Syllabus Review Task Force Central Texas College Instructional and Accreditation Support Services.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Culture of Collaboration Cultivating a Campus Environment for Assessment.

Advertisements

Example of Physical Change

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.

March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.

MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere Concordia University Presentation January 18, 2013 Jackson Community College.

Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Vocational Education Leadership Institute – March 2007 Program Development, Reduction, and Review: Faculty.

Sharing Wisdom: Effective Faculty Orientations Chief Academic Officers Annual Meeting July, 2014.

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY COLLEGE Education Council “Your voice on issues relevant to post- secondary education in the Pacific Northwest and the province”

Online Model Course Program Dr. Leslie Tirapelle Online Education 10/21/2013.

LMS RFP (LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM) The LMS Research Team Center for Instructional Technology December, 2011.

Lesson 12: What Happens When Substances are Mixed with Water?

Version 2 November Provost and VPAA G.E. Assessment Task Force Centers Program Assessment and Review Committee President Director of Institutional.

Strategic Planning Steering Committee Where Are We Now? UNO has been involved in strategic planning since its doors opened in Chancellor.

Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.

Copyright © 2003, Scott Higgins and Marianne Hollis Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for.

Building an Online MSW Program from the Ground Up Mary Ann Forgey Cathy Berkman.

Basic Research Administration Principles Presented by Ronald Kiguba Research Coordinator, Makerere Medical School.

Lynette Olson, Assessment & Effectiveness Director & Gary Langer, Associate Vice Chancellor, Office of the Chancellor, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.

Dr. Judy Ashcroft, Associate Vice President and Director Dr. Rob Bruce, Deputy Director Ms. Shan Evans, Associate Director Mr. Michael Sweet, Graduate.

Presented by: Insert Name Safety Management Consultant

Quality Matters and Online Courses in Sakai Brian Dashew, Instructional Designer, Marist College Dr. Reba-Anna Lee, Assistant Director for Academic Technology.

Student Services Program Review Plan. Overview Develop/Review Mission, Purpose, Vision and Values Create Strategic Academic Development Plan (5 year plan)

Who’s the Boss? Faculty Advisor or Principal Investigator Supervision versus Student Investigator or Study Coordinator Responsibilities Gwenn Snow, MS,

Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer

Why a Consortium?. For individual faculty members and colleges, the OER effort is isolated and the goal harder to attain.

Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.

Competency-based Instructional System Design: A Model for Program Assessment 3 rd Annual Texas A&M Assessment Conference Barbara Lyon, Ed.D., SPHR Tarleton.

Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.

“Tools of the Trade” Presented by Gina Bailey, Assistant Director, Contracts and Grants Accounting Rodney Greer, Director Office of Research & Innovation,

LeBaron Woodyard Dean, Academic Affairs October 30, 2013 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHIEF INSTRUCTIONAL OFFICERS FALL 2013 CONFERENCE.

MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere MACRAO Summer Summit 2012 June 21, 2012 Bay City, MI.

Team Building. Objective Explain What is a Team List the Differences between Group and Team Explain the Characteristics of a Team Explain What is Team.

1 Distance Learning Task Force Report and Recommendations President John Hitt Dr. John Opper Mr. Richard Stevens March 25, 2009.

AU Senate Chair’s Report Dr. Bill Sauser August 21, 2012.

Introduction of the Curriculum for Prospective NHTI Faculty NHTI Coordinating Committee Association of College & University Housing Officers – International.

Office of Faculty Affairs August 25, Office of Faculty Affairs August 25, 2015 Professional.

Key requirements Focused on student learning Inclusive Transformative Five year duration Strong assessment component.

CCLC Conference March 18, 2005 Pam Deegan, CIO President, Miramar Randy Lawson, CIO President Elect, Santa Monica.

Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.

4Faculty.org Online Professional Development Resources.

Agenda Introduction QUIZ Ancient History/Process Discussion items – Master syllabus – Class syllabus – Alternate Delivery syllabus Information Items.

Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.

