The New IDR Process: How to Prepare Your Boss TEI Dallas and Fort Worth Chapters Chief Tax Officers’ Conference May 19, 2014 Emily A. Parker

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 12 Tax Administration & Tax Planning
Advertisements

APARTMENT OWNERS NETWORK NOVEMBER o Outline the new District Court Procedure o o Service of Proceedings – Problems o Statute of Limitations – 6.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation & Procedure Introduction To Litigation Litigation & Procedure Introduction.
Chapter 8.  A civil action relates to an act or omission that infringes the rights of a person, group or government instrumentality and seeks to return.
“NOT NOW, NOT HERE: SUPREME COURT RULE 103(b) & FORUM NON CONVENIENS MOTIONS” Judge Lynn M. Egan Judge Daniel T. Gillespie September 26, 2014.
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
Income Tax Fundamentals 2009 Gerald E. Whittenburg & Martha Altus-Buller Student’s Copy 2009 Cengage Learning.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
The Property Management Webinar Series Presents Evictions Made Easy (with) The New Rules Instructed by Judge Al Cercone, Justice of the Peace (JP3-1)
Revenue Audits Returns processed in a “non-judgemental” manner Revenue Audit of selected returns. Objective is to promote voluntary tax compliance. Audit.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
Courts and Court Systems Chapter 2. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Explain the difference between trial and appellate courts. Explain.
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Alternative, Judicial, and E-Dispute Resolution
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
L.A. 310 – DISCOVERY PART II. Depositions C.C.P section 2025 Defined: Oral testimony taken (usually prior to trial) which is: –Under oath –Before a certified.
Pretrial Matters: Pleadings & Motions © Professor Mathis-Rutledge.
Chapter 13: Criminal Justice Process ~ Proceedings Before Trial Objective: The student should be able to identify the required procedures before a trial.
FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT, ALBRECHT, & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 18.
Federal Tax Law Research Hierarchies of Authority Paul D. Callister, JD, MSLIS Director of the Leon E. Bloch Law Library & Associate Professor of Law UMKC.
1 Chapter 15: Administrative Procedures. 2 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES (1 of 2) n Role of the IRS n Audits of tax returns n Requests for rulings n Due dates.
Income Tax Fundamentals 2010 Gerald E. Whittenburg & Martha Altus-Buller Student’s Copy 2010 Cengage Learning.
©2007 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license. Chapter.
1 Chapter 4 Copyright ©2006 Thomson South-Western, Mason, Ohio William A. Raabe, Gerald E. Whittenburg, & Debra L. Sanders Administrative Regulations &
1 “For Better or For Worse” State Bar of Arizona American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers January 28, 2010 Rules Update Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure,
ADVANCED OVERVIEW CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, Inc. RONNETTE RAMOS · MOLLY STAFFORD SACRAMENTO · APRIL 30, 2008 LANDLORD/ TENANT LAW.
Civil Rules Update Denton County Bench-Bar Conference April 25-26, 2013 Justice Phil Johnson Texas Supreme Court 1.
Discovery of taxpayer information: IRS use of its summons power Michael Prindible, Senior Counsel SB/SE IRS Office of Chief Counsel, Dallas, Texas August.
Chapter 12 Tax Administration & Tax Planning Income Tax Fundamentals 2008 Gerald E. Whittenburg & Martha Altus-Buller Student’s Copy.
Tax Executives Institute Minnesota Chapter TEI/IRS Liaison Meeting
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
230 F.R.D. 640 (D. Kan. 2005).  Shirley Williams is a former employee of Sprint/United Management Co.  Her employment was terminated during a Reduction-in-
Mr. Valanzano Business Law. Dispute Resolution Litigate – ________________________________________________ In some cases, people decided too quickly to.
Chapter 4 Alternative, Judicial, and E- Dispute Resolution.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2002 Class 8 September 13, 2002 Professor Fischer.
Chapter 4.  Litigation: The process of bringing, maintaining, and defending a lawsuit  Pretrial litigation process can be divided into:  Pleadings.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -
1 Chapter 15: Administrative Procedures. 2 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES (1 of 2)  Role of the IRS  Audits of tax returns  Requests for rulings  Due dates.
1 Resolving Special Education Disputes Understanding When and How to Use the New Procedural Safeguard System Education Law Center November 28,
1 IDEA REAUTHORIZATION PRESENTATION OF COMPLAINT A district must have a procedure that gives any party the opportunity to present a complaint.
2009 Legislative Changes Concerning Protective Orders and Firearms Effective October 1, 2009 FVC--1.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 22 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 16, 2002.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
 Legal requirement to file returns and pay taxes. ◦ I.R.C. Sections 6001, 6011 ◦ Regulations under § 6011  Self-assessment system. ◦ Proper form, required.
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
College of Nursing December 13, 2006 John O. Cates
No-answer and Post-answer
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Thurs., Oct. 12.
Chapter 3 Alternative, Judicial, and Online Dispute Resolution
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
Tues., Sept. 3.
Anatomy of a Lawsuit 1/17/2019.
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Civil Pretrial Practice
EVICTIONS.
Chapter 15: Administrative Procedures
Presentation transcript:

