325 MHz RF Cave and SC Spoke Cavity Tests Robyn Madrak – Accelerator Physics Center (APC) for the HINS/Project X Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

of LFD Compensation Study S1 Global Cryomodule
Overview of SMTF RF Systems Brian Chase. Overview Scope of RF Systems RF & LLRF Collaboration LLRF Specifications for SMTF Progress So Far Status of progress.
Juliette PLOUIN – CEA/SaclayCARE’08, 3 December /21 Superconducting Cavity activities within HIPPI CARE ‘08 CERN, 2-5 December 2008 Juliette PLOUIN.
 Outline: ◦ 325 MHz Superconducting Spoke Resonators in the Project X Linac (HINS front end). ◦ SSR1 Single Spoke Resonator with β g =.21: Fabrication.
Superconducting Spoke Resonator Cavities and Cryomodules
FNAL Superconducting RF Program Sergei Nagaitsev.
Tuning system requirements
ANL HWR Cryomodule Status Update 27 January 2015 Zachary Conway On behalf of the ANL Linac Development Group Argonne National Laboratory Physics Division.
SLHC-PP – WP7 Critical Components for Injector Upgrade Plasma Generator – CERN, DESY, STFC-RAL Linac4 2MHz RF source Thermal Modeling Gas Measurement and.
MEBT & RT CH Section Thomas Page Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee May 10 th – 12 th, 2006.
SPX - Cavity WBS U , U , U Genfa Wu SRF Scientist Accelerator Systems Division/RF Group DOE Lehman CD-2 Review of APS-Upgrade.
Superconducting Accelerating Cryo-Module Tests at DESY International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 (ECFA-CLIC-ILC Joint Meeting) Denis Kostin, MHF-SL,
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
TDR Part 2: 3.3 Cavity Integration (10 pages) H. Hayano Baseline Design based on the meeting discussion.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2010' Sept. 10 KEK Global Design Effort 1 Lorentz Force Detuning Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
Test infrastructure and test programs at KEK-STF Kirk 2013/3/26TTC meeting
Page 1 Jean Delayen HyeKyoung Park Center for Accelerator Science Department of Physics, Old Dominion University and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator.
XFEL SRF Accelerating Module Prototypes Tests at DESY Fermilab Seminar, July 21st Denis Kostin, MHF-SL, DESY.
SRF Plans at ANL & FNAL Bob Kephart ILC Program Director, Fermilab ANL-FNAL-U of C Collaboration Meeting Oct 12, 2009.
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
1 Simulation for power overhead and cavity field estimation Shin Michizono (KEK) Performance (rf power and max. cavity MV/m 24 cav. operation.
2.1 GHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL June 15, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  June 15, 2015.
Test plan for SPL short cryomodule O. Brunner, W. Weingarten WW 1SPL cryo-module meeting 19 October 2010.
Group 6 / A RF Test and Properties of a Superconducting Cavity Mattia Checchin, Fabien Eozénou, Teresa Martinez de Alvaro, Szabina Mikulás, Jens Steckert.
Overview and Status of the Fermilab High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D Program Giorgio Apollinari for Bob Webber.
HINS R&D Giorgio Apollinari Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee May 6-8 th, 2008.
Preliminary Results from First Blade Tuner Tests in HTS Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Serena Barbannoti Matteo Scorrano.
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
F DOE Annual Program Review High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D in the Meson Detector Building Bob Webber & Giorgio Apollinari September 26, 2007.
Status of Project X Design plans, cavity and cryomodule development Vyacheslav Yakovlev, Camille Ginsburg (FNAL) TESLA Technology Collaboration (TTC) Meeting.
SSR1 Summary Harry Carter & Tom Peterson 19 November 2010.
Warren Schappert Yuriy Pischalnikov FNAL SRF2011, Chicago.
Superconducting RF: Resonance Control Warren Schappert PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 10 March 2015.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
A Proposal for FJPPL (TYL) Development of Frequency Tuners Optimization and Cryomodule Integration for 1.3 GHz SRF Cavities G. Devanz, F. Nunio, O. Napoly.
Project X High Power 325 MHz RF Distribution and Control Alfred Moretti, Nov 12, 2007 Project X Workshop.
LFD and Microphonics Suppression for PIP-II Warren Schappert April 15, 2014.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control FNAL experience Presented by Yuriy Pischalnikov for Resonance Control Group Fermilab- Los Alamos MaRIE Project Meeting March.
11/12/2013P. Bosland - AD-retreat - Lund Designs of the Spoke and Elliptical Cavity Cryomodules P. Bosland CEA/Saclay IRFU On behalf of the cryomodule.
Superconducting RF: Resonance Control Presented by Yuriy Pischalnikov for W. Schappert, Y.Pischalnikov, J.Holzbauer PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 15.
H-ECCTD KICK-OFF DESCRIPTION AND CHALLENGES 16/03/2016 F. PEAUGER.
Microphonics Suppression in SRF cavities for Project X Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Project X Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, April 11, 2012.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
Shuichi NoguchiTTC Meeting at Milano, Injector Cryomodule for cERL at KEK Cavity 2 Prototypes were tested. Input Coupler 2 Couplers were tested.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control. CW mode of operation (FNAL’s experience). Yu. Pischalnikov W. Schappert FNAL TTC CW SRF Meeting, Cornell University, 12June,
ESS SC cavities development G. Devanz TTC meeting, march 1st 2011, Milano.
Cavities, Cryomodules, and Cryogenics Working Group 2 Summary Report Mark Champion, Sang-ho Kim Project X Collaboration Meeting April 12-14, 2011.
325 MHz Superconducting Spoke Cavity Coupler status. T. Khabiboulline Power Coupler design for Superconducting Spoke cavities. Originally.
INTRODUCTION The Fermilab High Intensity Neutrino Source (HINS) program has been developing 325 MHz superconducting spoke resonator accelerating cavities.
Spoke Resonators at Fermilab
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
WP5 Elliptical cavities
Cavity Test Results for PIP-II
New Cavity Techniques and Future Prospects
Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert (FNAL)
LINAC AG • IAP • Goethe Universität Frankfurt
Tuner system Zhenghui MI 2017/01/17
VERTICAL TEST RESULTS OF SPOKE RESONATOR AT IPNO
Cavity resonance control
Experience with High Loaded Q cavity Operation at JLAB
Tuner system for CEPC MI Zhenghui 2016/09/14
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
High gradients in TESLA nine-cell cavities
Resonance Control for Narrow-Bandwidth, SRF Applications
First High Power Test of the ESS Double Spoke Cavity package
Challenges, Progress and Plans of SRF CH-Structures
FLUX TRAPPING STUDIES ON LOW BETA CAVITIES
Presentation transcript:

325 MHz RF Cave and SC Spoke Cavity Tests Robyn Madrak – Accelerator Physics Center (APC) for the HINS/Project X Group

Single Spoke Resonator (SSR) Cavities SSR1: 325 MHz,  = 0.22 superconducting cavities Init design for the proton driver/HINS pulsed linac (3ms, 1% DF), 4K Now being incorporated into design for the Project X CW linac, 2K Two SSR1 cavities have been fully fabricated (1 – Zanon, 2 – Roark) HINS design gradient 10 MV/m Bpeak/Eacc3.87mT/(MV/m) Q 0 at design gradient 0.5 x 10 9 R/Q 242  Effective L0.136 m 2/28/20112Robyn Madrak - APC

Dressed SSR1 Cutaway of cavity, He vessel 2/28/20113Robyn Madrak - APC

Cryostat in SCTF Test Cave 80 K shield He line Coils for B field test vacuum line Nitrogen line 2/28/20114Robyn Madrak - APC Cryostat has B field shield X-ray detectors  Diodes inside of cryostat  FOXES and Chipmunks outside 1.44 m OD Coupler port

SSR1-01 Test History Tested first in VTS at 4K and 2K, bare, CW. Tested CW at SCTF, dressed (these results) – Measured cavity Q 0 vs. E, max E acc, Xray activity vs E – Q disease test (dependence of Q on cooldown time) – Cavity df/dP (frequency sensitivity to pressure fluctuations) – Lorentz Force detuning coefficient – Sensitivity to external magnetic fields (Q degradation) – Fast Tuner tests (microphonics compensation, etc.) Tested Pulsed – Test of cavity along with design coupler – Max E acc – Tuner compensation for LFD during pulse Future upgrade planned: 2K operation 2/28/20115Robyn Madrak - APC

SCTF, Q 0 vs E, CW tests, high Q ext 2/28/20116Robyn Madrak - APC Quench limited, ~ 27 MV/m T = 4.7 K Measured by chipmunks, outside of cryostat, ~1m from cavity Design: Q 0 at 10 MV/m = 5e8

Tuner Tests/Pressure Sensitivity Measured df/dP = -145 ± 15 Hz/torr (sim predicted 210 Hz/torr) Lorentz force detuning coefficient : 1.5 ± 0.5 Hz/(MV/m) 2 (sim predicted 3.8 Hz/(MV/m) 2 ) ProjX Cavity BW Hz ; HINS initially ~400 Hz; here ~2Hz 7 Fast Tuner Pressure Compensation ~ 300 Hz variation w/o lock Yuriy Pischalnikov, Warren Schappert Good results with fast tuners for pressure fluct. compensation: 8 Hz variation w/lock compared to 300 Hz w/o lock ~ 8 Hz variation w/ lock 2/28/2011

Q Disease Is a drop in Q due to the formation of hydrides during cooldown Effects can be minimized by a fast cooldown ‘Sensitive’ temperature region is 150 – 70 K Typically does not appear during the ‘first’ cooldown after chemical processing Can possibly be ‘cured’ (or minimized) by hydrogen degassing (baking at 600C) followed by flash BCP Was observed on SSR1-01 in the VTS: saw x 8 drop in Q at 4.4 K with 7 hour hold at 100 K 2/28/20118Robyn Madrak - APC

Q Disease in the VTS VTS ~ factor of 8 drop in Q after 7 hour K From Ristori et. al, ‘Development of 325 MHz Single Spoke Resonators for HINS at Fermilab: Recent Results PAC ‘09 2/28/20119

Q Disease at SCTF After VTS, SSR1-01 Hydrogen degassed (600 C bake) at Jlab Q drops but drop is small (~20% drop)  minimal Q disease; baking was a success Will be more sensitive at 2K – awaiting upgrade to test this 2/28/201110Robyn Madrak - APC 3 hours in sensitive region 11 hours in sensitive region Note: Q in second cooldown same as in 1 st cooldown

Magnetic Field Sensitivity Tests Project X – will likely have solenoids for beam focusing near the cavities  test sensitivity of cavities to B field (look for Q drop) Installed two coils on each end of the cavity Quench cavity 5000X in 8-10 G Bfield Measured Q at high and low field – no degradation 11 I I

High Power Pulsed Tests w/Design Coupler 2/28/ st pulsed test, 1 st test with power coupler: Q L ~1e6 – Reached 36.5 MV/m with ~2ms flattop – ~40 MV/m quench limit for short pulse Fast tuner tests - piezos: (Pischalnikov, Schappert) – Lorentz Force detuning ~3kHz peak to peak w/no compensation – Piezo compensation reduces f drift to ~50 Hz during pulse f drift during pulse f (Hz)

Summary 1 st CW – dressed tests were a success for the facility and for SSR1 Cavity Q vs E and max E acc exceed design requirements 600 deg C bake (thanks to Jlab) good results at 4K, need studies at 2K Fast tuners compensate well for microphonics, LFD Magnetic field sensitivity results are encouraging. No effect due to quenching with field >50X expected fringe field Pulsed tests of coupler/cavity satisfactory, high max E acc during pulsed testing 2 K tests in the not-so-distant future 2/28/201113Robyn Madrak - APC