Project Structure & Risk Matrix Hyderabad Mirpurkhas Dual Carriage-way Project Under Public Private Partnership Nov 2012 By Mujtaba Shahneel Director –Finance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Finance & PPPs A Mechanism of Optimising Private Sector Involvement in Infrastructure Investment Public-private partnership in Ukraine: opportunities.
Advertisements

Private Sector Expectations In the PPP project structure.
Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad
Financing Essentials for Public-Private Partnerships United Nations SU/SSC Training Course September 19, 2006.
A framework for organising and financing infrastructure provision Jan-Eric Nilsson, VTI.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT I AND II
Public Debt Management with emphasis on PPP 1 Ministry of Finance 08 th Dec 2014.
International Models for Affordable Housing: Lessons from the United Kingdom The Euromoney Egypt Housing Finance Conference - 25 May 2009 Trowers & Hamlins.
Vivek Aggarwal Managing Director, MP Road Dev. Corporation
AN OVERVIEW OF PROJECT FINANCE IN PRIVATE-PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS FINANCE 101 T ERRI S MALINSKY Managing Director B.C.
For rep/agent use only. Not for further distribution.
1 Short Term Financing May 11, Learning Objectives  The need for short-term financing.  The advantages and disadvantages of short-term financing.
Risk Identification, Mitigation and Key Documents in Infrastructure Projects. Presentation by Mohit Saraf Partner Luthra & Luthra Law Offices May 01,
What is the ADF Partial Risk Guarantee? Partial Risk Guarantees (PRGs), also known as political risk guarantees, cover private lenders and investors against.
Page 1 July 2014 Capacity Building of Banks/FIs For EE Project Financing Capacity Building of Banks and Financial Institutions for Energy Efficiency Project.
Business and organization model Market consultation information meeting September 10 th, 2012.
NHA | ADVISORS Strategy. Innovation. Solutions. Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency Financial Review and Initial Assessment October 22, 2014.
DEBT, PRIVATIZATION & Commercialization of Essential Services These are intimately linked –  Debt creates the “need” and justification for privatization.
Credit.  Credit (from Latin credere translation. "to believe") is the trust which allows one party to provide resources to another party where that second.
Structure of Project in PPP- (2) John Plumb. Agenda Following on from the Strategy and business case to develop the ideas Structure of PPP arrangements.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 9 - 9/29/2002.
© 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 15 Leases.
VII-Financing of Constructed Facilities The Financing Problem Institutional Arrangement for Facility Financing Avaluation of Alternative Financing Plans.
Copyright © 2002 Harcourt, Inc.All rights reserved. CHAPTER 23 Short-Term Financing Working capital financing policies Accounts payable (trade credit)
Lesson 8. 1.Estimate the amount of debt needed to achieve the firm’s goals. 2.Understanding the balance sheet and operating statements. 3.Make the needed.
Experience with PPP projects in Europe Vilnius 22 th November 2006 Dr. Christian Kummert, DEPFA BANK plc.
Chapter 2 Project Financing Dr. Nabil I El Sawalhi Associate Professor of Construction Management AEPM 21.
Financing Urban Public Infrastructure
TABLE OF CONTENTS History & Success Story of Deokjae
Econ – Chapter 13 – Outline #1. I. Savings and Financial System = An economic system must be able to produce capital if it is to satisfy the wants and.
Background of PPP Negotiation
Module 22 May  Interest rate – the price, calculated as a % of the amount borrowed, charged by lenders to borrowers for the use of their savings.
