Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Torts.
Advertisements

DutyCausation DamagesBreach of Duty Elements of Negligence.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 2,
Confusion & Damage. Confusion & Damages Confusion as an element Confusion as an element Assessing confusion Assessing confusion Damage as an element Damage.
Tort Law: Negligence Civil Law Mr. DeZilva. Negligence The most common unintentional tort is negligence The most common unintentional tort is negligence.
What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Torts True or False Torts Defined Torts Completion.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Negligence and Strict Liability Litigation and Procedure Negligence.
March 18, 2015 Law of Tort. Tort = a civil wrong A harmful action or inaction that causes harm or damage to another person DUTY OF CARE BREACH TORT.
Consumer Issues Chapter 28.
Tort Law Part 2 Negligence and Liability. Negligence Most common tort Accidental or Unintentional Tort Failure to show a degree of care that a “reasonable”
Chapter 16 Lesson 1 Civil and Criminal Law.
Chapter 3 Tort Law.
NEGLIGENCE Law 12 – MUNDY Negligence  Tort law is based on mostly case precedents and certain provincial and federal legislation;  Hence, our.
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
CHAPTER 4 AUDITOR’S LEGAL LIABILITY Fall 2007 u Types of CPA Liability u Liability Under Common vs. Statutory Law u Defenses u Liability under SEC Acts.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar Steve Baron Bradley IM 350 Fall 2010.
SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Fraud and Misrepresentation Section 6.1.
By : Lillie Gray 1 st period Business Law Exam.  Crime- an offense against the public at large, which is therefore punishable by the government.  Tort-
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
CIVIL LAW 3.2 TYPES OF TORTS. Types of Torts  There are three categories of torts:  Intentional Wrong  Negligence  Strict Liability.
10-1 Chapter 10— Torts in the Business Environment REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by.
Forms of promotion (wk 3) Product promotion involves the passing of information to public about the features of a product and persuading them to buy. Below.
The Case Against Cybersquatting A Discussion of Domain Name Trademark Protection By Matt Poole.
Genuine Agreement If the offeror makes a valid offer, and the offeree has made a valid acceptance, then a genuine agreement has been reached. The courts.
Civil Law Security Services. Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission.
Business Law I Negligence and Strict Liability.
The Law Of Torts Chapter #4.
Chapter 04 Legal Liability of CPAs McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Tort Law Summary. Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law It is a “wrong” which.
7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 61 Personal Injury Laws Offenses Against Individuals Intentional Torts, Negligence, and Strict Liability Civil Procedure CHAPTER.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases. Types of Civil Lawsuits In civil cases the plaintiff – the party bringing the lawsuit – claims to have suffered a loss and usually.
Negligence. Homework 20.1 and 20.2 – read Chapter and 20.2 – read Chapter 20.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
Invasion of Privacy in Digital Media Basic Concepts.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada4-1 Chapter 4: Intentional Torts.
Chapter 17 Torts: A Civil Wrong
Chapter 5 Negligence and Intentional Torts
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Lookalikes: Can Telling the Truth be Unfair? Anna Carboni, Powell Gilbert LLP Fordham IP Law Institute 19 th Annual Conference: IP Law & Policy.
Tort Law Summary. Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law It is a “wrong” which.
1 Trademark Infringement and Dilution Steve Baron March 6, 2003.
CIVIL LAW 3.4 NEGLIGENCE. Elements of Negligence  Duty: a legal obligation  Breach of Duty: violation of a duty, either by engaging in an action or.
Marketing communication and unfair competition Iveta Chadimová Ph.D. student Metropolitan University Prague.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
Corporate and Business Law (ENG). 2 Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section B: The Law of Obligations B1. Formation of contract B2.
Personal Injury Laws Objective: Define negligence and strict liability Bellwork: What was conversion? How do you think the name came about?
INTRODUCTION TO LAW OF TORTS. WHAT IS TORT? TORT IS A FRENCH WORD WHICH IS DERIVED FROM THE LATIN WORD “TORTUS” WHICH MEANS TO TWIST AND IMPLIES CONDUCT.
OBJECTIVES To describe the main aims of criminal law To describe the main aims of civil law To identify and discuss the main differences between the two.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2 The Law of Torts A person can commit an unintentional tort, when he.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Negligence SLO: I can understand the three types of torts, including negligence, intentional torts, and strict liability. I can identify relevant facts.
Section 4.2.
The Law of Torts I’m going to sue you!.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION Why does conflict develop?
Negligence.
Intentional Interference with the Person
2.03 Civil Law.
Negligence Torts Chapter 14 Pg 415.
Passing Off. Passing Off Contents Summary Key points Passing Off compared with Trade Mark infringement Approach to Passing Off in Courts esp IPEC.
Section 6.1.
Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
Legal Terms fraud (p. 128) rescind (p. 128) material fact (p. 129)
Registered trademarks & tort law (passing off)
Negligence and Other Torts
Lesson 6-1 Civil Law (Tort Law).
Civil Law 3.4 negligence.
Differences and similarities
Presentation transcript:

Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy Peter Charleton & Sinéad Reilly Source of Image: National Archives

Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy How is it different to trade mark protection? What are its elements? How is such an account to be approached? Questions to consider Does it require proof of deception? Why can a winning plaintiff choose an account of profits over damages? How far can it be pushed? Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)

Passing Off: Elements of the Tort Goodwill Misrepresentation Damage Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)

Passing Off: Elements of the Tort McCambridge Ltd v Joseph Brennan Bakeries (Irish High Court) “it would take more care and attention than… it is reasonable to attribute to the average shopper for him or her not to avoid confusion between the two packages when observed on the shelf, especially when these are placed adjacently or even proximately so.” (Peart J) Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)

Passing Off: Elements of the Tort Moroccanoil Oil Israel Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd (UK High Court) Aldi “living dangerously” with “cheeky packaging” Bringing the requirement of deceit in through the back door? Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)

Unimagined Worlds Right of publicity How far does this go? Catchphrase, impersonator, lookalike, sound-alike, voice Evocation of celebrity’s identity? Vanna White: a step too far? Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)

Unimagined Worlds Robyn Rihanna Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) (UK High Court) “the sale of this image of this person on this garment by this shop in these circumstances” (Birss J) Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)

Unimagined Worlds “if [the requirement for a false endorsement] is applied in a vague way to mean a false implication that there is “some association” or financial link between the celebrity and the advertised product or service or indeed if the requirement for a misrepresentation is dropped in favour of protecting against unpaid use of the celebrity for attention-grabbing then true passing off is not involved.” (Hazel Carty) Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)

Instruments of Deception British Telecommunications v One In A Million (UK Court of Appeal) “… If it be the intention of the defendant to appropriate the goodwill of another or enable others to do so, I can see no reason why the court should not infer that it will happen, even if there is a possibility that such an appropriation would not take place.” (Aldous LJ) Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)

Account of Profits Anomaly UK Approach Irish Approach Woolley & Timesource Ltd v UP Global Sourcing UK Ltd & The Lacmanda Group Limited Impractical to carry out an analysis as to how much profit was made through the attribution of the brand and how much of that profit would probably have been made anyway. McCambridge Ltd v Joseph Brennan Bakeries Conducting such an assessment avoids unjust enrichment & a penal approach Set out series of propositions for future cases Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)

To sum up… The tort is all about what is fair: you build up goodwill, someone else makes their product look like yours; they steal, let’s be nice, it might be an accident, the plaintiff’s attributes; there is confusion, at least; the packages are produced to the judge and it is her or his educated response to facts that drives the definition of the remedy: perhaps more so than the law. Passing Off: An Uncertain Remedy (Fordham Annual Conference, April 2015)