OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Base B and Emissions Sensitivities Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments—Round 2 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Advertisements

Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.
Preliminary Results CMAQ and CMAQ-AIM with SAPRC99 Gail Tonnesen, Chao-Jung Chien, Bo Wang, UC Riverside Max Zhang, Tony Wexler, UC Davis Ralph Morris,
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
CENRAP Modeling Workgroup Mational RPO Modeling Meeting May 25-26, Denver CO Calvin Ku Missouri DNR May 25, 2004.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Modeling Source Apportionment Gail Tonnesen,
Template CAMx Ancillary Input Development Chris Emery ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato CA November 14, 2012.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
OThree Chemistry MM5 Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 1 T. W. Tesche Dennis McNally.
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
Template Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and NOy and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in CAMx Chris Emery, Sue Kemball-Cook, Jaegun Jung, Jeremiah.
Page1 PAGE 1 The influence of MM5 nudging schemes on CMAQ simulations of benzo(a)pyrene concentrations and depositions in Europe Volker Matthias, GKSS.
Ams/awma_ PROCESS-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE GULF BREEZE IN SIMULATING OZONE CONCENTRATIONS ALONG THE EASTERN GULF COAST Sharon G. Douglas.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Continued Diagnostics and PA Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Recent Diagnostics and PA Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Initial CAMx Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation October.
A comparison of PM 2.5 simulations over the Eastern United States using CB-IV and RADM2 chemical mechanisms Michael Ku, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Ozone SIP Schedule and CCOS Products Policy Committee Meeting John DaMassa April 18, 2002.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
1 Prepared by: Neil Wheeler Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, CA Presented to: CCOS Technical Committee Sacramento, CA August 15, Central California.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Presented at the AQAST 9 th Semiannual Meeting Wednesday June 3 rd, 2015 Presentation by: Dan Goldberg, Ph.D. Candidate Co-authors: Tim Canty, Tim Vinciguerra,
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
Sensitivity of Air Quality Model Predictions to Various Parameterizations of Vertical Eddy Diffusivity Zhiwei Han and Meigen Zhang Institute of Atmospheric.
Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS.
1 Seasonal Modeling: Comparison of Phases 1 and 2 Emission inputs to CMAQ Shaheen R. Tonse Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CCOS Technical Committee.
1 Understanding Relationships Between Changes in Ambient Ozone and Precursor Concentrations and Changes in VOC and NOx Emissions from 1990 to 2004 in Central.
OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments--Round 3 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
OTC Modeling Committee April 2015 Update Presented by: Dan Goldberg Thursday April 9 th, 2015.
An Exploration of Model Concentration Differences Between CMAQ and CAMx Brian Timin, Karen Wesson, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Sharon Phillips EPA/OAQPS.
C. Hogrefe 1,2, W. Hao 2, E.E. Zalewsky 2, J.-Y. Ku 2, B. Lynn 3, C. Rosenzweig 4, M. Schultz 5, S. Rast 6, M. Newchurch 7, L. Wang 7, P.L. Kinney 8, and.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
WRAP Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting August 16, 2006 The CMAQ Visibility Model Applied To Rural Ozone In The Intermountain West Patrick Barickman.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Photochemical grid model estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter across the continental United States Kirk Baker U.S.
June 29, 2011NASA/ARB Data Analyses Discussion1 What can We Learn from ARCTAS-CARB Data? Modeling and Meteorology Branch Planning and Technical Support.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Modeling for the Sept ’00 Episode: Process Analysis Problem Definition Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Data Needs for Evaluation of Radical and.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Nancy J. Brown, LBNL Kick-off of the CEC Seasonal Modeling Study Sacramento, August A Seasonal Perspective on Regional Air Quality in Central California.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.
BAY AREA MODELING Status of Modeling Work Technical Committee Meeting November 18, 2003 Bay Area Air Quality Management District and Environ Corp.
Comparisons of the Response of Simulated Ozone Concentrations to Changes in Emissions Using the Carbon Bond IV and SAPRC99 Chemical Mechanisms Bruce Jackson,
OThree Chemistry Refinement of the Sept ‘00 Modeling Episode: Part I--Status of Current Simulation Central California Ozone Study: Modeling Support.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency CCOS STATUS REPORT Policy Committee Meeting Saffet Tanrikulu, Ph.D. October 25, 2002.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency March 13, 2003Presentation to the Policy Committee1 Ozone SIP Modeling and Data Analysis:
Ozone Transport Analysis Using Back-Trajectories and CAMx Probing Tools Sue Kemball-Cook, Greg Yarwood, Bonyoung Koo and Jeremiah Johnson, ENVIRON Jim.
The relationship between summertime ozone peak hour and NOx and VOC emissions Jianfeng Li April 21, 2016.
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Base B and Emissions Sensitivities Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 3 T. W. Tesche Dennis McNally Harvey Jeffries 3 December 2003

OThree Chemistry Peak 1-hr Ozone Measurements for Sept ‘00

OThree Chemistry Recent Analyses & Results  Recent Reporting  Aug-Sept ’00 Monthly Technical Progress Narrative  Task 2 Model Performance Improvement Plan (  CAMx Base B Operational Evaluation  Multi-species (CO, NO, NO2, NOx, O3)  Aircraft  Ozonesonde  Vertical Slice Plots at Elk Grove, Parlier, Arvin  MM5 PBL height model performance testing  CAMx Emissions Sensitivity Simulations  Base Bn3 (3x NOx Emissions Scale-up)  Base Bv3 (3x VOC Emissions Scale-up)  Base Bn3v3 (3x VOC & NOx Emissions Scale-up)  Process Analysis Problem Definition (see companion file)