Blue Sun University Due to rising concerns from faculty, senior administrators, and the occurrence at lawsuits regarding MOOCs at other similar institutions,

Pharmacy School Self Study Prof. Abdalla Elkhawad UMST.

Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.

U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.

Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Implementing the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act in the Federal Government.

ANDREW FURCO University of Minnesota October 2009.

Moving Successfully Toward SACS Reaffirmation: An Introductory Discussion Presenters Dr. Cathy Fleuriet Associate Vice President for Institutional Effectiveness.

MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere MIACADA 2009 Conference May 11, 2009 Lansing Community College.

Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.

Presentation to Adjunct Faculty (AF) Members By Academic Affairs August 16 th, 2012 Dr. Braha Dr. Kehe MEET AND CONFER POLICY MEETING 1.

Presented by the Outreach & Training Subcommittee of College Planning Council, as required by Section V.8 of the College Planning Council Handbook College.

Central Arizona College Fall 2010 Tutor Training TemFuller

Texas Process: UI Claimant Work Search

Functional Area Assessment

Implementing the Strong Workforce Program - Curriculum

Effective Practices for Creating Curriculum Handbooks

John Freitas, Los Angeles City College

Instructional Design Gibran Carter.

Curriculum and Accreditation

Changes in matter solutions.

Mohammad A. Rob Management Information Systems

Changes in matter Mixtures.

Roles and Responsibilities

Program Development, Reduction, and Review: Faculty Take the Lead

Local Response to the SSTF Recommendations and Implementation

SPR-B Research Coordination Webinar

Standard II Randy Beach, ASCCC South Representative Stephanie Droker, Vice-President, ACCJC Deborah Wulff, Vice-President of Academic Affairs, Cuesta College,

Quality Matters Overview

Presentation transcript:

Syllabus Review Task Force Central Texas College Instructional and Accreditation Support Services

Organization Chart Chancellor Deputy Chancellor/Dean Educational Program and Support Services Michelle Anderson (IM) Lesley McGough (Fac Qual) Stephanie Durham (Sec) Director DeanDirectorDean Distance Education and Education Technology Student Services Instructional Services Library Services Learning Outcomes Assessment Institutional Effectiveness

Informal structure Come and go Participation voluntary Rotate location Meeting no longer than minutes 12 to 18 months project length Syllabus Review Basics

Committee A body of persons delegated to consider, investigate, take action on, or report on some matter vs. Task Force A temporary grouping for the purpose of accomplishing a definite objective Chairman The presiding officer of a meeting, organization, committee, or event vs. Facilitator One that helps to bring about an outcome by providing indirect or unobtrusive assistance, guidance, or supervision

Solution an action or process of solving a problem an answer to a problem specifically: a set of values of the variables that satisfies an equation an act or the process by which a solid, liquid, or gaseous substance is homogeneously mixed with a liquid or sometimes a gas or solid a homogeneous mixture formed by this process; especially: a single- phase liquid system the condition of being dissolved a bringing or coming to an end or into a state of discontinuity

Trade-offs a balancing of factors all of which are not attainable at the same time a giving up of one thing in return for another

Task Force Charge 1. Define Master Syllabus 2. Define Class/Course Syllabus 3. Address possible revision a) What is needed? b) What is not needed? c) How can we improve? 4. Electronic capabilities 5. Learning outcomes

Resources Web PagesPhone Instructional Services: X Syllabus Review Task Force:

Stage One Define Master Syllabus

Master Syllabus What is it? Why is it? Who uses it? How is it different from a class syllabus?

Master Syllabus What is it?

Contract between faculty member and student Resource for newly hired adjunct faculty members Tool to disseminate administrative policies Marketing tool  provide preview of course content  highlight new course offerings

Master Syllabus What is it? Why is it?

Describes the course Defines the purpose/reason for the course Establishes the course within the broader program of study Communicates expectations Provides consistency

Master Syllabus What is it? Why is it? Who Uses it?

Syllabus Users Faculty/Adjunct Student Other institutions (transfer) Administration Regulatory Agencies  THECB/SACS  HB 2504

Master Syllabus What is it? Why is it? Who uses it? How is it different from a class syllabus?