New Awardees Session Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Conference May 29-31, 2013 Washington, DC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

AmeriCorps Education Award Program Student Orientation.
2014 Proposal Writing Workshop January 9, 2014 Co-sponsored by the: National Science Foundation & American Association for the Advancement of Science.
National Science Foundation Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
New Awardees Session Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Conference May 23-25, 2012 Washington, DC.
“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.
Cost Sharing Update Facilities, Equipment & Other Resources – New format will assist proposers in complying with NSF cost sharing policy and is a required.
…Promoting a collaborative partnership among families, schools and communities to create positive educational outcomes for Virginia’s school children.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Alliance Meeting May 18, 2006 National Science Foundation Division of Grants and Agreements Al Wilson, Grants Management Specialist (703)
Quality Improvement Capacity for Impact Project (QICIP) Pre-Review Conference Call Competitive Funding Opportunity Announcement: HRSA March 25,
Noyce Program Evaluation Group Our evaluation project has four major components: –Preparation of an extensive literature review pertaining to recruitment.
1 Exploring NSF Funding Opportunities in DUE Tim Fossum Division of Undergraduate Education Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day May 6, 2008.
Funding Opportunities NSF Division of Undergraduate Education North Dakota State University June 6, 2005.
Selected Results from the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Evaluation Frances Lawrenz Christina Madsen University of Minnesota.
CAREER Proposal Budgeting Workshop Sponsored Programs Office May 17, 2011.
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
2011 Proposal Writing Workshop Part II: Features of Effective Proposals.
Preliminary Highlights from the Noyce National Program Evaluation May 30, 2013 Ellen Bobronnikov Cris Price.
Proposal Writing Webinar February, Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Initiated by Act of Congress in 2002 Reauthorized in 2007 (America COMPETES.
The Programme is funded by Erasmus+ under
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
NSF Proposal Writing Guidelines Overview Components Other Important Factors Tips for Success
2012 Proposal Writing Workshop Co-sponsored by the: National Science Foundation & American Association for the Advancement of Science.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
SELLING TEACHING AS A GREAT PROFESSION Preaching to the Choir.
Proposal Writing Workshop Part II: Features of Effective Proposals.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
AmeriCorps Education Award Program Campus Partner Orientation Presented by: Brittany Campese NYCC Program Coordinator.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 Overview of Federal Regulations for Federal Grants.
Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum September 5, 2002.
Pathway to Success December 16, 2013 MSP Annual Conference Division of Grants and Agreements.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Frances Lawrenz and The Noyce evaluation team University of Minnesota 1 Acknowledgement: This project was funded by National Science Foundation (Grant#REC )
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Jeanne R. Small Oklahoma City, Oklahoma March 2, 2006 Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) National Science Foundation.
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
School Leadership Program Pre Application Meeting February 19, 2010 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: An Introduction for New State Coordinators February /2013.
ESEA APPLICATION TRAINING 2013 Equitable Participation Rules for Title I Private School Students Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 1.
NSF Implementation of the Research Performance Progress Report March
AmeriCorps Education Award Program Student Orientation.
IES Statistical and Research Methodology in Education Grant Program (84.305D) 2010 Program Meeting.
1 QEM/BIO Workshop October 21, 2005 Award Administration.
No Child Left Behind Math and Science Partnerships Title II Part B.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships program U.S. Department of Education Regional Conferences February - March, 2006.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
FINANCIAL AID Ms.Escoto. ancial_aid_in_the_bag.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Nuts and Bolts Session David Campbell Program Director Division of Research on Learning Discovery Research K-12 Principal Investigators.
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
Philadelphia Regional Noyce Partnership Doing Together What We Can’t Do Alone Eighth Annual NSF Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Conference Washington,
New Awardees Session Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Conference July 7-9, 2010 Washington, DC.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Reporter’s Notebook Guidelines on how to fill up the annual report form.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
 The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) requires equitable services to be provided to private schools.  Why? Federal programs are supported.
For EFRI PIs to complete Active awardees Post-award For EFRI officers to complete EFRI Reporting Systems Active awardees Post-award Reference Indicators.
AISL PI Conference February 29, 2016 Division of Grants and Agreements.
Phase II Financial Review Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Administering Your Proposal
Session Three – Post Award Management May 25, 2018
2018 Proposal Writing Webinar
NSF Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program, Program Lead
Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program, NSF
Presentation transcript:

