Law & Policy Associates MECKLENBURG COUNTY Detention Operations Master Plan REPORT KIMME & Associates, Inc./Law & Policy Associates with assistance from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Advertisements

Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.
Corrections System Master Plan PRELIMINARY CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 CARTER GOBLE LEE In association with CH2M HILL.
Washtenaw County Strategic Space Plan Recommendations November 1, 2006.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Paul McDonnell April 23, 2009 TEETER Teeter is a method for distributing taxes which guarantees that participating agencies receive 100% of levied.
Feasibility Study and Concept Design for the Maine Correctional Center Maine Department of Corrections Windham, Maine Prepared by: SMRT Architects and.
WELCOME STARKE COUNTY CITIZENS! Please Sign the Attendance Sheet.
SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.
Coshocton County Public Safety Facility Proposed Public Safety Facility Constructed in 1973.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Developing Master Plans for Constructing Tribal Correctional Facilities and Multi-Service Centers Tribal Justice and Safety Conference July 30, 2007 Phoenix,
1 Purpose  Summarize Monday’s workshop  Update on the Radio System – confirm staff’s recommendation  Jail Expansion – discussion/direction  Discussion.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER SIXSIX.
Yavapai County Jail District. Jail District Overview  Jail District History –Formation of Jail District –¼ Cent Sales Tax –Camp Verde Jail Expansion.
Jail Population Mitigation Strategies January 18, 2007.
Maine County Commissioners’ Association & Maine Sheriffs’ Association JOINT PLAN To Establish The: MAINE JAIL AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS SYSTEM An Overview.
Hamilton County, Ohio Correctional Master Plan Pre-architectural Program Analysis of Options.
San Francisco Sheriff Department Budget and Finance Committee Departmental Overview April 21, 2005.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
Reentry: A Community Based Strategy. Overview Brief History of Community Programs Over the last two decades there has been substantial growth in community.
State of Connecticut Department of Correction Juvenile Justice Planning and Implementation Committee Data Presentation Commissioner Theresa C. Lantz.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FY11 Budget Workshop May 18, 2010.
State Board of Corrections An Overview of Public Law 2008 Chapter 653.
DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE OPERATING BUDGET DEFICIT Wansley Walters, Secretary Rick Scott, Governor SENATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMITTEE October.
The Annie E. Casey Foundation Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative JDAI Council of State Governments May 17, 2009 Rand Young, WA State JDAI Coordinator.
The Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey A Partnership Responding to Prisoner Re-entry.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
Public Safety and Justice Policies, Systems, and Issues for Adult Criminal System April 8, 2004 Community of Interest.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.
April 24, 2012 Report on Operating Costs for Proposed Jail Expansion 04/24/12 1 Report on Operating Costs for Proposed Jail Expansion.
PRETRIAL SERVICES IT’S COMING... FY 2001: project development/planning grant (9 months) FY 2002: project implementation grant for full operation.
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to The Urban Institute, its trustees, or.
Presentation to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr. February 22, 2011.
Skagit County Criminal Justice Master Plan Conclusions and Recommendations.
Broward Sheriff’s Office Department of Detention and Community Control In-Custody Behavioral Services Division Presentation for the Florida Partners in.
\. 2 Expediting Court Process As bureaucracies advance red-tape bureaucratization tends to develop Opportunities to expedite can occur at various points.
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Proposed Streamlining Plan October 28, 2011.
1 2015/16 – 2016/17 Budget Process BCC Workshop April 27, 2015.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
1 Department of Correctional Services Vote 19 CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: 2001/2002.
September 15, 2008 Budget Workshop Spending Authority.
Orange County Corrections Department December 4, 2007 CORRECTIONS UPDATE Corrections Chief.
DUVALL 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE and SURVEY RESULTS 9:00 – 10:30 AM Survey Results 30 minutes (Lara) Comprehensive Plan, Density and Capacity, and.
Alpine County Government Center Board of Supervisors Presentation June 26, 2013.
Criminal Justice Committee Meeting September 23, 2015 Transition Process to New Jail 1.
Copyright 2011 Curriculum Technology, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
DCS 2010/11 ENE BUDGET ALLOCATIONS PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE
Jail Population Management and Pretrial Practice in California
Department of Corrections BCC Public Safety Workshop February 28, 2017
Community Corrections 2019 Budget
Garry Herceg Consultant Pretrial Justice Institute
Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016
Rockwall County, Texas Criminal Justice System Assessment and Forecast
Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
AACRAO Financials Leadership Conference December 6, 2014
Trends and Projections
Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: 2001/2002
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
JASPER COUNTY PHASE 2 JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND JAIL EXPANSION PROJECT
Presentation transcript:

