THE DEFENSE OF BASIC LIBERTIES II Mill

The Free Market Argument

1. Truth is generally valuable. 2. Censorship lowers the net amount of truth. 3. If (1) and (2), then censorship is generally impermissible. 4. [So] Censorship is generally impermissible.

The Free Market Argument We can never be sure that the opinion we are endeavoring to stifle is a false opinion; and if we were sure, stifling it would be an evil still. On Liberty, page 19

The Knowledge Argument …to shut out discussion entirely is seldom possible, and when it once gets in, beliefs not grounded on conviction are apt to give way before the slightest semblance of an argument. Waiving, however this possibility—assuming the true opinion abides in the mind, but abides as a prejudice, a belief independent of, and proof against argument—this is not the way in which truth ought to be held by a rational being. This is not knowing the truth. Truth, thus held, is but one superstition the more, accidentally clinging to the words which enunciate a truth. On Liberty, pages 36-7

The Free Market Argument 1. Truth is generally valuable. 2. Censorship lowers the net amount of truth. 3. If (1) and (2), then censorship is generally impermissible. 4. [So] Censorship is generally impermissible.

The Knowledge Argument 1. Knowledge is generally valuable. 2. Censorship lowers the net amount of knowledge. 3. If (1) and (2), then censorship is generally impermissible. 4. [So] Censorship is generally impermissible.

The Free Market Argument

The Development Argument …to conform to custom, merely as custom, does not educate or develop in him any of the qualities which are the distinctive endowment of a human being. The human faculties of perception, judgment, discriminative feeling, mental activity, and even moral preference, are exercised only in making a choice. He who does anything because it is the custom, makes no choice. He gains no practice either in discerning or in desiring what is best. The mental and moral like the muscular powers, are improved only by being used…

The Development Argument …He who lets the world, or his own portion of it, choose his plan of life for him, has no need of any other faculty than the ape-like one of imitation… It is possible that he might be guided in some good path, and kept out of harm’s way, without any of these things. But what will be his comparative worth as a human being? It really is of importance, not only what men do, but also what manner of men they are that do it… Supposing it where possible to get houses built, corn grown, battles fought, causes tried, and even churches erected and prayers said, by machinery—by automatons in human form—it would be considerable loss to exchange for these automatons… men and women… Human nature is not a machine to be built after a model, and set to do exactly the work prescribed for it, but a tree, which requires to grow and develop itself on all sides, according to the tendency of the inward forces which make it a living thing. On Liberty, pages 60-1

The Development Argument

1. The development of mental skills like wisdom and creativity is generally valuable. 2. Censorship prevents the development of mental skills. 3. If (1) and (2), then censorship is generally impermissible. 4. [So] Censorship is generally impermissible.