 Assessment.  Objective: To gather a college-wide collection of student oral presentation data from all speech faculty to establish a rubric that can.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Learning Outcomes at Pensacola State College (GLOs)
Advertisements

Follow-Up Workshop on Institutional Evaluation Plans March-April, 2009.
Strategies to Measure Student Writing Skills in Your Disciplines Joan Hawthorne University of North Dakota.
Reinventing Program and Services Review at Chaffey College Marie Boyd Giovanni Sosa Tom Vitzelio.
Outcomes Assessment- Full Implementation Meeting Fall 2009.
SLO Course Assessment in 5 Easy Steps Vivian Mun, Ed.D.
Daniel Peck January 28, SLOs versus Course Objectives Student Learning Outcomes for the classroom describe the knowledge, skills, abilities.
The Academic Computing Assessment Data Repository: A New (Free) Tool for Program Assessment Heather Stewart, Director, Institute for Technology Development,
EXTENDED ESSAY, CONTINUED Assessment Criteria and Subject Areas.
Training Practitioner Adjuncts: A Model for Increasing Educator Effectiveness Paul C. Jackson DM, PE Peg Jackson, DPA, CPCU.
22 May Session Overview Purposes: Provide an overview of the assessment plan for Foundational Studies Discuss Phase I of the assessment plan – assessing.
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Course (Re)design and the Chico Rubric Andrea Saltzman Martin Jim Julius SDSU Course Design Institute May 27, 2009.
Developing Rubrics Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education 1.
Communicating Effectively in Interior Design SLO #3 Communicate Effectively Through the Clear and Accurate Use of Language Jan Cummings Bobanne Kalkofen.
Introduction to Rubrics. What is a rubric? Rubrics classify behaviors or abilities into categories that vary along a continuum, and they are tools that.
Analysis of Institutional Data of the Assessment of SLOs October 27, 2009.
The process of identifying consistent performance criteria – from the Technical Communication Program Communication within the TC program Communication.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Designing Ongoing Assessments. Practical Things to Think About When Designing Assessments Group or individual assessment? Is the UP introductory, guided.
ACADEMIC QUALITY & STANDARDS TEAM 2008 Institutional Audit Outcomes.
The Course Ajar: Principles and Practices for Multi-Section Program Design Ed Nagelhout Department of English UNLV Faculty Research Institute ● 5 March.
Outcomes-Based Accreditation: An Agent for Change and Quality Improvement in Higher Education Programs A. Erbil PAYZIN Founding Member and Past Chairman.
NSE Assessment (Session 1): The Academic Plan Assignment for MEP
Maps, Rubrics and Templates A Primer on Their Uses for Assessment in Student Affairs.
Goal Understand the impact on student achievement from effective use of formative assessment, and the role of principals, teachers, and students in that.
May 8 th Assessment Day 2015 Agenda Introductions Assessment Overview Review General Education Outcomes. Overview of past assessment work. What.
Unit 3 Effective Communication BMA-IBT-6 Use professional oral, written, and digital communication skills to create, express, and interpret information.
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.
Cohort 4 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring 2009.
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
Cohort 4 - Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring
. Reaffirmation 2014Off-site review is completedOn-site review is February 2014QEP is ready to be submitted in January 2014.
Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee.
Good student success efforts are like good fishing. 1.What do you want to catch? 2.When to fish 3.Find the fish 4.Chose a lure 5.Know the limits 6.Get.
Everything You Need to Know for Spring 2010 S. Kashima.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
NSE Assessment Overview: Your Role in Outcomes-Based Assessment What Will We Learn About Our Students?
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
English Department Glendale Community College English Assessment Program Documents are available online on the Assessment Program webAssessment Program.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Public Speaking COMMUNICATION Dr. Muslim Suardi, MSi., Apt. Faculty of Pharmacy University of Andalas.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
Assessing Information Literacy with SAILS Juliet Rumble Reference & Instruction Librarian Auburn University.
Assessment of Course-Level Learning Outcomes in Psychology.
EdTPA: Elementary Literacy
Language Arts Senate Report: Student Learning Outcomes SLO Process => Inquiry Inquiry => What We Do Well vs. What Needs to Improve Inquiry = Faculty Dialogue.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Expanding Role of Case Management at UWF Dr. Lusharon Wiley, Associate Dean of Students & Ombudsperson.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Telling Stories Relating Theory & Practice Oral Communication.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Dr. Christopher L. Markwood Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi January 23, 2014.
Credit for Prior Learning 8/17/2016 Faculty In-service.
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Institute for Educators In Nursing and Health Professions
Strategies to Improve Student Success in Oral Communication
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
الوحدة 20 مهارات التواصل مع الآخرين
New Student Experience
Christina Kasprzak, ECTA/ECO/DaSy September 16, 2013
Developing a Rubric for Assessment
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
Valencia College and UCF
SLO Assessment Cycle Instructional Breakout Session
Presentation transcript:

 Assessment

 Objective: To gather a college-wide collection of student oral presentation data from all speech faculty to establish a rubric that can be used for any oral communication discipline.

 Purpose of Data Collection: o Meet college-wide Institutional Assessment (Program Learning Outcomes Assessment) goals o Continue providing evidence of student learning

 Process for Gathering Data: o Across all 4 campuses o Across all class sections (in class/ online/ hybrid) o Used heaviest weighted speeches

 Criteria measured by rubric: o Organizational Pattern o Central Message o Supporting Materials o Language Choice o Delivery Techniques

 Levels of Accomplishment:

 Results Overview: o Approximately 2,500 Scantrons were returned o Approximately 60% faculty response rate

Organizational Pattern Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total % % No Response % % MINIMALLY292.2%403.3% PARTIALLY % % GENERALLY % 72.9% % 74.8% SIGNIFICANTLY % %

Central Message Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total % % No Response %887.2% NOT EXPLICITLY STATED 191.5%332.7% BASICALLY UNDERSTANDABLE % % CLEAR AND CONSISTENT % 74.20% % 72.80% COMPELLING % %

Supporting Materials Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total % % No Response %867.1% MINIMALLY685.3%1088.9% PARTIALLY % % GENERALLY % 60.5% % 66.9% SIGNIFICANTLY % %

Language Choices Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total % % No Response1279.8%756.2% MINIMALLY201.5%221.8% PARTIALLY % % GENERALLY % 74.4% % 74.5% SIGNIFICANTLY % %

Delivery Techniques Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total % % No Response1229.4%756.5% UNCOMFORTABLE 786.0%223.8% TENTATIVE % % COMFORTABLE % 63.6% % 68.1% POLISHED AND CONFIDENT % %

Summary (Level 3 or Higher) Organizational Pattern73.90% Central Message73.50% Supporting Materials63.70% Language Choices74.50% Delivery Techniques65.90%

 Outcomes: o Speech rubric established for cross- discipline use o Affirms speech faculty assessment leveling  Next Steps: o Create supporting materials intervention tool to improve student learning o Assess student use of supporting materials in heaviest weighted speech