PREFABRICATED BRIDGE ELEMENTS & SYSTEMS (PBES), DECISION- MAKING FRAMEWORK Claude Napier Sr. Structural Engineer Resource Center - Structures TST.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
Advertisements

William Lohr, P.E Federal Highway Administration Minnesota Division Office.
Work Zone Impact Strategies Module 6. TMP Overview3 Identification of TMP Strategies Should be based on: type of work zone traffic conditions anticipated.
Bob Grubbs Lead Bridge Engineer ODOT Region 3, Tech Center Lessons Learned FAST 14, Boston MA FHWA Highways for Life Showcase.
ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (ABC): THE KEYS TO SUCCESS FROM AN OWNERS PERSPECTIVE Presented by James McMinimee, P.E., P.S.E. UDOT Chief Engineer, Director.
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
Innovative Approaches to Wildlife/Highway Interactions The “Seven Dwarfs”
SOUTHEAST PBES/ABC REGIONAL PEER EXCHANGE ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 26,
Innovative Contracting Techniques that Consider Driver Impacts Use of A+B Bidding Presented by: David L. Kent P.E. New York State Department of Transportation.
Bridge over BNSF Railroad 7 km East of Windham - East Bridge Replacement Project Using Accelerated Bridge Construction.
SHRP2 Project R04 Bridge Designs for ABC
Utah’s Use of CMGC & Project Delivery
Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems
Research Advisory Committee Annual Meeting FHWA Briefing Michael Trentacoste Associated Administrator Research, Development, & Technology Director, Turner.
Continuous Value Enhancement Process
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
3/10/2010 March 2010 ABC Pooled Fund Study TAC Teleconference 1.
MULTI-STATE ABC DECISION TOOL AND ECONOMIC MODELING Toni Doolen, PhD August 2011 School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Oregon.
Module 1 What are Prefabricated Bridge Elements & Systems for Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC/PBES)? Module 1 What are Prefabricated Bridge Elements.
M AKE E VERY DAY COUNT A CCELERATING B RIDGE C ONSTRUCTION WITH P REFABRICATED B RIDGE E LEMENTS & S YSTEMS.
Construction Industry Efforts and Capabilities to Support PBES Deployment. William G. Duguay J.D. Abrams, L.P.
Location Strategy and Layout Strategy
Activities CTC-415. Activity Consumes Time Usually consumes resources (cure time for concrete) Definable start and finish Assignable – V. important –
Factors to Consider in Innovative Contracting Doyt Bolling and Jared Holland Utah Technology Transfer Center.
ES305: Virtual Tools in Engineering Design: The Eng. Design Process James Carroll, Associate Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
 Life in communities has changed over the years.  One of those changes is in transportation. Transportation is a way of moving people or things from.
ABC/PBES COSTS by Mary Lou Ralls, P.E., Principal Ralls Newman, LLC (formerly Texas State Bridge Engineer)
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 6 Specifications and Special Provisions Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
MAINTENANCE & TRAFFIC OPERATION INCIDENT MANAGEMENT.
2002 AASHTO ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE A CONCISE OVERVIEW.
Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center.
NE Regional statistics and discussion guide report Summary
Enosburg BRO 1448(40) Bridge 48 on TH 2 Over the Tyler Branch Alternatives Presentation.
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
WVDOH Accelerated Construction Concepts Benjamin Beerman, PE.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
SHRP 2 - FIRST DEMO PROJECT KEG CREEK, IOWA R04 – “BRIDGE DESIGNS FOR RAPID RENEWAL” Sandra Larson, P.E. Iowa Department of Transportation Research and.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
St Johnsbury BF 7000(20) Bridge 6 on VT Route 2B over the Lamoille Valley Rail Trail Presenter: John Byatt, PE Consultant Project Manager.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
C ONSIDERING L ARGE T RUCKS IN THE D EVELOPMENT OF T RAFFIC M ANAGEMENT P LANS Neil Boudreau, MassDOT State Traffic Engineer April 13, 2015.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training.
Asset Management in Action: Use of a Triple Bottom Line Approach to Prioritize Capital Improvement Needs Richard Cuthbert R. W. Beck, Inc.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 4 Work Zone Applications Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
“Get in, do it right, get out, and stay out.”
Materials, Pavements & Transportation Operations CONCEPTS FOR ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS Stuart Anderson Gerald Ullman Making.
Enosburg BRO 1448(40) Bridge 48 on TH 2 Over the Tyler Branch Public Information Meeting.
1 Rehabilitation of 188 th Street over Grand Central Parkway PIN: X Contract #: D Deck Replacement October 2015.
Bristol BF 021-1(33) Regional Concerns Meeting VT Route 116 – Bridge #12 over Baldwin Creek April 27, 2015.
Rapid Bridge Construction: Prefabricated Substructure Elements AASHTO RAC High Value Research Workshop July 27, 2011.
Re-Do It -- Faster, Cheaper, Greener Pavement Renewal Solutions.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
HIGHWAY DESIGN PROCESS & ROUTE LOCATION Spring 2016.
Construction zones and traffic control Objective Review extent of problem Identify contractor responsibilites Identify control plan components.
Item 6b. Project Vicinity Park Ave Bridge Existing Park Avenue Bridge.
A CCELERATING B RIDGE C ONSTRUCTION (ABC) WITH P REFABRICATED B RIDGE E LEMENTS & S YSTEMS (PBES)
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
Maintenance and Temporary Traffic Control
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
LOI # Pilot Program Design & Related Services for Development of Accelerated Bridge Construction Standards & Pilot Bridge Construction.
Aaron Crowley, Ph.D. KSWA Travis Smith, P.E. TDOT Biloxi, Mississippi
New Bridge Construction
Sandra Larson, P.E. Iowa Department of Transportation
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
HERO UNIT Training Module
Traffic Control Plan A plan directed to the safe and expeditious movement of traffic through construction and to the safety of the work force performing.
Materials Innovation Hub Challenge Martin Richardson
Fiber Reinforced Polymer Systems
Presentation transcript:

PREFABRICATED BRIDGE ELEMENTS & SYSTEMS (PBES), DECISION- MAKING FRAMEWORK Claude Napier Sr. Structural Engineer Resource Center - Structures TST

Learning Outcomes Understand the ABC viable concepts Understanding of barriers/obstacles to install PBES in hours or days Understanding of needs/opportunities to install PBES in hours or days Knowledge of PBES decision-making framework 2

Learning Outcomes Be able to use flowchart and/or matrix questions for decision making to identify important considerations to determine best course of action for bridge construction List and define rapid onsite construction factors List and define other factors impacting the decision to use ABC or prefabricated structures 3

Learning Outcomes List and define the different costs factors influencing the PBES decision Be a champion to promote PBES Technology 4

ABC Viable Concepts Ground up Material Choices Equipment Prefabrication Access-logistics Pre-assembly Pre-purchase & fabricate Off site Assembly Off site roll-in or lift-in 5

ABC Viable Concepts Incremental launching Longitudinal versus transverse components Contracting techniques to be considered: – performance related specifications – warranties – design/build – cost + time – lane rental – incentive/disincentives – value engineering 6

ABC Viable Concepts Alternatives for construction – Construction during non-peak hours Nighttime closures Week-end closures – Total or partial closures – Lane closures or detours Public relations: keep traveling public, businesses, politicians, etc informed 7

Why ABC-PBES? ABC-PBES offers significant advantages over Cast-in- place construction. ABC-PBES results into: Reduced onsite construction time Minimized traffic disruption – from months to days Reduced Environmental impact Improved work zone safety – improved worker safety Lower First and Life-Cycle Costs Improved product quality – controlled environment, cure times, easier access, etc.

Question: Barriers to routinely install PBES in hours or days? Prefabricated Bridges to Accelerate Construction Survey to Sample State Bridge Engineers

Question: What would help most to use PBES? Prefabricated Bridges to Accelerate Construction Survey to Sample State Bridge Engineers

Questions:  Barriers to routinely install PBES in hours or days?  What would help most to use PBES? Prefabricated Bridges to Accelerate Construction Survey to Sample State Bridge Engineers

Framework for PBES Decision-Making Users Decision makers for bridge type Implementers – Designers – Project Managers

Framework for PBES Decision-Making – Format Introduction Flowchart – Decision-Making at a Glance Matrix – Decision-Making Questions Decision-Making Considerations – Questions with Discussion and References

Framework for PBES Decision-Making – In General PBES are better – Due to improved quality control off-site and off- the-critical-path fabrication PBES are faster PBES are safer PBES have lower initial costs – Due to significantly reduced traffic control, risks, environmental impacts, user delay costs

Framework for PBES Decision-Making Specific Project Considerations Better Faster Safer Is prefabrication the best solution for this specific project ? – Lower initial costs ? – Long lasting ?

ATAGLANCEATAGLANCE Decision Making Flowchart

RAPID ONSITE CONSTRUCTION FACTORS Traffic Volume / Emergency / Commerce / User Delay ???

OTHER FACTORS Worker Safety / Wetlands-Air Quality-Noise / Endangered Species / Multiple Similar Sections ???

PBES CONSTRUCTION COSTS LESS ???

