Microrovers: Current and Past Examples and Conclusions Microrover Space Horizons Workshop Brown University Feb. 16, 2012 Bruce Betts, Ph.D. The Planetary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Critical Role of CubeSat Spacecraft in a Multi-Tier Mission for Mars Exploration JEREMY STRAUB DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA.
Advertisements

GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility 1 Small Satellite Opportunities at Wallops Flight Facility Dr. John Campbell Director, Wallops Flight Facility.
ROVER EGRES S DESIGN Hahna Alexander Anton Galkin Zack Morrison Mobile Robot Design – Fall 2011.
Space & Planetary Robotics Group Aerobots for Planetary Exploration Dave Barnes Head of Space Robotics Department of Computer Science Aberystwyth University.
ISIS Turnkey Missions ISIS designs, manufactures, launches and operates affordable, capable, nanosatellites ISIS provides turnkey missions for institutional,
Optical Navigation System Michael Paluszek, Joseph Mueller, Dr. Gary Pajer Princeton Satellite Systems EUCASS July 4-8, 2011 St. Petersburg, Russia.
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.
A Synergistic Strategy for Robotic and Human NEO Exploration Tom Jones Florida Institute for Human & Machine Cognition IPEWG Aug 11 1.
| Astronautics Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment University of Southampton,
Australian Centre for Space Photonics Andrew McGrath Anglo-Australian Observatory.
Introduction to HCC and HCM. Human Centered Computing Philosophical-humanistic position regarding the ethics and aesthetics of a workplace Any system.
PROJECT ICARUS by Noah Michael, Student Project Manager & Dr. Nikos Mourtos, Faculty Project Manager AE 170A/B Course Instructor.
Settlement Site Selection and Exploration Through Hierarchical Roving Gregory Konesky SGK Nanostructures, Inc. Rutgers Symposium on Lunar Settlements Rutgers.
Beyond Tang: The Hidden Benefits of the Space Program Dr. Nadine G. Barlow Dept. Physics and Astronomy Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ.
Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH ESA Wireless Sensor Motes Study George Prassinos, SSC, University of Surrey.
Flying, Hopping and Perching Microbots for Extreme Environment Exploration Deployed Using CubeSats Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic.
André Weiß, DLR Institute of Space Systems Concurrent Evaluation – An Application for DLR’s Concurrent Engineering Facility SECESA 2010, October,
DRIVING INNOVATION AND ABILITY TO COMPETE THROUGH OUTSOURCING Anthony (Tony) C. Bernardo, Alloy Polymers Inc. NPE 2003 bernardo:
Flags Courtesy of 3dflags.com Robotic Precursor Missions to the Moon and Mars Douglas. A. Craig Tetsuji Yoshida NASA- HQ Shimizu Corp. November 2008.
Software causes many failures - significant mission risk Hard to quantify effects on system risk of: software defects software development practices software.
Robots at Work Dr Gerard McKee Active Robotics Laboratory School of Systems Engineering The University of Reading, UK
Aurora Flight Sciences proprietary Aurora Overview James D. Paduano Presented to the ACGSC October Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation 9950 Wakeman.
Networked Control Systems Vincenzo Liberatore. Today: Cyberspace Interact with remote virtual environment – On-line social activities Communicate with.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
Modularly Adaptable Rover and Integrated Control System Mars Society International Conference 2003 – Eugene, Oregon.
NASA Robotics Mining Competition Ben Stinnett, ASU Dr. Srikanth Saripalli, ASU Tucson, AZ April 12, 2014.
High Altitude Scientific Ballooning (Near Space Engineering)
Future Plans for Wireless Standards Development Richard J. Barton NASA Johnson Space Center.
New, unique, meaningful destination for human explorers in next decade Provides a high-value target well-suited to exploitation using unique astronaut.
Provider of Near Space Solutions. Tactical Ballooning & Return Vehicles A New Paradigm for Low Cost Near Space Access & Persistence Near Space Corporation.
Science Objectives & Investigation Methodology Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
LSU 01/17/2006Spring LaACES Schedule For the semester and the next few weeks.
Space Program Benefits US Space Program has been around since 1958 US Space Program has been around since 1958 Technology developed for space program has.
August 2003 At A Glance VMOC-CE is an application framework that facilitates real- time, remote cooperative work among geographically dispersed mission.
Page 1 Unclassified _NB_Next Steps.ppt Phillip E. Paulsen Space Communications Office NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) Cleveland, Ohio 6 November.
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
Riga Technical University Department of System Theory and Design Usage of Multi-Agent Paradigm in Multi-Robot Systems Integration Assistant professor Egons.
Universal Chassis for Modular Ground Vehicles University of Michigan Mars Rover Team Presented by Eric Nytko August 6, 2005 The 2 nd Mars Expedition Planning.
Dynamic Modeling of the Chariot Suspension System Joseph Shoer / ES6 Exit Presentation 7 August 2009.
Current Status of JAXA’s Lunar and Planetary Exploration
The Mars Exploration Program
Gravity-Independent Locomotion: Potential Approaches to Robotic Mobility on Asteroid Surfaces Eddie Tunstel Space Robotics & Autonomous Control Lead Space.
Differentiation What is meant by differences between learners?
Educator Resources in Space Sciences Caitlin Nolby North Dakota Space Grant Consortium.
Interplanetary Lasers Joss Hawthorn, Jeremy Bailey, Andrew McGrath Anglo-Australian Observatory Free space optical communications.
Crew Mobility for Lunar Surface Exploration Dr. Rob Ambrose NASA-JSC May 2008.
Hopper Spacecraft Simulator. The “Hopping” Concept -Land on a celestial body using engines, conduct surface operations, then re-ignite engines and ‘hop’
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
A&AE 450 – Senior Design Un-pressurized Surface Vehicles, Local Science Issues and Robotic Exploration February 13, 2000 Christopher Burnside.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science 1 NASA—Johnson Space Center Astromaterials Research and Exploration.
Jim Bell Cornell University The Planetary Society July 30, 2009 Mars Exploration : Rationale and Principles for a Strategic Program Preliminary.
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
Planetary Science Decadal Survey David H. Smith Space Studies Board, National Research Council Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group Arlington,
NASA Model-Based Systems Engineering Pathfinder 2016 Summary and Path Forward Karen J. Weiland, Ph.D. Jon Holladay, NASA Systems Engineering Technical.
Future Plans for Wireless Standards Development
Developing Robots for Space
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Project and Workshop Objectives
Return to The Moon: An International Perspective
CubeSat: The Wee Space Box.
Goddard Contractor Association
Project Introduction Spring 2017.
Natural Sciences and Technology Grade 6
IEEE ICRA 2005 Planetary Rover Workshop April 22, 2005
Public Engagement Lead LRO and SAM
OCP Engineering Workshop Rack & Power, Advanced Cooling Solutions, Data Center Facility
Division Chief, Spaceport Management & Integration
Presentation transcript:

Microrovers: Current and Past Examples and Conclusions Microrover Space Horizons Workshop Brown University Feb. 16, 2012 Bruce Betts, Ph.D. The Planetary Society

What is a microrover? –No precise definition currently. –One example: 1 to roughly 10 kg; MUSES-CN to Sojourner Lots of examples in design and Earth use, only Sojourner in flight We’ll look at microrovers: –Coolness –Catalog –Examples –Uses –Conclusions Microrovers

Why are microrovers cool? Low cost, mass, volume imply: –Several can be piggybacked on missions –Increase capability, decrease risk for low cost –Power advantage: higher power to mass ratio for smaller rovers –Can use in riskier ways if desired, –Mitigate risk by flying multiple –Easy to deploy Microrovers lead to new paradigms

Background: Cornell/TPS Microrovers Project The Planetary Society –Bruce Betts –Louis Friedman –Doug Stetson –Interns Cornell University –Jim Bell (later ASU) –Mason Peck –Joseph Shoer –Yervant Terzian –S/C Engineering class Stellar Exploration –Tomas Svitek and associates Independent –Tom Jones TM at JPL –Brian Wilcox Much of what is presented here came out of a Cornell/Planetary Society project (NASA Steckler Grant) to study Microrovers for use with astronauts. Though focus with astronauts, many products/conclusions remain useful for robotic only

Microrover Catalog Created online microrover catalog What has been done for space and Earth on microrovers. Want to help new groups: –Not reinvent “the wheel” –Stimulate design thoughts One stop info on over 100 Terrestrial and Planetary Rovers (up to 100 kg for comparison) Tells us what we missed

Online Microrover Catalog

Examples of current/recent microrovers Only “microrover” flown: Sojourner (11.5 kg) on Mars Pathfinder. MUSES-CN (1 kg) was also developed for flight by JPL

Example prototypes for space JPL Sample Return Rover Carleton U./CSA Kapvik (30 kg) Neptec/CSA Juno prototype ESA Nanokhod (1.5 kg)

Earth uses examples (note design variety) Inuktun VGTV (commercial inspection) 6 kg Hirose/Fukushima Titan IX (defense/commercial) prototype mine removal Recon robotics Recon scout 0.5 kg, defense iRobot SUGV 11 kg defense

How can we use microrovers? –Reconnaissance: scout possible traverses (e.g., for large rover, or for astronauts) even more efficient if use multiple several microrovers quickly explore area compared to one large rover –Science: wide range possible from imaging to contact science depending on payload. –High risk exploration, e.g., steep slopes, lava tubes

How can we use microrovers (2) Increasing Astronaut/Big Rover Safety –Enable focusing EVAs/Big rover traverses on optimized tasks –Facilities Inspection –Communications relays for astronauts working “over the next hill”

How can we use microrovers (3) Increase Public Excitement/Involvement –Will be “fun” and engaging for the public –Enable additional perspectives imaging spacecraft, facilities, and astronauts (family portrait) Increase Student Involvement –Like CubeSat analogy, standardized microrover conducive to university/student run projects –Can have limited student/public teleoperation

Design Studies We did some basic design studies One semester long Cornell engineering design class on this topic (~50 students) Provided input to follow-on professional study (Stellar/TPS/Cornell), which distilled and added to student studies, and developed general and specific conclusions

Sample 3-Student Team Projects

Some General Conclusions Microrovers kg offer unique benefits and risks, significantly different from larger rovers Paradigm shift: not a single rover that does it all, allows new concept of operations A group of microrovers may accomplish more, with fewer issues of reliability and lower cost than a single, large rover Low mass and easily stowed, microrovers adaptable to flexible, everyday use compared to larger

Specific Conclusions Power/insulation solutions exist to allow a microrover to survive the lunar night; Mechanically matching an astronaut's speed should not be a driving requirement for the rover's mobility subsystem. Instead: –Virtual proximity through network, and –Recon, science, inspection prior to or in place of astronaut EVA Microrovers can provide GPS-like position knowledge

Specific Conclusions (2) Microrovers could have same core design, but portions including payload could reconfigured, ideally in a plug-and- play fashion. Working collaboratively as a network allows tasks to be shared among many nodes, including communications relay. Teleoperation, autonomous, or both. Ideally, both – at least limited autonomy.

Web and (Microrover catalog and additional info/papers from TPS/Cornell study) Contact: Let me know what is missing from catalog.