Capture, focusing and energy selection of laser driven ion beams using conventional beam elements Morteza Aslaninejad Imperial College 13 December 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
Advertisements

Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a a UCLA/Particle.
Plasma wakefields in the quasi- nonlinear regime J.B. Rosenzweig a, G. Andonian a, S. Barber a, M. Ferrario b, P. Muggli c, B. O’Shea a, Y. Sakai a, A.
Bunch shape monitor for Linac-4 A.V.Feschenko Institute For Nuclear Research (INR), Moscow , Russia.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
SCT-2012, Novosibirsk, June 8, 2012 SHOCK WAVE PARTICLE ACCELERATION in LASER- PLASMA INTERACTION G.I.Dudnikova, T.V.Leseykina ICT SBRAS.
Forschungszentrum Dresden Rossendorf Trevor Burris, Ph.D. Candidate Beam Transport for Laser Accelerators - A Brief Overview of Work at FZD 17 August 2009,
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Comparison of final focus magnetic systems for the Assisted Pinched Transport and the RPD-2002 J. Barnard,
Lecture 3: Laser Wake Field Acceleration (LWFA)
Before aperture After aperture Faraday Cup Trigger Photodiode Laser Energy Meter Phosphor Screen Solenoids Successful Initial X-Band Photoinjector Electron.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Simulation studies of the e-beams for Renkai Li and Juhao Wu 5/20/2014 ALD Review.
Laser accelerated ions and their potential for therapy accelerators I. Hofmann, GSI Accelerator Department HIAT09, Venezia, June 8-12, Introduction.
EuroNNAc Workshop, CERN, May 2011 External Injection at INFN-LNF ( integrating RF photo-injectors with LWFA ) Luca Serafini - INFN/Milano High Brightness.
ENHANCED LASER-DRIVEN PROTON ACCELERATION IN MASS-LIMITED TARGETS
Carbon Injector for FFAG
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
Particle acceleration by circularly polarized lasers W-M Wang 1,2, Z-M Sheng 1,3, S Kawata 2, Y-T Li 1, L-M Chen 1, J Zhang 1,3 1 Institute of Physics,
1 Sensitivity of coupled laser- accelerated ion beams into conventional structures P. Antici, M. Migliorati, A. Mostacci, L. Picardi, L.Palumbo, C. Ronsivalle.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology Toward a World-Leading University Y.K KIM.
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan National Taiwan University, Taiwan National Central University, Taiwan National Chung.
1 Generation of laser-driven secondary sources and applications Patrizio Antici Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Università di Roma “Sapienza”
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
X-RAY LIGHT SOURCE BY INVERSE COMPTON SCATTERING OF CSR FLS Mar. 6 Miho Shimada High Energy Research Accelerator Organization, KEK.
UCLA Positron Production Experiments at SABER Presented by Devon Johnson 3/15/06.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
Non Double-Layer Regime: a new laser driven ion acceleration mechanism toward TeV 1.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Munib Amin Institute for Laser and Plasma Physics Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Laser ion acceleration and applications A bouquet of flowers.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Particle Physics Group Meeting January 4 th – 5 th 2010 Commissioning EMMA, the Worlds First Non Scaling Fixed Field – Alternating Gradient Accelerator.
Gabor lenses for capture and energy selection of laser driven ion beams in cancer treatment. J. Pozimski PASI meeting RAL 5 th April 2013 Imperial College.
23. September 2016 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Weiland | 1 Laser acceleration.
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
SPARCLAB: PW-class Ti:Sa laser+SPARC
Emittance measurements for LI2FE electron beams
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
New concept of light ion acceleration from low-density target
UNILAC requirements for BIOPHYSICS research
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
V. Bagnoud PHELIX, Plasma Physics department GSI Darmstadt
The LIGHT project Status of the LIGHT experiments HICforFAIR PhysicsDay: Accelerator July 5th 2012 GSI Helmholtzcenter for Heavy Ion Research Abel Blazevic.
8-10 June Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris, France
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
Large Booster and Collider Ring
EuPRAXIA working package report
Wakefield Accelerator
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Using a Bessel Light Beam as an Ultra-short Period Helical Undulator
Peking University: Jinqing Yu, Ronghao Hu, Haiyang Lu & Xueqing Yan
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Start to end design of a dedicated laser driven proton hybrid beamline for Cultural heritage applications Antonia Morabito 15 October 2018.
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Capture, focusing and energy selection of laser driven ion beams using conventional beam elements Morteza Aslaninejad Imperial College 13 December 2012

