Sponsored by: UNCW Shared Services Steering Committee March 5, 2014 and March 14, 2014 Rev: H UNCW SHARED SERVICES WORKSHOPS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Value of a Project Management Office Copyright: Kathy J. Lang, 2004.
Advertisements

Criminal Justice Organizations: Administration and Management
Web Portal Governance Roles and Responsibilities.
Organizational Structure
Stewarding Illinois January, The Challenge we Face State resources are expected to decline by $50-75 million over the next year Well.
Cuyahoga County Transition Brecksville Kiwanis Cuyahoga County Transition Brecksville Kiwanis Thursday, July 15, 2010.
Collaborative Technical Services Team Report GUGM May 15, 2014 Cathy Jeffrey.
Biomedical Engineering Consolidation Update 28 th September 2011 Chris Buck P.Eng.
Reviewing professional services: Support Process Review (SPR) at the University of Bristol HESA/SUMS Seminar, 24 th June 2011 Helen Galbraith, Director.
Strategic Reorganization
The Objectives:  Investigate the feasibility of consolidating three student administrative areas into one Centre.  Improve the student experience through.
0 Private and Confidential Team Presentations Finance and Infrastructure & IT Track Team Dr. M. Abul-Hamayel Dr. Musa Sayyad Dr. Ma’an Kousa Mr. Shaibu.
0 Private and Confidential Team Presentations Finance & Infrastructure, and IT Track Team Dr. M. Abul-Hamayel Dr. Musa Essayyad Dr. Ma’an Kousa Mr. Shaibu.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
Enterprise Financial System Project Overview & Update Council of Research Associate Deans March 22,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
Human Resources Update Academic Senate Coordinating Committee February 2, 2015.
Assessing Your Organizational Span of Control State Classification Office, September 2003.
E-Procurement in Scotland Steve Murray April 2005
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
UNCW Shared Services Forum March Agenda TopicPresenter Welcoming Remarks The State of Higher Education Chancellor Miller The Significance for.
Copyright © 2013 by ScottMadden. All rights reserved. University of Florida Business Process Census Information Session April 2013.
Rutgers Integrated Administrative System RIAS Phase III – HRMS, Budgeting, and Enterprise Reporting Treasurer’s Luncheon December 2, 2008.
Re-organizing Information Technology University at Buffalo.
Sponsored by: UNCW Shared Services Steering Committee March 5, 2014 and March 14, 2014 Rev: H UNCW SHARED SERVICES WORKSHOPS.
1 APPENDIX A Cluster 1 Modifications and Cluster 2 Design September 2009 HR Solutions Center.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Provost’s IT Task Force January – March Objectives Assess the information technology organizational requirements to support cost effective infrastructure.
Advisory Committee on Application* Development** CCFIT * Administrative, not research ** Build/Buy/Borrow: Provisioning.
Academic Business Officers Group 44 th Annual Conference Break Out Session Budget Planning & Management Challenges Lisa Daniels, Assistant Dean Division.
Diversity at American Airlines : An Integrated Business Strategy Denise Lynn Vice President, Diversity and Leadership Strategies Colloquium on Global.
UCSF HUMAN RESOURCES SERVING THE ACADEMIC AND STAFF COMMUNITY School of Medicine Faculty Council, June 21, 2012.
Establishing an IT Process Improvement Program Carrie Regenstein-CSG- May 13, 2005 and Jeff Silber EDUCAUSE Midwest Reg. Conf.— March 23, 2005 Copyright.