Law & Policy Associates MECKLENBURG COUNTY Detention Operations Master Plan REPORT KIMME & Associates, Inc./Law & Policy Associates with assistance from American University April 15, 2008

Law & Policy Associates Adult Jail Population

Law & Policy Associates 3 Adult Jail Population History 2,668 beds available 2,668 beds available  North (614), Central (1904), WRRC (150)  2,776 with Youthful Offender Addition  excludes temporary “Sprung” structure 2,671 Average Daily Population CY ,671 Average Daily Population CY 2007  956 in Calendar Year 1990  179% increase while County grew 70% 2,867 = Peak Day in 2007 (+7.5%) 2,867 = Peak Day in 2007 (+7.5%)

Law & Policy Associates 4

5 Mecklenburg 2007: 30.7 Mecklenburg 1990: 18.7 Mecklenburg Rate in 1983 = 6.8

Law & Policy Associates 6 OvercrowdingOvercrowding Partly function of Peaks & Classification Partly function of Peaks & Classification High security and special needs areas not used for other classifications High security and special needs areas not used for other classifications Overcrowding in minimum-medium pods Overcrowding in minimum-medium pods  14, 56 bed pods; each has inmates Averaged 399 inmates “on the floor” daily in 2007 (Calendar year calculation) Averaged 399 inmates “on the floor” daily in 2007 (Calendar year calculation)  Peak of 586 (September 25) Bed Shortfall today Bed Shortfall today

Law & Policy Associates 7 Inmates “On-the-Floor”

Law & Policy Associates BASE ADP, Facility, Cost Projections

Law & Policy Associates 9 “BASE” ADP Projections (total system: North, Central, WRRC) System processes as they are System processes as they are Linked to county growth Linked to county growth  695,000 in 2000  1,600,000 by 2027 (+130%)

Law & Policy Associates 10 Space Planning - BASE Needs Space Needs provided in 2 phases Space Needs provided in 2 phases Phase 1: Phase 1:  Initiate planning immediately  2,404 new beds, 5,180 total when done  Open in 2012  Satisfies needs through 2020 Phase 2: Phase 2:  2,144 new beds, 7,324 total when done  Satisfies needs through 2030

Law & Policy Associates 11 Preliminary Schedule - BASE 825 Bed Shortfall by ,000 by 2013

Law & Policy Associates 12 Phase 1 Space Needs ,060,000 sq.ft. available today

Law & Policy Associates 13 Phase 2 Space Needs 2030

Law & Policy Associates 14 Construction Costs - BASE Needs (in 2008 dollars) Phase 1: $290-$355 million Phase 1: $290-$355 million  Annual payment at 5%, 20 years  Based on average construction cost  $26.0 million annually Construction Inflation = 7% annually Construction Inflation = 7% annually Phase 2: $240-$300 million Phase 2: $240-$300 million  Annual payment at 5%, 20 years  $21.8 million annually

Law & Policy Associates 15 Annual Operational Costs - BASE Needs (in 2007 dollars) Operations/Staffing/Utilities Operations/Staffing/Utilities Current Costs: $80 million Current Costs: $80 million Future costs above 2007 costs: Future costs above 2007 costs:  Phase 1 in opening year (2012): +$12.6 million (16%)  Phase 1 in 2020: +$47 million (59%)  Phase 2 in 2030: +$97 million (122%)

Law & Policy Associates 16 Combined Annual Cost Increases- BASE Phase 1 in opening year (2012): $39 million above 2007 costs Phase 1 in opening year (2012): $39 million above 2007 costs Phase 1 in 2020: $73 million Phase 1 in 2020: $73 million Phase 2 in 2030: $145 million Phase 2 in 2030: $145 million  Includes overlapping building payments on phases 1 & 2 ($26.0M plus $21.8M)

