Understanding the Details of Your Evidence-Based Options Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Community Guide Branch, Centers for Disease Control.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 2006 WHO's Contribution to Scaling Up towards Universal Access to HIV/AIDS Prevention, Care and Treatment Department of HIV/AIDS.
Advertisements

Public Health Essential Service #2
Understanding Capacity Building Assistance
Finding an Evidence- Based Program. Objectives Know how to use your needs assessment and program goals and objectives to help you select your program.
AMCHP-CDC Skills Building Suite: Evidence-based Practice: Moving along the Continuum from Selection to Sustainability Friday, September 13, 2013 Starr.
Does It Work? Evaluating Your Program
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
An overview of NREPP and how to use it National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices.
Making the Evidence-Based Program Fit Your Needs: Adaptation and Your Program Summary.
1 Strategic Planning. 2 Elements of the Strategic Planning Process Strategic planning is a continual process for improving organizational performance.
WORKING TOGETHER TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHY AGING PROGRAMS: PUBLIC HEALTH, AGING, AND UNIVERSITY COMMUNITIES Lucinda L. Bryant PhD MSHA MBA, University.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
CAPP Evaluation: Implementing Evidence Based Programs in NYS Jane Powers ACT for Youth Center of Excellence 2011 A presentation for Comprehensive Adolescent.
Healthy North Carolina 2020 and EBS/EBI 101 Joanne Rinker MS, RD, CDE, LDN Center for Healthy North Carolina Director of Training and Technical Assistance.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Implementing and Evaluating Evidence-based Strategies
NCALHD Public Health Task Force NC State Health Director’s Conference January 2014 A Blueprint of the Future for Local Public Health Departments in North.
Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
STUDY PLANNING & DESIGN TO ENHANCE TRANSLATION OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR RESEARCH Lisa Klesges, Russell Glasgow, Paul Estabrooks, David Dzewaltowski, Sheana Bull.
Adapting an Evidence-based Approach to Fit Your Community.
Selecting an Evidence-based Approach (EBA) with the Best Fit Image courtesy of Naypong at FreeDigitalPhotos.net.
ORIENTATION SESSION Strengthening Chronic Disease Prevention & Management.
Evaluation Basics Purpose of Evaluation As adults and youth design and implement their evaluation, there are several important principles that will help.
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Opioid Misuse Prevention Program “OMPP” Strategic Planning Workshop
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Inventory and Assessment of NBCCEDP Interventions Evaluation November 1, 2007.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Joe Selby, MD MPH EBRI December 15, 2011 What Might Patient (Employee)- Centered Research Look Like?
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
2004 National Oral Health Conference Strategic Planning for Oral Health Programs B.J. Tatro, MSSW, PhD B.J. Tatro Consulting Scottsdale, Arizona.
CAPP Evaluation August 2011 Update Jane Powers, Amanda Purington, Jenny Parise ACT for Youth Center of Excellence.
SCIENCE-BASED PROGRAMS AND ADAPTATIONS Prepared by Healthy Teen Network and ACT For Youth.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
XXX_DECRIPT_MON00/1 Quality and impact of Social Science and Operations Research by the Special Programme in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive.
Getting Started Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
Evidence-Based Public Health Selecting Evidence-Based Interventions Joanne Rinker 1.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Maria E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Professor Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences University of Texas, School of Public Health.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Refining the Program Intervention Based on Research.
Using an Evidence-Based Approach to Address Maternal and Child Health Priorities Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Community Guide Branch, Centers.
Why a CPCRN? CDC Expectations Katherine M. Wilson, PhD, MPH CPCRN Technical Monitor Division of Cancer Prevention and Control CDC.
CHAPTER 28 Translation of Evidence into Nursing Practice: Evidence, Clinical practice guidelines and Automated Implementation Tools.
Chapter 11: Building Community Capacity to Take Action Operation: Military Kids Ready, Set, Go! Training.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Finding evidence-based approaches. Assessing your Community Implementing & Evaluating Establishing Goals & Objectives; Planning for Evaluation Finding.
HIV AND INFANT FEEDING A FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITY ACTIONS.
Using Quality Improvement Strategies to Implement an Intervention Module Created By Population Health Improvement Partners
Using Logic Models to Create Effective Programs
Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
Massachusetts Cancer Prevention Community Research Network (MCPCRN) CPCRN Atlanta Meeting October 15-16, 2009.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Session 4 Agenda 1. Strategic Prevention Framework Sustainability Step 4: Implementation Step 5: Evaluation 2. Bringing It All Together 2.
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.
1 Considerations When Providing Technical Assistance on Using Evidence December 13, 2010 Shawna L. Mercer, MSc, PhD, Director, The Guide to Community Preventive.
Introduction Social ecological approach to behavior change
Introduction Social ecological approach to behavior change
Strategies to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance and to Improve Infection Control Robin Oliver, M.D., CPE.
Adapting an EBI Program to Fit
Putting Public Health Evidence in Action
Building Public Health Nursing Capacity through Shared Services
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the Details of Your Evidence-Based Options Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Community Guide Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention September 10, 2013 Association of Maternal & Child Health Programs Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (proposed) Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services (proposed)

Disclaimer Any views or opinions expressed by the speaker do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC, HHS, or any other entity of the United States government. Furthermore, the use of any product names, trade names, images, or commercial sources is for identification purposes only, and does not imply endorsement or government sanction by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2

Acknowledgements This training is brought to you by 3

Today’s Learner Objectives  Identify factors that influence choice of evidence-based strategies and interventions.  Identify the types of information needed from your community and organization to ensure a proper match with an intervention.  Assess the fit of the organization to the potential strategies and interventions  Identify elements that can and cannot be changed when using an intervention. 4

Homework Review: How Did it Go?  Scavenger Hunt Handout 1.Explore The Community Guide website and answer questions specific to the Task Force-recommended strategy, Behavioral and Social Approaches to Increase Physical Activity: Individually-Adapted Health Behavior Change Programs. 2.Use the RTIPs and Center TRT websites to Select one program intervention from each that is aligned with the Task Force-recommended strategy, Behavioral and Social Approaches to Increase Physical Activity: Individually-Adapted Health Behavior Change Programs. Answer questions for each program intervention you selected. 5

Homework Review: How Did it Go? (cont’d)  Intervention Comparison Tool Handout 1.Review your responses on the Organizational Readiness Checklist. 2.Consider the information you gathered about your health priority and community. 3.Fill out only the first blank column “Priority Area for Our Community” based on your community as well as your responses for the Organizational Readiness Checklist. You will fill out the remaining columns during our next webinar. 6

Community Assessment Implementation & Evaluation Establishing Goals & Objectives; Planning for Evaluation Finding Evidence Selection Adaptation Where do We Stand? 7 Sustainability

SELECTING AN EVIDENCED-BASED OPTION THAT FITS YOUR COMMUNITY 8

Why Is Understanding the Details of Evidence-Based Options Important?  Assess how much adaptation is needed by gauging its fit to your community and organization.  Review methods, facilitators’ guide or implementation protocol to understand the steps for delivery.  Learn the costs of implementation.  In short, decide which program to use. 9

Before You Hit the Ground Running  Consider the goals, objectives and target audience for your proposed program, practice or policy.  Consider the characteristics of the organization or setting.  Then, select the best one to match those goals, objectives, and audience. 10

Definition of Fit  Overall compatibility between a strategy and the – Audience and community served. – Organization that will implement it.  Ideal Match 11

Fit Considerations  Strategy and Intervention Health behaviors/topics Goals Type of delivery methods Time span Settings  Audience Age Education Gender Race/ethnicity Socioeconomic status  Organization Fit with mission Leadership support Availability of a project coordinator Resources: Finances/cost Staff & expertise Facilities Partnerships  Community Priorities and values Readiness for prevention Fit with other programs 12

What do you think? 13

Activity! 14

Activity: Selecting an Intervention 1.Using the RTIPs and Center TRT websites, choose two intervention programs to address your identified priority area (from Column 2). 2.Using the Intervention Comparison Tool a.Complete Option 1 & Option 2 Columns using information you find about each intervention program. b.Compare Option 1 & Option 2 and discuss how each might fit with your population and organization. 15

Intervention Comparison Tool 16

Activity: Selecting an Intervention (cont’d) 3.Tell us what you chose and why. Process: We will hear from three groups.  If you would like to volunteer your choices, RAISE YOUR HAND in the webinar. We will randomly select someone. Once someone is selected, please LOWER YOUR HAND.  After the first response, if you have chosen a different intervention and are willing to explain, please RAISE YOUR HAND. We will randomly select someone. Once someone is selected, please LOWER YOUR HAND.  After the second response, if you have chosen a different intervention and are willing to explain, please RAISE YOUR HAND. We will randomly select someone. Once someone is selected, please LOWER YOUR HAND. 17