2.1 and 2.1 Management Structures. Introduction A management structure is a term used to describe the ways in which parts of an organisation are formally.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY Campus Systems and Calendar Systems: a self assessment Sarah Noell, ITD, Project Coordinator Harry Nicholos, ITD, Technical co-chair.
Lean Six Sigma in MIDAS 1. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Defined Lean Six Sigma is a recognized industry best practice for business improvement which focuses on.
UBC Department of Finance Office Staff Survey Forum Presentation March 17, 2004.
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Administrator Briefing Spring Quarter 2009.
Development of the Strategic Vision and Where We Go From Here? Dan Dooley Vice President.
Centralizing Data Collection at Statistics Canada Marc St-Denis Lise Rivais.
College of Agricultural Sciences & Hatfield Marine Science Center Business Center May 7, 2009.
Administrative Review & Restructuring. 1 The President’s Charge Review administrative organization and delivery of administrative services at all levels.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
OIT Reorganization August 27, Today’s Agenda Principles of Reorganization Survey Feedback Organization Chart Leadership Team Structure Items to.
Defining our Destiny – Now! Goal = Academic Excellence Strategy – An administrative organizational structure for the Colleges of Arts and Sciences to fulfill.
Office of Core and Shared Resources Faculty Council Meeting October 9, 2012.
Read to Learn Identify the differences between management structures. Name six skills necessary for effective management.
UCSF Human Resources Update to stakeholders December 18, 2014.
Establishing an IT Process Improvement Program Carrie Regenstein and Jeff Silber EDUCAUSE Midwest Regional Conference, Chicago March 23, 2005 Copyright.
THINK EFFICIENCY Administration Review Customer & Support Services Scrutiny Committee 24 th November 2008.
College of Agricultural Sciences & Hatfield Marine Science Center Business Center May 13, 2009.
Cuyahoga County Transition Human Resources & Executive Committee Public Forum Cuyahoga County Transition Human Resources & Executive Committee Public Forum.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
SALARY EQUITY SUMMARY Faculty Council April 13, 2012 Bruce W. Carney Executive Vice Chancellor & Provost.
- 1 - FINAL_NOScript_JDVerificationTraining pptx Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs Assistant: Using knowledge of a functional area(s),
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DIVISION OF THE PRESIDENT Approved by the President in Spring  Provide students with a quality educational.
Research Administrator Portal A Technology Solution to Support Research Administration Activities at the Unit Level April 28, 2016.
Copyright 2010 by CH2M HILL, Inc. Company Confidential Getting More Bang for the Buck: Improving Efficiency Approaches and Tools Kristin M. Howlett, PMP.
Copyright © 2012 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved
Shared Services Initiative Summary of Findings and Next Steps.
New Hire Packet Automation Factors for Decision Making.
Welcome To University Shared Services
Cowlitz County, WA Accounting Function Review
Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs
Parent Council engagement: September 2015
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Training: Intro to FLAC (Faculty Load & Compensation)
Managed Content Services
University of Missouri Task Force on Reporting Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Sponsored by: UNCW Shared Services Steering Committee March 5, 2014 and March 14, 2014 Rev: H UNCW SHARED SERVICES WORKSHOPS

