ID and Social Approach Strengths and Weaknesses Additional Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Abnormal Psychology Discuss to what extent biological, cognitive, and sociocultural factors influence abnormal behaviour Evaluate psychological research.
Advertisements

Methodology of the Behaviourist Approach
Research Methods & Approaches
Evaluation & exam Social Approach Core Study 1: Milgram (1963)
Debates G544: Section B Nature/Nurture FreeWill/Determinism
Social Approach Background to study Core Study 3: Piliavin (1969)
Psychology The usefulness of psychological research.
N The Experimental procedure involves manipulating something called the Explanatory Variable and seeing the effect on something called the Outcome Variable.
Unit 2 The Learning approach Study in Detail Watson & Raynor (1920)
Discuss validity and reliability of diagnosis
Reliability and Validity. * How consistent the test is within itself - this might be affected by different people collecting the data differently in an.
Contents What is Individual Differences Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Individual Differences Psychology: Thigpen and.
Abnormal Psychology: Past and Present Chapter 1. Tips for Effective Studying Establish a quiet place, free of distractions, where you do nothing but study.
Identify and List… Theory behind the study Aim of study.
Validity “The extent to which a test or research study measures what it was designed to measure”
Ms. Carmelitano RESEARCH METHODS EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES.
Chapter 2 Research in Abnormal Psychology. Slide 2 Research in Abnormal Psychology  Clinical researchers face certain challenges that make their investigations.
Social Psychology Contents What is Social Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Social Psychology: Milgram. (1963) and Zimbardo.
Ms. Carmelitano RESEARCH METHODS EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES.
Student information pack: Validity Some key points which you may find helpful.
Research support for validity and reliability theories
Cognitive Level of Analysis
VALIDITY IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
Individual Differences Approach
Do Now Sit according to your learning style.. Bellringer Reflect on your individual learning style. How will you better participate / advocate for yourself.
The Social Approach Focus on Section C questions.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. Social Psychology Assumptions: That other people influence our behaviour. 1. Individuals and groups affect behavior (you act differently.
Reliability of one cognitive process
AICE.Milgram.
Learning Objectives  ALL will understand advantages and disadvantages of Ainsworth’s Strange Situation and will be able to complete a table with necessary.
What’s coming up….  Ethnocentrism  Nature-nurture  Individual and situational explanations  Determinism and free will  Reductionism and holism  Psychology.
Evaluate, including the relative strengths and weaknesses, of Field experiments including their use in criminological psychology with regard to : Evaluate,
Methodology: How Social Psychologists Do Research
Research Methods.  To have an understanding of observation techniques.  To know the strength's and limitations of this type of study.
INTRODUCTION TO METHODS Higher Psychology. What do Psychologists do?  Discuss in groups  5MINS.
Stanley Milgram. What is interesting about this experiment?
Issues and Debates  Ethnocentrism  Nature-nurture  Ethics  Individual and situational explanations  Reductionism and holism  Psychology as a science.
Origins of Psychology 4.2.1: Approaches in Psychology Origins of Psychology: Wundt, introspection and the emergence of Psychology as a science.
Abnormal Psychology Lesson objective: Discuss the validity and reliability of diagnosis.
Lesson 4. In a laboratory experiment involving a medical consultation role-play, participants were randomly allocated to one of two conditions. In Condition.
Piliavin Social Psychology Core Studies. Background Bystander - Anyone who is present at an incident but not directly involved. Bystander effect – the.
VALIDITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #3.
A2 unit 4 Clinical Psychology 4) Content Reliability of the diagnosis of mental disorders Validity of the diagnosis of mental disorders Cultural issues.
The Scientific Method in Psychology How do we collect our data?  Observation.
Lesson 4 Cognitive Psychology.
Experiments Research Methods.
At the end of WW2 people were asking the question ‘what made so many German people act in such atrocious ways?’ Why did the holocaust happen? Are the.
Psychology and Research Methods
What do you need to know? Approaches in psychology
RECAP Whiteboard relay… Outline and evaluate Milgram’s original obedience study (12)
A2 unit 4 Clinical Psychology
IB Psychology Today’s Agenda: Turn in: Abnormal Intro Cont.
Research Methods in Psychology
Methodology of the Behaviourist Approach
The Social Learning Theory
IB Psychology Today’s Agenda: Turn in: What is Sanity? Nothing
IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
ASSUMPTIONS STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
Unit 1 Research Methods (can be examined in Unit 1&2)
Types of Experiments Lab Field Natural Quasi.
IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
The Biological Approach
Research Methods.
Piliavin et al. (1969) Good Samaritanism: An Underground Phenomenon?
 Piliavin et al. developed a model to explain their results called the Arousal: Cost vs. Reward model. They argue that firstly, observation of an emergency.
What is individual differences?
Biological Psychology Approach
Let’s start today’s lesson by
AS Psychology Research Methods
AS Psychology Research Methods
Presentation transcript:

ID and Social Approach Strengths and Weaknesses Additional Information

Individual Diffrences

Evaluation – strengths StrengthEvidence Aims to look at the motivations behind behaviour (what causes people to behave the way they do). E.g. in Griffiths, the ‘thinking aloud’ aimed to see their irrational reasoning, showing how different types of gambler use different heuristics. In T&C they used interviews with Eve and her family to find out about her past and were able to establish a cause for her MPD. These examples show how looking at people as individuals may best show how individual cognitions and experiences can lead to abnormal behaviour later in life. Can be useful in improving the experiences of people with mental health problems – e.g. Thigpen and Cleckley, Rosenhan and Griffiths Rosenhan’s findings contributed to improvements in patient care and an awareness of the pitfalls of using diagnostic criteria, highlighting the need to treat people as individuals. T&C aimed to help Eve and though they did not cure her, did improve some of her symptoms e.g. headaches and blackouts, showing the importance of understanding the unique situation of sufferers and how taking an individual differences approach can benefit patients. High in Ecological Validity – e.g. Rosenhan, Griffiths Rosenhan’s study took place in real hospitals with no demand characteristics. Griffiths took place in a real life arcade, with money to play for. This supports the approach as it shows that Individual Differences in thoughts and behaviour exist in the real world. We can use objective psychometric tests to show the difference between normal and abnormal, and to measure differences between individuals Thigpen and Cleckley used IQ and memory tests to see if there was an objective difference between each of Eve’s personalities. This lends an element of reliability and objectivity to the ID approach. (more of a supplementary point e.g. if you have 2 strengths already and want to add another) As people are all unique the only way we can look at them is to see them as an individual (the idiographic approach) For example MPD is a rare and idiosyncratic disorder – no two people will have it in the same way. Griffiths showed that different people use different heuristics and that the wrong use of these can lead to problems with rationalisation, outlining the contribution of individual differences. Rosenhan showed that using a set of criteria to diagnose mental illness may not be the most valid way to measure the experience of mentally ill people and that they should be treated as individuals. Both of these examples show how treating people and patients as individuals can improve their well being and reduce suffering.

Evaluation – weaknesses StrengthEvidence Ignores the influence of the situation affecting behaviour E.g. it ignores the influence of culture as MPD is far more prevalent in the USA, suggesting that there is something about the society in which you live that influences your behaviour/thinking. This suggests that there may be more to behaviour than individual differences. Small samples/case studies leads to problems with generalisability – Eve White was a unique case and cannot, therefore, be generalised beyond her experience of the disorder. Griffiths study had a relatively small sample and therefore it may not be reflective of all regular gamblers. The nature of the ID approach requires in depth and often small samples, this limits its usefulness as it cannot be applied groups of people. Lacking in control over the environment Rosenhan’s study took place in a natural environment (field study) so there was no way of controlling extraneous variables. Eve White had a naturally occurring disorder and again, they could not manipulate the variables. Griffiths too had a naturally occurring IV (though this is an ethical strength) This means that we cannot be certain the individual differences are the only cause of the behaviour. This types of research can create labels as it separates normal from abnormal Rosenhan’s study showed the effects of labelling and perhaps the research into ID that says some people are ‘different’ could lead to negative consequences for the individual. If we are ‘lumping together’ people into ‘sane’ and ‘insane’ then we are no longer looking at them as individuals.

Social

StrengthEvidence Demonstrates the extent to which situational factors affect behaviour Milgram showed the power of authority and the setting in which people are acting. Yale is a prestigious university therefore participants trusted the experimenter and the situation implied a professionalism and competency. This shows how the situation can exert an influence over individuals’ behaviour. Demonstrates the power of interpersonal factors and group membership Reicher and Haslam – showed how identification with a group can have an effect on behaviour e.g. the prisoners became more tyrannical e.g. trying to overthrow the guards. This shows the influence of groups on behaviour. RH – an example of interpersonal influence on behaviour was when they introduced the Trade Unionist – this demonstrated how one person could change the group dynamic. Field studies have high ecological validity Piliavin’s experiment was conducted on a subway train so Ps are not aware they are in an experiment. No demand characteristics. They experimenters found that under certain conditions people were more likely to help. This demonstrated how there is an effect of others/the environment in real life settings. Investigates issues which are highly relevant to society and may explain unexplained phenomena or events Milgram’s study can help to explain atrocities such as the My Lai massacre, as he found that people were obedient to authority and would undergo an agentic shift. This demonstrates how in certain situations the influence of others and the environment may lead to atrocities. Piliavin & Kitty Genovese… Piliavin’s findings about bystander behaviour may help to explain why people may not help in an emergency, for example in the case of Kitty Genovese. This shows how the social approach can help us to understand everyday or even unusual behaviour.

Weaknesses of Social ApproachEvidence Research can often be unethical Milgram causing some Ps to have a nervous breakdown and they leave the experiment realising that they are capable of killing somebody – this shows that how, sometimes in order to understand group behaviour unethical conduct is required. Laboratory studies can have low ecological validity Milgram’s obedience may not generalise to the real world as his study was conducted in a lab, a far cry from the traumatic and very real situation of war R&H - prisons are not something you go to voluntarily and generally there will be little control in real life over group dynamic. These examples show how some of the assumptions made by the SA are based on ecologically invalid information. May be dependent on culture, society, historical context, etc Piliavin – more helping behaviour (altruism) in the sixties or in American culture. Milgram – more respect for authority in the sixties? This shows that the findings of social approach studies are context and culture dependent and may not be applied now or in all cultures. Ignores the influence of individual differences e.g. not everyone went to 450V in Milgram’s study Piliavin - some people are more willing to help R&H some guards were more authoritarian. This shows how the social approach cannot explain all behaviour, as some people behave differently from what is expected.