1 EEA/ELRA Load Curtailment Jarreau Cycle 4 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reducing Peak Demand using Self-Organizing Systems Reducing Peak Demand using Self-Organizing Systems Follow Natures Lead Copyright 2007 REGEN Energy Inc.
Advertisements

1 Demand-Side Management Influence on Reliability NERC Demand-Side Management Task Force (DSMTF) Rick Voytas, Chair November 2007 Presented To The U.S.
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
Briefing on California ISO Dynamic Transfers Stakeholder Process For WECC Seams Issues Subcommittee Meeting May 4, 2010 Jim Price, Lead Engineering Specialist.
© 2009 The Williams Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ______________ WECC November 12, 2012.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Standards WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 7-8, 2006.
1 PER-005 Update Impact on Operators System Operator Conference April and May 1-3, 2012 Columbia, SC Margaret Stambach Manager, Training Services.
Public Health Seattle & King County Incident Command System Overview May 2004.
Goshen Area Bus Reconfiguration
2013 Summer Overview Jeffrey S McDonald Power System Operator CUEA San Diego, CA June 6, 2013.
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
NPRR 532 Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin David Kee CPS Energy Energy Supply & Market.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Demand Response Working Group AESO ‘As Is’ and Needs Assessment.
1 Low Load Process Jarreau Cycle Objectives l Review applicable NERC Standards that apply l Review CDP 2.6 Low Load Condition Procedure l Describe.
Load Resource Deployment Summary 2006 to Present 2006 DateTime Duration (min) Amount of Response (MW)Type of Deployment 4/17/200615: EECP Step.
Recent ERCOT Events Lessons Learned
System Operator Conference NERC Standards Review for: Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair Discussion Item: Use of Emergency eTags January 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Emergency Transfer Criteria NYSRC Reliability.
Understanding Multiagency Coordination IS-701.A – February 2010 Visual 2.1 Unit 2: Understanding Multiagency Coordination.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Operational Communications and Coordination: Real World Experiences
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Part of a Broader Strategy
Governor’s Taskforce for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Issue Paper Communications Workgroup Members Robert Rolfs, State Epidemiologist, Utah Department.
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Stakeholder Meeting February 13, 2008 Interaction between Scarcity Pricing and Demand Response Dongqing Holly Liu, Ph.D. Senior Market and Product Economist.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Reliability and Operations Subcommittee Report Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2005.
Changes to the Network Emergency Co-ordinator (NEC) Safety Case resulting from Exit Reform UNC Workgroup 0412 Meeting – 1 st March 2012.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
Flowgate Allocation Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Role of Smart Grids in the Italian Energy Policy Strategy Marcello Capra General Directorate for Electricity Market, Renewables, Energy Efficiency and.
©2004 PJMwww.pjm.com 1 PJM's Perspective on Reliability – Summer 2004 and Beyond Karl Pfirrmann President -- PJM Western Region FERC Summer Reliability.
Project Portfolio Management Business Priorities Presentation.
Explanation of Changes to Draft “Firming” Schedule, Service Schedule E Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
Operations Report Kent Saathoff System Operations ERCOT.
ESI/SPP Seams Agreement Implementation Update Transmission Planning Summit August 11, 2010.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
NERC Lessons Learned Summary LLs Published in December 2015.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board November 14, 2006.
Demand Response as a Distributed Energy Resource presented by: Mark S. Martinez Manager, Program Development PLMA Fall Conference September 2004.
H.B. “Trip” Doggett President and Chief Executive Officer Review of February 2, 2011 Energy Emergency Alert (EEA) Event Emergency Event Coordination Workshop.
ISO Confidential Overview of California’s Current Drought and its Effects on the Energy System Dede Subakti, P. E. Director, Operations Engineering Services.
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
Exercise Neptune Findings Gas Customer Forum 29 th January 2007 Jacky Carroll Network Manager Emergency Planning Gas National Control Centre.
1 EEA Workshop 3 April 2, /3/2015For the purpose of discussion only.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
May 4, 2001 Maryland PSC Summer Reliability Assessment Allegheny Power May 4, 2001.
ROS Presentation: Dynamic Scheduling and EEA Austin, TX September 10, 2009 Steve Isser Vice President and General Counsel Good Company Associates
RELIABILITY COORDINATOR TOPICS 2006 FRCC SYSTEM OPERATOR SEMINAR.
Reliability and Operations Subcommittee Report on Reliable Fuel Operations in ERCOT Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee February 3,
NERC Lessons Learned Summary
Transmission Planning in ERCOT- Overview
Black Start Overview.
Southern Cross Directives Planning Items
PSERC Workshop – August 5, 2008
December 9, 2005 Allison DiGrande, External Affairs Department, ISO/NE
Reliability & Market Impacts Resulting from RC Expansion
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Rich Hydzik, Avista NWPP RSGC Vice-Chair
ViVa_MultimediaStoryboard
ViVa_MultimediaStoryboard
Introduction to: National Response Plan (NRP)
Special MRC – Fuel Security
Reliability & Market Impacts Resulting from RC Expansion
Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview
Presentation transcript:

1 EEA/ELRA Load Curtailment Jarreau Cycle

2 Objectives l Discuss and describe each NERC EEA. l Dispatchers will be able to identify the proper EEA and ELRAL to use for different situations. l Describe the difference between a projected shortfall and dynamic shortfall and the steps to mitigate each. l Describe the difference between a System Wide shortfall vs. local shortfall. l Perform actual drills with a set of given conditions

3 References l NERC – tory_Approved.htmlhttp:// tory_Approved.html –Standard EOP — Capacity and Energy Emergencies –Standard EOP — Load Shedding Plans l Current Day Procedures –EMO/SPO Current Day Procedure 2.1 Curtailment Process l Transmission Business Procedure “Curtailment Process”

4 Dynamic Shortfall (attachment 7)

5 Energy Emergency Alert (EEA) l For clarification during a potential and actual energy emergency, NERC established four levels of Energy Emergency Alerts. –EEA 1 — All available resources in use. –EEA 2 — Load management procedures in effect. –EEA 3 — Firm load interruption imminent or in progress. –EEA 0 – Termination.

6 Entergy Load Curtailment Procedure Dynamic Shortfall - A Dynamic Shortfall is an unanticipated shortage of supply that is immediate or anticipated to occur within less than ten minutes. Projected Shortfall - A Projected Shortfall is a shortage of supply anticipated to occur more than ten minutes in the future. Projected Shortfalls can become Dynamic Shortfalls if System conditions suddenly worsen. Systemwide Shortfall - A Systemwide Shortfall is a shortage of supply that can be relieved by curtailing load anywhere on the System. In Systemwide Shortfalls, all loads are eligible for curtailment in accordance with the general curtailment priorities. Local Shortfall - A Local Shortfall is a shortage of supply in a local area that would cause line overloads or low voltage problems in that area. Only the curtailment of demand in that area can relieve these problems. In Local Shortfalls, certain local loads are subject to curtailment, while loads elsewhere in the Entergy System will not be subject to curtailment, since curtailing those loads would not relieve the local problems.

7 Entergy Load Risk Alert Protocols (ELRAL). l Establishes a “common language” to quickly and efficiently inform Entergy key management of the criticality of any load risk situation. l Develops a Native Load Buffer risk indicator. l Provides EOS/EMO to declare Load Risk Alert Levels. l Provides for activation of the System Command Center when native load is at risk. l Provides highly coordinated communications with proactive and pager alerts providing consistent and timely information to all key management.

8 High Level Description Matrix

9 Table of Interruptible Loads/Sales

10 Entergy Operating Subcommittee (EOS)

11 Firm Load Curtailment Allocation Worksheet

12 Curtailment/Interruptible Amount Summary

13 Drill Scenario 1 l Given a set of conditions please determine a plan of action and discuss with class: –Date: 07/23/2010 –Time: 16:30 –GA1 trips at full load leaving current reserve at -200 reserves –Once you call for RSS coverage for GA1 then Grand Gulf trips l What would be some of your actions and the developed plan to and what is your actions?

14 Drill Scenario 2 l Given a set of conditions please determine a plan of action and discuss with class: –Date: 07/15/2010 –Time: 16:30 –WF3 trips at full load leaving current reserve at -800 reserves l What is the plan and what is your actions?

15 Review l Discussed and describe each NERC EEA. l Defined the term “energy deficient entity” as described by the NERC Standard. l Discussed EEA and ELRAL levels. l Described the difference between a projected shortfall and dynamic shortfall and the steps to mitigate each. l Described the difference between a System Wide shortfall vs. local shortfall. l Discussed key steps in curtailment process. l Performed drills