September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Integrating Project Complexity and Risk Stormwater Management System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Drainage Basin System
Advertisements

Storm Water Runoff. Where Does Storm Water Go? Site Development Watershed Characteristics Storm Water Management The Rational Method Storm Characteristics.
Surface Irrigation.
State of Stormwater Management Practice in Florida Inter-American Development Bank User Charge Based Funding Mechanisms for Stormwater Management James.
Module 4: Temporary Sediment Controls. Learning Objectives n Identify locations for sediment control BMPs n Identify applications for different types.
Central Massachusetts Regional Stormwater Coalition Part 5 Standard Operating Procedures September 26, 2013 Community Innovation Challenge Grant 2013.
WHAT IS GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE ? Khris Dodson, Environmental Finance Center November 17, 2010.
Discussion Topics Brief history of structural stormwater management The Low Impact Development (LID) alternative to ponds, ponds, ponds… LID for Hydromodification.
Evaluation of Private Property I/I Sources for Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study City of Grand Rapids – E. Leonard Heights Area Presenter: Jay Zawacki, CDM.
October Storm Flows City of Worcester DPW & Parks Department, Sewer Operations Division January 26,2006.
CE 3372 Storm Sewer Conduit, Junctions, Inlets. Storm Sewers 0 Inlets capture stormwater 0 Junctions connect laterals to trunk lines. 0 Conduits (pipes)
Where does all that rain go? Stormwater Management in London.
Infiltration Trenches Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
Post Construction Runoff Control & BMPs J. C. Hayes, Ph.D., P.E. & D. Hitchcock, Ph.D. South Carolina Stormwater Forum May 8, 2007 Columbia, SC.
Getting Caltrans to Approve Your Plans Basic Drainage Policies and Requirements Roy H. King, MS,PE California Department of Transportation Division of.
Introduction To The Highway Runoff Manual This introduction focus on: An overview of the Highway Runoff Manual. The definition of Minimum Requirements.
Volusia County Public Works
Center Street & 2080 East Roadway Connection Springville City John Cazier, Derrick Turner, Justin Brewer, Taylor Nordquist.
Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works. OBJECTIVE MINIMIZE OR ELIMIINATE FLOODING FROM FREQUENT SMALL STORMS Storms of 1- to 2-year frequency.
Seattle Stormwater Runoff Remediation by Jimmy Mounivong.
Low Impact Development Overview  Alternative to end of pipe approach to SWM  Maintain hydrologic function of local ecosystem  Treat stormwater close.
DRAINAGE 101 September 13, 2010 City of Champaign Stormwater Utility Fee Advisory Committee.
& Community Design LSU Green Laws Research Project Green Laws Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry EBR Parish Tree And Landscape Commission Louisiana.
SLIDE 1 Sustainable Stormwater Management May 6, 2015 Blue Highways: Transportation and Stormwater Management in Virginia Ginny Snead, PE Richmond Office.
Wake County Stormwater Workshop Guidance on the New Stormwater Ordinance and Design Manual August 29, 2006.
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3 Vancouver, WA, Workshop October 17, 2007 PM.
Wes Marshall, P.E. University of Connecticut May 2007 CE 276 Site Design Final Exam Outline.
Hydrologic Cycle and Watersheds. Hydrologic Cycle Components Precipitation Infiltration Percolation Runoff Evapotranspiration.
1 Urban Drainage and Intersection Design Image:
Stormwater Infrastructure for Water Quality Management Dr. Larry A. Roesner, P.E. CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas, Austin April 8,
Hydrographs and Drainage Basins. Drainage Basins: A drainage basin is the catchment area of a river and its tributaries. The boundary of the catchment.
Integration Of Stormwater Master Plans with Watershed Plans The Link between Flooding and Development September 23, 2008 Bob Murdock, P.E., CFM.
STEP 3: SITING AND SIZING STORM WATER CONTROLS Section 6.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 11. Storm Water Runoff Storm water runoff is the precipitation which seeps into the ground if precipitation occurs faster.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Drainage Task Team Volusia County Public Works Judy Grim, P.E. Road and Bridge Director.
Stormwater Rain and melting snow Collected by storm drains and flows into streams, rivers, lakes.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak, P.E. Presentation to the San Diego Region Co-permittees Hydromodification Workgroup December 6, 2006 Contra.
Urban Storm Drain Design: Pump Station Design. Purposes To lift stormwater to higher elevation when discharge of local collection system lies below regional.
__________________________ SITES INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT for WATER RESOURCE SITE ANALYSIS COMPLEX WATERSHEDS SITES IN SERIES.
Stormwater Management for Colleges and Universities Phase II for Colleges and Universities State Stormwater Programs Industrial Facilities.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Stormwater Water Quality Treatment Options Alvin Shoblom, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer.
Term Project Presentation CE 394K.2 Hydrology Presented by Chelsea Cohen Thursday, April 24, 2008.
Miami. Miami: Climate Miami’s client is similar to Houston in several ways. It has one of the highest levels of rainfall of any major U.S. city. It receives.
Integrating Simulation and Design for Stormwater Management by Alan A. Smith Alan A. Smith Inc. Dundas, Ontario, Canada.
CE 3372 Water Systems Design Lecture 18: Storm sewers, inlets, conduits and related hydrology and hydraulics.
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Introduction to Urban Hydrology
Basic Hydraulics: Storm Water Management concepts
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Development Todd E. Hubmer PE WSB &
CTC 450 Review 1  WW Characteristics. Objectives 2  Understand the basics of storm drainage systems  Understand the basics of sewer systems.
Steven Peene, PhD Director of Water Resources Applied Technology and Management, Inc. Overview of FDOT’s Statewide Stormwater Management Plan (SSWMP)
Proposed Storm Water Utility Fee July Proposal for future Drainage Improvement: Faith Presbyterian Church Estimated Cost: $35, *Install three.
The Town of Fort Myers Beach Stormwater Utility: Frequently Asked Questions Prepared by Tetra Tech September 2015.
Construction of On-Site Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Modeling Low Impact Development Techniques and Detention Basins in SWMM CEE 6/5460 David Rosenberg.
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Development
CE 3372 Water Systems Design
WEST & EAST DISTRICT PROJECTS PRESENTATION
Components of Stormwater Management Systems
IRRIGATION PRINCIPLES
Campus Stormwater Management
Land Use and Zoning Committee Special Workshop
Introduction to Urban Hydrology
Hydrology.
MIDS Calculator Use - Intermediate
MS4 OVERVIEW 2015.
Regional Stormwater 2016 Operations, Maintenance, & Projects
Presentation transcript:

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Integrating Project Complexity and Risk Stormwater Management System Design Task Force

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Foundational Concepts  Greater Public Risks? Increased certainty of professional competence needed Increased certainty of professional competence needed  Greater Project Complex? Increased professional proficiency needed Increased professional proficiency needed

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Levels of Risk Level of ImpactHuman Safety OFW / Impaired Waters Property Damage MinimalNoneNoNone LowNoneNoMinor ModerateUnlikelyYesModerate SignificantPossibleSevere ExtremeClearly yes

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT 1988 Agreement MinimalModerateLowExtremeSignificant Low Medium High Complexity Risk RLA: PE:

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Combined Risk and Complexity MinimalModerateLowExtremeSignificant Low Medium High Complexity Risk Minimal: Intermediate: Advanced: Competency -

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Levels of Complexity - Low  Single Basin Routing w/ Single Control Structure  No Infiltration Modeling  Small, Manmade Basin Hydrology  Multiple Pipes in Series (Small Storm Drain System)

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT  Medium Size Basin Hydrology  Multiple Basins in Series with Multiple Control Structures  Small Interconnected Basins With Parallel Connections and Multiple Outfalls  Multiple Pipes in Series (Major Storm Drain System) Levels of Complexity - Medium

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT  Recovery of Infiltration Basins with Simple Boundary Conditions  Exfiltration Trench Systems  Closed Regional Basin Levels of Complexity – Medium (Con’t)

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT  Regional Hydrology  Infiltration Basins with Complex Boundary Conditions  Large Interconnected Basins with Parallel Connections and Multiple Outfalls  Soils Amendments Levels of Complexity - High

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Combined Risk and Complexity MinimalModerateLowExtremeSignificant Low Medium High Complexity Risk Minimal: Intermediate: Advanced: Competency -

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Minimal Risk / Low Complexity  Burger King with Wet Pond Draining to a Drainage Ditch ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond Not an impaired waterway or OFW Not an impaired waterway or OFW

