MA 110: Finite Math Dr. Maria Byrne Instructional Laboratory 0345 Lecture 10/29/2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Which units are you most interested in covering? Unit A –Management Science Unit B – Growth Unit C – Shape and Form Unit D – Statistics.
Advertisements

Voting Methods Continued
Math 1010 ‘Mathematical Thought and Practice’ An active learning approach to a liberal arts mathematics course.
IMPOSSIBILITY AND MANIPULABILITY Section 9.3 and Chapter 10.
Chapter 1: Methods of Voting
The Mathematics of Elections
Mathematics The study of symbols, shapes, algorithms, sets, and patterns, using logical reasoning and quantitative calculation. Quantitative Reasoning:
VOTING SYSTEMS Section 2.5.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have studied the plurality and Condorcet methods so far  In this method, once again voters will be allowed to express.
MA 110: Finite Math Dr. Maria Byrne Instructional Laboratory 0345 Lecture 10/31/2008.
MAT 105 Fall  Harder than you might think  There are many examples in history where the results were disputed  We care about this because we.
Math for Liberal Studies.  In most US elections, voters can only cast a single ballot for the candidate he or she likes the best  However, most voters.
MAT 105 Spring  There are many more methods for determining the winner of an election with more than two candidates  We will only discuss a few.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
MAT 105 Spring  As we have discussed, when there are only two candidates in an election, deciding the winner is easy  May’s Theorem states that.
1.1, 1.2 Ballots and Plurality Method
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
Using a Modified Borda Count to Predict the Outcome of a Condorcet Tally on a Graphical Model 11/19/05 Galen Pickard, MIT Advisor: Dr. Whitman Richards,
Fair Elections Are they possible?. Acknowledgment Many of the examples are taken from Excursions in Modern Mathematics by Peter Tannenbaum and Robert.
Math for Liberal Studies.  There are many more methods for determining the winner of an election with more than two candidates  We will only discuss.
CRITERIA FOR A FAIR ELECTION
1 The Process of Computing Election Victories Computational Sociology: Social Choice and Voting Methods CS110: Introduction to Computer Science – Lab Module.
How is this math? Mathematics is essentially the application of deductive reasoning to the study relations among patterns, structures, shapes, forms and.
Social choice (voting) Vincent Conitzer > > > >
1.3 More Group Ranking and Paradoxes Ms. Magne Discrete Math.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting The Paradoxes of Democracy Vote! In.
CPS Voting and social choice Vincent Conitzer
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 2 - Slide Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
MAT 105 Spring  Harder than you might think  There are many examples in history where the results were disputed  We care about this because we.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Voting theory: application of methods that affect the outcome of an election. Sec 1: Preference Ballots and Schedules.
Chapter 15 Section 1 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have seen many methods, all of them flawed in some way  Which method should we use?  Maybe we shouldn’t use any of them,
Let’s take a class vote. How many of you are registered to vote?
How are Presidents Elected? Unit 10 Part 2. Electoral College – Today – New Way The electoral college elects the president – NOT THE DIRECT or “POPULAR”
Voting Tie Breakers. With each method described – plurality method, Borda count method, plurality with elimination method, and pairwise comparison method.
How Should Presidents Be Elected? E. Maskin Institute for Advanced Study.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Preference Ballot A Ballot in which the voters are asked to rank the candidates in order of preference. 1. Brownies.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.2 Flaws of Voting.
14.2 Homework Solutions Plurality: Musical play Borda count: Classical play Plurality-with-elimination: Classical play Pairwise Comparison: Classical play.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan Voting and Social Choice Majority Rule and Condorcet’s Method Other Voting Systems for Three.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 1.Conclusion - 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting CONCLUSION Elections, Fairness,
Voting System Review Borda – Sequential Run-Off – Run-Off –
My guy lost? What’s up with that….  In the 1950’s, Kenneth Arrow, a mathematical economist, proved that a method for determining election results that.
 Harder than you might think  There are many examples in history where the results were disputed.
1.
1 The Process of Computing Election Victories Computational Sociology: Social Choice and Voting Methods CS110: Introduction to Computer Science – Lab Module.
Voting: Does the Majority Always Rule?
1 The Mathematics of Voting
Impossibility and Other Alternative Voting Methods
1.
Plurality with elimination, Runoff method, Condorcet criterion
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
8.2 Voting Possibilities and Fairness Criteria
Impossibility and Other Alternative Voting Methods
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
1.3 The Borda Count Method.
Alex Tabarrok Arrow’s Theorem.
Warm Up – 5/27 - Monday How many people voted in the election?
Warm Up – 1/23 - Thursday How many people voted in the election?
Classwork: p.33 (27abc run off, 29ab run off, 31, 33ab run off)
Section 15.2 Flaws of Voting
5-2 Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
Voting systems Chi-Kwong Li.
MAT 105 Fall 2008 More Voting Methods.
Voting Pairwise Comparison.
Quiz – 1/24 - Friday How many people voted in the election?
Flaws of the Voting Methods
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
Presentation transcript:

MA 110: Finite Math Dr. Maria Byrne Instructional Laboratory 0345 Lecture 10/29/2008

"Democracy is the worst form of government” “Except for all those others that have been tried.“ ~ Winston Churchill

Democracy “Of the people, by the people, and for the people.” – Abraham Lincoln Democracy is a form of government in which the supreme power is held completely by the people under a free electoral system. Voting is the cornerstone of any electoral system.

