HANFORD: WORKPLACE BERYLLIUM EXPOSURE RISK ASSESSMENT Wint Su Wai and Thanh-Hien Ngo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FHM TRAINING TOOLS This training presentation is part of FHMs commitment to creating and keeping safe workplaces. Be sure to check out all the training.
Advertisements

EH Terminology Presented by QBE Loss Control Services.
Eduardo J Salazar-Vega, MPH CPH Jan Koehn, MS CIH.
Exposure Assessment: A Statistical Validation of Mercury Exposures in the Workplace An Analysis of Potential Workplace Exposure to Mercury from Broken.
Silica Larry Joswiak, MPH March 31, 2010.
Risk Assessment.
BERYLLIUM-ASSOCIATED WORKER PROGRAM. Objectives  How did I get here?  What is beryllium?  Health effects of beryllium exposure  OSHA, DOE and Fermilab.
Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene 6th Edition
Annual Formaldehyde Awareness Training
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
Gerald Whitney Operating Experience Program Coordinator Presented May 5, 2010 DOE OEC Workshop - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory "Lessons from the.
Occupational Health & Safety
Unit 3: Potential Chemical Exposure During Two-Component
Risk Assessment in the Environment. What is the difference between hazard and risk? Risk: probability that an event or effect will occur and  Combination.
Ship By: Alain Flores & Matt Wilson Breakin g …in Bangladesh.
Environmental Hazards, Risk, & Human Health. Leading Causes of Mortality.
Safety 5120Industrial Hygiene Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) TLV ® Definition concentrations … which it is airborne concentrations … which it is believed.
WORKER SAFETY Radionuclides Web Cast August 4, 2004 Loren W. Setlow Office of Radiation and Indoor Air
Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene 6th Edition
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
Community Health Risk Assessment An Assessment of Risk Related to the Oil and Gas Industry in Garfield County Teresa A. Coons, PhD Senior Scientist Saccomanno.
A growing number of diseases in children from rural and urban areas are linked to unsafe, degraded environments. However, many health care providers are.
Hazard Communication.  Introduction Hazard Communication (HazCom) Training  Required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)  All.
Introduction to INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
Arsenic in Livestock Well Water on the Diné Reservation Clarita Lefthand, Ph.D. Student University of Washington Some Data presented here was obtained.
Occupational Health (North America) 18 th International Lead Conference June 2013 Robert Steinwurtzel and Thomas Hogan
Introduction to Workplace Safety
HANFORD: WORKPLACE BERYLLIUM EXPOSURE RISK ASSESSMENT Wint Su Wai and Thanh-Hien Ngo.
Health Hazards Instructional Goal
Beryllium Workers Surveillance Program - Update W. G. Tankersley, D. Cragle, S. Wells Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee Presented.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Tier 1 Environmental Performance Tools Economic Criteria.
Containing Toxicity with Policy Natural Disaster.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Acceptable Exposure Limits …extrapolation of toxicological data to recommendations for limits for occupational exposures.
1 Setting Action Levels and Controlling exposure with Air Monitoring A review...
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
TOXICOLOGY OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS CHEMICAL PHYSICAL ERGONOMIC PSYCHOLOGIC BIOLOGIC.
Health Hazards!!! Introduction:
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
Environmental Public Health Indicators: The CDC Approach Michael A. McGeehin, Ph.D., M.S.P.H. Director Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects.
EHS 507 Setting the PEL  Old PEL  Sig Risk*  New PEL  L.F. Risk*  Data Arsenic  500  g/m 3   10  g/ m 3   Epidemiology Ethylene.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
TOXICOLOGY The study of chemical or physical agents and their interaction with biologic systems to produce a response in a organism. The dose makes the.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
Determinant of health, pollution and regulations ( 管理 ) on health William W. Au, Ph.D.
CDR Tarah S. Somers Commander US PHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry May 2016 Environmental Health Nurse Agency for Toxic Substances and.
HAZWOPER stands for Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response. It’s a set of standards developed by OSHA that provides guidelines to protect workers.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Industrial Hygiene. Learning Objectives Briefly explain the relevance and importance of the practice of industrial hygiene in.
CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.
Recap Day 1: Key Concepts
DoD Relative Risk and Indian Lands
Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene 6th Edition
Benzene.
Silica.
Lead.
Final Rule to Protect Workers from Beryllium Exposure
Exposure Assessment: A Statistical Validation of Mercury Exposures in the Workplace An Analysis of Potential Workplace Exposure to Mercury from Broken.
Objective – Be Safe in the Lab
From Lab to Label: Innovations That Feed The World
Bart Ostro, Chief Air Pollution Epidemiology Unit
Acrylonitrile.
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
Apes Ch 11 Risk, Toxicology, and Human Healthy
TOXICOLOGY.
Introduction to Risk Assessment
Presentation transcript:

HANFORD: WORKPLACE BERYLLIUM EXPOSURE RISK ASSESSMENT Wint Su Wai and Thanh-Hien Ngo

HANFORD

History  Hanford is the most contaminated nuclear site in the western hemisphere  Established in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project to develop nuclear weapons for WWII  Home to the B reactor, the first full-scale plutonium production reactor in the world  Focus of the nation's largest environmental cleanup

Stakeholders  Hanford Tri-Party Agreement - USDOE, USEPA, ECY-WA  Hanford Advisory Board  Indian Nations Program  Hanford Natural Resource Trustee Council  Local Advocacy Groups -Columbia Riverkeeper, Heart of America Northwest, Hanford Watch, Hanford Challenge, Physicians for Social Responsibility  Nuclear Safety Division of the Oregon Office of Energy  Washington State Department of Health

