last? Stephen & Maureen Martin Rolf Jucker Carolyn Roberts ICEE Conference, Ahmedabad, India,
York St John University | PLAYING YOUR CARDS RIGHT: The Psychology Card Sort and WBL PLAYING YOUR CARDS RIGHT: The Psychology Card Sort.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
The HELM Project: Helping Engineers Learn Mathematics
DESIGN AND ONLINE DELIVERY OF A COASTAL SCIENCE MODULE USING A CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH. RAMESSUR R.T. 1 and SANTALLY M.I. 2 1.Faculty of Science, University.
Checklists Stakeholders Methods Pedagogy Learning styles Writing styles Style and language Content Intercultural aspects Multimedia Questionnaires Examples.
Design Research Intelligent questioning for effective designs.
Designing for the i-POD generation - Investigating students’ prior expectations and experiences of technology Amanda Jefferies, Nuz Quadri, Diana Kornbrot.
Increasing Preservice Teachers' Capacity for Technology Integration Through the Use of Electronic Models Melissa Dark Purdue University.
An Introduction to Information Literacy Judith Keene Information and Learning Services, University of Worcester.
Video as a Tool for Self- Assessment of Undergraduate Oral Presentations David J McGarvey and Paul C Yates Lennard-Jones Laboratories, School of Chemistry.
Personal Development Planning Margaret Harrison Associate Dean of Academic Frameworks.
University of Jyväskylä – Department of Mathematical Information Technology Computer Science Teacher Education ICNEE 2004 Topic Case Driven Approach for.
Factors Affecting the Innovation- Decision Process to Adopt Online Graduate Degree Program in Thailand (IEC2014) Siripen Pumahapinyo (1) Praweenya Suwannatthachote.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology FVU Seminar 20 June 2005.
CMI Leadership & Management Expansion of eAuthoring services for all academic staff Gareth Compton.
If you must print – please switch to Outline View to conserve paper.
An investigation of the impact of student support initiatives on the retention of computer science students Clem O’Donnell 1, James Murphy 2, Abdulhussain.
Getting Started E-Learning Module Storyboard Jessica Kluntz LHDT 548.
NUMBERS ARE NOT ENOUGH. WHY E- LEARNING ANALYTICS FAILED TO INFORM AN INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN Presented by: Sajana Meera.
Evaluation and analysis of the application of interactive digital resources in a blended-learning methodology for a computer networks subject F.A. Candelas,
Yoonsun Lee (Seoul Women’s University) e-Learning Quality Assurance.
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
ELearning Design and Development: a journey through murky waters Denise M. Sweeney, Educational Designer, University of Leicester.
Recommendations for Best Practice. Best Practice This section will present an analysis of the literature in the following categories: Organization of.
Good practice in Research Data Management Module 6: Tools, training and support.
INTRODUCTION THE PURPOSES OF RESEARCH CONCEPT FRAMEWORK METHOD CONCLUSION RESULTS.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
J. Martin EDIT 6900 A “PresentationQuest” Designing a Collaborative Learning Lesson Plan.
Improving Participation in Adult Education Web 2.0 tools for strengthening competencies of adult education providers.
Dafna Hardbattle, Ken Fisher & Peter Chalk London Metropolitan University International Blended Learning Conference University of Hertfordshire,
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Health Literacy Online Marisa Nelson, MPS Health Educator Chronic Disease Prevention and Control.
A Model to Facilitate Effective Blended E-learning within Universities in Developing Countries B. Aguti, R. J. Walters, G. B. Wills Electronics and Computer.
Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
Jenni Parker, Dani Boase-Jelinek Jan Herrington School of Education Murdoch University Western Australia.
Use of new technologies in first year biology teaching Mary Peat, Sue Franklin, Rob Mackay-Wood & Aida Yalcin School of Biological Sciences,
Professor Norah Jones Dr. Esyin Chew Social Software for Learning – The Institutional Policy of the University of Glamorgan ICHL 2012, China
1 WERT: WP 5 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010 Aim To pilot and evaluate the content and context of the course material with target groups To help women.
USING TECHNOLOGY TO TRANSFORM THE NATURE OF THE CURRICULUM A Professional Development Project for English Language Arts (AND …?) at … CENTRAL MEMORIAL.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology EDEN Conference 22 June 2005.
Is Twitter for the Birds? Using Twitter to Enhance Student Learning Bill Collier Des Laffey Ben Lowe.
Using virtual collaboration tools for designing innovative education scenarios Gabriel Dima University “Politehnica” of Bucharest, Romania.
1 The Design of Multimedia Assessment Objects Gavin Sim, Stephanie Strong and Phil Holifield.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Keys to Successful 21 st Century Educational Leadership Jazzar and Algozzine Chapter 8 Curriculum Considerations & Implementations.
Information commitments, evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning evnironments Ying-Tien Wu & Chin-Chung Tsai Institute.
1 Evaluating the Quality of the e-Learning Experience in Higher Education Anne Jelfs and Keir Thorpe, Institute of Educational Technology (IET), The Open.
An Evaluation of an On-line Anatomy Course by Lab Instructors: Building on Instructional Design Guo, X., Katz, L., & Maitland, M. The University of Calgary,
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
An Introduction to Formative Assessment as a useful support for teaching and learning.
Students as Change Agents Exploring issues of Student Engagement among On- Campus MSc Students Denise Ryder, Jonathan Doney, Nii Tackie-Yaoboi With Nadine.
The UQ student employability vision: The University of Queensland will develop highly sought after graduates who have engaged in a range of opportunities,
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology WebCT Executive Seminar EDEN.
