How can it be a syllogism if it doesn’t look like an A,E, I, or O statement? Translating “Ordinary” Sentences into the Standard Forms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (1/2).
Advertisements

Inference and Reasoning. Basic Idea Given a set of statements, does a new statement logically follow from this. For example If an animal has wings and.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
Quantifiers and logical inference
Categorical Logic Categorical statements
Chivalry Week Skills and Principles Day 1 Appositive: Nonrestrictive An appositive is a word or phrase following a noun that gives the noun another name.
Chapter 4 Modifier: A word that describes
Categorical Reasoning
F22H1 Logic and Proof Week 7 Clausal Form and Resolution.
PRONOUN ANTECEDENT AGREEMENT DEFINITION  A pronoun (I, me, he, she, herself, you, it, that, they, each, few, many, who, whoever, whose, someone, everybody,
CAS LX 502 8a. Formal semantics Truth and meaning The basis of formal semantics: knowing the meaning of a sentence is knowing under what conditions.
Today’s Topics Limits to the Usefulness of Venn’s Diagrams Predicates (Properties and Relations) Variables (free, bound, individual, constants)
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
Categorical Syllogisms Always have two premises Consist entirely of categorical claims May be presented with unstated premise or conclusion May be stated.
Example Essays An example essay is simply an essay that provides several examples to support the thesis statement. These examples could be specific incidents,
Chapter 9 Categorical Logic w07
A mistake someone should never make!
Subject Verb Agreement The Golden Rule
The Sentence Pattern Built on Linking Verbs Lesson 4 Joseph C. Blumenthal.
Sentences. All sentences need… A ‘subject’. This is the ‘who’ or the ‘what’ in the sentence. The subject is the person/thing which the action revolves.
Discrete Maths Objective to introduce predicate logic (also called the predicate calculus) , Semester 2, Predicate Logic 1.
Conventions: Clauses and Phrases.  A complete sentence must have a subject, a matching verb, and express a complete thought.
Subject Verb Agreement Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement

CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8 DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF.
Categorical Propositions All S is P No S is P Some S is P Some S is not P.
© 2006 SOUTH-WESTERN EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING 11th Edition Hulbert & Miller Effective English for Colleges Chapter 2 PRONOUNS.
Atomic Sentences Chapter 1 Language, Proof and Logic.
8 Parts of Speech. Verb A verb asserts something about the subject of the sentence and express actions, events, or states of being. The puppy plays with.
Algebra Form and Function by McCallum Connally Hughes-Hallett et al. Copyright 2010 by John Wiley & Sons. All rights reserved. 3.1 Solving Equations Section.
Quantifiers, Predicates, and Names Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College Universals, by Dena Shottenkirk.
PART TWO PREDICATE LOGIC. Chapter Seven Predicate Logic Symbolization.
Identity and Equality Properties. Properties refer to rules that indicate a standard procedure or method to be followed. A proof is a demonstration of.
The Science of Good Reasons
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic By David Kelsey.
Night 2 Presented by Eric Douma
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Fallacies Of Thinking A fallacy is flawed logic or misguided thinking.
4 Categorical Propositions
Logic – Basic Terms Logic: the study of how to reason well. Validity: Valid thinking is thinking in conformity with the rules. If the premises are true.
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
Prepared by: A. T. M. Monawer Success in EPT Listening & Speaking Reading Writing Listening &Speaking Reading Writing.
Arguments, translation, representation -Sign In! -Quiz -Review Quiz -Unstated premises and translation -Things that look like arguments but aren't -Representing.
Words, Clauses Sentences. Grammar The Basics Subject, Verb, Object Modifiers, Prepositions, Articles Modifiers, Prepositions, Articles Modifiers: Adjectives,
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic
CS 285- Discrete Mathematics Lecture 4. Section 1.3 Predicate logic Predicate logic is an extension of propositional logic that permits concisely reasoning.
What are Determiners? Unit 14 – Presentation 1 “a broad category of the English grammar that contains many subcategories in it, e.g. demonstrative & indefinite.
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Sentence Structure How to create complete sentences and avoid the run-on sentence.
Gerunds & Infinitives Unit 9 Grammar Forms & Functions 3.
Predicates and Quantifiers
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Pronouns Fill in your chart as we discuss the types/cases of pronouns.
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic By David Kelsey.
Chapter Nine Predicate Logic Proofs. 1. Proving Validity The eighteen valid argument forms plus CP and IP that are the proof machinery of sentential logic.
GRAMMAR REVIEW OF FIRST SEMESTER
Misplaced and Dangling Modifiers A great way to confuse readers.
Business English 2 for management LAST LECTURE. AFFIRMATIVE AGREEMENT SO and TOO Neither; Either -> reminder.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement
Quantifiers and logical inference
Adverbs of Frequency Let’s begin!
5.1 Standard Form, Mood, and Figure
TYPES OF CLAUSES IN ENGLISH GRAMMER.
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
4.1 The Components of Categorical Propositions
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
Presentation transcript:

How can it be a syllogism if it doesn’t look like an A,E, I, or O statement? Translating “Ordinary” Sentences into the Standard Forms

Clearly identify the subject & predicate “Seldom have sailors had such acclaim.” Becomes: Sailors have seldom had such acclaim. OR Sailors are persons who have seldom had such acclaim. All take great risks who put their eggs into one basket. Becomes: All persons who put their eggs in one basket are persons who take great risks.

Supply the missing quantifier Unless it is clear from the context that “some” is intended, the rule is that “all” is meant. Psychotics are dangerous. Should be: ALL psychotics are dangerous. Americans are great sprinters. Should be: SOME Americans are great sprinters.

Add the missing complement. Sometimes a complement needs to be added to an adjective or to a describing phrase. Some lions are docile (since we cannot point to a “docile”) becomes: Some lions are docile creatures (or animals)

Supply the missing Copula Dogs bark. Should be: All dogs are barking animals. Some ancients believed in devils. Should be: Some ancient peoples are people who believed in devils.

Exclusive Sentences E.g., sentences beginning with “only” or “none but” Only men are priests. Cannot mean: “that all men are priests.” Only men are priests, means: “All priests are men.” THE RULE: Drop the “only” or “none but” Add “all” as the quantifer Reverse the subject and predicate None but adults are admitted. Means: All those admitted persons are adults.

Negative Sentences Words such as “nothing”, “none”, “no one” are to be replaced with the quantifier “no”. e.g. None of the damned is happy. Becomes: No person who is damned is a happy person. Nothing human frightens me. Becomes: No human beings are things that frighten me.

More Negative sentences If the sentences says: “All (subject) are not (the predicate)” or “Every...not...” follow the rule: “All...not...” sentences should be interpreted as O sentences unless they are CLEARLY E sentences. i.e., “All... Not...” Becomes “Some... Not....” All Germans are not Nazis, DOES NOT mean “No Germans are Nazis” (E) But rather: “Some Germans are not Nazis.” (O)

Exceptive Sentences Sentences containing “except” cannot be translated into any one of A,E, I, O sentences. “Everyone except women may attend.” Means something expressed by: 1) All who are not women may attend. (A) (All who are non-women may attend) and 2) No women may attend. (E)

Exceptive Sentences (cont.) Since a syllogism requires only 3 sentences, we cannot use both in our syllogism. The rule: either the A or E sentence may be used, but not both. An argument which contains an exceptive sentence and which is valid will remain valid if the exceptive sentence is interpreted either as an A sentence or as an E sentence. See the next slide:

Another exceptive example All students except senior students take Physical Education. Means: No seniors take Physical Education. And All other students take Physical Education. Better yet: All non-seniors take Physical Education.

If it has: “Anyone, anything, Whoever, It translates into an A sentence. Anyone who comes must participate. Anything which comes must participate. Whoever comes must participate. Whatever comes must participate. Everyone who comes must participate. If anyone comes he must participate. The person who comes must participate Becomes… All who come must participate. All persons who come must participate. All who come are people who participate.