OThree Chemistry Review of Recent Research  Pertinent Studies  Envair Study: “Understanding the Effectiveness of Precursor Reductions in Lowering 8-hr Ozone Concentrations”, Reynolds and Blanchard, Envair, Chemical Process Analysis (CPA) in SAQM utilized. SAQM ozone response small, even to large VOC, NOx reductions. – 50% &75% reductions in VOC, NOx, & VOC+NOx – Zero out runs (no anthro) only lowered peak 1-hr ozone to 90 ppb Ozone production becomes more efficient with decreasing NOx emissions, undermining effects of NOx controls. CO emissions contribute ~ 20% of ozone under heavy NOx controls.  UNC Study: “Application of Integrated Process Rate Analysis to the SARMAP Air Quality Model”, Jeffries and Wang, UNC, Integrated Process Rate Analysis in SAQM utilized. Focus on influence of different vertical diffusion schemes in SAQM. SAQM Vertical transport and ‘mass adjustment’ in most significant components in Process Analysis balance. Unexpectedly large influence from vertical diffusion and dry deposition.

OThree Chemistry MM5 Model Configuration: Run 4

OThree Chemistry CAMx Model Configuration: Base B

OThree Chemistry CAMx Base B Operational Evaluation  Multi-species (CO, NO, NO2, NOx, O3)  Statistical Evaluation: Comparison Between Base B and Base A Accuracy Bias Error  Graphical/Statistical Results Aircraft (Base A) Ozonesonde (Base A) Vertical Slice Plots at Elk Grove, Parlier, Arvin (Base B)

OThree Chemistry Location of CAMx & MM5 Analysis Subdomains

OThree Chemistry CAMx4 Evaluation: Base B vs. Base A

OThree Chemistry Accuracy of Peak 1-hr Ozone: Base B vs. A

OThree Chemistry Bias in Hourly Ozone: Base B vs. A

OThree Chemistry Gross Error in Hourly Ozone: Base B vs. A

OThree Chemistry CAMx4 Evaluation: Full vs. SJV Domain

OThree Chemistry Accuracy of Peak 1-hr Ozone: Full vs. SJV

OThree Chemistry Bias in Hourly Ozone: Full vs. SJV

OThree Chemistry Gross Error in Hourly Ozone: Full vs. SJV

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Aircraft Results 17 Sept ’00 at 1400 PST Base A

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Aircraft Results 18 Sept ’00 at 1400 PST Base A

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Aircraft Results 18 Sept ’00 at 1500 PST Base A

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Aircraft Results 19 Sept ’00 at 0400 PST Base A

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Aircraft Results 19 Sept ’00 at 1400 PST Base A

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Aircraft Results 19 Sept ’00 at 1500 PST Base A

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Aircraft Results 20 Sept ’00 at 1400 PST Base A

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Ozonesonde Results Parlier Ozonesonde at 1400 PST on 18 Sept ‘00 Base A

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Ozonesonde Results Parlier Ozonesonde at 1700 PST on 18 Sept ‘00 Base A

OThree Chemistry CAMx Comparisons with Ozonesonde Results Parlier Ozonesonde at 1700 PST on 19 Sept ‘00 Base A

OThree Chemistry Vertical Ozone Slice Plots At Elk Grove East-West Slice on 18 Sept ’00 at 1500 PST Base B PBL Height

OThree Chemistry Vertical Ozone Slice Plots At Elk Grove North-South Slice on 18 Sept ’00 at 1500 PST Base B

OThree Chemistry Vertical Ozone Slice Plots At Parlier East-West Slice on 18 Sept ’00 at 1500 PST Base B

OThree Chemistry Vertical Ozone Slice Plots At Parlier North-South Slice on 18 Sept ’00 at 1500 PST Base B

OThree Chemistry Vertical Ozone Slice Plots At Arvin East-West Slice on 18 Sept ’00 at 1500 PST Base B

OThree Chemistry Vertical Ozone Slice Plots At Arvin North-South Slice on 18 Sept ’00 at 1500 PST Base B

OThree Chemistry CAMx Sensitivity Simulations  CAMx Emissions Sensitivity Simulations  Base Bn3 (3x NOx Emissions Scale-up, across-the-board)  Base Bv3 (3x VOC Emissions Scale-up, across-the-board)  Base Bn3v3 (3x VOC & NOx Emissions Scale-up, across-the-board)

OThree Chemistry MM5 Modeling (next steps)  MM5 sensitivity to nighttime, ground-level temperature FDDA?

OThree Chemistry Emissions Modeling (next steps)  Influence of potential systematic biases in biogenic & motor vehicle emissions ( Runs Bn3, Bv3, Bn3v3 )  Adequacy of current speciation profiles for various VOC categories?  Adequacy of NO/NO2 split ( Believed to be minor issue? )

OThree Chemistry CAMx Modeling (next steps)  48 hr spin-up appears sufficient  Process Analysis (IPRA, CPA) underway  Model sensitivity to ICs/BCs (GEOS-Chem boundary conditions?)  Adequacy of dry deposition scheme for SJV  Effects of temperature bias on biogenic & motor vehicle emissions  Model sensitivity to vertical diffusivities  Adequacy of diurnal PBL height estimates

OThree Chemistry Data Sets Needed  Availability of most recent 1-hr/8-hr ozone design values for all regulatory monitors in 4 km domain?

OThree Chemistry Next Two Weeks  Analyze IPR results at Elk Grove, Parlier, Arvin.  Consider additional emissions sensitivity experiments.  Review emissions sensitivity experiments from Bay Area and other CCOS modeling studies