ATAGLANCEATAGLANCE Decision Making

Decision-Making Matrix Example Questions QuestionYesMaybeNo High traffic volume? Emergency replacement?... Worker safety concerns?... High daily traffic control costs?...

Decision-Making Matrix One or two factors may warrant use of PBES Alternatively, user may assign weights to factors In any case, a majority of “Yes” responses indicates PBES offers advantages

Considerations in Selecting PBES – Categories Rapid Onsite Construction Factors Other Factors Costs Factors

Considerations Category: Rapid Onsite Construction High ADT/ADTT? Emergency bridge replacement? Evacuation route, or over a railroad or navigation channel? Requires lane closures, detours or temporary bridge? If closed, or detour distances long? Impacts critical path of total project?

Considerations Category: Rapid Onsite Construction, cont’d. Close during off-peak traffic periods? Requires rapid recovery from natural or manmade hazards, or rapid completion of future repair/rehab? Construction time restrictions due to adverse economic impact? Weather limits CIP construction? Are spans under 200 ft.?

Considerations in Selecting PBES – Categories Rapid Onsite Construction Other Factors – Safety Concerns – Environmental Issues – Standardization – Site Issues

Considerations Category: Other Factors Safety Concerns – Worker safety concerns? (e.g. adjacent power lines, high heights, or over water) Environmental Issues – Environmentally sensitive area? (e.g. wetlands, air quality, and noise) – Natural or endangered species? – Historic bridge?

Considerations Category: Other Factors, cont’d. Standardization – Multiple similar spans? – Bridges grouped for economy of scale – Available state or national prefabricated bridge standards? – Regional off-the-shelf components using stockpiled standards? – Incorporation of aesthetic or context-sensitive design requirements?

Considerations Category: Other Factors, cont’d. Site Issues – Problems with delivery of ready-mix concrete? – Knowledgeable available contractors? – Available prefabricators? – Contractor options for prefabrication? – Delivery to the site?

Considerations Category: Other Factors, cont’d. Site Issues, cont’d. – Accessibility at the site? – Prefab foundations & substructures? – Formwork & falsework requirements? – Straight/skewed/curved alignment? – Requires seismic connections? – Available connection details?

Considerations in Selecting PBES – Categories, cont’d. Costs – Maintenance of Traffic – Contractor’s Operations – Owner Agency’s Operations – Service Life Available Online Resources

Considerations Category: Costs Maintenance of Traffic – Changing traffic control plan? – Delay-related user costs a concern? Contractor’s Operations – Innovative contracting strategies? – Use of innovative equipment? – Contractor costs for insurance/bonding?

Considerations Category: Costs, cont’d. Owner Agency’s Operations – Necessary staffing? – Bridges grouped for economy of scale? – Broader use? – Adequate prefabrication time in contract? Service Life

FHWA Decision-Making Framework

Utah DOT Decision Chart

Framework Available Online General Information Publications Framework For PBES Decision-Making

Why Use PBES Technologies? Prefabricated Bridge Advantages: Faster (offsite & off critical path) Safer (for traveling public & construction & inspection personnel) Better Quality (controlled environment) Lower Cost (Costs comparable to or lower than conventional construction)

Polling Question #1 Select the items that are ABC Viable Concepts. a.Prefabrication of standard elements b.Cast-in-place is planned on bridge alignment c.Pre-assembly d.Off site assembly e.Weekend or night time closures are planned.

Polling Question #2 Select the obstacles to installing PBES in hours or days. a.Lack of education and training b.Lack of standards & specifications c.Construction industry is geared up for prefab d.Potential higher cost & limited resources e.Durability is not a concern

Polling Question #3 Select the major components of the PBES decision making framework. a.Decision-making flowchart b.Life cycle cost analysis tool c.Decision-making matrix of questions d.Decision-making consideration questions and discussions e.All of the above

Polling Question #4 Select the items that are onsite construction factors. a.Low traffic volumes b.Emergency repair project on high ADT route c.Project has negative impact on major industry d.Highway work is on the critical path of project and bridge is not. e.There are significant user delays if lane is closed for construction.

Polling Question #5 If rapid onsite construction is not required for a project, select the other factors that may make prefabrication the preferred solution. a.Bridge is high over the water and near high voltage lines. b.Endangered species c.Wetlands d.Repetitive superstructure spans and substructure types e.All of the above

Summary and final concluding remarks Use PBES Decision-Making Framework to help accelerate bridge construction and help change America’s driving experience and meet the customers’ needs. Claude Napier, Senior Structural Engineer , Louis Triandafilou, Senior Structural Engineer , Resource Center, Structures TST