NCI Clinical Proteomic Technologies for Cancer Re-issuance Anna D. Barker, Ph.D. Deputy Director National Cancer Institute Henry Rodriguez, Ph.D., M.B.A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 FDA Industry Workshop Statistics in the FDA & Industry The Future David L DeMets, PhD Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics University of.
Advertisements

Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
UC BRAID: Co-creating and evaluating performance in a regional laboratory for conducting translational science UC BRAID Executive Committee: Steven Dubinett.
Building the Digital Infrastructure for Vermont’s Learning Health System ONC HIT Policy Committee Testimony September 14, 2011 Hunt Blair, Deputy Commissioner.
The Division of Monoclonal Antibodies Kathleen A. Clouse, Ph.D., Director CTGTAC - July 26, 2007.
What’s NIH? National Cancer Institute National Eye Institute National Heart, Lung, and Blood Inst. National Human Genome Research Inst National Institute.
Wrapup. NHGRI strategic plan What does the NIH think genomics should be for the next 10 years? [Nature, Feb. 2011]
ACCELERATING CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH Anantha Shekhar MD, PhD Indiana University School of Medicine Indiana Clinical and.
Presenter Anna Daily Ph.D.-Senior Scientist March 9, 2012 Breast Health Providers Conference.
CALGB Fall Committee Meeting October 2006 Correlative Science Protocol Development Paula N. Friedman, PhD Director, Biospecimen & Correlative Science Operations.
Biospecimens Carolyn Compton, MD, PhD James Robb, MD Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research (OBBR), NCI June 25, 2007.
Medical Diagnostics NIAID Funding Opportunities Maria Y. Giovanni, Ph.D. Assistant Director for Microbial Genomics and Advanced Technologies National Institute.
EVALUATION OVERVIEW: Key Questions and Roles Mary L. Fennell, Ph.D. (EOC Chair) Professor and Chair, Brown University June 19, 2007.
An Overview of Mission-related Research Office of Blood Research and Review C.D. Atreya, Ph.D. Associate Director for Research OBRR, CBER BPAC, Dec
REVIEW OF THE LOW DOSE RADIATION RESEARCH PROGRAM (LDRRP) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE FOR BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Introduction of Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles.
NCI’s Clinical Proteomic Technologies for Cancer: “Restructuring Proteomics to Succeed in Discovering Cancer Biomarkers” Joe.
Experimental Design and Biospecimens David F. Ransohoff, MD Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Dept. of Medicine.
Molecular Library and Imaging Francis Collins, NHGRI Tom Insel, NIMH Rod Pettigrew, NIBIB Building Blocks and Pathways Francis Collins,NHGRI Richard Hodes,
The NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
Institute of Cancer Research - Institut du cancer ICR’s Activities in Cancer Imaging.
Kathryn Camp, M.S., R.D., CSP Consultant to the Office of Dietary Supplements National Institutes of Health Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable.
Daniel C. Liebler Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Vanderbilt, Tennessee Performance and Optimization of LC-MS/MS Platforms for Unbiased Discovery.
Science at the FDA: Update for the Science Board Jesse L. Goodman, MD, MPH Chief Scientist and Deputy Commissioner for Science and Public Health November.
Figure 4.1 NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Finance Corporate strategy and portfolio decisions Regulatory affairs Marketing and sales + market research.
Organizational Gaps in Reaching the “Desired State” Helen Winkle.
Grants. The mission of the Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) is to improve the role of quantitative imaging for clinical decision making in oncology.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
DOE Resources & Facilities for Biological Discovery : Realizing the Potential Presentation to the BERAC 25 April 2002.
