Developing Environmental Indicators with Our States EPA Region 3/State Indicators and Outcomes Initiative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3-Year Implementation Schedule. What is the 3-Year Implementation Schedule? A list of prioritized projects for implementers with a time frame to complete.
Advertisements

Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
Planning for Our Future:
The Greening of North Carolina Network NCSU IES: GNCN:
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bay Bank The Chesapeake’s Ecosystem Service Marketplace.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
1 Theory of Change Chesapeake Bay Funders Network Program Evaluation Training Workshop OMG Center for Collaborative Learning January 9-10, 2008.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
Guidelines for State School Environmental Health Programs EISA Sec. 504.
EPA Office of Water Source Water Protection Initiative Elizabeth Corr, Associate Director Drinking Water Protection Div. Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Workshop on State and EPA Tools and Strategies for Implementing Performance-based Programs “Using Performance Partnership Agreements and Grants to Institutionalize.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Facility Lead Corrective Action Opportunities with Union Carbide RCRA National Meeting May, 2005 Bob Greaves EPA Region 3.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Region 1 & 2 IR Workshop October 28,  The Water Quality Framework is a new way of thinking about how EPA’s data and information systems can be.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Sonoma Ecology Center TMDL Implementation Project Update November 4, 2011 Funded by EPA, Managed by SFEP, Administered by MMWD, and north bay partnership.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance State of California Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth Preliminary Project Goals.
Activities of the National Water Quality Monitoring Council Gail Mallard, USGS NWQMC Meeting Phoenix, AZ, December 10, 2002.
Advancing Environmental Protection Through PBEPs How Do You Demonstrate the Value of Your PBEP in Meeting Agency Goals? PBEPs P.
Strengthening Coastal Decision- making in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick Making coastal development geospatial data available and delivering tools needed.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
1 Improve Your Steering with Dashboard Reports 2006 National Environmental Partnership Summit Breakout Session: Creating Positive Change: Tools and Techniques.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
From Policies to Programs to Practices Establishing the Green Infrastructure Eric Friedman Director of State Sustainability Mass. Executive Office of Env.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
EPA and Ecosystem-Based Management: Success of the Watershed Approach Michael H. Shapiro Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water, US EPA Capitol Hill.
 The SNC’s mission is to initiate, encourage and support efforts that improve the environmental, economic and social well- being of the Sierra Nevada.
Alberta’s strategy for sustainability APEGGA February 17, 2004.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Lead NAAQS Review: 2 nd Draft Risk Assessment NTAA/EPA Tribal Air Call August 8, 2007 Deirdre Murphy and Zachary Pekar OAQPS.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Chesapeake Forest Restoration Strategy Kick-off webinar May Strategy Teams 60+ representatives 30+ federal, state, ngos Draft/public input July.
Adaptive Management Strategies - Making It Work - Brian Kemp GM – Conservation Lands Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Ontario, Canada.
1 SDGs – National and Sub-national Implementation and Indicators International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Request for Proposals Q&A Webcast – February/March
Stream Health Outcome Biennial Workplan Neely L. Law, PhD Center for Watershed Protection Chesapeake Bay Program Sediment & Stream Coordinator Habitat.
Welcome to the CLU-IN Internet Seminar 2010 CARE RFP National Webcast Sponsored by: CARE National Program Delivered: February 2, 2010, 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM,
R7 Pollinator Protection Workgroup Actions Damon Frizzell U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 7 April 21,
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Office of the Secretary of Natural Resources Protecting Our Natural Resources Creatively and Cost-Effectively Environment Virginia The Honorable L. Preston.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
CBP CLIMATE RESILIENCY WORKGROUP Cross-Goal Climate Resiliency Analysis and Decision-Making Matrix and Implementation Methodology.
Chesapeake Bay Program
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Clean Water Fund Grants
CBP Climate Resiliency Workgroup
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Ken Grimm National Environmental Partnership Summit May 10, 2006
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Request for Proposals Q&A Webcast - February 2009
ChesapeakeProgress Research Results
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Presentation transcript:

Developing Environmental Indicators with Our States EPA Region 3/State Indicators and Outcomes Initiative

EPA/State Indicators & Outcomes Initiative  Overview of process  Where we are  Where we are going  Observations

Planning for Environmental Results: EPA/State Indicators and Outcomes Workgroup The Charge:  Create a handful (5-7) of outcome measures/indicators for public display  Develop outcome and efficiency measures for all key programs measures for all key programs  Within our programs, use best available data and tools to prioritize available data and tools to prioritize and target areas for implementation and target areas for implementation  Use best available data and tools to ID high priority/high vulnerability areas to target multiple program  Look forward – where should we be in the future?

A Vision for Environmental Success: Focus on measurable, real outcomes (move beyond outputs – Level 3 and above) Use analytical science-based targeting tools with best available data. Establish joint State/Regional indicators-based management strategy. Provide Web access to measures and data

Guiding Management Questions: What are the environmental and human health results of our work? Where can we target the programmatic tools we have to achieve the greatest environmental and human health results? Where are the greatest environmental and public health risks AND opportunities? What does the future look like?

Collaborative Indicators-Based Decision Process Public Interest/ Appeal

Condition Stressors What We Value Trends in Blue Crabs Habitat Nutrients Farms Etc. Development Point Sources NonPoint Source Permits Fish Advisory Enforcement 404/state Wetland State/EPA Programs $’s Spent, FTEMonitoring Program EffectivenessEfficiency Water Clarity Causes How are We Doing? Action Public Interest/Appeal

Number of Population Protected from Exposure to Environmental Hazards Acres Cleaned- Up (SF/Solid Waste/ Brownfields) Percent of Population Breathing Clean Air Reduction in Energy/ GhG Emissions Improvement in Living Resources Index in the Chesapeake & Delaware Bays Acres of Wetlands Restored/ Improved/Protected Percent of Population Drinking Safe Water Percent Assessed Waters Meeting Designated Uses State/EPA Region 3 Combined Indicators

Percent Population Breathing Clean Air Reduction in Energy/ GhG Emissions/ Improvement in Living Resources Index in the Chesapeake & Delaware Bays Acres of Wetlands Restored/ Improved/Protected Acres Cleaned- Up (SF/Solid Waste/ Brownfields) Number of Population Protected from Exposure to Environmental Hazards % People Drinking Safe Water Percent Assessed Waters Meeting Designated Uses State-EPA Combined Indicators

Initial Phase Targeting Results Final Ranking: High Restoration = 11 – 14 Medium Restoration = 8 – 10 Low Restoration = 5 – 7

Potential Wetland Restoration Sites Approximately 3.2% of Monocacy Watershed Restoration Potential AcresLow Medium High TOTAL

Where Are We ?  Combined list of indicators  Pilot demonstration projects  Initial list of key programs and outcomes; developing and outcomes; developing targeting strategies for FY07 targeting strategies for FY07  Communications strategy

Where Are We Going?  Integrate outcomes and document partnership in grants and agreements  Begin Region-wide assessments for integrated State/EPA program implementation: –Assess the current environmental condition in Region III –Determine environmentally vulnerable areas (future) –Determine “environmental drivers/stressors” and indicators –Create a Regional Environmental Index

Looking Forward Looking Forward on Targeting

Predicting the Future Current ConditionFuture Condition Areas We Need To Work In worse same

Observations  This is not easy to do – support from on high is crucial on high is crucial  Report to upper level management often  Don’t reinvent – build on what exists (data, indicators, outcomes)  Must deal with opposing forces: competition vs minimizing change  Make the process and results relevant to staff – show how what they do connects to the big picture  Make public information (indicators, outcomes) relevant, understandable, important – tell a story; change behavior?  Look toward the future, but don’t ignore the past  Collaborate, collaborate, collaborate – esp. with States: –Do they want to make sausage with you, or taste-test when it’s done? –Involvement: How, who and when? –What’s in it for them?