“Why are we learning about democracy in math class?” (or) “What’s mathematically the problem with democracy?”

Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem It is mathematically impossible to create any system of voting involving 3 or more candidates that is “fair” in all possible scenarios.

“Fair” means: If one candidate receives more than half the votes, that candidate should win. Majority Win Rule If a candidate would beat another candidate in a head-to-head match, it should not be possible for the first candidate to lose to the second candidate. Head-to-head Winning Rule If a candidate will win in one scenario with a certain distribution of votes, they should win in any other scenario in which they have the same votes and more. Keep Winning Rule If a losing candidate drops out of the race, it should not affect who the winner is. Irrelevant Loser Rule

Majority verses Plurality We need to make a distinction between “majority” and “plurality”. Majority: A subset that has more than half of a group. (>50%) To avoid confusion, also known as an absolute majority. Plurality: A subset that has more than any other subset in a group. To create confusion, also known as a majority.

100 Doughnuts: 40 doughnuts are glazed. 30 doughnuts have sprinkles. 30 doughnuts are old-fashioned. There is no majority. Glazed doughnuts represent the plurality.

100 Cats: 58 cats are Siamese. 12 cats are Persian. 30 cats are Calico cats. Siamese cats are the plurality and the majority.

A Typical Voting Scenario Where to go for dinner? McDonalds, Mellow Mushroom or The Pillars?

A Typical Voting Scenario Where to go for dinner? McDonalds, Mellow Mushroom or The Pillars? McDonaldsMellow MushroomThe Pillars PeterX ClaireX HiroX SureshX SilarX NikiX JessicaX

A Typical Voting Scenario Where to go for dinner? McDonalds or Mellow Mushroom? McDonaldsMellow Mushroom PeterX ClaireX HiroX SureshX SilarX By majority rule, they should go to Mellow Mushroom.

Another Voting Scenario Where to go for dinner? McDonalds, Mellow Mushroom or The Pillars? McDonaldsMellow MushroomThe Pillars PeterX ClaireX HiroX SureshX SilarX NikiX JessicaX

Another Voting Scenario Where to go for dinner? McDonalds, Mellow Mushroom or The Pillars? McDonaldsMellow MushroomThe Pillars PeterX ClaireX HiroX SureshX SilarX NikiX JessicaX The Pillars may win. However, less than half want to go there.

Same Voting Scenario… More Info Where to go for dinner? McDonalds, MM or The Pillars? McDonaldsMMThe PillarsComments PeterXI can’t afford Pillars! I would rather go to McDonalds! ClaireXI can’t afford Pillars! I would rather go to McDonalds! HiroX SureshX SilarX NikiXI have lots of $$ today! JessicaXI have lots of $$ today!

Same Voting Scenario… More Info Where to go for dinner? McDonalds, MM or The Pillars? McDonaldsMMThe PillarsComments PeterXI can’t afford Pillars! I would rather go to McDonalds! ClaireXI can’t afford Pillars! I would rather go to McDonalds! HiroX SureshX SilarX NikiXI have lots of $$ today! JessicaXI have lots of $$ today! Peter and Claire would like a head-to-head match between McDonalds and the Pillars.

(out of many) 1. Plurality Method 2. Pairwise Comparison Method We’ll Study: Two Voting Systems

Plurality and Pairwise Comparison Methods Both satisfy the majority wins rule. Both fail the irrelevant loser rule. Only pairwise comparison satisfies the head- to-head winning rule.

Plurality Method Only considers voter’s top choice. The candidate with the most votes wins. A tie can be handled in any way the voting system agrees upon. If there is an absolute majority vote for one candidate, that candidate wins.

Plurality Method Only considers voter’s top choice. The candidate with the most votes wins. A tie can be handled in any way the voting system agrees upon. If there is an absolute majority vote for one candidate, that candidate wins. Simple and easy voting method.

Countries using Plurality Voting United States! Canada India United Kingdom

Pairwise Comparison Method Also known as condorcet methods. Considers all ranked choices of each voter. If one candidate beats every other candidate in a head-to-head natch, that candidate is the winner. If one candidate beats one candidate but is beaten by another candidate, a point-system is used to find the winner that will satisfy people the most.

Comparing Plurality and Pairwise Comparison Fairness RulesPluralityPairwise Comparison Majority Wins RuleXX Head-to-head Winning RuleX Keep Winning RuleXX Irrelevant Loser Rule

Comparing Plurality and Pairwise Comparison Fairness RulesPluralityPairwise Comparison Majority Wins RuleXX Head-to-head Winning RuleX Keep Winning RuleXX Irrelevant Loser Rule

Condorcet methods are not currently in use in government elections anywhere in the world.

Why not?

Examples