Clean, Green, and on the Same Team! How Economic and Workforce Development are Partnering to Serve an Emerging Regional Industry.
Managing Medical R&D Defining and Realizing Clinical and Commercial Value David J. Wierz Senior Director Commercial Investment & Pricing Strategy Wyeth-Ayerst.
Anticipated FY2016 Appropriations Agency$ Million NIH200 Cancer70 Cohort130 FDA10 Office of the Natl Coord. for Health IT (ONC) 5 TOTAL215 Mission: To.
The Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Robert Nordstrom, Ph.D. Larry Clarke, Ph.D.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
Bringing Metrology to Clinical Proteomic Research David Bunk Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Update From FDA: Office of the Commissioner and Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Janet Woodcock, M.D. Acting Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
The Cancer Systems Biology Consortium (CSBC)
DIABETES AND SCIENCE EDUCATION IN AMERICAN INDIAN SCHOOLS: Time Line Lawrence Agodoa, M.D. Director, Office of Minority Health Research Coordination National.
CPTR Overview CPTR 2012 Workshop October 2-4, 2012.
The SNM Centralized IND & Clinical Trials Network Enabling Implementation Investigational & Approved PET Imaging in Multicenter Clinical Trials George.
Proposal for End-of-Phase 2A (EOP2A) Meetings Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18, 2003 Lawrence.
The 7th Campbell Colloquium May 14-16, 2007 London, UK Knowledge Translation and Disability and Rehabilitation Research _______________________________________________.
Valentina Di Francesco Senior Program Officer for Bioinformatics, Structural Genomics and Systems Biology Microbial Genomics.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Shaping a Health Statistics Vision for the 21 st Century 2002 NCHS Data Users Conference 16 July 2002 Daniel J. Friedman, PhD Massachusetts Department.
Team Building: Critical Role of Interdisciplinary Research Teams in Translational Research C. Kent Osborne, M.D. Director, Lester and Sue Smith Breast.
THE MURDOCK Study: A Rich Data Resource for Biomarker Discovery and Validation Brian D. Bennett 1, Jessica D. Tenenbaum 1, Victoria Christian 1, Melissa.
Wishwa N. Kapoor, MD, MPH, Director Doris M. Rubio, PhD, Co-Director Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Scholars Program.
NIH and the Clinical Research Enterprise Third Annual Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003 Mary S. McCabe National Institute of Health.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Site Visit Introduction Kathryn M. Carbone, M.D. Associate Director for Research.
Laurie E. Locascio, Ph.D. Director, MML/NIST NIST/MML: Measurement Assurance for Biological Systems.
Office of Research and Development Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo.
1 LS DAM Overview August 7, 2012 Current Core Team: Ian Fore, D.Phil., NCI CBIIT, Robert Freimuth, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, Mervi Heiskanen, NCI-CBIIT, Joyce.
Clinical Utility of EQA Dr. Angela Amayo UON27/11/2008.
NCI Division of Cancer Prevention Ongoing Activities at Frederick Facilities Presented By: Lori Minasian, M.D. Robert Shoemaker, Ph.D. October 1, 2015.
RAS Initiative at the Federally Funded Research and Development Center at Frederick Presented By: Sara S. Hook October 1, 2015.
Semantic Web - caBIG Abstract: 21st century biomedical research is driven by massive amounts of data: automated technologies generate hundreds of.
New Approaches to Metabolomics Research
Biomedical Data Science for Precision Medicine
American Evaluation Association, Evaluation 2016
NCI Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program
National and International Efforts worth knowing about
Trial Funding and Engagement: The NIH Sponsored CTSA Program
Neuroscience Biomarker Program
Presentation transcript:

NCI Clinical Proteomic Technologies for Cancer Re-issuance Anna D. Barker, Ph.D. Deputy Director National Cancer Institute Henry Rodriguez, Ph.D., M.B.A. National Cancer Institute NCI Board of Scientific Advisors March 8, 2010

Only a handful of new protein biomarkers Introduced in past 15 yrs and current rate is only ~1.5/yr Leigh Anderson, Clin Chem (2010) in press "The genome is after all the instruction but it doesn’t do the work – proteins do the work.” Dr. Francis Collins, source: Catalyst, ABC 2001

Basic Technology for Studying Cancer at the Molecular Level Consensus that unlike genomic technologies, proteomic technologies were not fully mature Source: Adopted from “Defining the Mandate of Proteomics in the Post- Genomics Era: Workshop Report.” National Academy of Sciences. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 1: , Technologies for Quantitative Analysis Experimental design Analytical variability (platform assessment/optimization – MS/MS) Lack of standards, protocols, and reference data Biospecimens Data acquisition, analysis, and reporting Lack of high-quality reagents Barriers identified (NCI workshops ):

History of CPTC NCI Proteomics Planning Process Planning: Identification of Phase 1 CPTC Goals Technical barriers (platform evaluation / optimization) Discovery (survey) stage Verification (targeted) stage Biospecimen collection, handling, storage and processing Experimental design (Statistical Issues)) Data acquisition, analysis and reporting Lack of Standards, protocols, high quality reagents  CPTC launched  Proteomic Affinity/Capture Methods Workshop  Proteomic Technologies Informatics Workshop  Clinical Proteomics Technologies Team Initiative proposal  Clinical Proteomics and Biomarker Discovery in Cancer Research  Initial draft proposal for a Clinical Proteomics/Biomarker Discovery Initiative  Proteomic Technologies for Early Cancer Detection  Proteomics Planning Workshop (NCI/NHGRI/NIGMS) April 2002 April 2003 June 2004 Sept 2004 Jan 2005 Feb 2005 Dec 2005 Nov 2004 BSA recommendation, CPTC to address sources of variability and bias in clinical proteomics Oct 2006

CPTC Center Network (Team Science/Multidisciplinary) “The ultimate goal of this project will be a pipeline for biomarker discovery in which each step has been rigorously and quantitatively tested.” Leland Hartwell, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center “The ultimate goal of this project will be a pipeline for biomarker discovery in which each step has been rigorously and quantitatively tested.” Leland Hartwell, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Key Accomplishment s (Milestone Driven) Standardization/Transferability of mass spectrometry 4 different LC-MS/MS platforms standardized Shotgun mass spec; Targeted/Quantitative mass spec (Verification) Metrics, SOPs (27), performance data sets (6), reference materials (2), computational algorithms (26) developed Bias-free biospecimen collection (Ransohoff, Skates, OBBR) FDA: 2 mock 510(k) presubmissions (multiplex- mass spec & affinity array) Public Data Portal (caTranche: caBIG TM -silver level) Community Reagents (Antibody Characterization Lab; 84+ monoclonal antibodies) International antibody characterization standards Data Release Policies (Amsterdam Principles) Community Recognition: 11public-private partnerships; NHLBI coordination, MOU with FDA, Korea Institute, American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC) Scientific output: 7 patents; >171+ papers Leveraged funding: additional NIH grants, philanthropy, industry, and venture investors Purdue Center for Analytical Development antibodies.cancer.gov caTranche Round-Robin studies

CPTC Proteomics Pipeline and “Go / No-Go” Decision Points CPTC Phase 1 Pipeline MS/MS – tandem mass spectrometry MRM-MS – multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry

Independent Evaluation Report Commissioned by NIH Office of the Director NIH support National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney (NIDDK) National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Advisory Committee NCI: Drs. Gallahan, Jessup, Solomon, Aragon, and Hiltke NCRR: Dr. Old, Senior Advisor to the Director (formerly Clinical Proteomics Director at National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute) UPenn Medical School: Dr. Blair, Vice Chair, Department of Pharmacology Outcome Significant milestones achieved; long-term potential as a key component in proteomics for personalized medicine

CPTC Phase 2 Strategy Workshop Recommendations Phase 1 of CPTC will achieve goals – set the stage for rational biomarker discovery pipeline TCGA and other large scale genomic characterization/sequencing programs have shown that a large scale, systematic approach can identify most genomic alterations CPTC is poised to build upon the outputs of TCGA (and similar efforts) in the context of protein biology (protein mapping) Phase 2 of CPTC should employ results of Phase 1 – develop network to systematically verify relevant proteins using known genomic alterations as starting point – enable technology development Participants Genomicists, oncologists, technologists, biologists, informatics, clinical chemists, diagnostics, therapeutics, regulatory, patient advocates, NCI Divisions

Gene splicing alterations Common Clinical Sample - Multiple Measurements TCGA: Building Multi-Dimensional Data to Identify All Relevant Genomic Changes in Specific Cancers Adopted from Cameron Brennan From Ron DePinho

Significant Opportunity to Leverage Progress in CPTC – Employ TCGA and Other Genomic Data to Define Cancer Proteomes Biological mechanisms: Are genetic aberrations detectable at protein level? qualitative and quantitative What is their effect on protein function? e.g. protein-protein interaction; structure-function relationship Clinical applications: Can genotypic information guide protein biomarker development? Are these candidates involved in specific biological pathways? e.g., cancer development & progression; predictive/drug response Source: Adopted from – Gstaiger, M., Aebersold, R. Applying mass spectrometry- based proteomics to genetics, genomics and network biology. Nature Reviews Genet Sep;10(9): A systematic/integrative approach is needed TCGA and similar efforts provides rational basis for cancer proteomics