Present Threats  Water Contamination 450 billion gallons of contaminated waste have been dumped into unlined soil trenches 53 million gallons of waste in 177 underground storage tanks, 60 have leaked; contamination of groundwater near Columbia River  Atmospheric Contamination

Who is at risk?  Workers  1 million people living in the 42 cities or towns located below Hanford on the Columbia Draw water from Columbia for municipal, commercial & industrial uses.  Tribal members (Yakima, Utmilla, Nez Perce) hunting, fishing, social gathering

Radioactive and Chemical Contamination

Hazard Identification

Beryllium  Grayish, lightweight but strong alkaline earth metal  Mining, refining, and in the manufacture of ceramics, electronic, and aerospace equipment.  Used at Hanford from 1960 until 1986 in the production of nuclear fuel rods

“When certain sensitive individuals are exposed to even minute amounts of inhaled beryllium, they are at considerable risk of becoming beryllium sensitized and contracting a potentially fatal granulomatous lung disease called chronic beryllium disease (CBD) and an increased risk of lung cancer......from a worker health and safety perspective based on the number of affected workers, beryllium currently rates as a greater hazard than radiation.” - The Hanford Advisory Board

Routes of Exposure  Inhalation (Direct) airborne particles of beryllium metal, alloys, oxides, and ceramics  Ingestion (Indirect) Hand-to-mouth  Dermal (Indirect) ultrafine particles

Adverse Health Affects  Beryllium Sensitization (BeS) to clinically apparent pulmonary disease  Acute disease: inflammation of lungs and acute pneumonitis  Chronic beryllium disease (CBD) or berylliosis  Dermal and carcinogenic effects Group B1: probable human carcinogen (EPA) Group 1: human carcinogen (IARC)

Takaro et al. study: Screening for Beryllium Sensitization among Former Hanford Workers Beryllium workers respondent to date, May 1998:  AGE: years old  Average: 62 years old  SEX:  108 males (87.1%)  16 females (12.9%)

Precautionary Assessment ParameterScore Community/Social Issues Goal3 Need3 Future Generations2 Democratic community based process2 Alternatives3 Total13/15 Unsupportive of health and community

Exposure Issues Exposure2 Multiple Exposures3 Children Exposed0 Consumer Products0 Occupational Exposure3 Food Exposure0 Total8/20 Relatively medium risk of exposure

Hazard/Toxicity Hazard10 Individual Sensitivity2 Ecological hazard2 Volume5 Persistent3 Bioaccumulate3 Uncertainty2 Total27/30 Extremely hazardous

Standards and Regulations AgencyFocusLevelComments American Conference of Government al Industrial Hygienists ACGIH Air: workplace 2 ug/m ug/m ug/m 3 Advisory: TLV-TWA Notice of intended change, 2007; TLV-TWA Notice of Intended Change, 2007; STEL National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Air: workplace0.5 ug/m 3 Advisory, 10-hour TWA, REL Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Air: workplace2 ug/m 3 5 ug/m 3 25 ug/m 3 Regulation, PEL as TWA Regulation, Ceiling Regulation, STEL, 30 minute maximum peak Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air emissions to atmosphere (Clean Air Act) 10 g/24 hours Regulation

Uncertainty Factors ChildrenN/A Subchronic to chronic extrapolation 8 Human Variability10 Database uncertainty10 Uncertainty Factor: 8 x 10 x 10 = 800

RfC (Reference Concentration) (ug/m 3 ) = NOAEL (ug/m 3 ) / Uncertainty Factors RfC for EPA : 0.02 µ g/m 3 NOAEL from Eisenbud et al : u g/m 3 NOAEL from EPA: 0.1 ug/m 3 RfC for Eisenbud: ug/m 3 /800 = ug/m 3 RfC for EPA: 0.1 ug/m 3 / 800 = ug/m 3

Conclusions  The maximum concentration of beryllium via inhalation should be ug/m 3 to prevent adverse health affects from workplace exposure. (EPA=0.02 ug/m 3 )  The OSHA occupational exposure limit for 8-hr workshift 2 ug/m 3 is not protective. Should use ACGIH: 0.5 ug/m 3  More stringent regulations and guidelines at state, national, and international level.

Risk Management  More studies for workplace inhalation exposure data for possible chemical transformation of Beryllium and its half-life in air limited information on reproductive or developmental effects  More adequate exposure monitoring

Dose Exposure concentration, duration, frequency Occupational health standard, PPE, Engineering and Administration control Adverse Health Risk: CBD, Lung Cancer Genetic Susceptibility Age, gender, nutrition, behavior Screening Wellness Program Surveillance Hazard Healthy Worker Subclinical Disease (BeS) Repair Progression Pathways from exposure to disease showing modifying factors and opportunities for interventions.

Risk Communication  Monitoring ambient concentrations  Promote awareness towards Beryllium exposure  Preventive Focused Education for workers : safety, PPE, changing clothes  AdvanceMed Hanford’s Beryllium Monitoring Program BeLPT (Beryllium Lymphocyte proliferation test) Chest radiographs Pulmonary Function Tests Carbon monoxide diffusion Regular follow-up visits

Media Coverage  Do not always get it right  Loss of interest  Disaster or loss of funding  newsworthy

Questions?