Portfolio Committee on Energy Securing financial sustainability (in response to lower tariff decision) May 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cross-Border Infrastructure: A Toolkit Tariff and Rate Setting Session on Regulation & Accountability Max Bradford Castalia The views expressed here are.
Advertisements

Demand Side Planning Considerations on the Skills Planning Mechanism Presentation in Policy Roundtable LMIP Singizi Consulting March 2014.
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
1 Global Real Estate Valuation Policy Update: the European Perspective The principle: the EU Treaty does not provide the European institutions with direct.
22 August 2012 Regulating for productive efficiency – an assessment of the regulatory framework faced by Eskom Presented at the South African Economic.
Responding to the Electricity Challenges: Five Point Plan Overview 19 December 2014 Confidential 1.
Click to edit Master title style 0 Eskom’s MYPD2 Tariff Application 03 December 2009 Brian Dames – Chief Officer (Generation Business)
The Australian Energy Regulator Public Forum April 29 Expenditure incentive guidelines Presentation on key issues.
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
Aust. AM Collaborative Group (AAMCOG) An introduction to ISO “What to do” guide 20th October 2014.
Incentive Regulation Topics Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
Response to the Eskom Revenue Application for the Multi Year Price Determination for the period 2010/11 to 2012/13 (MYPD 2) Presentation by Business Unity.
The Australian Energy Regulator. Today’s agenda Presentations from : ◦AER — Chris Pattas, General Manager - Networks ◦Consumer Challenge Panel — Hugh.
An Overview of Our Regulatory Proposal
DATE: 21 August 2012 Determining the Regulatory Asset Base Anthony Felet – Regulatory Finance Specialist 1.
European Economic and Social Committee EUROPEAN INDUSTRY AND MONETARY POLICY The role of the European Investment Bank MAIN PROVISIONAL CONCLUSIONS (To.
Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board Meeting April 23, 2014 Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager.
1 27 March 2013 MYPD3 Briefing Session – Portfolio Committee on Energy.
PRASA GROUP FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2013.
Electricity Pricing: Presented by: AT Audat (Acting CD: Electricity) 06 August
ENERGY INTENSIVE USERS GROUP Ian Langridge Chairman January 2010 Eskom’s Revenue Application for Multi Year Price Determination MYPD (2)
SOUTH AFRICAN DIAMOND AND PRECIOUS METALS REGULATOR (SADPMR)
MYPD2 SACCI VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO NERSA 21 January 2010 Peggy Drodskie Executive Advisor to the CEO.
Towards an Affordable, Stable Electricity Supply MISSION CRITICAL FOR SOUTH AFRICA Public Presentation To NERSA by Nick Holland Chief Executive Officer.
Briefing on Eskom Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises 18 February Top Secret - 1.
STREAM 1B: SECTOR STRUCTURAL AND RESTRUCTURING ISSUES CLLR C JOHNSON, SALGA NEC ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE SUMMIT 9 JUNE 2008.
The Australian Energy Regulator. Today’s agenda Presentations from : ◦ AER – Chris Pattas, General Manager – Networks ◦ Consumer challenge panel – Ruth.
The Australian Energy Regulator Public Forum NSW electricity distribution & transmission revenue proposals July 2014.
Annual Results Presentation 27 August 2009 Jacob Maroga – Chief Executive Empowering the South African dream.
1 Electricity Industry – Municipal Tariff Issues and NERSA Approval Processes Compiled by Nhlanhla Ngidi.
SMART ELECTRICITY Planning and building a modern infrastructure for South Africa SMART Electricity Planning a healthy, modern, affordable electricity supply.
An overview of Demand Side Management (DSM) Implementation in RSA Morore Mashao ESKOM - DSM.
The Multi- Year Price Determination MYPD Presented by: Thembani Bukula Regulator Member – Electricity Regulation.
Department of Labour Unemployment Insurance Fund Budget 2006/07 UIF Presentation to Portfolio Committee 13 March 2006.
Quarterly Performance Report For the period October – December 2014.
TSDBF / TPF & TRANSNET SOC LTD JOINT FINAL PROPOSAL TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 25 NOVEMBER 2011.
1 PRESENTATION TO PPC ON ENERGY 24 MAY 2013 MUNICIPAL TARIFF DETERMINATION PROCESS.
Submission to NERSA on Revised Eskom MYPD2 Chemical and Allied Industries Association January 2010.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Presentation to Select Committee on Economic Development
Getting Ready! Potential issues for consumers Queensland Distribution Network Regulatory Proposals Bev Hughson, Consumer Challenge Panel (CCP) 8 August.
Municipal involvement in the energy crisis Select Committee on Labour & Public Enterprises.
Driving towards Impact through Development Goals Washington, DC 04/13/2011.
1 Local Government Budgets and Expenditure Review 2001/02 – 2007/08.
Eskom MYPD2 Nersa Public Hearings Fri 22 Jan Doug Kuni – Managing Director South African Independent Power Producers Association.(SAIPPA)
1 RORB Return on Rate Base. Legal Basis  Section 43, (f) of Republic Act No Section 43. Functions of the ERC – x x x (a) x x x (f) x x x “The rates.
Budget Presentation 2010/2011 – 2013/2014 All Communities 28 January 2010.
Here Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Programme Bidder’s Conference 16 August 2012 Andrew Etzinger Senior General Manager Eskom.
Council Improvement Plan Council Meeting 1 June
MYPD2 APPLICATION 15 OCTOBER 2009 Jacob Maroga – Chief Executive Empowering the South African dream.
1 Electricity Distribution Price Review Metering Workshop 14 July 2005.
Annual Budget for 2017/2018 Financial Year
ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION INDUSTRY DECISION
2014 Adjustment Appropriation
NERSA presentation at the PPC meeting held on 24 May 2006
ELECTRICITY PRICING POLICY AND IMPACT ON THE MULTI YEAR PRICE DETERMINATION BY NERSA Matthews Bantsijang 7/6/2018.
PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND INDUSTRY 2 NOVEMBER 2012 IPAP 2012/10.
Creating a ‘country compact’ to ensure a secure and sustainable future
Creating a ‘country compact’ to ensure a secure and sustainable future
Creating a ‘country compact’ to ensure a secure and sustainable future
Parliament Portfolio Committee
Creating a ‘country compact’ to ensure a secure and sustainable future
Creating a ‘country compact’ to ensure a secure and sustainable future
Creating a ‘country compact’ to ensure a secure and sustainable future
Creating a ‘country compact’ to ensure a secure and sustainable future
Electricity Price Increase 2008/9
Minerals & Energy Parliamentary Portfolio Committee
NUM WESTERN CAPE SUBMISSION ON IRP 2018
OUTLINE Legislative context, NERSA vision and NERSA mission
Presentation transcript:

