LINKING ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTRUCTION Ty Duncan ESC 17 Coordinator of Accountability and #esc17

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
Action Items For Accountability 2015 URGENT and INTENSE.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Index 4 Description: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 is : the Post-secondary Readiness index, which is used to show the readiness of students on campus.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! TEPSA Summer Conference 2014 Ty Duncan, ESC 17 on Twitter.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3 rd Grade Parent Information Night.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Accountability Update District Testing Coordinator Advisory Committee Meeting March 20,
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! Shauna Lane, ESC Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator
Accountability 2014!! Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Shauna Lane, ESC 17 Ty.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Accountability Update Ty
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Texas Assessment Conference| February 16, 2016 Shannon Housson, Director, Division of Performance Reporting Department of Assessment and Accountability.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
State Testing Program Update Sharon Nobis CHHS Assistant Principal Grapevine-Colleyville ISD November 7, 2011.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
2016 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Department of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting February 25, 2016.
TETN Videoconference #36664| April 21, 2016 Texas Education Agency | Assessment and Accountability Performance Reporting Overview of 2016 Accountability.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
Accountability 2016 Shauna Lane, Educational Specialist
Accountability Overview 2016
Data Review and Discussion David Holland
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Update
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
State and Federal Accountability Overview
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

LINKING ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTRUCTION Ty Duncan ESC 17 Coordinator of Accountability and #esc17

Accountability Instruction

Pass/Fail Culture

From Your Demographics Are Changing at AIE 2014 “Culture hides more than it reveals, and it hides most effectively from its own participants.” – Edward T. Hall

Drivers High end performance, not mere passing at low standards. Level III performance is just as important as “passing”, whatever that may be. Special on emphasis economically disadvantaged students and Level II performance which speaks to directly to the intervention systems. Growth, you can “pass” and still fail in Index 2. Final Recommended Standard is the goal. Phase-in is not extremely important in an Index system.

Subject Phase 1Phase 2 FinalLevel III Reading Grade 353%65%75%88% Grade 452%66%77%86% Grade 554%65%76%87% Grade 652%65%75%88% Grade 752%64%74%84% Grade 850%63%75%85% English I53%60%63%85% English II54%59%63%85% Math Grade 359%72%83%91% Grade 460%71%81%90% Grade 554%66%78%88% Grade 642%58%71%87% Grade 744%56%69%85% Grade 839%52%64%88% Algebra 137%50%61%83% Science Grade 559%70%80%91% Grade 856%65%74%78% Biology37%51%61%83% Social Studies Grade 850%62%73%83% US History41%53%65%81% Writing Grade 452%61%68%84% Grade 754%63%71%85% Index Index Index Index Index Index Index Index

Thank You Cheri Hendrick!

9 To receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, all campuses and districts must meet the following targets on all indexes for which they have performance results in Accountability Manual Appendix L 2014 Accountability Targets [non-AEA Districts and Campuses] Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 All 4 components STAAR only District Campus: Elementary N/A12 Middle School 2827N/A13 High School/K-12 N/A315721

Index 1: Student Achievement 2014 Target: non AEA 55 / AEA 30 Index 1: Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students on BOTH general and alternative assessments. English Language Learners (ELL) Included: English STAAR Two – Four Years in U.S. Schools* included using ELL Progress Measure STAAR L included using ELL Progress Measure English STAAR Five plus Years in U.S. Schools* included using Phase-in 1 Level II Spanish STAAR Two plus Years in U.S. Schools* included using Phase-in 1 Level II English Language Learners (ELL) Exclusions: English and Spanish STAAR English Language Learners (ELL) One year in U.S. Schools* excluded *English Language Learners (ELL) Years in U.S. Schools as reported on 2014 TELPAS 10

Index 2: Student Progress 2014 Target: 5th percentile based on campus type, district 5th percentile across all campus types 11 Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students served by special education, and English language learners.  By Subject Area: Reading and Mathematics (Writing is excluded in 2014)  Points based on weighted performance:  One point given for each percentage of tests at the Met or exceed progress level.  An additional point given for each percentage of tests at the Exceeded progress level.  Additional progress measures in 2014: STAAR-M, STAAR-Alt, and ELL.  High Schools/K-12 campuses as well as AEA campuses & districts will not be evaluated for Index 2 in 2014  Additional progress measures in 2014: STAAR-Modified, STAAR-Alternate, and English Language Learners (ELL). Shaded areas are new for 2014

How is Growth Defined?