Redesigning a Communication Support System for Teachers 05/12/2000 Yasuhisa Kato Learning, Design, and Technology Master Project.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Improve Own Learning and Performance. Progression from levels 1-3 Progression from levels 1-3 At all levels, candidates are required to show they can.
Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.
Engaging Students in Technical Modules: The Quest to Promote Student Identification of Problematic Knowledge. Dr William Lyons, School of Engineering,
LAMS: The Learning Activity Management System James Dalziel Professor of Learning Technology & Director, Macquarie E-Learning Centre Of Excellence (MELCOE)
Teaching and Learning Online What Makes Sense When Moving Courses Online.
Module 5: Questioning, Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Introduction and Module Overview Standards Knowledge and skills Assignments.
Enhancing Students’ Collaborative Learning Through Podcasts Libby Rothwell Kingston University Dr. Ming Nie University of Leicester.
Expansion of eAuthoring services for all academic staff
指導教授:Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者:Chen, Wan-Yi 報告日期:
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Assessment feedback: More modality matters Michael Henderson,
Presentation transcript:

Introduction There are various theoretical concepts and skills that bioscience students need to develop in order to become effective at solving problems. One such issue is being able to apply physical science principles. With growing pressure on available teaching time it is important that academic staff provide additional resources for students in order to develop important underlying academic skills. It has also been suggested that low achieving students often lack the ability to seek essential information to solve problems (Tsai & Shen, 2009). Integrated e-learning can potentially combine theoretical information with problem-solving tasks to help overcome these issues. Aims The main aim of this project was to develop physical science skills for bioscience students by:  developing a web-based template that allowed interactive problem- based learning materials to be embedded within biosciences courses  using social networking / communities to engage students in learning and obtain feedback on the materials developed  assessing the potential of disseminating the interactive template to the wider bioscience community Methods An implicit and explicit syllabus was developed to devise appropriate bioscience related physical science problems. These were hosted on a novel interactive web-based template which incorporated key features intended to promote learning (Figure 1). Two online ‘Problems’ were developed, ‘Problem 1’ trialled with Undergraduate students, ‘Problem 2’ with Postgraduate students. The two ‘Problems’ were evaluated from a student and staff perspective using a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Student feedback and usage data were also retrieved electronically. Mean (  SD) values were calculated for the Likert scale questions and qualitative data was analysed using hierarchical content analysis. Results of the evaluation fed into future development of the resources. Results The resource was used by 58% of Undergraduate and 53% of Postgraduate students who were enrolled on the modules linked to the study. Key findings from the student evaluation revealed that the resource had a positive effect on learning for both groups (Figure 2). The majority of comments indicated that the resource developed an improved understanding of the physical science concepts covered. The lowest scoring items were improvement in problem-solving skills (Undergraduate) and benefit of the social networking forum (Postgraduate). Questions relating to changes in study habits were generally positive, both groups indicating they would like to use similar resources in the future. The exception was Undergraduate students who scored 2.75±0.97 on the impact of the resource on how they think about solving problems. Resource content and usability scored highly. Favourable features including immediacy of feedback and information presented in a variety of mediums. Comments from students and staff identified the need for audio files and more interactive material, including information on laboratory procedures that related to resource content at Postgraduate level. Also the length of Problem 1 appeared to be too vast for some Undergraduate students. The social networking element received a mixed reaction with staff and some students feeling a greater level of engagement across resource users was necessary to make it more effective. Discussion & Conclusion Despite the positive reactions to the resource salient features were identified that had the potential to further improve it. As well as develop physical science principles the resource aimed to teach these concepts within a problem based framework. Therefore, when the evaluation revealed Undergraduate students did not perceive any benefits to their problem solving skills the resources were revised. To facilitate this Borromeo Ferri’s (2006) theory of the modelling process was applied to questions and content allowing a clearer, more meaningful path through each problem. Analysis of student comments also allowed salient features of each Problem that generated some form of dissatisfaction to be identified and amended. This resulted in the inclusion of audio files, interactive mathematical tools and a laboratory skills lesson. In addition to splitting Problem 1 into two, more manageable parts, and reducing text on facing pages by providing optional links to more detail information. The Postgraduate students scored lowest on the social networking aspect but commented that they communicated through existing social networking channels. Strategies to improve forum usage will be required with future cohorts. Due to the success of this project there are plans to make the resources developed available via the University of Roehampton website. References Borromeo Ferri, R. (2006) Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 38, (2), pp Mayer, R.E. (2001) Multi-media Learning. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. Tsai, C. & Shen, P. (2009) Computers in Human Behavior, 25, pp Acknowledgements This project was funded by the UK Centre for Bioscience, the Higher Education Academy. The authors would like to thank Alison Carlisle and Phil Cheeseman for their technical support throughout the project. Physical Principles for Bioscience Students: A Problem Based Learning Tool T Smith 1, S Strike 1, B Middlemas 1, M Robson 2 & R Lee 1 1 University of Roehampton, London SW15 4JD, UK 2 Kingston University, Surrey KT1 2EE, UK Figure 2: Mean scores from student questionnaires on items relating to effect on learning. A score > 3 indicates positive agreement Figure 1: Initial development of online learning tool Non-linear learning Implicit Syllabus (Physical Science Principles & Related Bioscience Problems) Explicit Syllabus (Real Life Problems) Interactive Web Based Template (Moodle v1.9.8 Lesson Tool) Multimedia rich (Mayer, 2001) Social networking forum Web 2.0 technologies