TNSA (Target Normal Sheath Acceleration) For relatively thick targets (μm thick AL foils) Acceleration of surface ions(60 MeV protons). For TNSA scaling considerations predict that laser intensities of a few W/cm 2 are required to reach the 200 MeV proton energies of interest for ion therapy. RPA (Radiation Pressure Acceleration ) Radiation Pressure Regime proposed by Esirkepov et al., 2004 Laser acts like a piston that accelerates foil as a whole. Promises several hundred MeV protons (or carbon) “mono-energetic”. Major challenges are to fabricate the required ultrathin target foils that have a typical thickness in the order of 10 nm only. Laser acceleration:  Beyond W/cm 2, laser pulses can produce particle beams.  There are different regimes of ion acceleration depending on target thickness and laser parameters:

Laser ion acceleration potential candidate for therapy applications :  available energies are getting interesting (65 MeV p)  high "quality" of beams at origin (small 6D phase space)  abundance of protons per shot (total ~ …10 13 )  high rep rate lasers emerging (10 Hz)  laser accelerator "compact" (acceleration length < 1mm) Focusing and the transport of laser driven protons a challenging problem.  Large energy spread  Large angular divergence,  Beam handling: though the emittance of particles bunches produced by laser acceleration are very favourable, the hardware necessary to match these beams to a therapy scanning system is unwieldy, expensive and impractical. BUT

Aperture collimation (no focusing) Development of a Laser –Driven Proton Accelerator for Cancer Therapy C.M. Ma et al., Laser Physics, 2006, Vol. 16, No. 4,pp Energy selection (bends + apertures) 250 MeV Passive elements to form dose Aperture collimation (no focusing) Development of a Laser –Driven Proton Accelerator for Cancer Therapy C.M. Ma et al., Laser Physics, 2006, Vol. 16, No. 4,pp Energy selection (bends + apertures) 250 MeV Passive elements to form dose Very compact particle selection not requiring much more than 1 m distance laser target to tumour. 1.Transverse collimation by a small aperture immediately behind the target limiting transmission to a production cone angle of Ω≈±10 mrad (0.5 degrees), 2.A dispersive energy separation device 3.A Second aperture close to the tumour Very compact particle selection not requiring much more than 1 m distance laser target to tumour. 1.Transverse collimation by a small aperture immediately behind the target limiting transmission to a production cone angle of Ω≈±10 mrad (0.5 degrees), 2.A dispersive energy separation device 3.A Second aperture close to the tumour Obviously, the available particle flux density form the source and the need for keeping the distance low are critical issues here.

PMQ Parameters Magnetic field strengths 55 and 60 T/m Repetition rate1 Hz Proton beam energy 2.4 MeV Focused to a spot with a size of 3 x 8 mm 2 at a distance of 650 mm from source Lens collection by quadrupole More flexibility can be expected if active lens focusing by a solenoid or quadrupole is applies which allows using a larger production cone angle Lens collection by quadrupole More flexibility can be expected if active lens focusing by a solenoid or quadrupole is applies which allows using a larger production cone angle Focusing and Spectral Enhancement of a Repetition- Rated, Laser-Driven, Divergent Multi-MeV Proton Beam Using Permanent Quadrupole Magnets M. Nishiuchi et al Appl. Phys.Lett.94,061107(2009) Focusing and Spectral Enhancement of a Repetition- Rated, Laser-Driven, Divergent Multi-MeV Proton Beam Using Permanent Quadrupole Magnets M. Nishiuchi et al Appl. Phys.Lett.94,061107(2009)

