April 14, 2008. Indicate every resource type proposed for impact on the Application: Tidal Wetland (short form for some projects) Nontidal Wetland Waterway.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Advertisements

Maryland Department of the Environment Restoration and Regulation Discussion Presented by: Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Department of the Environment.
Maryland Department of the Environment Restoration and Regulation Discussion Presented by: Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Department of the Environment.
Subdivision Plat Submittals Subdivision Plat Submittals
CBJ Planning Commission Presentation November 9, 2010 Subdivision Ordinance Revision Update.
A section has been added regarding Stream Restoration Design Criteria: A. Designs for stream restoration try to mimic natural conditions present in stable.
TA Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Current Features: 1.Floodways, 100 yr 2.Floodplain, outside floodway, 100 yr 3.Jurisdictional Wetlands 4.Stream.
Planning 319/NPS Projects. Failure to Plan? Planning consists of four planning phases. Contracting Planning process Implementation Issuing Payment.
Standards of Practice Route Surveys Title 46 Professional and Occupational Standards Part LXI. Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors 1.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
BCT 102 Printreading Architect Civil Engineer Reading & Scale Use.
PowerPoint Presentation
Island County SMP Shoreline Residential Development Workshop December 5, 2011.
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
Suzanne Macey.  DEC looks at known occurrences with 1 mile  FWS looks at known occurrences plus the potential for suitable habitat  Contact DEC and/or.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Planning Commission meeting 5/22/2012.  Project Schedule  Planning Commission’s Role  Review Chapters 1 – 3 of Draft SMP  Focus is on understanding.
Chapter 13 Site Plan Layout.
Erosion is the process by which the land surface is worn away by the action of wind, water, ice, or gravity - it is the process where soil particles are.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
Project Scope Hire Consulting Firm to perform following:
1 Introduction to QA/QC Process. 2 CHECKLISTS SheetsItems to CheckGeneral Reference YesYes NoNo N/AN/A General General Plan Content DM=Design Manual General.
Chapter 14 Legal Descriptions and Site Plan Requirements.
Prepared for: NEW YORK STATE PLANNING FEDERATION April 14, 2015 Prepared by: BME ASSOCIATES Peter G. Vars, P.E. Essential Skills: Reading and Interpreting.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Open Space Residential Development Bylaw Town of Rehoboth.
Team Tech meeting May 22, 2006 State Traffic Commission & DEP Storm Water Permitting State Traffic Commission Permitting & Storm Water Permitting State.
Protective Regulations Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices January, 2007 Kirby Date, Countryside Program Coordinator.
1 The Plan and Plan Review Issued May 2009 Level IB: Advanced Fundamentals Seminar Education and Training Certification Requirements for Persons Involved.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
1 Field Maintenance of Structural and Vegetative Measures Level 1A: Fundamentals Seminar Education and Certification for Persons Involved in Land Disturbing.
Chapter 12 Legal Descriptions and Site Plan Requirements.
Site Plan Requirements © 2010 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Civil Engineering and Architecture.
Shoreline & Waterway Management Section Regulations Governing Beach Protection and the Use of Beaches December 27, 1983 Beach – is that area which extends.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
Maximizing Impact / Minimizing Impact: Balancing Human and Environmental Concerns through Site Access Design Lee-Anne Milburn Department of Landscape Architecture.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Created by The North Carolina School of Science and Math.The North Carolina School of Science and Math Copyright North Carolina Department of Public.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Stormwater Water Quality Treatment Options Alvin Shoblom, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Low Impact Development (LID)
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,
Update: Where We Are and Feedback Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stake Holder Meeting June 25, 2008.
Appeal to the Decision of the Environmental Protection Commission Mark Kassar November 11, 2008 Environmental Protection Division Environmental Protection.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Clearing and Site Preparation and Site.
Hohnloser De novo review of proposed boundary line adjustment at and South Highway One, Gualala, Mendocino County (APN ) Item F12a.
Figures & Maps Documentation Floodplain (FIRM) Maps Wetland (NWI) Maps Site Maps Conceptual Site Development Plan.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Development Todd E. Hubmer PE WSB &
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
LPEA BAYFIELD SUBSTATION LA PLATA COUNTY LOCATION & EXTENT REVIEW March 12, 2015.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
LAND Subdivie a 4.27 acres into 18 lots 17 detached single family homes One duplex Base density allows for unit Affordable housing bonus.
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Supervisor, RIDEM RIPDES Permitting Program
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing April 10, 2013
THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Variance Case VA vary the side yard setback from 8 feet to 5 feet for a first floor addition on the main house expand the second floor to be in-line.
Site Plan Requirements
Kastanis- Existing Conditions
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
Shaver Creek Permitting
Competency: Create site plan drawings
Presentation transcript:

April 14, 2008

Indicate every resource type proposed for impact on the Application: Tidal Wetland (short form for some projects) Nontidal Wetland Waterway 100-year Floodplain **If you propose an activity in a Nontidal Wetland, then there will be a Buffer or Expanded Buffer impact** Nontidal Wetland Buffer Nontidal Wetland Expanded Buffer

Check each box for impacts, activity type, and project type. Extent of proposed activity on the Application must match activity shown on plan. If the activity descriptions do not match, the Application may be rejected. Include project dimensions Names of adjacent property owners Signature and printed name of landowner

Provide Clear Directions to site Street address if it exists If the lot has no street address, provide parcel number Street address of neighboring parcels, if available

Submit clear plans. Plans that are incomplete or illegible may result in rejection of application. Plans must be submitted on 8 ½ x 11 sheets for all applications. Include site plan and detail impact plans and cross sections For Nontidal Wetland and Waterway/Floodplain applications, also submit full size engineering plans. Extent of proposed activity on plans must match activity shown on application. If the activity descriptions do not match, the application may be rejected.

Submit Clear Plans (continued) 1. North arrow 2. Vicinity map 3. Legend 4. Scale 5. Site address, property boundaries and adjacent property owner name and address 6. Regulated resources for entire site. Distinguish between resources proposed for impact and those that will be preserved.

Each resource and its impact shall be shown with a symbol that is distinctive from other resources and impacts, and included in the legend. For example: Wetland ­­___  ____  ____  Wetland buffer ____   ____   ____   Stream/waterway ________________ Limit of disturbance ____X ____X____X Silt fence ______S_____S_____S Use features such as shading or cross-hatching to indicate impact site for regulated resource(s). Location point where samples or photographs were taken

On 8 ½ x 11 detail and engineering plan detail, show each impact site with area (square feet and acres) of wetland type, linear feet (stream/waterway) volume (cubic yards in floodplain). Stabilization notes for temporarily disturbed regulated resources Limit of disturbance Property boundaries Steep slopes Critical Area line Protected open space

On 8 ½ x 11 detail and engineering plan detail (continued) Local setback lines for regulated resources, if applicable Building setback lines Existing and Proposed structures Erosion and sediment controls Stormwater management Profile and cross sections of resource impact sites Mitigation site, if applicable

Tidal Wetlands Depending on scope of project, Long or Short Joint Federal/State Application will be required Include project dimensions Provide clear directions to site Street address if it exists If the lot has no street address, provide parcel number Street address of neighboring parcels, if available

Reduction of adverse impacts Include justification of project design. The preference is for the most beneficial and least environmentally damaging alternative. Marsh establishment or other natural shoreline enhancement is the first preference. You will be required to justify why natural ”living shoreline” is not appropriate.

Submit Clear Plans 1. North arrow 2. Vicinity map 3. Legend 4. Scale 5. Site address, property boundaries and adjacent property owner name and address 6. Existing structures on shoreline and property 7. Shoreline structures on neighboring property 8. Distance of proposed structure to property line

Submit Clear Plans 1. Name of waterway and opposite shoreline Measure the distance channelward (starting mean high water line on property and extend into channel) to the nearest shoreline. 2. Wetland boundary 3. Mean High Water Line 4. Mean Low Water Line 5. Shoreline shape

Submit Clear Plan (continued) Waterway Measurements 6. Channel width Measure the distance channelward (starting mean high water line on property and extend into channel) to the nearest shoreline. 7. Distance that structures extend into channel. A structure that extends too far out in the waterway may block access to the navigation channel and will not be authorized.

Fetch Distance White line shows correct method to measure distance to nearest shoreline. Yellow line is incorrect measure of shortest distance

Submit Clear Plans Waterway Measurements (Continued) 8. If project is done in combination with pier, show ¼ distance channelward (measured from mean high water into channel) 9. Water depth Take these measurements at low tide from the mean low water line. Show location where the water depth at one foot increments, starting at one foot, until the depth is shown at least 100 feet past the proposed structure or until it reaches a navigation channel.

Submit Clear Plan (continued) 10. Local setback line. If there is no local setback line, locate any piers 10’ from property line. If proposing a deviation from a required setback, provide written documentation of support from adjacent landowners and the approved local variance, if applicable. 11. Limit of disturbance 12. Erosion and Sediment Control Structures, if applicable 13. Planting and stabilization notes

Additional Information Wetland Delineation/Determination Completed and legible data sheets Monitoring well, soil data, or other hydrology data Photographs Wetland functions Mitigation plan, justification, replacement of lost functions Avoidance and minimization of impacts Alternative site analysis

Additional information (continued) Attempts to address constraints to reduction of impacts, e.g. waiver from local requirements Other field/habitat surveys Purpose and public need