Goals of Justice Reinvestment Manage growth of the prison population and reduce spending on corrections Increase the cost- effectiveness of existing criminal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Advertisements

1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
Slide 1 Recent Developments in Sentencing and Corrections Reform Presentation to the Nevada Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice January.
Yamhill County: Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM)
Background The Sentencing Commission is a public governor and legislature- appointed body whose purpose is to study Louisiana sentencing and incarceration.
ICAOS Mini Training Transfer Eligibility and Reporting Instructions Eligibility Presented by: Training Committee [Revision 3/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.
Reducing the Prison Population: The Sentencing Project
Strengthening Probation as the Sanction of Choice In order for Probation to be a meaningful sanction, it must be adequately funded. Probation is the sanction.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Community Supervision and Alternative Sanctions Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
State Board of Corrections An Overview of Public Law 2008 Chapter 653.
Indiana Reentry Courts: How to? 2012 IACCAC Fall Conference November 8, 2012 Indianapolis, IN.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Planning for Re-alignment in San Diego
The Annie E. Casey Foundation Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative JDAI Council of State Governments May 17, 2009 Rand Young, WA State JDAI Coordinator.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
Michigan Department of Corrections Institutional and Community Corrections.
Housing Ex-Offenders: Identifying Barriers and Proposing Solutions Angela Lee ODRC Reentry and Family Program Administrator.
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Public Safety Improvement Act. Criminal Justice Initiative Work Group Process 35+ stakeholder meetings 6 meetings from July through October 2012 – Analyzed.
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
ICAOS Training 103-Supervision in the Receiving State [Revision 12/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
Realignment: The Role of the BSCC and the Composition of Local Detention Facilities Patricia Mazzilli, Executive Director Board of State and Community.
Drug Courts Prepared by Sheri Heffelfinger Montana Legislative Services Division For the Law and Justice Interim Committee February 2008.
Presentation on the Phase 1 Report on the Home Confinement Program Orange County, Florida August 6, 2013.
Task Force on Public Safety OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION OCTOBER 30, 2013.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Grant Review Committee OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION OCTOBER 21, 2013.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Working with Performance-based Standards Oregon Youth Authority.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Winters April 9 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Davis April 8 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.
DELAWARE OFFICE OF DEFENSE SERVICES DELAWARE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE STATE OF DELAWARE PUBLIC DEFENSE COUNSEL AT PRETRIAL Hon. J. Brendan O’Neill,
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Safety and Justice Challenge: An Effort to Reduce the Jail Population
FY17: Briefing on Jail Bed Contingency Funds
Summit County Probation Services
Reducing the Prison Population: The Sentencing Project
Juvenile Justice Technical Assistance
RSAT History, Best Practices and Future
History (Continued) In May, 2011, Federal Court required that the prison population of California be decreased from 180% of prison capacity to no more.
General Counsel Andrew Bailey
12 Research and the Future of Probation and Parole.
Presentation transcript:

Goals of Justice Reinvestment Manage growth of the prison population and reduce spending on corrections Increase the cost- effectiveness of existing criminal justice investments Reinvest in strategies that can increase public safety Increase Public Safety Hold offenders accountable in meaningful ways Make smarter, more effective use of community corrections use Strengthen probation supervision

Sentencing Policy Changes Increased penalties for theft and non-theft related offenses Changes to prison terms for 1 st and 3 rd degree felons Community control sanctions for 4 th and 5 th degree felons Changes to criminal penalties for certain drug offenses Risk reduction sentence option

Sentencing Policy Changes RC RC Court-determination at sentencing DRC must prescribe programming based on risk/needs of the offender DRC must notify sentencing court of successful completion of programming & risk reduction sentence at least 30 days Risk reduction sentencing allows courts to release offenders after serving 80% of the aggregated non-mandatory prison if participate in prison programming Truth-in-sentencingIncentive program participationTransparency

Probation Changes Use of a standardized risk/need assessment system – ORAS Reduce duplication of supervision resources Establish minimum standards for effective probation supervision Collect and analyze data from every probation department in the state Provide incentive and improvement grants

Probation Supervision Policy Changes RC RC RC RC RC Courts Probation Correctional Facilities Adult Parole Authority Parole Board ORAS Adopt a single validated risk assessment tool for adult offenders Matching Risk & Needs to Supervision & Programming

Probation Supervision Policy Changes RC Reduce duplication of supervision resources Offenders are being assigned to both misdemeanor and felony probation and, consequently, report to two different officers in two separate probation departments. In counties with multiple courts operating probation agencies, those courts will: develop memoranda of understanding for transferring probation cases from municipal to common pleas courts and vice versa. Practical ProblemPolicy Solution

