Syntax Lecture 13: Revision. Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X 1  X 0 Y 2 ) – Specifier (X 2  Y 2 X 1 ) – Adjunct.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Syntax Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation.
Advertisements

BBN-ANG-253 Advanced Syntax Lecture Course Autumn, 2014/15
Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
NP Movement Passives, Raising: When NPs are not in their theta positions.
Chapter Two Syntactic Categories Syntactic categories are of two types: Lexical categories (N, V, P, A, AdP) and functional categories (IP, CP, DP)
Syntax Lecture 10: Auxiliaries. Types of auxiliary verb Modal auxiliaries belong to the category of inflection – They are in complementary distribution.
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Dobaian1 Ch. 2: Phrase Structure Syntactic Structure (basic concepts) Syntactic Structure (basic concepts)  A tree diagram marks constituents.
Syntax Lecture 9: Verb Types 2.
X-bar Construction XP  (Spec) X’ (X’  X’ YP) adjunct rule X’  X (ZP) complement.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 7 About Nothing. Nothing in grammar Language often contains irregular paradigms where one or more expected forms are absent.
Lecture 11: Binding and Reflexivity.  Pronouns differ from nouns in that their reference is determined in context  The reference of the word dog is.
Week 12b. Relative clauses CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Relative clauses Another place where we see wh- movement, besides in explicit questions (either in the.
Syntax Lecture 12: Adjectival Phrases. Introduction Adjectives, like any other word, must conform to X-bar principles We expect them – to be heads – to.
Week 14. Finishing up from last time and some commentary… CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
Lecture 6: Verbs with Clausal Arguments
Linguistic Theory Lecture 8 Meaning and Grammar. A brief history In classical and traditional grammar not much distinction was made between grammar and.
Week 9b. A-movement cont’d
Syntax Phrase and Clause in Present-Day English. The X’ phrase system Any X phrase in PDE consists of: – an optional specifier – X’ (X-bar) which is the.
Week 8. Midterm debrief CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Midterm results Mean: 88 Mean: 88 Median: 93 Median: 93 A A- B+ B B-
Week 13a. QR CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Quantifiers We interpret Bill saw everyone as We interpret Bill saw everyone as For every person x, Bill saw x. For.
1 CSC 594 Topics in AI – Applied Natural Language Processing Fall 2009/ Outline of English Syntax.
Syntax Lecture 3: The Subject. The Basic Structure of the Clause Recall that our theory of structure says that all structures follow this pattern: It.
CAS LX 522 Syntax I Week 9. Wh-movement.
CAS LX 522 Syntax I Week 11a. Wh-movement.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 3 Movement. A brief history of movement Movements as ‘special rules’ proposed to capture facts that phrase structure rules cannot.
X-Bar Syntax - an overview. Constituents again… Determine the constituent structure of the following two sentences The long hot summer which everyone.
Lecture 4: Double Objects and Datives.  Universal Theta role Assignment Hypothesis  Every argument bearing the same theta role is in the same structural.
Extending X-bar Theory DPs, TPs, and CPs. The Puzzle of Determiners  Specifier RuleXP  (YP) X’ – requires the specifier to be phrasal – *That the book.
Lecture Four Syntax.
Syntax Lecture 8: Verb Types 1. Introduction We have seen: – The subject starts off close to the verb, but moves to specifier of IP – The verb starts.
Lecture 9: The Gerund.  The English gerund is an intriguing structure which causes a particular problem for X-bar theory  [His constantly complaining.
IV. SYNTAX. 1.1 What is syntax? Syntax is the study of how sentences are structured, or in other words, it tries to state what words can be combined with.
Syntax Lecture 5: More On Wh-movement. Review Wh-movement: – Moves interrogative ‘wh’-phrase – from various positions inside the IP – to the specifier.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 10 Grammaticality. How do grammars determine what is grammatical? 1 st idea (traditional – 1970): 1 st idea (traditional – 1970):
October 15, 2007 Non-finite clauses and control : Grammars and Lexicons Lori Levin.
Lecture 7: Tense and Negation.  The clause is made up of distinct structural areas with different semantic purposes  The VP  One or more verbal head.
Lecture 10: Topic, Focus and Negative Fronting.  So far we have seen that the front of the clause is reserved for the part of sentence semantics that.
Revision.  Movements leave behind a phonologically null trace in all their extraction sites.
Rules, Movement, Ambiguity
Linguistic Theory Lecture 5 Filters. The Structure of the Grammar 1960s (Standard Theory) LexiconPhrase Structure Rules Deep Structure Transformations.
Ian Roberts  Generate well-formed structural descriptions  “create” trees/labelled bracketings  More (X’) or less (PS-rules) abstract.
 Chapter 8 (Part 2) Transformations Transformational Grammar Engl 424 Hayfa Alhomaid.
Syntax Lecture 6: Missing Subjects of Non-finite Clauses.
SYNTAX.
◦ Process of describing the structure of phrases and sentences Chapter 8 - Phrases and sentences: grammar1.
Lecture 1: Trace Theory.  We have seen that things move :  Arguments move out of the VP into subject position  Wh-phrases move out of IP into CP 
Principles and Parameters (II) Rajat Kumar Mohanty Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.
X-Bar Theory. The part of the grammar regulating the structure of phrases has come to be known as X'-theory (X’-bar theory'). X-bar theory brings out.
Week 10 X-bar syntax: More on Clauses English Syntax.
Chapter 4 Syntax a branch of linguistics that studies how words are combined to form sentences and the rules that govern the formation of sentences.
Lecture 6: More On Wh-movement
The structure of sentences
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation
Week 10 X-bar syntax: More on Clauses
Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
Lecture 3: Functional Phrases
Lecture 3 Krisztina Szécsényi
Syntax Lecture 9: Verb Types 1.
BBI 3212 ENGLISH SYNTAX AND MORPHOLOGY
Lecture 4b: Verb Processes
Lecture 7: Missing Subjects of Non-finite Clauses
Syntax Lecture 10: Verb Types 2.
Lecture 12: Summary and Exam
Lecture 8: Verb Positions
: 2018.
: 2018.
:.
Principles and Parameters (I)
Syntax Lecture 12: Extended VP.
Presentation transcript:

Syntax Lecture 13: Revision

Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X 1  X 0 Y 2 ) – Specifier (X 2  Y 2 X 1 ) – Adjunct (X n  X n, Y m ) if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise

Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X’  X YP) – Specifier (XP  YP X’) – Adjunct (X n  X n, Y m ) if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise

Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X’  X YP) – Specifier (XP  YP X’) – Adjunct (X n  X n, Y m ) if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise

Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X’  X YP) – Specifier (XP  YP X’) – Adjunct (X n  X n, Y m ) if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise Adjunction to XP: adjunct = YP (Y 2 )

Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X’  X YP) – Specifier (XP  YP X’) – Adjunct (X n  X n, Y m ) if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise Adjunction to X’: adjunct = YP

Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X’  X YP) – Specifier (XP  YP X’) – Adjunct (X n  X n, Y m ) if n = 0, m = 0; 2 otherwise Adjunction to X: adjunct = Y

Lecture 1: X-bar Theory DP analysis: an example – Determiner is the head of the nominal phrase – NP is complement – Possessor is specifier

Lecture 1: X-bar theory 1)A: the sister of the head is the specifier B: the mother of the head is X’ aA is true and B is false bA is false and B is true cA and B are false dA and B are true

Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation Binary features – [±F]functional vs. thematic – [±N]nounlike vs. not nounlike – [±V]verblike vs. not verblike

Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation [-F] categories – [+N, -V]nounN – [-N, +V]verbV – [+N, +V]adjective/adverbA – [-N, -V]prepositionP [+F] categories – [+N, -V]determinerD – [-N, +V]inflectionI – [+N, +V]degree adverbDeg – [-N, -V]complementiserC

Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation Subcategories of [-F] categories determine what arguments a head selects – DP, PP, CP, , etc. – E.g. write [ DP a letter] smile fact [ CP that the world is round] out [ PP from the cupboard] certain [ CP that I am right]

Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation All [+F] categories have only one type of complement: – D– NP – I– VP – C– IP – Deg– AP

Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation 2)Which categories are [+N, +V]? aNouns and adjectives/adverbs bNouns and determiners cAdjectives/adverbs and prepositions dAdjectives/adverbs and degree adverbs

Lecture 3: The Subject The subject is odd – It can be an argument of the verb But it isn’t in the VP – It can be meaningless – It can be underlyingly empty and moved into E.g. passive

Lecture 3: The Subject We also find VPs with subjects – He made [ VP the ice melt] So there are two subject positions – but only one subject

Lecture 3: The Subject Solution – Subject originates inside VP D-structure – Moves to specifier of IP S-structure

Lecture 3: The Subject 3)What is in the specifier of an active IP at S- structure aNothing bThe subject cThe object dThe VP

Lecture 4: The complementiser system The complementiser heads a CP – Different forces Declarative (that/for) Interrogative (if) The IP is its complement – Different complements Finite (that/if) Infinitive (for) Wh-phrases move to its specifier

Lecture 4: The complementiser system 4)What is the complementiser of the underlined CP in the following? I wonder [ CP whether he knows] aA phonologically empty complementiser bThere is no complementiser cWhether dIf

Lecture 5:Wh-movement Wh-phrases move for semantic reasons – A CP with a wh-phrase in spec is interrogative – A CP without a wh-phrase in spec (and no interrogative head) is declarative But not all wh-clauses are interrogative – Relative clauses involve wh-movement – The relative wh-phrase moves to enable to clause to be interpreted as a modifier – So, all wh-movement is semantically motivated

Lecture 5:Wh-movement Restrictive relative clauses – Wh-relative The man [ CP who you dislike] – that-relative The man [ CP that you dislike] – zero relative The man [ CP you dislike] – All involve wh-movement The wh-phrase is covert in that and zero relatives

Lecture 5:Wh-movement 5)What is in the specifier of CP of a restrictive relative clause which is introduced by an overt complementiser? aNothing bAn overt wh-phrase cA covert wh-phrase dthat

Lecture 6: non-finite clause subjects There are two types of infinitival clause which appear to lack a subject – John seems [ -- to be rich] – John wants [ -- to be rich] They look the same, but they are not.

