Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Guide Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 201.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Overview of the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management David Berrisford, Field Services Branch Director DPS Homeland Security & Emergency.
Advertisements

Minnesota Port and Waterway Security Working Group Meeting April 12, 2012.
INTEGRATING RISK MANAGEMENT INTO THE HOMELAND SECURITY ENTERPRISE Brief to OEMA Spring Directors Seminar 12 April 2012SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR
National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.
Office of Risk and Emergency Management: Emergency Preparedness Professional Development Series Bridging the Gap: Utilizing Community Partnerships in Developing.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
1 MOTOROLA and the Stylized M Logo are registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office. All other product or service names are the property of their respective.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
THIRA FEPA Mid Year Work Session THIRA – EMPG/HSGP Grant Requirement Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) “THIRA processes.
Houston UASI and RCPI A local-regional approach to THIRA
Capabilities Estimation
A Brief Explanation of the Comprehensive Emergency Management System and its “Stakeholder” relationship to Hydrometeorological Products, Services and Supporting.
Arizona: One Approach to doing a THIRA Presented by: Lisa Hansen, Assistant Director, Planning and Preparedness, Arizona Department of Homeland Security.
Hazard Planning for Hospitals Large and Small Darrell Ruby, CEM Region 9 Coordinator.
For Discussion Purposes Only
1 Integration: Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) and Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REPP) Technological Hazards Divisions.
Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Mr. James Kish, Director Technological Hazards National Preparedness Directorate.
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program State Process and SHSS.
Session 6 Integrated Emergency Management. Objectives of the Session Students will be able to 6.1 Define the principle of integration. 6.2Discuss the.
Federal Transit Administration Office of Safety and Security FTA BUS SAFETY & SECURITY PROGRAM 18 th NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RURAL PUBLIC AND INTERCITY.
State/Urban Area Improvement Planning Conference.
Michael Warren Senior Emergency Services Coordinator HMEP GRANT ADMINISTRATOR (916) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
Spring Directors’ Conference Presented By: Andrew Velasquez III
Mitigation Plan for Four New Jersey Counties Monitoring, Evaluation, & Updates prepared for: Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties prepared.
THIRA/SPR Process 2014 August 7, What is the THIRA? Stands for Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Required by DHS – Must be completed.
Part of a Broader Strategy
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop.
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
National Preparedness All Hazards Consortium Corey Gruber Assistant Deputy Administrator, National Preparedness National Preparedness.
Mitigation can include structural and nonstructural efforts.
Disasters and Emergencies The Role of The Chaplain in the world of Emergency Management.
FY 2013 Emergency Management Grants Program (EMPG)
1 Inter Agency Board Meeting San Antonio, TX February 29, 2012.
Association of Defense Communities June 23, 2015
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Program Overview
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop February 26, 2013 Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
FEPA Mid Year Work Session Emergency Management, Preparedness and Assistance (EMPA) Agreement – State Funds Program Conditions – Attachment C =
Homeland Security Grant Program 2015 Process Michelle Hanneken Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
2012 Homeland Security Grant Program Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Mr. Sam Jonker-Burke Mr. Mike Curtis April.
Mitigation Plan for Four New Jersey Counties Municipal Mitigation Measures prepared for: Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties prepared by:
Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe “Best Practices for Supporting Tribal Members” Lee Shipman, Emergency Management Director.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
1 Emergency Management Forum – 8 January 2009 Department of Crime Control & Public Safety Division of Emergency Management.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
Session 8Slide 8-1 The Mitigation Plan Session 8 Slide Deck.
2011 HSGP Grant Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Mr. Sam Jonker-Burke Mr. Mike Curtis April 30, 2012.
USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop Sandra K. Knight, PhD, PE, D.WRE Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, FEMA August.
Prepare + Prevent + Respond + Recover + Mitigate Preparedness Section Planning Branch 1.
T HREAT AND H AZARD I DENTIFICATION AND R ISK A SSESSMENT.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
Homeland Security Grant Program Emergency Preparedness Conference – June 2009 NH Department of Safety John J. Barthelmes, Commissioner Earl M. Sweeney,
2016 THIRA & State Homeland Security Grant. Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) National Preparedness Goal driven Annual Assessment.
North Carolina Emergency Management Homeland Security Grants Management Tuesday, March 22 1:00 - 1:45 pm Harrah's Conference Center Ash Meeting Room Callion.
Keys to THIRA/SPR Results driven by participants
Overview Briefing Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Presidential Policy Directive 8 / PPD-8: National Preparedness May 2012.
Overview
April 21, 2017 Workshop Overview
Tribal Hazard Mitigation Planning
Developing a Multiyear Training and Exercise Plan
THIRA/SPR Overview and Updated Methodology
Is Our Nation More Prepared Since 9/11?
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
NHSC Homeland Security Grants Return on Investment Study
Preparedness Grants 101. Preparedness Grants 101.
The Foundation of Capability:
FY 2019 Homeland Security Grant Programs HS Grant Regional Meetings
The Intercity Bus Security Grant Program & Associated Initiatives 2019 BISC Summer Meeting Kerry L. Thomas Chief, Transportation Infrastructure Security.
Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235
Louisiana School Emergency Management Program
Presentation transcript:

Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Guide Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 201

THIRA is Part of a Larger Effort  The National Preparedness System outlines an organized process for achieving the National Preparedness Goal.  The foundation of the System is identifying and assessing risks.  THIRA is one process that a community can use to identify and assess their risks.

What is a Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA)?  CPG 201 is the guidance; THIRA is the output  THIRA does not replace the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) or Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP)

Who Is Required to Complete a THIRA? All grantees receiving Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) and Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) – Typically, this means states, commonwealths and territories All Urban Areas receiving funding under the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) grant program

2012 FEMA THIRA ANALYSIS  FEMA Regional THIRAs were submitted September 2012  Urban area, state, territorial, and tribal nation THIRAs were submitted on December 31, 2012  FEMA Reviewed THIRA Analysis and Provided Feedback to States on:  THIRA outputs  Desired outcomes/Capability Targets  Objective of FEMA Review Analysis:  Inform national preparedness efforts

THIRA COMPONENTS

Step 1: Threat and Hazard Types Identify types of threats/hazards: Natural Technological Human-caused

Step 1: Example Threats and Hazards of Concern

Step 2: Give the Threats and Hazards Context Focused on hazards and threats of greatest concern Show how a threat or hazard can affect your jurisdiction Multiple threats or hazards occurring at the same time Cascading effects of a threat or hazard

Step 3: Examine the Core Capabilities Using the Threats and Hazards

3.a Determine the Desired Outcomes

Step 3: Examine the Core Capabilities Using the Threats and Hazards 3.b Consider Estimated Impacts  For each threat and hazard, determine the impacts on the community through the lens of the core capabilities  Consider impacts related to the mission areas

Step 4: Set Capability Targets Capability targets are based on the greatest impact combined with the desired outcomes The output of this step is to have a target for each of the Core Capabilities These targets will serve as the basis for the State Preparedness Report capability assessment

Step 5: Apply THIRA Results After the THIRA is completed, apply result to the community’s risk management efforts A jurisdiction may find it simply needs to sustain existing capabilities, or it may identify a resource shortfall or capability gap

THIRA Benefits Strategic planning for prioritizing resources Inform Mitigation planning and projects Use to build planning scenarios Utilize results for exercises and training

Next Steps / On-going Activities Review and update THIRA annually Coordinate THIRA process with stakeholders including whole community Encourage local jurisdictions to conduct their own THIRA (A maybe…down the road)

THIRA: Things to Remember Required for Grantee (State) Funding Eligibility Informs, but does not take the place of, our HIRA and other risk analyses Our plans and programs should be risk-based We should allocate resources according to our risk (get more bang for our buck)

Questions Patrick Sheehan, Chief Plans Branch