OverviewCharlie Maimone Chair Steering Committee Data Collection and Review JoAnn McDowell Chair HR Workgroup Workshop Exercise Steering Committee Workshop Agenda

“The transition we are making will not be easy. As we face a future of increasingly limited resources and even higher accountability for our operational efficiency, it is a challenge we must meet together, capturing ideas from all who are responsible for UNCW's continued excellence. We must collaborate as a campus, not simply within our own units or divisions, to put us in a greater position to capitalize on existing resources.” Gary L. Miller UNCW Shared Services

Steering Committee Charlie Maimone Vice Chancellor for Business Affairs Steve McFarland Vice Provost & Senior Associate; Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Larry Clark Dean, Cameron School of Business Sharon Boyd Associate Vice Chancellor for Business Affairs Brian Victor Associate Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs David Glew Department Chair, Management Cameron School of Business

Charge to Workgroups Steering Committee Human Resources Management Report Writing Services CHARGE: Recommend an organizational model that maintains or improves on our quality of services while saving time and/or money for the university Budget Management

Work Groups BUDGETHRREPORT WRITING Data Gathering Major Processes This is what you told us Need automated workflows Subject matter experts Less paper Reduce redundancy Remove functions from employees who seldom perform them HR functions widely distributed Compress & redistribute work by subject matter experts Increase use of technology Grouping of reports with subject matter experts Standardization Reduce inventory by service type not departmental division

University Budget Council Review-Report Writing Endorse the Report Writing Shared Services as a project worth investigation More analysis to determine the number of individuals needed

Report Writing Steering Committee The Report Center design should include employee input Provide the following enhancements to reporting… CHARGE: Plan the Implementation of a single Shared Services Reporting Center, inclusive of reporting infrastructure

Report Writing Steering Committee Cont’d Improve data report integrity, availability and flexibility Increase data report writing productivity Reduce fragmentation of work associated with data report writing Eliminate duplicate data tracking and reporting Reduce the time required for accurate data report development Include measurable outcomes

University Budget Committee Review- Budget & HR Recommend both the Budget Management and HR Shared Services Reports for further review Recommended a blended HR & Budget work group Identified several areas for further attention and analysis

Steering Committee HR/Budget CHARGE: Appoint a blended work team to consolidate the Budget and HR recommendations.

Shared Services at a More Detailed Level JoAnn McDowell Interim Assoc. Vice Chancellor for HR

Recommend an organizational model that maintains or improves on our quality of services while saving time and/or money for the university The Organizational Charge

Process Steps Held 3 in-person data collection sessions with 300 staff: – To understand distribution of administrative work among 6 career bands – To gather feedback for improved work processes Subject matter experts “mapped” 7 key HR processes – Identified inefficiencies and developed optimal process flow recommendations

Processes Examined-HR EPA Staffing SPA Staffing Temporary Employment Classification Supplemental Pay Salary Administration Onboarding * Mapping process included input from over 30 customers/suppliers of HR services

Processes Examined-Budget Cost Shares SCRI Flexes Activity Codes Position Control Special Projects Year End

Here is What You Reported

Distribution of Work (1)

Distribution of Work (2)

Here is What You Said “...Admins across campus currently have some of the same basic tasks which would be more effectively and accurately performed if done centrally.”

Here is What You Said “There are folks doing similar tasks and none of them are experts. Sometimes it seems more time is spent locating the latest processes (and possibly never finding them)…”

Visually………

Current Staffing

Summary of Findings (1) Data collection: – Work tasks fragmented among 300 individuals performing functions of 56 HR FTE and 71 non-HR (Travel, Purchasing, Other) FTE – Work processes inefficient and inconsistent – Huge inefficiencies due to central offices interaction with 300 +/- individuals

Summary of Findings (2) Data collection (con’t): – Limited Individuals with complete process knowledge – Process implementation not standardized

Summary of Findings (3) Process mapping: – Lack of automation – redundant and error prone procedures – Time consuming loops exist – Task fragmentation – Inconsistent process implementation – Excellent customer service is difficult

Next Steps Designing for Success

Group1 Identify strategies to ensure open communication and provide all employees with input and feedback opportunities.

Group 2 Identify strategies to evaluate baseline knowledge and expertise needed by employees and subject matter experts.

Group 3 Identify strategies to ensure excellent customer service and accountability of service providers.

Group 4 Identify strategies to maintain flexibility, performance, workload management and student services for departments; ensuring work is distributed fairly throughout the university.

All Groups Identify strategies for how we can help your colleagues feel more comfortable.

Please Provide Top 3-5 Strategies Remember: We are asking for STRATEGIES not solutions!

What are the Dots For? Select best strategies Can distribute dots any way you choose

One More Thing! Are there any other important shared service factors we have not included ?

Shared Services Workshop Sponsored by: UNCW Shared Services Steering Committee March 2014 Rev: H

The Process Starts With Data Division # of employees in data collection Human ResourcesTravelPurchasing Other Business Budget Gen Admin & OtherTOTALS FTE Academic Affairs Business Affairs Chancellor's Office Student Affairs University Adv’t Blank Grand Total