Portfolio Committee on Energy Securing financial sustainability (in response to lower tariff decision) May 2013

2 Content Nersa Decision, Rationale and Implications Eskom Response

Summary NERSA granted Eskom 8% X 5, equating to revenue of R862bn which results in a shortfall of R225bn Without appropriate intervention the NERSA decision will impact Eskom The shortfall cannot be made up with efficiencies alone Eskom’s response is being finalised through an integrated delivery programme which will: continue to implement the committed savings of R30 bn and find further efficiencies Consider how the business can be reshaped Identify additional support that may be required Look to the regulatory framework and rules to assist in addressing the challenge Certain policy implications will have to be addressed with Eskom’s shareholder 3

Eskom’s MYPD3 application has a well defined point of reference  Application was based on the regulatory formula allows for the recovery of prudent costs (primary energy and operating ) depreciation and a return on assets which encompassed the following key principles: 1.Eskom’s aim shift its performance across all metrics in line with world class utilities 2.Costs kept at single digit increases -Primary energy increases of 8,6% (including coal at 10%), operating costs increases of 8% (maintenance key driver) 3.Electricity Pricing Policy (DoE - December 2008) – recovery of costs and earning return on assets at replacement value 4.NERSA previously allowed targeted return of 8.16% -Application reached 7,8% by 2017/18, averaged 4% over MYPD period 5.Debt guarantees – government support of R350bn -R60 billion subordinated loan fully drawn 6.Debt levels maintained within R350 billion guarantee ceiling – approximately 80% of funding secured 4 Aim to achieve cost reflectivity improved Eskom’s financial profile and complimented its ability to fund itself with lower risk and government support

NERSA’s disallowances result in a R225 billion cash flow gap over the 5 year period 5 Commentary Total disallowed revenue equates to R225 Billion Key reductions in Primary Energy, Depreciation, Opex and returns The implications have been weighted towards the end of the 5 year period Revenue reconciliation to application Phasing of disallowances Capex 10bn 24bn 41bn 62bn 88bn

Key items which were disallowed by NERSA CostEskomNersaReason given by NERSAEskom response Primary energy R355bnR293bnBased on MYPD 2 coal costs Assumed lower water costs Assumed stable gas prices Used nuclear fuel benchmarks Limited OCGT load factor and stable diesel prices Based on actual coal costs Based on actual water costs Realistic commodity fluctuations Used actual contractual costs DMPR11bnR1.9bnSufficient capacity after Medupi and Kusile to address energy shortfall Mistakenly understood as power buyback programs. Impact on KLO for next 2 years due to shortage in capacity prior to new stations producing energy IPPsR78bnR65bnRephasing of IPPs.Accepted OpexR270bnR222bnMYPD 2 approved manpower Double counting, efficiency for maintenance Other opex escalated with CPI from MYPD 2 Corporate overheads from MYPD 2 Based on actual numbers Did not double count for maintenance Other opex considered change in operating model Corporate overheads on actual IDMR13bnR5bnAssumed that IDM will be undertaken by an agency, based on MYPD 2 performance, limited to inflation Impact on keeping lights on. ReturnR187 bnR138 bnDisallowed inflation adjustments since subject to periodic revaluation; differing WACC and RAB; capex disallowed Incorrect to have real WACC on RAB that excludes inflation DepreciationR185 bnR140 bnDepreciation linked to RAB and Capex allowed. Ignores inflation adjustment and thus based on reduced RAB. Method of depreciation is correct based on allowed RAB and capex. Must adjust RAB for inflation 6

