FISH TRAP REDUCTION STEERING COMMITTEE ST. CROIX DISTRICT VOTING MEMBERS THOMAS DALEY- Chairman GERSON MARTINEZ –Vice chair WAYNE HARVEY HOMER KELLY FRANK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation on the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures By Shashank Priya, Director, Department of Commerce.
Advertisements

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Fisheries Act Renewal Developing a Modern Tool to Support New Directions Fall 2005 (FOR DISTRIBUTION)
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
ANRC AACD Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 6 Appointments and Election of Directors.
The Road to ABI Waiver Services. People are referred to the BISB through the website, BIAK, providers, TBI Trust Fund, hospital social workers, discharge.
What is the Education Investment Incentives (EIIA) Act? The EIIA is designed to provide much needed relief for tuition paying parents, while also enhancing.
1 NE Multi-species Buyback Fishing Capacity Reduction under Section 312(b)-(e) of the Magnuson- Stevens Act Leo Erwin, Chief, NE Financial Services, NMFS/NOAA,
Kansas Transition from Ground Water Development to Enhanced Ground Water Management Define the Resource Beneficial Use Protect and Control Thomas L. Huntzinger,
Doc.: IEEE /024 Submission January 2001 Jim Carlo, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Patents and IEEE 802 Stds IEEE 802 Chair’s Viewpoint Jim Carlo General.
St. Thomas/St. John Trap Reduction Steering Committee Status Report
Area Commissions Purpose Area commissions are established to afford additional voluntary citizen participation in decision-making in an advisory.
ACL Scoping Document CFMC3/24/09-3/26/09. Action 1: Amending the Stock Complexes in the Reef Fish Fishery Management Unit.
The goal of the scoping meetings was to allow the public to comment on the options considered and to provide alternative options not yet considered by.
In Berkshire County Sarah C. Hoecker. Economic Development Districts What is an Economic Development District? An EDD is a geographic location created.
(Host Club) CLUB QUALIFICATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THE ROTARY FOUNDATION.
Compatibility of Commercial Trip Limits and Recreational Bag Limits in the Management Area of St. Croix, USVI Regulatory Amendment 2 Queen Conch Fishery.
FISH TRAP REDUCTION STEERING COMMITTEE: ST. CROIX DISTRICT VOTING MEMBERS THOMAS DALEY (CHAIRMAN) HOMER KELLY GERSON MARTINEZ HANS LARSEN FRANK JOHNSON.
Albemarle County, Virginia Office of the County Assessor.
What’s Up With WOTC? Guest: Bret Anderson Hosted by: Vaune Shelbourn.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members in Alaska’s Commercial Fisheries Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members.
OPTIONS FOR AMENDMENT 2 TO THE FMP FOR THE QUEEN CONCH FISHERY OF PUERTO RICO AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS AND AMENDMENT 5 TO THE REEF FISH FMP OF PUERTO.
BALLOT July 2009 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
Moveable Equipment Inventory Brown Bag February 11, 2009 Bob Marchitto Manager, Moveable Equipment Inventory ,
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
EXPEDITED PERMIT PILOT PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER MEETING EXPEDITED PERMIT PILOT PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER MEETING Wednesday, September 13, 2006.
IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS AMENDMENT PROPOSALS Present by Rick LaRose, Chair Dispute Resolution Committee Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19,
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
THE FUTURE OF THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW PROCESS July 2005 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
Amendment 3 to the Fishery Management Plan for Queen Conch Resources of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act of 2006 March 2007.
Caribbean Fishery Management Council 137 th Meeting March , St. Thomas, USVI.
Outreach and Education USVI STYLE Building Fisher and Community Awareness and Appreciation for Our USVI Fisheries and Marine Resources Roy A Pemberton,
FRYSC Advisory Councils Partners in Progress
Cooperationand consortium building Luis Araque de Juan European Commission International Cooperation and Development DEVCO/EuropeAid Unit R.3 Legal Affairs.
Utilize commercial landings data by island (PR, STX, and STT) for (queen conch – STX and PR only) and (snapper unit 1, grouper unit.
PROVISIONS OF H.R SECTION 3: SCIENCE BASED IMPROVEMENTS TO MANAGEMENT [303(a )] Page 3, lines 22-25, Page 4, Page 5, lines 1-9 Paragraph 15 is.
Procurement Card Program. This program was established to allow rapid purchases of repetitive or low dollar goods and services while simultaneously reducing.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
FISH TRAP REDUCTION STEERING COMMITTEE: ST. CROIX DISTRICT VOTING MEMBERS THOMAS DALEY (CHAIRMAN) HOMER KELLY GERSON MARTINEZ FRANK JOHNSON WAYNE HARVEY.
MSRA Implementation Status Update. 2 Implementation Strategy Divide tasks Priority 1 – Due date specified in the Act Priority 2 – Required, but no due.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Structuring Species Closures that Work for Fishermen Kate Quigley Council Economist Ad Hoc Committee on Socio-Economic Impact of Yearly Closures July 24,
Enhanced Wireless Funding through HB 361 Shawn S. Smith Interim Ohio Coordinator.
Ec-12-0xyz EC Rules November 2012 James Gilb (Tensorcom) IEEE 802 Rules Update November 2012 meeting.
Surplus City Property – Request for Proposals Administration & Finance Committee February 1, 2012.
May 5, 2016 May 5, Reporting obligations for  Investment banks,  Stockbrokers and dealers  FM and Investment advisers 2. Publication financial.
2017 SCHOOL BOARD GENERAL ELECTIONS AND BY-ELECTIONS Alberta Education Lavonne Adams and Alexander Blyth May 9, 2016.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust and Studies Fund March 2015.
Brady Act Requirements In November 1993, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 (Brady Act), Public Law , was signed into law requiring.
California Spiny Lobster Proposed Regulatory Changes Fish and Game Commission Meeting February 10-11, 2016 Carlos Mireles Environmental Scientist, Marine.
SOPEC: Southeast Ohio Public Energy Council
Regulatory Amendment 2 Queen Conch Fishery Management Plan
Privacy & Confidentiality
Rules of Superintendence Applicable to Guardianships
156th Caribbean Council Meeting
Puerto Rico SU2 Commercial Permits Development for Federal Waters
PROVISIONS OF H.R
Introduction to Sponsor Balloting using the myBallot™ system
14. “(1) Unless otherwise agreed where the originator has stated that the electronic communication is conditional on receipt of acknowledgment, the electronic.
THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL
Puerto Rico SU2 Commercial Permits Development for Federal Waters
ACL Scoping Document CFMC 3/24/09-3/26/09.
Commercial Permits in U.S. Caribbean Federal Waters
Property Control Asset Forms
Presentation transcript:

FISH TRAP REDUCTION STEERING COMMITTEE ST. CROIX DISTRICT VOTING MEMBERS THOMAS DALEY- Chairman GERSON MARTINEZ –Vice chair WAYNE HARVEY HOMER KELLY FRANK JOHNSON STACHEL PARKER NORRIS BENJAMIN NON-VOTING TONY IAROCCI EDWARD SCHUSTER CARLOS FARCHETTE ROY PEMBERTON -- (DIRECTOR – DFW) COORDINATOR OBSERVERS JONATHAN BROWN – DPNR/DFW Dept. of Planning and Natural Resources HEATHER BLOUGH - NOAA/SERO Division of Fish and Wildlife DR. WILLIAM ARNOLD –NOAA/SERO

This final draft Fish Trap Reduction Program proposal, developed by the STX Trap Reduction Steering Committee, addresses the STX fish trap fishery only. The STX lobster trap fishery will be addressed in a separate proposal On March 16, 2011, DPNR announced that anyone entering the USVI fish or lobster trap fisheries after February 10, 2011, is not assured future access to the fishery. That control date serves as the basis for the eligibility and initial allocation criteria in this proposal This proposal represents the STX Steering Committee’s view of a sustainable management program for the STX fish trap fishery. It is a proposal only, developed in response to the Council’s charge, and would require rulemaking or, potentially, legislative action before taking effect If approved and implemented, this proposed Fish Trap Reduction Program would be reviewed by the STX Steering Committee in coordination with DPNR at least once every five years relative to program, territorial and federal management goals and objectives

Program Goals and Objectives Preserve and protect the historical and cultural STX fish trap fishery in a sustainable manner by: Limiting participation in the fishery Capping the maximum number of allowable traps/fisher Reducing the total number of traps in the fishery by 10% relative to the sum total of the maximum number of traps recorded by each individual fisher in association with STX landings between February 10, 2008 and February 10, 2011, (Control Date)

Eligibility Criterion: Who Can Participate In The Program? All fishers who held a valid USVI commercial fishing license and recorded STX landings on commercial catch records with fish trap gear between February 10, 2008 and February 10, 2011 would be eligible to participate in the program. Any fisher who feels excluded or has questions about participation in the program will have an opportunity to present their case to an Appeals Board.

Administration: How Will Participants Be Identified and Managed? Eligible participants would be identified by a STX fish trap endorsement to their USVI commercial fishing license Only fishers with a STX fish trap endorsement would be authorized to utilize fish traps on the STX shelf and/or to land in STX fish that have been harvested with trap gear within the St. Croix Territorial Waters Each fisher with a STX fish trap endorsement would be authorized to set a specific number of fish traps on the STX shelf based on their past 3 years of participation in the fishery Estimated Effect: How Many Fishermen Will Qualify? Based on DPNR commercial catch record data, 38 fishers would meet this eligibility criterion

Initial Allocation/Effort Reduction Strategy Criterion: How Will DPNR Allocate Fish Trap Tags Among Program Participants? The number of fish trap tags allocated each program participant would be equal to 10% less than the maximum number of traps they recorded on commercial catch reports between February 10, 2008 and February 10, 2011.