Probation Supervision Policy Changes RC RC RC RC RC RC Establish minimum standards for effective probation across Ohio Protocol for the hiring of professional chief probation officers Standards for pre and in-service training for probation officers Standards for implementing risk assessment information into practices System of progressive sanctions for violations Ensuring only one entity is responsible for the supervision of offender

Probation Supervision Policy Changes RC Collect and analyze data from every probation department in the state MONTHLY PROBATION REPORT Number placed on probation by offense level and basic demographics Number on probation at the end of the month by offense level and basic demographics Number exiting probation including reason for exit, offense level, and basic demographics Fiscal Accountability Effectiveness

9 Probation Supervision Policy Changes Provide funding and incentives to improve felony probation supervision and increase successful completion rates Purpose Help felony probation agencies reduce recidivism. Probation Improvement Grant Eligibility Any felony probation agency that is using ORAS and in compliance new probation standards Purpose Encourage practices and policies leading to further recidivism reductions Eligibility Counties that reduce revocation rates from baseline FY 2010 Probation Incentive Grant RC

Justice Reinvestment Initiative Advisory Committee The Justice Reinvestment Initiative (JRI) Advisory Committee is comprised of members from multiple areas of local government and the criminal justice system with a broad spectrum of experience. The JRI Committee is expected to advise DRC in developing criteria, guidelines and a process for evaluating the Probation Improvement and Probation Incentive grant applications submitted by entities seeking funding. 10

Community Corrections Changes Establish standards regarding admission criteria for all DRC funded programs OJACC collaborative Draft Administrative Rule

Community Corrections Policy Changes RC (D) RC (A)(2) Admit individuals to CBCFs who are high-risk to reoffend and provide assistance based on adherence to admission standards Degree of felony Community Control Sanction Revocation History Risk Level CBCF standards based on: Financial assistance contingent upon number of offenders admitted who satisfy admission standards

Community Corrections Policy Changes Develop Community Alternative Sentencing Centers Confining misdemeanants sentenced under community residential sanction Offenders with a sentence of 30 days OVI offenders

Other Changes Judicial release of offenders who have served at least 80 percent of at least a one-year sentence Changes to the earned credit days for programming within prison Enhance victim notification

Other Policy Changes RC ODRC Offenders 1 year or more who meet criteria and served at least 80 percent of sentence. DRC must petition the court. Sentencing Court If released court must sentence offender to appropriate community control Community Corrections Offender will be supervised under court’s probation department plus additional control sanctions Judicial release of offenders who have served at least 80 percent of at least a one-year sentence

Other Policy Changes RC RC Allows DRC to issue credit up to 5 days each month for program participation Offenders may earn 1 day or 5 days of credit per month for program participation depending on the type of crime Offenders may earn a one-time award of up to 5 additional credit days for completing two programs Offenders with 60 or more days of earned credit who are on post-release control must have GPS for first 14 days of release Earning ability is capped at 8 percent of the total number of days in the stated prison term DRC must evaluate earned credit annually

Other Policy Changes RC RC Enhance the victim notification process Office of Victim Services must notify each victim of a felony offense when the offender escapes and the apprehension Allows the Office of Victim Services to request assistance from the county attorney to locate the victim for notification

Other Policy Changes RC Develop a certification program to give employers relief from civil liability for offenders Must complete in- prison vocational program Demonstrate exemplary performance in cognitive behavioral program Complete community service Shows evidence of achievement and rehabilitation

Resources and ‘New’ Ideas Justice Reinvestment Officers Eligibility determined at institution Justice Reinvestment Officer determines suitability; prepares and communicates meaningful information for the Court Court makes informed release decision

Resources and ‘New’ Ideas Judicial Request for Community Sanctions If a court is sentencing an offender for a non-violent felony of the fourth or fifth degree and believes no community control sanctions are available for its use that adequately fulfill the overriding principles and purpose of sentencing, the statute directs the court to contact DRC and ask DRC to provide the court with the names of, contact information for, and program details of one or more community control sanctions lasting for a combined total of at least one year in duration. DRC shall provide the possible sanctions within ten (10) business days after receiving the request from a court. Council of State Governments Justice Center | 20

Resources and ‘New’ Ideas The Judicial Request for Available Community Sanctions form, DRC and any supplemental information (ie psi, criminal history, etc ) provided by the court are to be submitted to The Reentry Coordinator shall be responsible for monitoring the incoming s and providing a response to any court falling into their area of responsibility. Council of State Governments Justice Center | 21

Resources and ‘New’ Ideas JRI Phase 2 Assistance Training for Judiciary and Probation Bench cards Regional Symposia

Resources and ‘New’ Ideas Council of State Governments Justice Center | 23

Impact of Policy Changes

Next Steps Quality Assurance Review monthly probation data Building Capacity Train on policies Train on evidence based practices Implementation Plan Formation of Work Group Develop policies/standards/procedures

Sara Andrews Deputy Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation