SACOSAN IV Colombo, 4 – 7 April 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community-Based Research Workshop Series CBR 206 Writing Effective Letters of Intent.
Advertisements

Process and mechanics of HFA progress monitoring and Review Sujit Mohanty, UNISDR The Hyogo Framework for Action Progress Review and Reporting.
Scaling-up the UNDP-UNEP Poverty and Environment Initiative January 2007 environment for the MDGs.
Mutual accountability and aid transparency Mutual accountability and aid transparency Republic of Moldova 1IATI meeting, OECD Conference center.
UN-Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water 1 |1 | International Aid Transparency Initiative 8 February 2011 Paris, France.
1 Outcome of Mutual Accountability & Aid Transparency Survey: Bangladesh Monowar Ahmed Joint Secretary Aid Effectiveness Unit, ERD.
MDG based national development strategies and plans in Africa: the role of the Integrated Package of Services Presentation by BDP/BRSP at RBA Workshop.
1 ESA/STAT/AC.219/8 Region-wide Programme to Improve Vital Statistics and Civil Registration Systems prepared by: Margarita F Guerrero, Ph D Regional Adviser.
Presented at the ECOSOC 2012 Development Cooperation Forum 1 st High-level Symposium Bamako, Mali 5-6 May 2011 by Timothy Lubanga, Assistant Commissioner.
UNITED NATIONS’ RESPONSE TO THE
Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.
1 International Workshop Beijing, 8-10 June 2009 From Data to Accounts Session VI: General Discussion Moderator : Frederick W H HO.
1 Agenda item 4: Work modalities of the revised ISDR system to support the implementation of Hyogo Framework- Elements to be reviewed in groups- & prepare.
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
Dr. Stuart Kean Co-Chair UK OVC Working Group Moving Upstream with Children HIV and AIDS Integrating CABA into national development instruments Inter-Agency.
GENDER EQUALITY MARKER: ORIENTATION
ACHIEVING THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS IN KENYA
UNCT Planning Process in post crisis context DOCO training November 2008.
One UN Results Reporting Prototype Consultation Workshop UN DOCO New York, NY – September 2009.
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
Poverty Reduction Strategies: A tool for implementing the BPOA Linda Van Gelder The World Bank.
The Africa Action Plan An IEG Evaluation CSO Forum April 15, 2011.
11 Scaling Up World Bank Group Engagement with Civil Society: A Strategic Priorities Paper Civil Society Team EXTIA.
PRESENTATION AT THE WORKSHOP ON LDC PRIORITY NEEDS FOR TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL COOPERATION 29 OCTOBER 2009 GENEVA Sari Laaksonen Coordinator, Integrated.
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
GLAAS and SWA at the EC/EIB Brussels Seminar 6 July |1 | GLAAS & SWA The evidence and the action 6 July 2010 Peregrine Swann Senior Adviser
Recommendations on Maximizing the Positive Synergies from the interactions between Health Systems Strengthening and disease specific Global Health Initiatives.
1 Presentation to the Overseas Development Institute Friday, 30 January 2004 London Development Cooperation Report 2003 Presentation by Richard Manning,
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
THE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CLUSTER 12 TH RCM MEETING NOVEMBER 2011 UNECA- ADDIS ABABA.
South East Europe Investment Committee Work Programme and Communication Plan for th Meeting of the South East European Investment Committee Sarajevo,
Company Name PRESENTATION NAME Compilation and Dissemination of Energy Statistics International Workshop on Energy Statistics, Beijing, Sep 2012 International.
1 World Bank Support TFSCB STATCAP Monitoring systems / Core Welfare Indicators Questionnaire (CWIQ) Readiness Assessment.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
M&E Capacity Development in the AfCoP-MfDR and the Case in Ethiopia Tamirat Yacob AfCoP M&E CMT and Ministry of.
1 INAC First Nation Education Policy Framework Regional Dialogues Coordinated by AFN and INAC Education Policy Framework - Joint Steering Committee (EPF-JSC)
VOORBLAD.
Developing and Implementing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
1 Independent Evaluation in IFC Presentation to Staff of Islamic Development Bank May 3, 2009 Marvin Taylor-Dormond.
Thematic evaluation on the contribution of UN Women to increasing women’s leadership and participation in Peace and Security and in Humanitarian Response.
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
Objectives, Program, Processes, Products Durban 18-20, February Piers Cross Conference Director.
M&E in the GEF Aaron Zazueta GEF Evaluation Office Expanded Constituency Workshop Dalat, Vietnam - April 2011.
Overview of the Global Fund: Guiding Principles Grant Cycle / Processes & Role of Public Private Partnerships Johannesburg, South Africa Tatjana Peterson,
1 Jonathan Brown UNGASS HLM, New York, June 2008 Progress & Lessons Learned.
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water 1 | Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water GLAAS Presented by Rolf.
Multilateral Mechanisms for Managing International Development Assistance. The Challenge of Effectiveness and Reform Yuriy Zaytsev National Research University.
UN-Water Water Country Briefs Introduction & Background Frederik Pischke Interagency Water Advisory UN-Water Frederik Pischke Interagency Water Advisory.
Presentation on Managing for Development Results in Zambia By A. Musunga Director M&E MOFNP - Zambia.
National Malaria Program Scale-up for Advocacy Based on Impact 23 January 2006.
Report of the Special Committee on the Logical Framework, Governance and Funding Shaida Badiee, Development Data Group, World Bank Paris, June 2, 2010.
Global Assessment and Analysis of Sanitation and Drinking Water ( GLASS) Ghana Process Briefing and Launch 12 th Sept, 2013 Coconut Grove Hotel Accra 1.
Objectives and Strategies of RRSF The RRSF has been prepared with an overall objective and four specific objectives to overcome the identified problems.
WHO/OMS Improving and increasing investments in the health outcomes of the poor Macroeconomics and Health in context Dr. Sergio Spinaci, WHO Senegal, February.
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water 1 |1 | Water Country Briefs diagnostic workshop 9-10 December 2010 Geneva UN-Water GLAAS.
Aid Transparency: Better Data, Better Aid Simon Parrish, Development Initiatives & IATI Yerevan, 4 October 2009.
RESULT-BASED M&E FRAMEWORK FOR THE VIETNAM SEDP rd Round Table – Management for Development Results Hanoi 7 February 2007 Department of National.
OVERVIEW OF MACROECONOMIC & HEALTH KEY POINTS FROM THE OCTOBER 2003 GLOBAL CONSULTATION Briefing for Permanent Mission Representatives.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
Water Country Briefs Diagnostic Workshop Didier Allély Abdou Savadogo World Health Organization Geneva, 8-9 December 2010.
Strengthening Monitoring and Accountability Chair: Dr Raja Aurangzeb Khan Convenor: WaterAid and UNICEF.
Public health and environment 1 |1 | Including Health into Rio + 20 debates and decisions _____ Dr Carlos Dora Interventions for Health Environments Department.
"Learning and achievements of SWA Global platform and its relevance to achieving Hygiene and Sanitation Development in India" India WASH Summit 17 th February.
SWA’s Role in Improving Aid Effectiveness in the WASH sector SWA Country Processes Task Team Geneva, November 2013.
Overview of Bank Water Sector Activities
Cycle of Political Dialogue – Meetings in 2016
Presentation transcript:

SACOSAN IV Colombo, 4 – 7 April 2011 Meet the GLAAS Peregrine Swann Senior Adviser (WHO) swannp@who.int

Purpose of UN-Water GLAAS GLAAS analyses of the evidence to inform decision-makers in sanitation and drinking-water Tries to respond to the questions 'what works?' 'what has to happen to accelerate and sustain progress?' 'how can successful initiatives be scaled up?' The "table" where the different pieces of evidence come together (hence the puzzle)

This presentation will answer the following questions: Origins of GLAAS and how it fits within the global monitoring framework? What are the GLAAS products and what is their impact? How did GLAAS achieve this? What are the next steps?

1. Brief history of GLAAS Milestones: Nov. 2006: UNDP Human Development Report: Power, poverty and the global water crisis importance of political process and power relationships in water international system not working for water (unlike health and education)

Brief history of GLAAS Donor response at WB Spring Meeting April 2006 Feb. 2007: UN-Water gives mandate to WHO Aug. 2007: idea launched at Stockholm WWW Sep. 2008: pilot report – demonstrated the concept was feasible Apr. 2010: 1st report – feeds into first HLM

Example Input: Sector processes: Sector outputs: Development outcomes: Funds Sector processes: Strategies, consulting, implement the plan and monitor Sector outputs: Facilities and promotion Development outcomes: Greater use of safe drinking-water and sanitation facilities Improved health

Three levels of monitoring Inputs, Processes, Outputs Outcomes Global Regional National

The global monitoring framework Inputs, Processes, Outputs Sector Outcomes Development Outcomes improved health better education reduced poverty greater equity more dignity WHO/UNICEF JMP Global UN-Water GLAAS UNDP HDR Regional Regional assessments (e.g. CSOs) Regional National Sector Info & Monitoring Agencies for water, sanitation, health Joint Sector Reviews Agencies + budget/finance HH surveys Census Statistics Office National

3. The GLAAS products The 2010 report Report launched on 21 April 2010 Data from 27 donors and 42 developing countries

3. The GLAAS products 2010 report recommendations Four recommendations: R1: Demonstrate greater political commitment R2: Target resources better R3: Strengthen national and sub-national systems to plan, implement and monitor R4: Work in partnership

3. The GLAAS products 2010 report recommendations

GLAAS Highlights - Africa and Asia

GLAAS Asia Highlights

GLAAS Asia Highlights

GLAAS Asia Highlights

GLAAS Asia Highlights

GLAAS Asia Highlights

4. The impact of GLAAS Sanitation and Water for All - High Level Meeting SWA is a partnership to achieve universal and sustainable sanitation and drinking-water for everyone SWA approaches include: High Level Meetings Improving mutual accountability Evidence-based decision-making (e.g. GLAAS) Catalytic support for national plans

First High Level Meeting of Sanitation and Water for All 23 April 2010, Washington DC Sanitation and Water for All just held the first Annual High Level Meeting. The first annual High Level Meeting had three main objectives: Mobilise political support Monitor progress against global targets and commitments, decide how to address challenges and strengthen mutual accountability Improve sector financing & aid-effectiveness. Source: UNICEF World Bank Vice-President Katherine Sierra (right) welcomes the participants of the landmark High Level Meeting of Sanitation and Water for All to the World Bank, following opening remarks by the Chairs HRH Prince Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands of UNSGAB (middle) and Deputy Executive Director Saad Houry of UNICEF (left). 19

Bangladesh Minister of Finance at the High Level Meeting Source: UNICEF Mr.Abul Maal Abdul Muhith, Bangladesh’s Minister of Finance, Discussed the importance of prioritizing investments for sanitation and water and the importance of community participation.

High Level Meeting commitments a clear reflection of GLAAS recommendations Call for better donor targeting Six countries to increase domestic sector spending Seven countries to improve coordination between WASH and other sectors Ten countries to use data on coverage to target resources to the un-served Seven countries to improve national monitoring Four countries to address their HR gaps

5. How did GLAAS achieve this Partners UN-Water GLAAS is possible only through the active contribution of many partners: National counterparts!!!!!!!!!! UN-Water UNESCAP, UNDP Donors (e.g. DFID) WB WSP and AMCOW!!! IRC UNICEF, WaterAid, WSSCC and all the other SWA partners

5. How did GLAAS achieve this The process Indicators, data needs and sources The GLAAS survey Data presentation

Main categories of indicators Health impacts, economic benefits, and sector prioritization Coverage/service levels Policy and institutions Human resources Financing, planning and resources

Data sources Health data National sector reviews and regional assessments WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme OECD Creditor Reporting System WHO burden of disease data Global cost estimates (various sources) WSP Economics of Sanitation Initiative World Bank country economic and poverty data The GLAAS survey Specific GLAAS studies (e.g. in-country financial flows) Data sources Health data Levels of service for sanitation and drinking- water (e.g. access/use of) Policies and institutional framework (from national to global) Human resource capacity Financial resource capacity (domestic and foreign)

The GLAAS survey Aid recipient countries Survey implemented through the WHO Regional and Country Representatives 4 sections: sanitation, drinking-water, hygiene, financing Survey includes questions on: Current national targets for access Policy and institutions (including right to sanitation and water) Planning, monitoring and evaluation Budgeting and expenditure Participation and equity Outputs Sustainability Human resources

The GLAAS survey External support agencies Two main cases: Agencies reporting to OECD CRS (e.g. traditional bilateral and multilateral donors) Agencies not reporting to OECD CRS (e.g. Gates Foundation, Saudi Arabia, India, China)

GLAAS next steps Next steps to 2012 GLAAS report survey forms finalized by end of May WHO disseminates forms to country government officials early June countries complete forms June-September report drafted September - November report peer reviewed December/January report launched April 2012 key messages prepared for April HLM looking to get 80 countries if possible Partners' role critical to facilitate responses !

Concepts behind GLAAS data presentation The puzzle linking the pieces to the whole GLAAS tells a story of: How inputs get turned into WASH sector outcomes Highlighting the building blocks to progress GLAAS also sets WASH in the overall development context, by: Linking WASH outcomes to health and to economic growth Learning lessons from the education sector All of this to be a tool for decision makers

The way that data are presented Data presentation aims: To be clear and readable To present a balanced approach – providing data from donors and developing countries To identify individual donors and developing countries To highlight trends

UN-Water GLAAS Timeline 2011-2012 Scoping study Survey forms GLAAS Global Team Meeting SACOSAN Colombo GLAAS 2011 survey & Theme Development EMRO workshop Data analysis & report writing AfricaSan Kigali Peer review HLM 2012 GLAAS 2012 report published

THANK YOU www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/glaas glaas@who.int Peregrine Swann Senior Adviser, WHO swannp@who.int www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/glaas glaas@who.int