Administration: How Will Fish Trap Tags Be Issued And Managed? DPNR would administer the fish trap tag program Tags would be sequentially numbered Tags would be composed of a durable material so that they are not easily destroyed Tags would be color-coded so they are distinguishable from STT/STJ tags The maximum number of trap tags that any qualifying licensed trap fisherman could receive as an initial allocation is 150 traps.

Estimated Effect: How Many Fish Traps Will Be Authorized In The Fishery? This allocation/effort reduction strategy would result in 527 registered traps in the STX fish trap fishery. This represents:  A 14% increase in fish traps relative to the sum of the maximum number of fish traps recorded by each individual on DPNR commercial catch records during the fishing year (463).  A 2% decrease in fish traps relative to the maximum number of traps fished annually, on average, over the last three years (537).

 A 17% decrease in fish traps relative to the maximum number of traps fished annually, on average, over the last five years (635) A 42% decrease in fish traps relative to the total number of traps currently reported in the fishery through the STX fisher survey (908) An 87% decrease in fish traps relative to the total number of traps estimated in the fishery prior to Hurricane Hugo (4,000)

Criterion: Who May Buy Into The STX Fish Trap Program? STX fish trap endorsements and tags would be transferable to immediate family members, helpers and anyone who holds a USVI commercial fishing license.  Any person/corporation holding a USVI commercial fishing license would be eligible to purchase the STX fish trap endorsement and/or tags of a trap program participant.  Trap program participants could transfer their STX fish trap endorsement, tags and license as a package to an immediate family member or to a helper. Trap program participants could transfer tags among themselves without the transfer of a USVI commercial fishing license or STX fish trap endorsement

Administration: How Will Transfers Be Managed? DPNR would validate and process all transfers All fish trap endorsements and tags would be specific to the STX district and would not be valid on STT/STJ district The maximum number of trap tags that any person or corporation could hold at any given time is 150 Estimated Effect: How Will This Transfer Provision Affect Fishery Participation? This transferability provision would support the participation of local fishermen in the fish trap fishery over the long term.

Appeals Criterion: What Would Be Considered Valid Reasons To Enter The STX Fish Trap Fishery Through The Appeals Process? Data discrepancies (i.e., fisher can provide copies of USVI commercial catch records documenting he/she meets the eligibility criteria in this proposal) Investment in the fishery (i.e., fisher can demonstrate substantial investment in the fishery prior to the February 10, 2011 control date but does not have recorded landings between February 10, 2008 and February 10, 2011)

Appeals Cont. Administration: How Will The Appeals Process Work? An Appeals Board would be established to include STX Fish Trap Reduction Steering Committee members, the Director of DPNR’s Fish and Wildlife Division or designee and a DPNR’s legal council. All appeals would be heard/considered separately during a specified time period before initial allocations are made under the trap reduction program. That time period would be announced in local papers.

Appeals Cont. Appellants would be required to submit all documentation they wish to be considered in their appeal in advance of the date on which their appeal will be heard, and, must also appear in person before the Appeals Board The Appeals Board would review each case privately and issue their findings that same day All Appeals Board decisions would be final.

Enforcement Only fishers with a STX fish trap endorsement would be authorized to utilize fish traps on the STX shelf and/or to land in STX fish that have been harvested with trap gear on the STX shelf All fish traps set on the STX shelf must be identified by a uniquely numbered STX fish trap tag issued under this program All lost or stolen fish traps must be reported to DPNR through submission of a Lost or Stolen Fish Trap Report which details: The specific location each trap was placed and lost or stolen The date the loss or theft was discovered How the fisher discovered the trap(s) was lost or stolen

Enforcement Cont. The specific number(s) of the lost trap(s); and All steps taken to locate the lost or stolen trap(s) Replacement tags may be requested from DPNR through submission of a Fish Trap Tag Replacement Application on which the applicant certifies under penalty of perjury The fish trap tag number(s) listed on the application were issued to the applicant for the current year, were secured to the applicant’s traps, and were lost, stolen or mutilated The applicant filed the required “Lost or Stolen Fish Trap Report” with DPNR (a copy of the lost or stolen report must be attached to the application)

Enforcement Cont. The specific number(s) of the lost trap(s); and All steps taken to locate the lost or stolen trap(s) The fish trap tag number(s) listed on the application were issued to the applicant for the current year, were secured to the applicant’s traps, and were lost, stolen or mutilated The applicant filed the required “Lost or Stolen Fish Trap Report” with DPNR (a copy of the lost or stolen report must be attached to the application) If the original tag(s) is ever found or recovered, the applicant will immediately return it to DPNR

Review DPNR and the STX Steering Committee would review this program after the first three (3) years and thereafter review every five years relative to program objectives, territorial fishery conservation management goals, and, (as appropriate) Federal fishery conservation and management goals. Penalties Any person who knowingly takes or attempt to take, with the aid or use of any vessel, any fish pot/trap belonging to another unless otherwise provided by law, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall upon conviction, be subject to a fine not to exceed $50,000, suspension of license as authorized by law or imprisonment for not more than one (1) year, or to both such fine and imprisonment