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Minimal Risk / Medium Complexity  Burger King with Wet Pond Draining to a Drainage Ditch Upstream retention Upstream retention Closed Basin Closed Basin  Mall Draining to a WMD Canal Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Exfiltration Trench Exfiltration Trench

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Minimal Risk / High Complexity  Burger King with Wet Pond Draining to a Drainage Ditch Upstream retention with Karst topography Upstream retention with Karst topography Soil amendments Soil amendments  Business Draining to WMD Canal Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Large regional flow through ditch within site Large regional flow through ditch within site

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Low Risk / Low Complexity  Small Residential Development with Wet Pond Draining to a Drainage Ditch ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond Not an impaired waterway Not an impaired waterway

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Low Risk / Medium Complexity  Small Residential Development with Wet Pond Draining to a Drainage Ditch Upstream retention Upstream retention Closed Basin Closed Basin  Mall Draining to a WMD Canal Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Exfiltration Trench Exfiltration Trench

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Low Risk / High Complexity  Small Residential Development with Wet Pond Draining to a Drainage Ditch Upstream retention with Karst topography Upstream retention with Karst topography Soil amendments Soil amendments  Mall Draining to WMD Canal Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Piping large regional flow through ditch within site Piping large regional flow through ditch within site

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Moderate Risk / Low Complexity  Medium Sized Residential Development with Wet Pond Ditch drainage flowing to single pond Ditch drainage flowing to single pond Neighborhood streets (low speed) Neighborhood streets (low speed) Swale percolation ignored in design Swale percolation ignored in design Drains to an Impaired Waterway Drains to an Impaired Waterway Piping regional flow through 48” pipe within subdivision Piping regional flow through 48” pipe within subdivision

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Moderate Risk / Medium Complexity  Medium Sized Residential Development Upstream retention Upstream retention Closed Basin Closed Basin  Large Mall Draining to an Impaired Waterway Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Exfiltration Trench Exfiltration Trench

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Moderate Risk / High Complexity  Medium Sized Residential Development with Wet Pond Upstream retention with Karst topography Upstream retention with Karst topography Soil amendments Soil amendments  Large Mall Draining to WMD Canal Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Hardpan issues with perched water table Hardpan issues with perched water table

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Significant Risk / Low Complexity  Burger King with Wet Pond Drains to a DOT roadside ditch with pond downstream Drains to a DOT roadside ditch with pond downstream ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond  Hospital with Wet Pond ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond Swale percolation ignored in design Swale percolation ignored in design No exfiltration trench No exfiltration trench

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Significant Risk / Medium Complexity  Medium Sized Residential Development Draining to a DOT Roadside Ditch Upstream retention Upstream retention Closed Basin Closed Basin  Hospital Draining to a WMD Canal Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Exfiltration Trench Exfiltration Trench

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Significant Risk / High Complexity  Large Residential Development Upstream retention with Karst topography Upstream retention with Karst topography Soil amendments Soil amendments  Emergency Management Facility Draining to WMD Canal Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Quantify large regional flow through ditch within site Quantify large regional flow through ditch within site Piping large regional flow through 72” pipe within development Piping large regional flow through 72” pipe within development

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Extreme Risk / Low Complexity  Burger King with Wet Pond Draining to FDOT Curbed Highway ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond ” – 18” pipes draining to the pond No exfiltration trench No exfiltration trench Posted speed = 40 mph Posted speed = 40 mph

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Extreme Risk / Medium Complexity  Residential Development Draining to FDOT Curbed Highway Upstream retention Upstream retention Inflow pattern changed from sheet flow to point flow Inflow pattern changed from sheet flow to point flow Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Trunk line 18” – 42” pipes draining to the pond Complex, interconnected upstream storage Complex, interconnected upstream storage

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Extreme Risk / High Complexity  Large Mall Draining to FDOT Curbed Highway Upstream retention with Karst topography Upstream retention with Karst topography Soil amendments Soil amendments Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Parallel interconnected ditches with control structures Exfiltration trenches used for flood protection Exfiltration trenches used for flood protection

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT DOT Perspective MinimalModerateLowExtremeSignificant Low Medium High Complexity Risk Minimal: Intermediate: Advanced: Competency -

September 16, 2009 Lora Hollingsworth, FDOT Questions / Discussion?