“SMARTer” Goals Winter 2012 1 A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework October 2011.
Advertisements

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 4: S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development August 2012 I. Welcome (3 minutes)
Paul Toner, MTA, President Heather Peske, ESE, Associate Commissioner for Ed Quality Teachers Union Reform Network Conference November 1, 2013 Massachusetts.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 1 Welcome!  Please complete the four “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 NEC and SEEM Workshop May 4,  9:00 AM - 10:00 AM: An overview of the process for Board members and union representatives  10:15 AM - 12:00 noon:
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Educator Evaluation Workshop: Gathering Evidence, Conducting Observations & Providing Feedback MSSAA Summer Institute July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Department.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Slide 1 is the title slide.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Title IIA: Connecting Professional Development with Educator Evaluation June 1, 2015 Craig Waterman.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Educator Effectiveness and The Common Core State Standards October 20, 2013 Bend Oregon.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
Educator Evaluation System
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education July, 2011
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion.
Educator Evaluation 101: A Special Overview Session for Educator Preparation Programs May 2013.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development August
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Welcome! March 2013 ELA Network
Candidate Assessment of Performance Using the CAP Rubric Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
The New Educator Evaluation System
The New Educator Evaluation System
The New Educator Evaluation System
Connecting the Model Curriculum Project to Educator Evaluation
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Baldwin High School Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Presentation transcript:

“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams

Please sit with your Team Members You will be talking in pairs/ trios and at your table during today’s workshop 2 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

3 ESE Homepage 3

4 Educator Evaluation Homepage 4

5 Educator Evaluation Model System 5

6 3 – 2 – 1 (+ 1) 3 things I know about SMART goals are… 2 things I know about how goals fit into the Educator Evaluation system are… 1 burning question I have is… + 1 hold for later Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

7 Intended Outcomes for today:  Understand the rationale and framework for the MA “SMARTer Goal” model  Be able to identify characteristics of “not so SMART,” “SMART” and “SMARTer” goals  Be able to translate at least one school/district priority into a “SMARTer” goal  Have at least one “SMARTer” goal to take back to your school/district 7 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

88 Agenda  Welcome, Warm Up & Intended Outcomes  Context: Goal Setting in the new Educator Evaluation Framework  Break (10 mins)  The Massachusetts “SMARTer” Goal Model  Guided Practice # 1  Guided Practice # 2  Guided Practice # 3  Wrap Up, Feedback and Questions Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

99 5 Step Evaluation Cycle  Foundation for the Framework & Model  Every educator is an active participant in an evaluation  Process promotes collaboration and continuous learning Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

10 Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Collaboration and Continuous Learning are the focus Every educator proposes at least 1 professional practice goal and 1 student learning goal – team goals must be considered. Evaluator approves the Goals and Plan for accomplishing them. Every educator uses a rubric and data about student learning to identify strengths and weaknesses

11 Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Collaboration and Continuous Learning are the focus Every educator & evaluator collects evidence and assesses progress on goals

12 Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process Continuous Learning Collaboration and Continuous Learning are the focus Every educator has a mid-cycle review focusing on progress on goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

13 Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Collaboration and Continuous Learning are the focus Every educator earns one of four ratings of performance

MA Department of Elementary and Secondary EducationMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 14

15 Educators earn two separate ratings 15 Summative Rating Exemplary 1-YEAR SELF- DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN 2-YEAR SELF-DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN Proficient Needs Improvement DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN Unsatisfactory IMPROVEMENT PLAN LowModerateHigh Rating of Impact on Student Learning (multiple measures of performance, including MCAS Student Growth Percentile and MEPA where available) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Summative Rating Exemplary 1-YEAR SELF- DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN 2-YEAR SELF-DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN Proficient Needs Improvement DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN Unsatisfactory IMPROVEMENT PLAN LowModerateHigh Rating of Impact on Student Learning (multiple measures of performance, including MCAS Student Growth Percentile and MEPA where available) Based on: Rating of Performance on each of 4 Standards + Attainment of Goals Based on Trends and Patterns on state- and district-determined measures of student learning gains

16 Note: Two Ways the 5-Step Cycle is different for Principals and Central Office Administrators  Goals: Model System includes district or school improvement goals, as well as student learning and professional practice goals  Evaluation Cycle: Annual Cycle (not two-year) for educator plan, regardless of experience  Your decision: Adopt or Adapt? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 16

17 Summative Performance Rating = Performance on each of 4 Standards + Attainment of Goals (professional practice, student learning) + (district/school improvement) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 17

18 Rubrics as a Starting Point for Setting Goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

19 Teacher Rubric-at-a-Glance With a partner, Identify 5 elements that you would most likely focus on with teachers in the work ahead to implement the new Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

