Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group (CFCG) Update IPACG/39 Keith Dutch, FAA 03 – 06 February.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Aviation Administration GOLD Amendment Program By:Tom Kraft Date:8 February 2012 Presented to:SOCM/2 Seminar.
Advertisements

FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
Introduction to Navigation Specifications
Chapter 6 Sub-Group ICAO Headquarters, November 2013
Air Traffic Management
Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 8, 2012 SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Operations.
Federal Aviation Administration Performance Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS) Data Link Operational Authorization Process Date:13-14 May 2013.
P. GAYRAUD /B. RABILLER Cologne the 21st of June 2007
SC227 – SC214 ISRA – Datalink Interface. PBN Manual, Part A, Chapter On-board performance monitoring and alerting On-board performance.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-40/PIA-4 Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 WP02: Timing Errors in Oakland OCA.
PBCS Workshop Bangkok, Thailand, May, 2013
Wings of Freedom TWO – WAY RADIO FAILURE. Wings of Freedom REFERENCES FAR Flight Information Handbook, Section A AIM, Section Individual.
DARP.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Transition to RNP 4/10 (MNPS to PBN) OSWG Gordy Rother and Kevin Kelley 10/8/2014 North Atlantic.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 WP29: Speed Variation.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP09: LOST FUEL SAVINGS DUE TO LACK OF.
ICAO SARPS and Guidance Material
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Gulf of Mexico 50 NM Lateral Separation – RNAV Routes Project Project Overview ATO Oceanic & Offshore.
ELEC4504/4906G AVIONICS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues Summary of the Outcomes of the 17th Cross Polar Trans East.
Performance Based Navigation Industry Forum Issues Workshop Presentation to Industry Forum 18 November 2009.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Presented by Jim Gardner, AFS-200 Proposed Amendment To Annex 6, Part I International Commercial Transport – Aeroplanes.
Office of Aviation Safety Controlled Flight Into Terrain Learjet 35A San Diego, California October 24, 2004.
Data Link Communications
Use Case Diagram. # 1 Provide Pre-flight Services Actors: Pilot, External Data Providers, FBO, FAA Goal Level: User Level Main Success Scenario 1.Client.
10/31/06 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Civil Aviation.
Aeronautical Information Exchange Model (AIXM). Introduction “Never let an aircraft take you somewhere your brain didn't get to five minutes earlier”
1 World Dispatch Summit Toronto, Canada May 2002 ETOPS Presentation Ralph Webster Transport CanadaTransports Canada Safety & SecuritySécurité et sûreté.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
Lecture 3: Air Traffic Control Tower
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program Operational Trials in Domestic Airspace Presented to:Data Comm Implementation Team (DCIT) By:Jerry.
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS  PART I- PRELIMINARY 1. Citation 2. Interpretation 3. Application.
LECTURE 4: ICAO CHART requirements
Federal Aviation Administration APEC Seminar on Practical Measures to Manage Aviation Emissions Collaboration on Aviation Emissions Reduction Partnerships.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration CFCG ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group IPACG/40 Keith Dutch, AJV September.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP06: ADS-B In-trail- Procedure (ITP)
ASSTAR Airborne Separation Operations in Oceanic Airspace Bob McPike, NATS ASAS-TN2 Conference Glasgow, September 2006.
Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA, AFS-430 Date: October 11, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration FPAW 2011 AC Rewrite Plan.
Milestone presentation Balloon flight regulations.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision TECHNICAL & OPERATIONAL COMPETENCE ATS.
Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR February 10, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR C-384 Presentation.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Teterboro Runway 19 Quiet Visual Approach Teterboro Users Group (TUG) Gerald Lynch, Eastern Service.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Oceanic and International Operations
Performance Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)
TYPES, AIRSPACE CLASSIFICATION, CHANGE FROM ONE TO ANOTHER
AIR TRAFFIC ONTROL.
Допълнение 7 на PANS-ATM (ICAO Doc 4444)
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Rome November 2008 Johan Martensson, CASCADE
Performance Based Navigation: Navigation Specifications
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
International Civil Aviation Organization
Chapter 6 Sub-Group ICAO Headquarters, November 2013
Air Transport Reporting Form K for ANSPs
Data Communications Program
Oceanic and International Operations
Session – 4: Existing ICAO Standards relating to Air Traffic Control
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Oceanic and International Operations
Oceanic and International Operations
Oceanic and International Operations
Oceanic and International Operations
Oceanic and International Operations
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group (CFCG) Update IPACG/39 Keith Dutch, FAA 03 – 06 February 2014

Federal Aviation Administration Reason for CFCG The Cross Polar Working Group (CPWG) proposed a common communication failure procedure for FIRs around North Pole –Each FIR has its own comm failure procedure –Aircraft pass through FIRs for relatively short periods –Proposed that aircraft maintain the last ATC-assigned speed, route, and altitude Annex 2 procedures and several Regions/ANSPs tell aircraft to follow “flight plan”, which permits step-climbs from Item 15. ICAO formed CFCG to resolve difference 2

Federal Aviation Administration CFCG Activity ICAO CFCG met October 2012 The Meeting reviewed communication failure provisions contained –Annex 2 — Rules of the Air –Annex 10 — Aeronautical Telecommunications, Volume II — Communication Procedures including those with PANS status –Current regionally-agreed provisions, amendment proposals submitted by the European Region, North American Region, and many national regulations, which differ from ICAO 3

Federal Aviation Administration CFCG Activity (continued) Discussions about “communication failure” and the scope of work for the CFCG –Failure of ATC comms were considered outside the scope of the CFCG –Would address single aircraft with partial and total comm (ATC-approved voice, data link, SATCOM, etc. and non-approved [cell phone]) loss Discussed various scenarios (low-density vs. high-density, surveillance, remote, etc.) 4

Federal Aviation Administration CFCG Activity (continued) Phase of flight (departure, en route, descent) Flight plan (Filed, Current, Repetitive, operational version for aircrew) Subsequent meetings to be held by WebEx Unable to progress activity due to differences –Continue flight according to FPL (altitude changes) –Continue flight last ATC assigned altitude 5

Federal Aviation Administration CFCG Current Status ISAVIA, NAV CANADA, and FAA propose that a flight should not automatically climb in accordance with the flight plan –ICAO NAT Region clearance formulated to provide conflict-free flight –Assigned flight level coordinated with downstream ATC –Level in FPL may no longer be operationally suitable –Flight crew and ATC may have different understandings of “current flight plan” 6

Federal Aviation Administration CFCG Current Status (continued) Others contend flight should automatically climb in accordance with the flight plan –Last assigned level may not provide terrain and obstacle clearance for the entire route –Flight plan represents an operationally suitable profile for the flight –Flight plan is a single point of information about the flight’s intentions 7

Federal Aviation Administration CFCG Next Meeting February 2014 ICAO Montreal, Canada 8

Federal Aviation Administration CFCG Questions? 9