© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION INTERROGATORIES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REFINING YOUR DISCOVERY TACTICS: A PLAINTIFF PERSPECTIVE Amanda A. Farahany Barrett & Farahany, LLP 1401 Peachtree Street, Suite 101 Atlanta, GA
Advertisements

U.S. LEGAL SYSTEMS – Federal Court Systems – State Court Systems.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation & Procedure LAW-220 Introduction to The Course.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION LAW AND MOTION.
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION ATTACKING THE PLEADINGS.
Drafting Good Discovery: Admissions and Interrogatories George B. Murr Advanced Civil Discovery The University of Houston Law Foundation Continuing Legal.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION CALENDARING DISCOVERY.
William P. Butterfield February 16, Part 1: Why Can’t We Cooperate?
Teaching Basic Civil Discovery in a Workshop Setting
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
L.A. 310 – DISCOVERY PART II. Depositions C.C.P section 2025 Defined: Oral testimony taken (usually prior to trial) which is: –Under oath –Before a certified.
Randy J. Cox.  Rule 6 – counting days  Rule 11 – adoption of federal rule  Rule 15 – amended pleadings  Rule 26 – no federal-court disclosure requirements;
Pretrial Matters: Pleadings & Motions © Professor Mathis-Rutledge.
Pleadings -- Documents exchanged to initiate lawsuit Complaint Answer Summons Discovery –Depositions from Witnesses: –Production of Documents –Written.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 6Slide 1 Steps in Filing a Complaint First, the necessary complaint must be prepared. Make sure you attach the: First,
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Pleading Pre-trial Discovery Resolution without Trial Trial & Post-trial Appeal.
 Is the most common response to a Complaint  Must be served within 30 days in California  Filed with the Court with a filing fee  Mailed to Plaintiff.
Introduction to Civil Procedure in the United States Wake Forest LLM Introduction to American Law Alan R. Palmiter – Sep
Introduction to Written Discovery
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION OBTAINING AND USING TANGIBLE EVIDENCE.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION COMPLAINTS AND CROSS-COMPLAINTS.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT.
THE COURT SYSTEM & DISPUTE RESOLUTION Used by permission. For Educational purposes only.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 24 DISCOVERY V.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Chapter 2 The Court System and Dispute Resolution Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 11Slide 1 Production of Documents Scope Scope Includes documents of all types, including pictures, graphs, drawings, videos.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY III.
PA110 Civil Litigation I Unit 6 Seminar.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DEPOSITIONS.
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
DISCOVERY. Types of Discovery Depositions Interrogatories Requests for Admissions Subpoena duces tecum Request for Physical Examination Request for Witness.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION AMENDING THE PLEADINGS.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial. Introduction to Law, 4 th Edition Hames and Ekern © 2010 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Options Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION TRIAL-SETTING PROCEDURES.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION APPEALS.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS.
Interrogatories & Depositions Civil Litigation I - Unit 6.
© Sara M. Taylor 2002 Document Production and Organization for Litigation Paralegals in California.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION CALENDARING PLEADINGS.
Primary Changes To The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Effective December 1, 2015 Presented By Shuman, McCuskey, & Slicer, PLLC.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION ARBITRATION AND ADR.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning BUSINESS LAW Twomey Jennings 1 st Ed. Twomey & Jennings BUSINESS LAW Chapter 2 The.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
March 4, 2011 Civil Procedure.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 22 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 16, 2002.
Teachers and the Law, 8 th Edition © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Teachers and the Law, 8e by David Schimmel, Leslie R. Stellman,
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY II October 11, 2005.
Teaching Basic Civil Discovery in a Workshop Setting Presented by Eric Nakano, Sacramento County Public Law Library.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION F CLASS 22/23 DISCOVERY IV.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
Part I: The Discovery Phase: What is it & What do you do?
Civil Litigation: Before The Trial
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION INTRODUCTION TO PLEADINGS
Civil Pretrial Practice
Class III Objectives Subject Matter:
Civil Pretrial Practice
Civil Pretrial Practice
Civil Pretrial Practice
Presentation transcript:

© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION INTERROGATORIES

2 INTERROGATORIES— written questions by parties to parties’ written responses, under oath.

3 ADVANTAGES OF INTERROGATORIES 1. Inexpensive 2. Broad (all info available) 3. Paralegal intensive 4. Allows time for research 5. Discovers contentions

4 DISADVANTAGES OF INTERROGATORIES 1. Encourage gamesmanship 2. Not spontaneous 3. Easy to evade 4. Only used for parties

5 TYPES OF INTERROGATORIES State court: Special (drafted) Official forms Federal court: Special (drafted)

6 INTERROGATORIES IN STATE PRACTICE Unlimited Civil Cases

7 FORMAT OF DOCUMENT  Caption  Title  Heading  Introduction  Interrogatories  Subscribed

8 FORMAT OF INTERROGATORIES  Numbered consecutively set to set  Not combined with other discovery  No space for answers

9 INTERROGATORY RULES  Each complete and independent  No preface or instructions  No subparts  Definitions capitalized in each  Not compound, conjunctive, disjunctive

10 Caption, Heading Alma Howardson, Esq. SBN Main St. Vista View, CA Attorney for Plaintiff Smith SUPERIOR COURT OF MOUNTAIN COUNTY James Smith, plaintiff,)Case No v. ) Robert Jones, and Does)INTERROGATORIES 1-5, defendants.) ________________________ )Propounded by: Plaintiff Propounded to: Defendant Set No. Two

11 Interrogatories Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure §2030, plaintiff James Smith, requests that defendant, Robert Jones, serve verified answers to the following special interrogatories within 30 days after service hereof: 7. State all facts upon which you base your general denial of the complaint herein. 8. IDENTIFY all persons you contend have knowledge of any facts upon which you base your general denial. AS USED IN THIS INTERROGATORY, “IDENTIFY” MEANS STATE THE NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF EACH SUCH PERSON, AND SPECIFY THE KNOWLEDGE THAT YOU CONTEND HE OR SHE POSSESSES. ______________________ Smith v. Jones Plaintiff’s Interrogatories, Set Twopage 1

12 OFFICIAL FORMS— still meet format requirements even though they:  have an introduction,  are not complete and independent,  have subparts,  have definitions, and  are compound.

13 “RULE OF 35”  Unlimited Official Forms, “Economic Litigation” forms optional  Special Interrogatories limited to 35 unless “Declaration of Necessity”  Two “Supplemental Sets” permitted

14 INTERROGATORIES IN STATE PRACTICE Limited Civil Cases

15 SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES— have same form and format as unlimited civil cases.

16 OFFICIAL FORMS “Economic Litigation” forms are mandatory.

17 “RULE OF 35” 35 aggregate total of all discovery! Each form interrogatory, each drafted interrogatory, each document request, and each deposition count toward the maximum 35 (without leave of court)— no declaration of necessity!

18 INTERROGATORIES IN FEDERAL PRACTICE

19 FORM AND FORMAT Identical to state court except  limit in local rules, exceeded only by court order  may have introduction  leave room for responses

20 THREE CATEGORIES OF INTERROGATORIES 1. Contention 2. Fact 3. Document identification

21 RESPONDING TO INTERROGATORIES

22 OPTIONS 1. Seek protective order to avoid response. 2. Respond under oath within 30 days (+5 if mailed) 3. Fail to respond—risk waived objections, sanctions.

23 DRAFTING RESPONSES 1. Assert all possible objections. 2. Respond fully and completely. 3. Produce documents instead of compiling info. 4. Serve original with respondent’s verification.

24 RESPONSE OPTION Respondent may provide documents as kept in course of business rather than compile summaries, facts.

25 LACK OF RESPONSE Propounder may move for order compelling responses, and for sanctions. All objections are waived.

26 DEFECTIVE RESPONSE STATE COURT If propounding party disputes responses or objections, counsel must meet and confer to resolve. If no resolution, propounder can move to compel and for sanctions, within 45–50 days of service.

27 DEFECTIVE RESPONSE FEDERAL COURT Same as state court, but no time limit for motion to compel.

28 SUMMARY Interrogatories, Drafted and Form PREVIEW Requests for Admission SUMMARY Interrogatories, Drafted and Form PREVIEW Requests for Admission