Progress Numbers

How did they come up with 32 points?

Grade 4Grade 5 Expected Growth: 32 Points Phase-In 1 Level II Level III Met Growth Not Met STAAR Grade 5 Reading Example

Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps 2014 Target: 5th percentile based on campus type, district 5th percentile across all campus types 16 Index 3: 2013 Construction – Table 1 Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of the economically disadvantaged student group and the lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups at each campus and district. By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies Student Groups: Economically Disadvantaged No minimum size Two Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity Groups Based on 2013 Index 1 All Subjects Minimum size: 25 tests in Reading and Math

Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps 2014 Target: 5th percentile based on campus type, district 5th percentile across all campus types 17 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of the economically disadvantaged student group and the lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups at each campus and district. Points based on STAAR performance: Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percentage of tests at Phase-in 1 Level II (Satisfactory) or above Level III advanced performance: An additional point for each percentage of tests at the Level III Advanced Level III advanced performance: An additional point for each percentage of tests at the Level III Advanced

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 18 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance of earning a high school diploma that provides students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school Index 4 non-AEA Targets: Elementary Schools: 12 Middle Schools: 13 High Schools/K-12: 57 (based on all four components)* Districts: 57 (based on all four components)* *Non-AEA Targets If all four components : 1)STAAR Final Level II, 2)Graduation Score/Rate, 3)Graduation Plan, and 4)College-Ready Graduates are not available for high schools or districts, evaluate only the STAAR Final Level II performance at the following Index 4 targets: High Schools/K-12: 21 Districts: 13

Accountability Instruction

Action Item # 1 Changing the Questions The Teachers Ask When They Get Data! How many Level III students do we have? How many Level II students are just below Level III? Are students making progress to the Level II Final Recommended Standard? How am I going to differentiate to ensure all students make progress?

Action Item #2 Create Intervention/Enrichment for Level III students to keep them there!! Level III is just as important as passing in this system. Not maintaining Level III students in this system will negatively impact Index 2 and 3 and could lead to IR rating regardless of how many students “passed.”

Action Item #3 Exposure to “high brow” intellectualism everyday! But in a landmark book this year, two sociologists, Angel L. Harris of Duke and Keith Robinson of the University of Texas at Austin, found that many things parents obsess over—checking homework nightly, volunteering at their kids' schools—have no measurable impact on student achievement ?mobile=y ?mobile=y Great teachers have active intellectual lives outside their classrooms. Economists have discovered that teachers with high SAT scores or perfect college GPAs are generally no better for their students than teachers with less impressive credentials. But teachers with large vocabularies are better at their jobs because this trait is associated with being intelligent, well-read and curious. In 1903, W.E.B. Du Bois, who once taught in a one-room schoolhouse in rural Tennessee, wrote that teachers must "be broad-minded, cultured men and women" able to "scatter civilization" among the next generation. The best teachers often love to travel, have fascinating hobbies or speak passionately about their favorite philosopher or poet.

Grade 5 Science – 50% correct in Texas 2014

Algebra I EOC – 36% Correct in Texas in 2014!

8 th Grade Social Studies – 37% Correct in 2014

Word Cloud of Level III on STAAR

Action Item #4 Creating a climate where teachers “grind” everyday! Student growth is an everyday, all day affair. Gaps in instruction no matter how small or inconsequential they may seem can make or break students with little background knowledge. Teacher attendance and attention to each child is paramount for Index 2 and ELL success.

Phases of Teaching: Attitudes Toward Teaching Copyright 1998, Austin Educational Associates We must engage in reflective conversations with our faculty to get us on the upward path to renewed energy and enthusiasm! “People often say that motivation doesn't last. Well, neither does bathing - that's why we recommend it daily.”– Zig Ziglar