20 Rubrics as a Starting Point for Setting Goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

21 By the way: Why Rubrics? Why Model Rubrics  Consistent, shared understanding of what proficient performance looks like, e.g., High Expertise Teaching Project  Common language and structure to organize evidence during each step of the 5-Step Cycle  Descriptors are starting point for setting goals to improve professional practice, setting PD priorities, and providing PD  Basis for fair judgments about performance against the four standards Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 21

22 The Model Rubrics are Aligned Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 22

23 Rubric Alignment, e.g., Goal Setting Superintendent Rubric (I-D-1): Supports administrators and administrator teams to develop and attain meaningful, actionable, and measurable professional practice, student learning, and, where appropriate, district/school improvement goals. Principal/School-level Administrator Rubric (I-D-1): Supports educators and educator teams to develop and attain meaningful, actionable, and measurable professional practice and student learning goals. Teacher Rubric (IV-A-2): Proposes challenging, measurable professional practice, team, and student learning goals that are based on thorough self- assessment and analysis of student learning data. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 23

24 Alignment of Rubrics, e.g., Goal Setting Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 24

25 An example Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

26 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

27 3 – things I know about SMART goals are… 2 things I know about how goals fit into the Educator Evaluation system are… 1 burning question I have is… + 1 new burning question I have is… Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

28 Agenda  Welcome, Warm Up & Intended Outcomes  Context: Goal Setting in the new Educator Evaluation Framework  Break (10 mins)  The Massachusetts’ “SMARTer” Goal Model  Guided Practice # 1  Guided Practice # 2  Guided Practice # 3  Wrap Up, Feedback and Questions Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

29 Agenda  Welcome, Warm Up & Intended Outcomes  Context: Goal Setting in the new Educator Evaluation Framework  Break (10 mins)  The Massachusetts’ “SMARTer” Goal Model  Guided Practice # 1  Guided Practice # 2  Guided Practice # 3  Wrap Up, Feedback and Questions Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

The case for a state-wide approach to writing S.M.A.R.T. goals Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

31 What Makes a Goal “SMART”? Read the two pages on your own (about 5 minutes): By the end, underline one sentence, one phrase and one word that you think are particularly significant (Make notes along the way) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

32 What Makes a Goal “SMART”? In groups of 6-8 people:  Round #1: share the sentence; mark them.  Round #2: share the phrase; mark them.  Round #3: share the word; mark them.  Discuss why each of you chose the phrase you chose and any new insights you gained from hearing your colleagues’ reasons for choosing the phrase they chose.  Identify one phrase to share with the larger group. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

33 A Massachusetts “SMARTer GOAL” = A Goal Statement + Key Actions + Benchmarks (Process & Outcome) = The Heart of the Educator Plan Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

34 Agenda  Welcome, Warm Up & Intended Outcomes  Context: Goal Setting in the new Educator Evaluation Framework  Break (10 mins)  The Massachusetts’ “SMARTer” Goal Model  Guided Practice # 1  Guided Practice # 2  Guided Practice # 3  Wrap Up, Feedback and Questions Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

35 Step-by-Step with the MA “S.M.A.R.T.er” Goal Model  Step #1: Use data to identify goal area  Step #2: Identify relevant elements from rubric  Step #3: Focus on essential parts of elements  Step #4: Draft the Goal Statement  Step #5: Add Key Actions and Benchmarks Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

36 The S.M.A.R.T.er Goal Process: an iterative process Revise goal statement, key actions and benchmarks as needed BUT…….. Don’t obsess! Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

37 Agenda  Welcome, Warm Up & Intended Outcomes  Context: Goal Setting in the new Educator Evaluation Framework  Break (10 mins)  The Massachusetts’ “SMARTer” Goal Model  Guided Practice # 1 Guided Practice # 2  Guided Practice # 2  Guided Practice # 3  Wrap Up, Feedback and Questions Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

38 Guided Practice #2: A superintendent’s meetings Proficient Performance on IV-A-3: Plans and leads well-run and engaging administrator meetings that have clear purpose, focus on matters of consequence, and engage participants in a thoughtful and productive series of conversations and deliberations. Establishes clear norms for administrator team behavior. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

39 Guided Practice #2 The goal statement: is it S.M.A.R.T.? The key actions: Is each one tightly linked to the goal? What is missing to ensure effective implementation? The benchmarks: Is there a process benchmark? (track actions done?) Is there an outcome benchmark? (track results achieved?) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

40 Guided Practice #2: Sample Superintendent Goal Goal Statement : During , I will devote at least 75% of administrative meeting time to district improvement goals and get better at using appropriate strategies to actively engage administrators in developing and sharing ways to implement those goals effectively at the school level. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

41 Guided Practice #2 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

42 Guided Practice #2 The goal statement: is it S.M.A.R.T.? The key actions: is each one tightly linked to the goal? what is missing to ensure effective implementation? The benchmarks: is there a process benchmark? (actions done?) is there an outcome benchmark? (results?) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

43 What’s really “new” here: professional practice goals  Student learning and school/district improvement goals are not “new” to us; developing them as MA “SMARTer” goals with goal statement, key actions, and process/outcome benchmarks is pretty new  What’s really new are professional practice goals in which educators have to be explicit about what we’re going to get better at, not just what we are going to do. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

44 Agenda  Welcome, Warm Up & Intended Outcomes  Context: Goal Setting in the new Educator Evaluation Framework  Break (10 mins)  The Massachusetts’ “SMARTer” Goal Model  Guided Practice # 1 Guided Practice # 2  Guided Practice # 2 Guided Practice # 3  Guided Practice # 3  Wrap Up, Feedback and Questions Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

45 Guided Practice #3: A Principal’s Observations and Feedback Goal Statement for Classroom Observation & Feedback: I will manage my time more effectively in order to increase the frequency and impact of classroom observations by learning how to do 10-minute observations and conducting eight visits with feedback per week, on average. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

46 Guided Practice #2: A Principal’s Observations and Feedback Goal Statement for Classroom Observation & Feedback: I will manage my time more effectively in order to increase the frequency and impact of classroom observations by learning how to do 10-minute observations and by the start of second semester conducting eight visits with feedback per week, on average, that an increasing percentage of teachers report are useful beginning with at least 60%. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

47 Guided Practice #3 In pairs:  Review the key actions and benchmarks: is anything important missing?  Identify two revisions and/or additions to the actions and/or benchmarks that will make this SMART Goal “S.M.A.R.T.er” Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

48 Agenda  Welcome, Warm Up & Intended Outcomes  Context: Goal Setting in the new Educator Evaluation Framework  The Massachusetts’ “SMARTer” Goal Model  Break (10 mins)  Guided Practice # 1  Guided Practice # 2  Guided Practice # 3 Wrap Up, Feedback and Questions  Wrap Up, Feedback and Questions Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

49 Wrap up: Goal Statement “starters” In pairs, First, review Sample School or District Goal Statements; identify:  District/School Improvement Goal Statements  Student Learning Goal Statements  Professional Practice Goal Statements Next, identify which could be TEAM goals? Finally, choose one to make “SMARTer” back in your school or district Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

50 Your “Homework” 1. Back in your district, with your partner:  Refine the goal statement you chose to your context OR Develop another one  Draft 3 key actions  Draft 1 process benchmark  Draft 1 outcome benchmark 2. Exchange your draft SMARTer Goal with another pair 3. Work together to make each draft SMARTer so you can use the revised SMARTer Goal as one of the goals you propose to your evaluator for Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

51 Wrap up: finding a touchstone Think: Think of some time in your life when you achieved a goal – related to work or not - and it made you proud. What was it about the goal and how you went about achieving it that worked for you? Pair: If you are willing, share with your partner one thing about the goal or how you went about it that worked for you. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

52 Intended Outcomes for today:  Understand the rationale and framework for the MA “SMARTer Goal” model  Be able to identify characteristics of “not so SMART”, “SMART” and “SMARTer” goals  Be able to translate at least one school/district priority into a “SMARTer” goal  Have at least one “SMARTer” goal to take back to your school/district 52 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

53 3 – things I/we know about the MA Model for SMARTer goals are… 2 ways to make a goal “smarter” are… 1 next step I/we will take is… Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

54 PLUS - DELTA Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education What worked?What would make it better?

55 More Resources Questions? Information? Link to Evaluation Overview on ESE website? Link to Massachusetts Model System: 55 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

56 Handouts 1a Model System Highlights 1b The 5-Step Educator Evaluation Cycle: Train-the-Trainer Modules 2a Teacher Rubric-at-a-Glance 2b Administrator Rubric-at-a-Glance 3a Descriptors on Evaluation: Superintendent Rubric 3b Descriptors on Evaluation: Principal/School-Level Rubric 4a Protocol for a Superintendent’s School Visits 4b Strategies and Suggestions for Observations 5 What Makes a Goal SMARTer? 6 Step-by-Step with the Massachusetts “S.M.A.R.T.er Goal” Model 7a A Sample Professional Practice Goal for a Superintendent 7b Sample District-Level Goal Statements 8a A Sample Professional Practice Goal for a Principal 8b Sample School-Level Goal Statements Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education