Effective School Leadership for Reading First Sharon Walpole University of Delaware.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements


Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
School Leadership that Works:
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
School Culture The Main Condition for Student Success.
Roles and Responsibilities of the Instructional Coach
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Principalship: Roles & Responsibilities PINSET-September 2011 Presented By Sajid Masood The Knowledge School.
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
Models of Instructional Leadership
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
A School Leader: 21Responsibilities
What should be the basis of
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting West Hialeah Gardens Elementary September 8, 2015 Sharon Gonzalez, Principal.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
ADMN 6130 Class 4 “Cheap teaching is like cheap dentistry, cheap cotton, or cheap anything else.” - Annual Report of the Owensboro Public Schools
Instructional Leadership in Low-Performing Schools Nikolai Vitti September 21, 2009 Florida Association of Staff Developers Tampa, FL.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
NELA Professional Growth Plan: Growth Analysis C. Miller-Walker Cohort 3.
TOP TEN LIST OF COACHING BELIEFS CURRICULUM 511 DR. PECK BY: HALI PLUMMER.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and research purposes only.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
Welcome to Reading First! From the Professional Development Architects Dr. Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Dr. Michael McKenna University of Virginia.
The Pathway Leadership Team’s Role Kathleen Harris, Director Technical Assistance and Coaching
Competency Reflections Tawana Daniels Dr. Laura Henry EDUC 6331 Administrative Internship 2.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Dardanup Primary School School Vision Presentation 2017
Family Engagement Policy
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Models of Instructional Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Effective School Leadership for Reading First Sharon Walpole University of Delaware

Successful School Reform is …  Specific The program is sufficiently detailed.  Powerful The program produces results.  Authoritative Leadership is involved and informed.  Consistent The program is uniformly implemented.  Stable The program is not changed without reason. Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72,433–479.

Joseph Murphy, in Leadership for Literacy: Research-Based Practice, PreK-3 (2003, Corwin Press), summarizes key qualities possessed by principals of schools where achievement is strong. The Effective RF Principal

Setting Goals The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Has a more child-centered visionHas a more adult-centered vision Sets manageable, realistic goalsFavors broad goals Sees student performance as centralLikes to see things run smoothly Expresses goals in measurable termsExpresses goals vaguely Uses goals for planningRefers rarely to goals Asks parents & staff to help set goalsLimits goal setting input

Communicating Goals The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Periodically reviews & discussesInfrequently discusses goals Actively clarifies goalsRarely clarifies goals Has teachers who know goalsHas teachers unfamiliar with goalsHas teachers who see themselves as good instructorsas good managers & colleagues

Promoting Quality Instruction The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Insists on certain teaching strategiesHas less focus on methods Favors interactive teachingIs content with less interaction Assigns teachers on the basis ofAssigns teachers bureaucratically improving achievement

Supervising Instruction The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Relies little on formal observationsValues formal observations Values informal visits and meetingsRarely makes informal visits Often reads about instructionSeldom reads about instruction Often provides specific feedbackSeldom provides specific feedback Counsels and assists poor teachersLess likely to confront poor teachers

Allocating Instructional Time The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Carefully sets time allocationsLess likely to set time allocations Coordinates time allocationsLess likely to have uniform schedule across teachers Schedules more instructional andLess likely to favor instructional over fewer non-instructional activitiesnon-instructional activities Insists on time for basicsLess likely to ensure their coverage Protects uninterrupted blockLess likely to preserve block

Coordinating the Curriculum The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Is highly involved in curriculumIs less involved in curriculumalignment Is concerned with the continuityTends not to focus on continuityof curriculum from grade to grade

Monitoring Student Progress The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Supports testing programsViews testing as a necessary evil Provides test results to teachersIs less timely in reporting results In a timely mannerto teachers Discusses results with groups andIs less likely to discuss results individual teachers Encourages teachers to use testDoes not emphasize the connection results to plan instructionbetween testing and teaching

Setting Expectations The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Holds adults accountable for studentDoes not hold others accountable learning outcomes Requires mastery of grade-levelIs more likely to socially promote skills for promotion to next gradestudents

Being Visible The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Is often out of the officeSpends large amounts of time in the office Makes an effort to move aboutIs less mobile the campus and in and out of classrooms

Providing Incentives The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Recognizes teachers with rewardsSeldom acknowledges teachers such as  distributing leadership  showing personal interest  making public acknowledgements  giving private praise Ensures that student rewards areIs less concerned about student frequent and they they go to a large rewards percentage of students Focuses rewards on achievement Is less likely to reward achievement

Promoting PD The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Is more likely to be directly involvedOften avoids PD sessions in PD activities Follows up by ensuring that PD Is unlikely to follow up PD methods are implemented Cobbles temporary coalitionsIs not adept at working with of teachers to help implementteacher groups to implement Encourages professional dialogueIs indifferent to dialogue Helps teachers attend conferencesResists conference attendance

Creating a Safe & Orderly Learning Environment The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Works with teachers to developIs less focused on management skills classroom management skills Establishes a clear and consistentFails to set up a clear policy disciplinary policy Enforces discipline fairly andMay be inconsistent in enforcing consistentlydiscipline Involves teachers and studentsSets rules independently In setting rules

Creating a Safe & Orderly Learning Environment The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Confronts problems quickly andIs tentative and indecisive forcefully Supports teachers with disciplineIs unsympathetic to teachers with problemsdiscipline problems

Promoting Collaboration The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Encourages teamwork and Allows teachers to function collaborative effortsindependently Gives faculty a formal role in Excludes teachers from decision decision makingmaking Informally seeks teachers’ ideasIs indifferent to the ideas and and opinionsopinions of teachers

Securing Outside Resources The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Is skilled at influencing districtReacts to district decisions decision making about resources Actively seeks resourcesIs passive about finding resources Assertively recruits the bestFollows standard hiring teachers (even from other schools)procedures Allocates money based on goalsMakes allocations based on other factors

Linking Home and School The More-Effective Principal The Less-Effective Principal Communicates with parents on aInfrequently communicates with regular basisparents Involves parents in school activitiesIs more likely to ignore parent participation Establishes programs that promoteFails to facilitate parent-teacher parent-teacher interactioninteraction Promotes the school toDoes not participate in community community groupsgroups Provides ways parents can learnDoesn’t about school and help their children

Which qualities of the principal relate to reading achievement?  Principal’s race  Principal’s sex  Number of years as a principal  Number of years as a classroom teacher  Knowledge about reading – Kean et al. (1979), What Works in Reading? (Federal Reserve Bank Study)

What can a Literacy Coach do to compensate for a principal’s shortcomings? 

You don’t have to change everything to change anything.