New Awardees Session Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Conference May 29-31, 2013 Washington, DC

Noyce Portfolio CategoryFY 2012Total (all years) Phase I Phase II 735 TF114 MTF318 TF/MTF 011 Planning n.a.23 Capacity Building 1424 Total 53403

Reporting Annual Report submitted to Research.gov  due 90 days before anniversary date  Activities and Findings (what was accomplished, what was learned, what was modified, evaluation results as available) For TF/MTF only: Annual cost sharing report Annual Data Collection for Noyce Monitoring Highlights Dissemination Final report due 90 days after expiration date  Project outcomes report to Research.gov

Project Reports in Research.gov Accomplishments: What was done? What was learned?  Major goals  What was accomplished under these goals? Major Activities Specific Objectives Significant results Key Outcomes or Other achievements  Training and Professional Development  Dissemination of results  Plans for next reporting period May upload files (e.g. evaluation report)

Project Reports in Research.gov Products: What has the project produced? Publications, conference presentations, website, brochures Participants & Other Collaborating Organizations: Who has been involved? (other IHEs, non-profits, school districts) Impact: What is the impact of the project? How has it contributed? Changes/Problems

Notifications and Requests Use FastLane to request:  Change in PI/Co-PI (withdraw, add, change level of effort)  Change PI information  Change in Participant Costs  Add a subaward  No-cost extension First time: Notification of Grantee-Approved No Cost Extension Second or more: Request for NSF-Approved No-Cost Extension

Good Advice Know who your program officer is Contact your program officer as questions arise and before submitting a request to FastLane Learn from other Noyce projects Connect to Noyce projects in your area

Frequently Asked Questions Is there a list of high need districts or schools? What does “high” mean in the definition of high need local educational agency used in the Noyce solicitation? The term "high need local educational agency" means a local educational agency that serves an elementary or secondary school located in an area in which there is: a high percentage of individuals from families with incomes below the poverty line; a high percentage of secondary school teachers not teaching in the content area in which the teachers were trained to teach; or a high teacher turnover rate. Consider “high” relative to state or national averages

Frequently Asked Questions Some resources for identifying high need districts/schools:  State Education websites  US Census website:  Teacher Cancellation Low Income Directory PubSchoolSearch.jsp

Frequently Asked Questions Does NSF have a standard form for student agreements? Follow guidelines in solicitation associated with your award (NSF ): The institution is responsible for collecting the repayment amounts, including interest, in accordance with P.L , SEC. 7030, which specifies that the repayment of scholarships or stipends as loans by individuals who withdraw from the program or fail to complete the service requirement shall be payable to the Federal Government, consistent with the provisions of part B or D of title IV of the Higher Education Act of  All forfeited stipend funds, less grantee administrative costs associated with collection of the repayment not to exceed 5% of the forfeited amount, will be returned to the United States Treasury.  Funds collected as repayments may not be used by the awardee. Resources: Financial Aid Office; other Noyce Projects

Frequently Asked Questions Does the Noyce Scholar or Fellow need to teach in a high need school or can they teach in any school in a high need district? Do Noyce Scholars have to teach in the partner districts? Does an Economics major qualify as a STEM major?

Frequently Asked Questions Our proposal indicated how many undergraduates and how many career changers we would recruit each year. Can we change the proportion based on the candidate pool? What if we don’t recruit the number we stated in the proposal? Do the funds carry over?

Frequently Asked Questions Can we reallocate funds into different categories? The tuition has increased since we began the project. Can we increase the scholarship amount?

Frequently Asked Questions What if a Noyce Scholar can’t find a job? How do the scholars repay the scholarship? One of our scholars has disappeared. What happens if we can’t find a Noyce Scholar who needs to repay the scholarship?

Resources Regional Conferences: Southeast, Northeast, Midwest, West Noyce National Conference Other Noyce projects Your NSF Program Officer

Project Locator Scholar Profile Conference Information Events News Resources Recruiting Materials Evaluation nsfnoyce.org

 Video scenarios (select Noyce) Your NSF Program Officer Resources for Noyce

Other Questions?