Venturesome – social purpose finance Paul Cheng Investment Manager, Venturesome.
Preliminary Financial Analyses February 2011 Presented by: David C. Miller Managing Director The PFM Group I-95 (Rest Area) Access Project.
Lecture 12 Lease Financing. It has emerged as a supplementary source of financing. Increase in off-balance sheet methods of financing. Increase in scope.
1 L25: Alternative Risk Transfer Objective: understand why ART products are used and describe examples of specific types of ART products.
CAPITAL BUDGETING INITIAL INVESTMENT PLANNING HORIZON TERMINAL VALUE REQUIRED RATE OF RETURN NET CASH FLOWS.
Financing of Infrastructure Projects:
Public-Private-Partnerships and Finance Patrick Legros* ECARES, ULB * Part of work in progress (Dewatripont-Estache-Grout-Legros)
Kenneth Langer, Ph.D. Global Environmental Investment Group Washington, D.C Insurance Mechanism To Facilitate Financing of Energy Efficiency Projects.
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING. What is Infrastructure? “Infrastructure is define as the physical framework of facilities through which goods and services are.
Commercial Matters Dublin Waste to Energy Project.
Doing Business With OPIC. OPIC’s Mission Statement “To mobilize and facilitate the participation of the United States capital and skills in the economic.
Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and The World Bank
Service delivery in the energy sector: Increasing private sector investment in generation & access PPPs in energy sector in Africa: Best practices and.
1 APPLICATION ON THE SPANISH CONCESSIONAL MODEL TO CENTRAL AND ESTERN EUROPE WORLD BANK WORKSHOP ON PPP IN HIGHWAYS: INSTITUTIONAL, LEGAL, FINANCIAL AND.
WSSB Capacity Enhancement Workshop1.  Definition: Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are a form of legally enforceable contracts between the public and.
An understanding..  It is a market where money or its equivalent can be traded.  Money is synonym of liquidity.  It consists of financial institutions.
Oct Project Fund- An Instrument to Finance Infrastructure Projects Two Case Studies.
 Our student loan product is designed to help students consolidate their outstanding federal student loans with the Department of Education.  By doing.
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Lease. Contents Classification of leases Finance leases - financial statements of lessees and lessors Operating leases.
IAS 17 (revised) A lease is an agreement whereby the lessor conveys to the lessee in return for a payment or series of payments the right to use an asset.
BBPW3203 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT II By : DANIZAH BINTI CHE DIN H/P : CLASS : TUTORIAL 1 – 12/1/2013 TUTORIAL 2 – 23/2/2013.
PENGURUSAN ASET AIR BERHAD (PAAB) Briefing to Analysts 19 MARCH 2009.
Budget Workshop Capital Improvement Plan Presentation on Public Private Partnership and Strategy for Municipal Complex, HWY 50, and Coast to Coast Trail.
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Lease
Operations to Manage Balances in the Treasury Single Account
FINANCIAL MARKETS TYPES
Environmental & Social Compliance in PROJECT FINANCING
“Ingredients” in good PPPs
sources of short term and long term financing
Environmental & Social Compliance in PROJECT FINANCING
Makerere University Investors Conference
BEIRUT - RAFIC HARIRI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION
Toolkit for Public-Private Partnership in Highways
SOURCES OF FUND Prepared by: KP Gwachha (M.Phil.)
ESCL – ANNUAL CONFERENCE 25 OCTOBER 2018 EDWINA UDRESCU, FCIArb Lawyer
Nationalising Special Purpose Vehicles to end PFI
Analyzing and Structuring Financially Sustainable Investments
Reserve Bank of India.
Presentation transcript:

Project Structure & Risk Matrix Hyderabad Mirpurkhas Dual Carriage-way Project Under Public Private Partnership Nov 2012 By Mujtaba Shahneel Director –Finance & Risk Management Public Private Partnership Unit, Finance Department, Government of Sindh

Executive Summary  Government of Sindh (GoS) formed Public Private Partnership (PPP) Unit in the Finance Department to promote and facilitate development in the province of Sindh  PPP Unit launched “Hyderabad Mirpurkhas Dual Carriageway” project under the PPP mode, which is the 1 st indigenously structured PPP project  Objectives were:  develop infrastructure of the province to facilitate growth and efficiency  develop a project structure that is self sustaining and a model for future PPP projects  To make the project financially viable it was decided to charge toll on the said road to generate revenue  Under international competitive bidding process, Deokjae (Korea) was short-listed to develop the project under PPP modality.  The project is already complete and toll collection has started on the road  The project was designed and constructed by firms of international repute  Financial close was achieved in March 2011 and the contingent liability of the GoS was taken care of by means of a unique treasury product  The project structure envisages risk sharing between the GoS and the developer, so that the economic viability and holistic utility of the project is enhanced

Project Consultants PPP Specialist (ADB) Rachna Gupta Legal Consultant (Foreign - ADB) Jacques Cook, Peckar & Abramson Bank’s Lawyer Haidermota & Co. Vetting Consultant Protech Inc. Independent Engineer Engineering Associates (Pvt.) Ltd Independent Auditor Ernst & Young Project Cycle for Hyd-Mirpurkhas Dual Carriageway SPV GoS Operate 60 Km Carriage way between Hyderabad and Mirpurkhas with economic benefit of at least PKR 738 million per ye ar DFBOT Public Sector Participant Government of Sindh Private Sector Participant Deokjae Connecting Roads Ltd Build Transfer

Project Break-down Break-down of project cost Break-down of Financing structure  Commercial loan will be repaid 1 st followed by repayments of other subordinated debt and dividend on equity facilities in a proportionate manner  Any deficit in commercial debt servicing (to the extent of 10% shortfall in projected traffic levels) would also be funded by GoS in the form of Minimum Revenue Guarantee. Additional funding shortfalls would be funded by the developer. MRG funding would carry interest and would be repayable by the project from future cash generations Cost PKR m Construction Cost 5,100 Interest During Construction 296 Engineering Cost 212 Financial & Legal Consultancy 201 Insurance 40 Other Costs 196 Total Project Cost 6,045* Construction Cost, 84% Other Costs, 16%

Proportionate repayments (after repayment of commercial loan) GoS sub-loanMRG  Tenure Flexible  Grace period 10 yrs  Repayment start date Jun-23  Repayment end date Jun-29  Interest 4% till repayment of bank loan & 8% thereafter  Inception Oct-12  Available till Jun-20  Tenure Flexible  Grace period 10 yrs  Repayment start date Jun-23  Repayment end date Jun-26  InterestBlended 5% Developers Equity  First dividend repayment date: Jun-21  Equity redemption:  Start date – Jun-23  End date – Jun-28  Equity redemption allowed amounts equal GoS subordinate loan repayment Commercial loan will be repaid first followed by other payments in proportionate manner  Inception Apr-11  Tenure 10 yrs  Grace period 2yrs  Repayment 8yrs  Interest 3M Kibor+2.5%  Repayment Quarterly Financing Structure: Details of Repayment Commercial Loan

Mark-up Subsidy Guarantee MechanismResults Earlier envisaged GoS would ensure the project gets commercial loan at 10%. GoS intended to lend the but the banks did not agree so now the transaction will be based on 3M KIBOR + 2.5%. The net result would be an explicit Subsidy named Mark- up Subsidy Guarantee(MSG) for which a Bank Guarantee would have to be furnished upfront Earlier GoS incurred an implicit cost of PKR 694 million due to placement of funds with Now, the explicit cost may be PKR 828 million at the base case rate *All numbers are tentative and based on different permutations of the base rate

GoS Soft Loan MechanismBenefits GoS will inject soft loan in the project during the construction phase and it would be paid back in pro rata basis after the full repayment of commercial debt. The alternative model followed in the region is that the Govt. gives an upfront grant upto 40% to 60% of the project cost, which would have amounted to about PKR 3 to 3.5 billion on the Indian model Minimum Revenue Guarantee MechanismBenefits GoS will provide MRG in two forms: The project already has a short fall in its debt payment structure that would mean that GoS will have to support it debt payment structure in the form of bridge financing facility; under current set up it would be to the tune of PKR 964 million. On the other hand, the 2 nd part of MRG would cover revenue short fall guarantee up to 10% if it exceeds 10% then the developer will need to inject capital in the form of equity or debt. The MRG loan stands at PKR 1750 million, which will be returned along with the interest after the commercial debt is repaid. MRG also gives a minimum revenue guarantee of 10% which contingent and amounts to PKR 426 The alternative route is to give a direct cumulative grant at the start of the project amounting to PKR 3 billion

Overall Scenario due to transaction structure Our StructureAlternative Our nominal cost at base case MSG= (PKR 828 million) deferred MRG & Soft-loan interest income Total returns with opportunity costs = (PKR 1160 million) Indian support: upfront non-recoverable grant of PKR 2.5 billion keeping in view the nature of project Korean Support: MRG support usually comes up to 80% which would have been PKR 104 billion for our project Egypt recently gave 100% MRG for its highway project from Cairo to Alexandria for 70,000 vehicle traffic- 100% MRG for our project would have been around PKR 130 billion AdvantagesDisadvantages Cost savings Model for other projects in the Country Complex structure *All numbers are tentative and based on different permutations of the base rate

