PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, 2011 12-3 pm.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.

Advertisements

Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.

OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’

 Reading School Committee January 23,

ESD 112 Professional Growth Cycle

Who’s on our Team? CLASS Phoenix Design Team Classroom educators, specialists, administrators, and classified from all grade levels Association groups.

Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview Supporting School and District Improvement in Massachusetts.

Differentiated Supervision

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1 March 2013.

Session Materials  Wiki

Session Materials Wireless Wiki

1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.

Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.

Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.

Welcome to Presentation to House Education and Early Learning and Human Services Committees January 17,

Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.

Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation July, 2014.

Session Materials  Wiki 

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.

Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.

PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.

Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.

Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.

WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6.

WELCOME Professional Growth and Evaluation System.

Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.

Collaboration Grants Design 101 Salem November 21 st, 2013.

PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.

Session Materials  Wiki

Educator Performance Assessments ESE Spring Convening May 27 and 28, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.

TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.

 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.

XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project: Instructional Framework Selection.

Glen Ridge Public Schools Overview of Teacher/Principal Evaluation Changes EE4NJ (Excellent Educators for New Jersey)

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,

Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.

EVAL Introduction RIG 2 – Cohort 1 October 29, 2012 Cathey Frederick ESD 189 eVAL Specialist.

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,

Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Designing Professional Development Session 1 – Introduction to Instructional Rounds Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.

Materials  Wiki 

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.

Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.

1 Principal Orientation. 1.The Ohio Resident Educator Program 2.Orientation Purpose 3.Collaborative Cultures 4.What is Residency? 5.Teaching and Learning.

OVEC/KDE Instructional Support Leadership Network Welcome Your facilitators are: Dr. Molly Sullivan Mr. Buddy Berry Mr. Thom Coffee Mr. Bill Hogan Mr.

Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,

XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project:

Five Required Elements

State Board of Education Progress Update

PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS

NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System

Presentation transcript:

PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm

AGENDA  Welcome and Introductions  RIG Purpose, Background and Assurances  Mini-grants  Overview of Grant Activities and Timelines  Communication Structures  Evaluation Tool  Team Time  Wrap up

Introductions  District  Role  Hope to gain  Expertise/experience to share

A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit of stronger teaching and leadership.

Legislative Timeline – All Districts Observation of pilot development Stakeholder engagement and communication Participation in evaluation Professional development and evaluator training Full state-wide implementation of new teacher/principal evaluation system

Regional Implementation Grants (RIGs)  Grants are part of a statewide initiative  Consortia will not “reinvent the wheel” but rather use the work of the pilots  Determination of instructional frameworks  Identification/development of appropriate multiple measures of student growth

RIGs will participate in..  PD for principals and classroom teachers  Evaluator training  Activities to evaluate the effectiveness of the new systems and support programs

Assurances  Explore the 3 instructional frameworks to serve as basis for teacher evaluation system  Danielson  5Ds of Teaching and Learning  Marzano  Select frameworks to base all work  Use the AWSP document to serve as basis for principal evaluation system

Assurances  Agree to meet timelines and meeting dates as determined within our consortia  Consider representation on your team from all stakeholder groups  Ensure Superintendent plays a significant role in the development of the implementation plans

Grant Timeline Explore and align criteria Teacher and Principal Review and select frameworks 5 Dimensions (CEL) Danielson Marzano Rubrics (From frameworks) Determine evidence Observations Plans Artifacts Reflections Student Work Other Summative Model Progression Holistic Formula Raw Score Hybrid Conditions Preparation PD Plan Communication Tools and forms MOU Participants

Work group timeline

Mini Grants  Funds distributed across state based on numbers of participating districts  Base amount of $ additional funds based on FTE  Funds can support  Substitute costs  Stipends  Resources  Professional development

Regional Communication Plan  Common messages  Materials and resources  Shared website - Wiki  Superintendent and Learning & Teaching Updates  Open workgroup sessions  Other

District Communication Plan  Common messages  Customized approaches  Key stakeholders Key stakeholders  Formal and informal methods

Steering Committee  Subset of larger work group  Provide guidance and feedback  Meet quarterly

Work Group  Representative group  5-7 people  Develop and lead implementation planplan

Evaluation Tool

Team time  Identify workgroup members  Review workgroup timeline  Draft or refine communication plan  View and sign mini-grant contract  Complete feedback form

While there are many formative and summative reasons to measure teacher and principal effectiveness, we believe the ultimate goal of all measurement should be.....to improve teaching and student learning.