Eskom View  Different assumptions : −What was efficient costs −Execution capability −Steps necessary to ensure security of supply −Inflationary increases in areas not subject to inflationary increases (insurance)  Different cost benchmarks assumed  View of starting point of cost base – forecast MYPD 2 decision v actual results 7

Strategic Implications  No explicit limitation of Eskom’s mandate  The following policy issues need to be addressed with the Shareholder to ensure alignment: −Eskom’s role in build beyond Kusile −Future role in IDM −Further Government support −The regulation of coal prices in SA and declaring coal a strategic resource 8

9 2 2 Eskom Response

New considerations, developments and strategic levers are available since MYPD3 submission 10 Mandate Financial Stakeholder Operational  IPP determination was reduced due to rephasing per DOE allowances and thus reducing costs  An update of IRP2010 is under development to adjust for changes in assumptions  To date no build beyond Kusile is allocated to Eskom  Discussion on a country pact for coal prices has commenced  Despite operational challenges, Eskom closed in a stronger financial position for FY13 than anticipated at time of submission  We have approved a business optimisation and efficiency programme (R30bn cost reduction included in MYPD3 submission has been identified)  In line with prudent operator principle, Board approved a technical operating standard of 80 (EAF) – 10 (PCLF) – 10 (UCLF)  We have secured demand market participation programs  Board decision to reprioritise and redeploy manpower to support operational and strategic imperatives  A joint Shareholder – Inter- government workgroup has been established to consider medium term constraints  We are engaging with NERSA on their MYPD3 determination, relating to the reasons for decision and assumptions made Board approved a Business Productivity Program Board approved a Business Productivity Program

Eskom has developed a holistic plan to address the challenges posed by the determination…  Eskom has 2 year period in which to implement substantial changes to mitigate the shortfall  We have initiated an integrated delivery program to engage stakeholders and ensure financial sustainability  The integrated delivery program has been approved by our board and supported by our shareholder  Business Productivity program delivers 4 key objectives within Eskom’s Integrated Delivery Program 11 … which also gives consideration to the new levers available NERSA response Efficiency and reshaping drive Strategic response for long term sustainability

This plan encompasses a systematic, rational approach to ensure that we are sustainable Major efficiency and sustainability drive Strategic response to ensure long-term sustainability NERSA response 1.Use the Regulatory Clearing Account as a mechanism to claw back against the NERSA determination Shape the business to realise long term efficiency gains Immediate reprioritisation and efficiency drive to identify cash reduction opportunities (over 5 years but with a specific focus on years 1 and 2) Address the Eskom mandate with key stakeholders, to reduce mandatory spend 3 3 Align capex programme in line with available funding options Additional shareholder support Explore funding alternatives 5 5 GAP Regulatory Clearing Account Efficiency Mandate Re =shape Capex Shareholder Funding Options R225bn Gap Gap closed Business Productivity Program 8 8 Roll out of Business Productivity Program (BPP) 8 8

Key Issues to clarify with Nersa  Nersa will be approached to ensure clarity on the application of the regulatory rules and framework to inform decisions that need to be made towards achieving financial sustainability. −The application of the Regulatory Clearing account (RCA) −Commitment in writing on specific treatment of cost variances −Reviewing the benchmark for coal costs and putting in place the sharing mechanism for variances in advance each year −Allowing for shifting of capital expenditure within allowed amount −Allowing for additional benchmarks to be obtained and this be considered in prudency reviews −Committing to an annual valuation of the regulatory asset base −Agreeing on appropriate timing of efficiency improvements, eg, UCLF 13

Next steps 1.Stabilize the business for the next 2 years and roll out of business productivity and re-shaping programme to identify and extract operating and capital efficiencies 2.Achieve a country pact on coal prices 3.Deliver on our capacity expansion program 4.Determine the maximum amount that can be recovered by applying the RCA methodology 5.Agree RCA principles and implementation process with NERSA 6.Confirm Eskom’s role beyond Kusile 7.Explore shareholder support. 8. Confirm list of projects for next 5 years which is aligned to the capital expenditure 14

Thank you 15