ADAPTING INTERVENTIONS TO FIT YOUR COMMUNITY Adopt Adapt 18

Adaptation is…… …making  Changes  Additions  Deletions  Substitutions …to an evidence-based strategy to make it more suitable for a particular population or an organization’s capacity. 19

Adaptation Dilemma for Practitioners  During the adaptation process, planners often choose pieces of programs that are the most appealing or that seem the most feasible, usually there is not much input from the community.  Little or no process for determining what in a program needs to change and what must stay the same.  This can lead to programs that are incomplete with little chance of maintaining impact. 20

Adaptation Dilemma for Researchers  Some authors suggest that when developmental issues and program targets are appropriate, adaptation is seldom or never needed (Elliot and Mihalic, 2004).  Others point out that the formative work to support adaptation is seldom done (Lau, 2006).  Nevertheless, in practice… Adaptation Happens. Elliott, D. S. & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science, 5, Lau, A. (2006). Making the case for selective and directed cultural adaptations of evidence-based treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13 (4),

Effective adaptation of a community-based program involves balancing…  Fit: Increasing compatibility between an evidence-based strategy and the organizational setting and audience characteristics.  Fidelity: Implementing core elements and key process steps as intended in the original evidence-based strategy. 22

Program Fidelity  Adherence to program protocol or implementation guide  Dose or amount of program delivered  Quality of program delivery  Participant reaction and acceptance *Rabin, Brownson, Haire-Joshu, Kreuter, Weaver. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 2008, 14(2), 117–

Fidelity: Core Elements of Evidence-Based Interventions *Eke, Neumann, Wilkes, Jones. Preparing effective behavioral interventions to be used by prevention providers: the role of researchers during HIV Prevention Research Trials. AIDS Education & Prevention, 2006, 18(4 Suppl A): Three types of core elements  Content  Delivery mechanisms  Methods

Core Elements of Evidence-Based Programs  Core Content Elements— relate to WHAT is being delivered or taught  Core Pedagogical Elements—relate to HOW the content is delivered or taught  Core Implementation Elements—relate to the WHEN, WHERE, AND BY WHOM [logistics] Adapted from: Lesesne, C. A., Lewis, K. M., Moore, C., Fisher, D., Green, D., & Wandersman, A. (2007). Promoting Science-based Approaches to Teen Pregnancy Prevention using Getting To Outcomes: Draft June Unpublished manual. 25

Yellow, Green, Yellow, & Red Light Adaptations Provides guidance on whether a particular adaptation is … …safe (green). …should be made cautiously (yellow). …should be avoided (red). Adapted from: Lesesne, C. A., Lewis, K. M., Moore, C., Fisher, D., Green, D., & Wandersman, A. (2007). Promoting Science-based Approaches to Teen Pregnancy Prevention using Getting To Outcomes: Draft June Unpublished manual. 26

Things That Can Probably Be Modified  Names of health care centers or systems.  Pictures of people and places and quotes.  Hard-to-read words that affect reading level.  Wording to be appropriate to audience.  Ways to recruit your audience.  Incentives for participation.  Timeline (based on adaptation guides).  Cultural preferences based on population. 27

Modifications That Might Be Made BUT Proceed with Caution  Substituting activities.  Modifying who delivers the program.  Changing the order of the curriculum or steps (sequence).  Altering the length of program activities.  Varying the primary audience.  Changing delivery format or process steps.  Adding activities to address other risk factors or behaviors. 28

Things That Cannot Be Modified  The health communication model or theory.  The health topic/behavior.  Deleting core elements or whole sections of the program.  Reduction in  Timeline (beyond guidelines).  Dosage (e.g., activities, time/session).  Adding activities that detract from the core elements. 29

What do you think? 30

Homework for Next Webinar (Sep 13) 31 Program Adaptation Checklist

Homework for Next Webinar (cont’d) 32 Program Sustainability Assessment Tool

Community Assessment Implementation & Evaluation Establishing Goals & Objectives; Planning for Evaluation Finding Evidence Selection Adaptation Next Webinar…. 33 Sustainability

Questions & Discussion 34

Thank you! Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Community Guide Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Starr Banks Cherie Rooks-Peck Kathi Wilson Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (proposed) Division of Epidemiology, Analysis, and Library Services (proposed)