Law & Policy Associates Recommended Approaches to Managing Jail Population Size

Law & Policy Associates 18 Reducing ALOS

Law & Policy Associates 19 Consensus Plan Policy Elements, Costs ($2.6 million*), & ADP Savings *Excludes cost of space

Law & Policy Associates 20 Total estimated annual cost of $2.6 million to: Implement revised bond / pretrial release policy Implement pre-warrant screening of citizen complaints Expedite resolution of jailed misdemeanor cases

Law & Policy Associates 21 Total estimated annual cost of $2.6 million to (continued) : Expedite disposition of jailed non- homicide felony cases (45% of total) Expedite resolution of jailed homicide cases Prompt resolution of jailed probation violation cases Enhance capacity of problem-solving courts

Law & Policy Associates MODIFIED ADP, Facility, Cost Projections

Law & Policy Associates 23 BASE & MODIFIED ADP Projection Summary

Law & Policy Associates 24 Space Planning - MODIFIED Phase 1: Phase 1:  Initiate planning immediately  Similar 400 bed shortfall as today by 2012  1,644 new beds, 4,420 total when done  760 beds less than BASE needs  Satisfies needs through 2020 Phase 2: Phase 2:  1,848 new beds, 6,268 total when done  1,056 total beds less than BASE  Satisfies needs through 2030

Law & Policy Associates 25 Construction Costs - MODIFIED Needs (2008 dollars) Phase 1: $ million Phase 1: $ million  Annual payment at 5%, 20 years  $18.2 million (based on average project cost) Phase 2: $ million Phase 2: $ million  Annual payment at 5%, 20 years  $18.7 million

Law & Policy Associates 26 Annual Operational Costs - MODIFIED Needs (2007 dollars) Operations/Staffing/Utilities : Operations/Staffing/Utilities : Current Costs: $80 million Current Costs: $80 million Future costs above current costs: Future costs above current costs:  Phase 1 in opening year (2012): +$3.1 million (3.9%)  Phase 1 in 2020: +$32 million (40%)  Phase 2 in 2030: +$70 million (89%)

Law & Policy Associates 27 Combined Annual Cost Increases- MODIFIED Phase 1 in opening year (2012): $21 million Phase 1 in opening year (2012): $21 million Phase 1 in 2020: $50 million Phase 1 in 2020: $50 million Phase 2 in 2030: $107 million Phase 2 in 2030: $107 million  Includes overlapping building payments on phases 1 & 2 ($18.2M & $18.7M)

Law & Policy Associates Estimated SAVINGS from Implementing Consensus Changes

Law & Policy Associates 29 COMBINED ANNUAL SAVINGS (Base minus Modified Costs) Phase 1 in opening year (2012): $17.3 million gross savings Phase 1 in opening year (2012): $17.3 million gross savings  Gross System Change Cost = $2.6 million  Net savings = $14.7 million annual  More than 5 to 1 return on investment

Law & Policy Associates 30 Gross Cost Estimate Summary (annual project and operational costs in $millions) Calculated In Current Dollars

Law & Policy Associates 31 Gross Life Cycle Cost Savings Includes Building Financing Includes Building Financing  20 years, 5% average rate  7% inflation for Ph. 1  4.5% inflation for Ph. 2 Includes Inflation: Includes Inflation:  CPI last 3 years = 2.7%  3% assumed Over 19 year life cycle: Over 19 year life cycle:  $780 million saved

Law & Policy Associates 32 Gross Life Cycle Costs of Consensus Change & Net Savings Life Cycle Costs of Consensus Changes Life Cycle Costs of Consensus Changes  $2.6 million in current dollars  3% inflation annually, grow w/population  Costs begin in FY GROSS Life Cycle Costs = $125 Million GROSS Life Cycle Costs = $125 Million NET Life Cycle Savings = NET Life Cycle Savings =  $655 Million

Law & Policy Associates 33 Maintaining the Savings Continue to monitor/assess progress Continue to monitor/assess progress Develop monitoring tools and processes Develop monitoring tools and processes Re-assess need for additional supporting assets regularly (staff, space, technology) Re-assess need for additional supporting assets regularly (staff, space, technology)

Law & Policy Associates MECKLENBURG COUNTY Detention Operations Master Plan REPORT KIMME & Associates, Inc./Law & Policy Associates with assistance from American University April 15, 2008