Achievements & Cost comparison of Hyderabad Mirpurkhas Road Project  The first developer bid for construction cost (CC) was PKR 9.8 billion  First round of negotiations brought down CC to PKR 6.2 billion  The final round of negotiations, with the help of Works and Service Department and ADB consultants, brought down the CC to final Price of PKR 5.1 billion (Cost per 75 million per km)  NHA data on Sindh road project’s cost overrun most of which have not been completed to-date

Financing Structure Evolution MilestoneGoS offer At the RFP GoS offered  100% revenue guarantee  Commercial debt raising guarantee with subsidized Soft loan In negotiation with the developer the GoS settlement  10% revenue guarantee  Lien on funds placed with the banks for interest rate subsidy  Soft loan In negotiation with the banks the GoS settlement initially  MRG : PKR 1023 million + PKR 426 million ( 10% contingent)  Pre-construction toll payment in lieu of political risk of PKR 250 million made part of project costs  Only interest rate subsidy by fund placement with no lien but with implicit opportunity costs  Soft loan: PKR 1.75 million Final package  MSG of PKR 551 million based on current rates  Soft loan: PKR 1.75 billion  MRG (also a soft loan) : PKR 1279million million (contingent 10%)

HMDC risk sharing GoS RiskDeveloper RiskEqual Risk of Developer & GoS Technical RiskBorne byMitigating Factors Design Risk Delay Risk Escalation Risk Inflation Risk Efficiency Risk Commercial Risk O&M Risk Project Abandon Risk Govt. Financial Risk Debt Financing Risk Interest Rate Risk Currency Risk Vetting, reviewing & IE all helped to mitigate this risk Fixed by placing the penalty clauses, GOS has mitigated this risk Fixed project as decided with the developer has transferred the risk appropriately The inflation risk has been incorporated in the fixed price contract Appropriate checks and balances & effective use of IE will help ensure that efficiency is obtained GoS is undertaking demand risk till commercial lending is repaid, so, risk is solely borne by Developer. However, if demand is lower than projected, GoS loan may be jeopardized Entirely borne by Developer If Developer abandons the project, it would be assumed by the Govt. and if IE and other mechanisms work well, GOS would have a developed facility Fixed interest rate arrangements helped in mitigating this risk GoS is financing only 30% of the project cost and MRG support however in the event of default the Govt. will end up with the developed facilty as per termination clause of concession agreement Moderate to high, because GOS is assuming debt arrangements and its repayments which is not common in PPP’s Developer is responsible for currency risk

Restricted Components for Cost Escalation DieselCementSteelBitumen Upto 10% escalation provisioned in current project construction cost estimate Above 10% Shared equally by GoS and the Developer Cost Escalation These restricted components form 30% of the total cost of the project Cost Escalation % Cost Escalation Charges Absorbed by the Project Developer Share GoS Share 10%PKR 139m Nil 20%PKR 255mPKR 139mPKR 58m 30%PKR 353mPKR 139mPKR 107m 40%PKR 437mPKR 139mPKR 149m GoS Exposure: Cost Escalation

Deokjae Default a)Retendering procedure  Highest tender price adjusted for outstanding bank loan before developer is compensated b)No Retendering procedure  Step-in rights for lender, or  Termination calculation expert appointed to compute compensation amount after adjusting debt GoS Default  Under this scenario it becomes binding on GoS to repay the loan via concessionaire under Section 22.3(a)(i) of concession agreement Force Majeure  Under this scenario it becomes binding on GoS to repay the loan via concessionaire under Section 22.12(a) of concession agreement Default Scenarios Triggers/milestone Base case GoS Default Developer Default Force Majeure Loan take-up  Compensate Developer  Project Completion   ? Lender’s Risk Overall Scenario Matrix

Default: Risk exposure versus Securitization After the project is completed, the GoS risk exposures are largely mitigated by securitization of assets worth more than the cumulative risks, thereby, the risk of the GoS is negligible

Thanks