Lecture 6: non-finite clause subjects Raising verbs – lack their own subjects – can take infinitival complements, – the subject moves to the subject of the raising verb

Lecture 6: non-finite clause subjects Control verbs – have their own subjects – can take infinitival complements, – the subject is a covert pronoun which refers to the subject of the control verb

Lecture 6: non-finite clause subjects 6)In the following structure, if V is a control verb, what will be in ‘—’ at S-structure? [ – may V [ John is rich]] aA meaningless element (it) bJohn cPRO dThe verb’s own subject argument

Lecture 7: Verb positions They are in V when – I is a free morpheme – I is a bound morpheme, but the verb cannot move In negative contexts In inversion contexts where the subject stays in spec IP They are in I when – I is a bound morpheme and the verb can move They are in C when – I is a bound morpheme – I to C movement (inversion) is necessary – The subject moves to spec CP

Lecture 7: Verb positions When a verb moves to support a bound morpheme, it adjoins to the morpheme

Lecture 7: Verb positions 7)In a main clause with the following D- structure, what will be in C at S-structure? [ CP - [ IP -- -ed [ VP John see who]]] adid bsaw cthat dwho

Lecture 8: Verb types 1 Causatives – They made the ice melt Overt free causative verb Lexical verb does not move – They melted the ice Covert bound causative verb lexical verb moves to support it

Lecture 8: Verb types 1 Transitives – John may throw Bill Theme is specifier of throw Agent is specifier of covert bound agentive verb (= do) Lexical verb moves to support agentive verb Agent moves to subject position Passives – Bill may be thrown Theme is specifier of throw Passive morpheme replaces agentive verb, so no agent Lexical verb moves to support passive morpheme Theme moves to subject position

Lecture 8: Verb types 1 8)In which of the following sentences is there a covert verb bound by the lexical verb? aHe was killed bThey made him walk cI saved him dThe ice melted

Lecture 9: verb types 2 Unergative verbs – Take cognate objects – Can’t appear in there and locative inversion constructions – Have an agent argument

Lecture 9: verb types 2 Unaccusative verbs – Can’t take a cognate object – Can appear in there and locative inversion structures – Have a theme argument

Lecture 9: verb types 2 9)If V is an unaccusative verb, which of the following sentences will be ungrammatical? aHe V-ed a cunning V bThere V-ed a letter cIn the post V-ed a letter dThe letter V-ed

Lecture 10: auxiliary verbs The aspectual morphemes (-ing, -en) are heads of VPs Main verbs can support only one overt bound morpheme All other morphemes have to be supported by a dummy auxiliary (do, have and be) – Do is used when the following verbal head is a thematic verb – Have is used when the following head is perfect (-en) – Be is used in all other cases

Lecture 10: auxiliary verbs 10)In a sentence containing the following sequence of bound morphemes, which one will be supported by be? tense – perfect - progressive aTense bPerfect cProgressive dNone of them

Lecture 11: the DP Empty determiners with proper nouns and bare plurals – [ DP  John], [ DP  men] Post determiners are APs in specifier of NP – [ DP the [ NP [ AP very few] complaints] Pre-determiners are determiners preceding an abstract ‘group noun’ for which of does not have to appear – [ DP all [ NP members of [ DP the committee]]] – [ DP all [ NP  (of) [ DP the crowd]]]

Lecture 11: the DP 11)Which of the following DPs does not involve an abstract group noun? aVery few of the men bBoth the men cAll men dSome of the men

Lecture 12: adjectival phrases Adjectival phrases are headed by a degree adverb (so they are DegPs) DegPs have measure phrases in their specifiers and APs in their complements – [ DegP [two sandwiches] [ Deg’ too [ AP short of a picnic]]] APs have extent phrases (very) in their specifiers and PPs, CPs or nothing in their complements – So [ AP very [ A’ small [ PP for a giant]]] Deg can be free (too, as, so, etc.) or bound (-er, - est) – In the latter case the adjective moves to bind the Deg

Lecture 12: adjectival phrases 12)In which of the following DegPs is the specifier of AP filled? areally very funny balmost too wide cso bright dbetter than the rest

Answers 1=b 2=d 3=b 4=a 5=c 6=d 7=a 8=c 9=a 10=b 11=c 12=a 0-6 = 1 7 =2 8=3 9-10= =5