Proposed CPTC Phase 2 Pipeline = BCR= CPTCs = PRRC = DCC= Clinical experts Protein Characterization Data, Results Storage & QC Reagents Protein Verification Analytically validated quantitative assays of proteins Pubic data sets that reveal which transcripts are translated, while mapping back to the TCGA Biospecimen QC Data, Results Storage & QC Assay Development Analyte Prioritization TCGA Go / No-Go

Emerging Proteomics Pipeline (A Paradigm Shift in Technology) CharacterizationVerification Clinical Studies (Qualification) >10,000 analytes 10s Biospecimens MS/MS Affinity Array ~100s of Candidates ~100s analytes 100s Biospecimens ~10 analytes 1000s Biospecimens MRM-MS ~10s of Candidates Immunoassay Panel of Biomarkers Pipeline enables delivery of highly- credentialed protein biomarker candidates for clinical studies (qualification). “This is a first step in the long march to move protein biomarkers from the laboratory into the clinic.” Steven A. Carr, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard “This is a first step in the long march to move protein biomarkers from the laboratory into the clinic.” Steven A. Carr, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard * * BIOSPECIMENS CPTC EDRNEDRN DCTDDCTD Divisions and Centers performing qualification studiesDivisions and Centers performing qualification studies

Re-issuance: CPTC Pipeline Highly credentialed biomarker candidates for qualification studies Library/catalog of characterized & verified protein analytes (genomic correlation) Quantitative multiplex assays, with data sets, reagents and SOPs Characterization * Cli. Stu. (Qual.) ImmAssay Panel of Biomarkers MS/MS platforms Affinity Arrays Quantitative MRM-MS platforms TCGA coordination Common biospecimen distributed Surveyed for proteins with genomic-based evidence of cancer relevance Assay development High quality reagents Biological signal in moderate number of samples Deliverables ~10 analytes 1000s specimens Verification BIOSPECIMENS * EDRNEDRN DCTDDCTD Divisions and Centers performing qualification studiesDivisions and Centers performing qualification studies

Re-issuance: Components – Deliverables Characterization Phase Verification Phase MS/MS platforms – protein survey Array platforms – protein function TCGA coordination Common biospecimen distributed across centers (tissue; proximal fluid) Pathway/network focus Quantitative MRM-MS/MS platforms Stage gates (basic biology and clinical potential; clinically driven evidence; and clinical cohort) Prospectively-designed biospecimen collections; clinical utility Reagents core Biospecimens (caHUB) Data Coord. Ctr. (CBIIT) CPTC center network Reagents & Resources CPTC Deliverables Quantitative multiplex assays, with data sets, reagents and SOPs Library/catalog of characterized & verified protein analytes (genomic correlation) Highly credentialed biomarker candidates for qualification studies candidate prioritization

Re-issuance: Proposed Mechanism and Budget CPTC center network: RFA (U24: Resource-Related Research Project-Cooperative Agreements) 6-8 Centers Annual budget: $15-24M, Total budget: $75-120M Reagents and Resources: RFP (contracts) (e.g., performance mixtures, antibodies) Common biospecimens Biomarker candidate library/database Data Coordination Center Annual budget: $2.5M, Total budget: $12.5M

Re-issuance: Milestones To evaluate the second phase of the CPTC program on an ongoing basis, a matrix of quantitative performance measures will be used. Milestones will depend to some extent on the members of the phase 2 network – and may require adjustment based on the cancer type being studied. Benchmarks that will be utilized to launch the program include the following: The number of genetic aberrations successfully confirmed by proteomic data The number of verified proteins that emerge from the program The number of new platforms and methodologies matured through trans-network testing The number of quantitative protein assays developed and analytically validated (verification stage) The number of cancer types studied

Re-issuance: Phase 2 Summary Develop a network to systematically characterize and verify proteins with a basis of known genomic alterations Enable technology development Analytically validate quantitative multiplex assays, with associated data sets, reagents and SOPs Enable the R01 and/or clinical communities to pursue rational biomarker discovery and development In short, CPTC Phase 2 will provide a resource of well-characterized and robust protein candidates, orthogonally verified using advanced technology platforms, cross-tested within a network, and shared with the public quickly for further development as potential cancer biomarkers. In this process, promising candidates could most certainly be discovered, but it is not the main goal/mission of the pipeline as the overall mission is to facilitate exploration of relevant portions of the cancer proteome at one level by CPTC and more exensively by the research communities