Roadmap to excelling in medical writing Dr Trish Groves Deputy editor, BMJ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer reviewer training part I: What do we know about peer review?
Advertisements

Appraisal of an RCT using a critical appraisal checklist
Perspectives Authors and editors perspective Is there much difference between perspectives of different stakeholders? –authors, readers, editors, clinicians,
AUTHORSHIP SKILLS: QUESTIONS SCIENTISTS FREQUENTLY ASK ABOUT THE WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF JOURNAL ARTICLES.
How to review a paper for a journal Dr Stephanie Dancer Editor Journal of Hospital Infection.
Fundamentals of good medical writing
How to Review a Paper How to Get your Work Published
Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop.
IMRaD: The Format for Scientific Writing
How to get research published, and what journals look for Dr Trish Groves Deputy editor, BMJ.
Doug Altman Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK
Writing for Publication
The material was supported by an educational grant from Ferring How to Write a Scientific Article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
TQ Oct 2009 Glasgow Junior Academic Forum Terry Quinn Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences University of Glasgow Sponsored through.
Critical appraisal of the literature Michael Ferenczi Head of Year 4 Head of Molecular Medicine Section, National Heart and Lung Institute.
How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.
Clinical trials methodology group Simon Gates 9 February 2006.
Research Proposal Development of research question
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
Introduction to evidence based medicine
Who stands behind the word? A journal editor’s view of ghostwriting Gavin Yamey MD Deputy editor, wjm Assistant editor, BMJ.
Publication bias in clinical trials Kamran Abbasi Deputy editor, BMJ.
Peer Review for Addiction Journals Robert L. Balster Editor-in-Chief Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
Types & Structure of Manuscripts Scientific Communication, Week 2.
Making all research results publically available: the cry of systematic reviewers.
How to Write a Scientific Paper Hann-Chorng Kuo Department of Urology Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.
Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines
“opinion or feeling that strongly favours one side in an argument or one item in a group or series”
Dr. Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam Department of Library and Information Studies, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch
Different Types of Scientific Writing. Overview Different types of papers Types of reviews Organization of papers What to leave in; what to leave out.
Scientific Writing in Medical Sciences
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
©Sideview Ethical research publication: who’s responsibility is it? Liz Wager PhD Publications Consultant, Sideview
Introduction to writing scientific papers Gaby van Dijk.
European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular diseases in women.
Editorial Misconduct George Thomas, Editor, Indian Journal of Medical Ethics
Skills Building Workshop: PUBLISH OR PERISH. Journal of the International AIDS Society Workshop Outline Journal of the International.
Peer reviewer training part II: What do editors want from reviewers? Dr Trish Groves Deputy editor, BMJ.
Landmark Trials: Recommendations for Interpretation and Presentation Julianna Burzynski, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS Heme/Onc Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 11/29/07.
Clinical Writing for Interventional Cardiologists.
Acknowledgements and Conflicts of interest Dr Gurpreet Kaur Associate Professor Dept of Pharmacology Government Medical College Amritsar.
Reviewing the Research of Others RIMC Research Capacity Enhancement Workshops Series : “Achieving Research Impact”
Scholarly Publication: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Jean H. Shin, Ph.D. Director, Minority Affairs Program American Sociological Association.
Publication ethics Professor Magne Nylenna, M.D., PhD
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Engaging with best editorial and publication practice Shreeya Nanda Deputy Editor.
Publication Ethics R.Raveendran Chief Editor, Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics.
Original Research Publication Moderator: Dr. Sai Kumar. P Members: 1.Dr.Sembulingam 2. Dr. Mathangi. D.C 3. Dr. Maruthi. K.N. 4. Dr. Priscilla Johnson.
Publication and Research Misconduct Stephanie Harriman Deputy Medical Editor.
Page 1 Plagiarism Concerns in IAS Manuscript Submissions March 2014
Medical Writing How to get funded and published November 2003.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop 10 October 2012, Freiburg, Germany.
Guide for AWS Reviewers Lois A. Killewich, MD PhD AWS AJS Editorial Board.
Scientific Writing Scientific Papers – Original Research Articles “A scientific paper is a written and published report describing original research.
Chapter Dental Public Health & Research Contemporary Practice for the Dental Hygienist Copyright ©2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: S. Unchern,  Research is not been completed until the results have been published.  “You don’t write because you want to say something,
Ethical Considerations Dr. Richard Adanu Editor-in-Chief International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (IJGO)
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
ETHICS – FROM CODES TO PRACTICE KARIM MURJI, THE OPEN UNIVERSITY, UK.
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
PUBLICATION PRINCIPLES for PUBLICATION PROFESSIONALS
Clinical Study Results Publication
The Essentials of Writing Scientific Papers
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
What the Editors want to see!
Presenting and publishing work
What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic. Ask What is a review?
Presentation transcript:

Roadmap to excelling in medical writing Dr Trish Groves Deputy editor, BMJ

Programme for the day IMRAD Study designs Clear writing Structured abstracts Statistics tests Self-editing Graphs, figures Impact factor Which journal? Publication ethics Clinical trial disclosure

The scope of medical writing Internal reports Regulatory reports Conference presentations abstract oral presentation poster Journal articles original research paper review article case report letter to editor

Follow the right road

Role of medical writers European Medical Writers Association policy: medical writers have a legitimate role in assisting named authors in developing manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals and presentations such contributions and funding information should be openly acknowledged not ‘ghostwriter’, which wrongly implies something secretive experts in scientific communication, data presentation, journal and congress requirements of journals, and publication ethics may therefore raise the standard of publications and accelerate the process

Excellent writing

Start with good science Communalism - common ownership of scientific discoveries Universalism - evaluation using universal, unbiased criteria Disinterestedness - scientists should act selflessly Organised scepticism - ideas tested and subjected to rigorous, structured scrutiny by peers US sociologist Robert Merton b1910

Plan effectively For original research: have a clear research question seek statistical advice use the right study design act ethically keep an open mind and minimise bias agree who will be principal investigator agree who will be authors and contributors agree to publish even negative results

Behave ethically Research ethics – declaration of Helsinki, ICH Publication ethics avoid misconduct protect patients’ identities report clearly: informed consent any deviation from usual practice full burden imposed on participants total risks posed to participants or others benefits to participants, patients, society It’s not always enough to state that the study was approved by an ethics committee or IRB

Clear writing keep it simple: use short, familiar words avoid jargon and acronyms be specific be concrete, not abstract say what you mean and mean what you say

Editors’ reports of manuscript problems Seldom Occasionally Frequently Poorly written, excessive jargon Inadequate/inappropriate presentation Poor description of design Excessive zeal and self promotion Rationale confused, contradictory Essential data omitted, ignored Boring Important work of others ignored Byrne DW, Publishing Medical Research Papers, Williams and Wilkins, 1998

Spin: the dishonest drug trial Not transparent (sponsors’ roles, competing interests) Compares intervention with one known to be inferior with ineffective dose of competitor intervention with so much of competitor that ADRs likely Uses multiple endpoints and reports selectively Reports results only from favourable centres Reports only favourable subgroup analyses Presents only most impressive results eg reduction in relative rather than absolute risk

On the left side the risk of stroke or bleeding during treatment for atrial fibrillation is shown relative to the class of people who have not had the treatment (as in relative risk reduction). The right side shows the treatment effect relative to a class of 100 untreated people who have not had a stroke or bleeding (as in absolute risk reduction) Gigerenzer G, Edwards A BMJ 2003;327: ©2003 by British Medical Journal Publishing Grou

Framing risk Conditional probabilities The probability that a woman has breast cancer is 0.8%. If she has breast cancer, the probability that a mammogram will show a positive result is 90%. If a woman does not have breast cancer the probability of a positive result is 7%. Take, for example, a woman who as a positive result. What is the probability that she actually has breast cancer? Natural frequencies Eight out of every 1000 women have breast cancer. Of these 8 women with breast cancer 7 will have a positive mammogram. Of the 992 women who do not have breast cancer some 70 will still have a positive mammogram. Take, for example, a sample of women who have positive mammograms. How many of these women have breast cancer?

Spin – it’s not only in trials… 2006 BMJ paper found that industry supported systematic reviews were of lower quality than Cochrane reviews of the same drugs, were less transparently reported, had fewer reservations about methodological limitations, and always recommended the sponsor’s drug without reservations Jørgensen AW et al. BMJ 2006;333: BMJ paper found that sponsored meta-analyses on antihypertensive drugs were not associated with favourable results but had overgenerous conclusions

Industry-commissioned reviews primary research articles create influence peer review approves the science journal brand endorses message better than drug reps secondary articles spread influence more likely to be read than research especially if KOL authors can alter policy

The honest review article describe information sources and methods of selection ideally, cite Cochrane and other systematic reviews clarify type and strength of evidence for key statements "A large robust randomised controlled trial finds..." "The findings of a small case series suggest..." declare provenance, funding, and competing interests

How can journals help? BMJ asks authors submitting or offering unsolicited reviews and editorials on potentially commercial topics three questions And every published article declares competing interests and provenance has anyone prompted or paid you to write this article? would/did a professional writer contribute to the article? to what extent? would the BMJ article be original, or would it be similar to articles submitted or published elsewhere?

GPP2 checklist

Publication agreements

Advice on submitting articles

Thanks