Solenoid Parameters Solenoid LengthL=360 mm Inner radiusR in =44 mm Outer radiusR out =76 mm Magnetic FieldB=13 T Focal distanceF=1 m Beam Parameters EnergyE=200 MeV Energy Spread∆E/E=±0.05 Special AngleΩ max =50 mrad RadiusR=10 μm Emittanceε=0.5 mm-mrad Pulse duration140 ps Lens Collection by Solenoid Collection and Focusing of Laser Accelerated Ion beam for Therapy Applications: Ingo Hofmann et al Physical Review Special Topics Accelerators and Beams 14, (2011). Lens Collection by Solenoid Collection and Focusing of Laser Accelerated Ion beam for Therapy Applications: Ingo Hofmann et al Physical Review Special Topics Accelerators and Beams 14, (2011). Sample trajectory through solenoid collector and ∆E/E=±0.05 Sample trajectory through solenoid collector and ∆E/E=±0.05 Distance target to solenoid= 240 mm

 Linear behaviour for energy spread  Quadratic dependence on the initial cone angle An emittance scaling law for the Chromatic emittance at the focusing : ε=α c Ω 2 (∆E/E) α c =0.3 m/rad  Linear behaviour for energy spread  Quadratic dependence on the initial cone angle An emittance scaling law for the Chromatic emittance at the focusing : ε=α c Ω 2 (∆E/E) α c =0.3 m/rad Phase space at the trajectory crossover

Usable intensities of 200 MeV protons as a function of selected production cone angle and energy window ∆E/E=±0.1 and Ω=40 mrad  I=3.5x times as high as the fluence requirement of 1.7x10 9 /cm 2 ∆E/E=±0.01 and Ω=40 mrad  I=3.5x times as high as the fluence requirement of 7x10 9 /cm 2 ∆E/E=±0.1 and Ω=40 mrad  I=3.5x times as high as the fluence requirement of 1.7x10 9 /cm 2 ∆E/E=±0.01 and Ω=40 mrad  I=3.5x times as high as the fluence requirement of 7x10 9 /cm 2

PHELIX laser system at GSI: The proton beams accelerated are contained within an angular distribution with up to a half-angle divergence of 7° for high energy protons and 20° for low energy protons. Exponentially decaying proton spectra had a maximum cut-off near 23 MeV. Intensities of 2.9*10 19 W/cm 2 With 72 J of normal incident linearly polarized μm laser light in 500 fs. The laser light focused to an 8.5μm by 17 um diameter spot size(FWHM) on a flat 25 μm thick Au foil. Laser Accelerated protons Captured and Transported by a Pulse power Solenoid T. Burrins-Mog, et al Physical Review Special Topics Accelerators and Beams 14, (2011) Laser Accelerated protons Captured and Transported by a Pulse power Solenoid T. Burrins-Mog, et al Physical Review Special Topics Accelerators and Beams 14, (2011) 8.5 Tesla solenoid for beam energy up to 23 MeV. Solenoid as the initial capture and collimating elements for a 250 MeV proton is scaled to 32 T.

Electrostatic lenses on the other hand have several advantages. Space charge plasma lenses of the Gabor type might be a cost effective alternative. See talk by Juergen Thank you Gabor Lenses for Capture and Energy Selection of Laser Driven Ion Beams In Cancer Treatment Juergen Pozimski Gabor Lenses for Capture and Energy Selection of Laser Driven Ion Beams In Cancer Treatment Juergen Pozimski Magnetic lenses are very sensitive to the energy of the particles and the extremely high –energy spread of the raw beam from the laser would render the design of such a transport system challenging. Conventional optical systems like solenoids or quadrupoles will be operating at the technical limits which would be contradictory to the cost and space argument.

Back up slides

Spectral Yield Pure aperture collimation: dN/dE=0.25x10 9 E=200 MeV ∆E/E=±0.01 →→∆E=±2 MeV →→∆E=4 MeV dN=(0.25x10 9 )=10 9 The standard proton fluence of 7x10 8 /cm 2 Required at the distal layer with a spot radius of 10 mm (resulting at 1 m distance according to the assumed divergence)requires, 2x10 9 which would be missed by a factor of 2 for a single laser shot.

Laser parameters considered by I. Hofmann: Spot radius = 10 μm Pulse duration = 66 fs Specific power = 3x10 21 W/cm 2 Peak power = 10 PW Pulse energy = 620 J Average power = 6 kW(10 Hz) Nishiuchi expriement Divergence half angle=10°±1° The beam diameter(FWHM)= 28±1 mm PMQ used. J-KAREN laser 100 TW