The New IDR Process: How to Prepare Your Boss TEI Dallas and Fort Worth Chapters Chief Tax Officers’ Conference May 19, 2014 Emily A. Parker Mary A. McNulty

● The IRS has the authority to examine any books, papers, records or other data that may be relevant or material to determining tax liability. 2 New IDR Process

● Information Document Requests are issued to collect documents and information during examinations. ● The new process applies to IDRs issued by the Large Business & International Division. 3 New IDR Process

● June 18, 2013: Part One – Issuance of IDRs ● November 4, 2013: Part Two – Enforcement of IDRs ● February 28, 2014: ●Incorporates and supersedes prior directives ●Clarifies new processes ●Effective beginning March 3, 2014 −Outstanding IDRs must be reissued to conform to the new requirements 4 New IDR Process

● Issue focused ●One issue per IDR ●Exception: IDR issued at beginning of examination that requests basic books and records and general information about a taxpayer’s business ● Discussed with taxpayer before issuance ● Mutually-agreed upon response date ●Exam must advise taxpayer whether the response is satisfactory by date noted on the IDR. 5 Issuance of IDRs

6

● Have document retention procedures in place, so records are readily obtainable ● Communicate with the IRS Exam team, especially about time constraints and availability of documents ● Review and comment on draft IDRs ● Keep IDR in draft form as long as possible ●Exam is instructed to finalize the draft within 10 days. 7 IDR Response Best Practices by Taxpayers

● Exam may grant one extension per IDR ● Taxpayer fails to respond: Exam should discuss with taxpayer within 5 days of the due date and determine whether an extension is warranted. ● Taxpayer provides incomplete response: Exam should discuss with taxpayer within 5 days of the response date and determine whether an extension is warranted. 8 IDR Extensions

● Maximum extension is 15 days ● If an extension is granted and no additional information is received, IDR enforcement process begins immediately. ● If an extension is granted and additional information is received, IRS must review it within 15 days. 9 IDR Extensions

● Mandatory 3-Step Process 1.Delinquency Notice −Will apply only to IDRs that were issued under new procedures −First issued on April 3, Pre-Summons Letter 3.Summons 10 New IDR Enforcement Process

● Step 1: Delinquency Notice (Letter 5077) ●Issue within 10 days of the IDR response date, as extended, or the additional 15 days for IRS review. ●Include response date that is no more than 10 days from date of Delinquency Notice. ●Territory Manager must approve any date beyond 10 days. 11 New IDR Enforcement Process

● Step 2: Pre-Summons Letter (Letter 5078) ●Territory Manager will discuss next steps with taxpayer. ●Territory Manager must sign. ●Issue within 10 days of the due date of Delinquency Notice. 12 New IDR Enforcement Process

● Step 2: Pre-Summons Letter (Letter 5078) ●Issue to taxpayer management official that is at least a level equivalent to the LB&I Territory Manager and a level above the taxpayer management official who received the Delinquency Notice – e.g., CFO. −Forewarn your boss to avoid surprise. −Be prepared for strained relationship with IRS. 13 New IDR Enforcement Process

● Step 2: Pre-Summons Letter (Letter 5078) ●Response date is generally 10 days from date of Pre- Summons Letter. ●A Director of Field Operations (DFO) must approve any date beyond 10 days. ●DFO must be made aware of Pre-Summons Letter before issuance. ●Letter should be discussed with IRS counsel before issuance. 14 New IDR Enforcement Process

● Step 3: Summons ●If response is not provided by date in Pre-Summons Letter, steps will be taken to issue a summons. ●Issuance of summons will be coordinated with IRS Counsel. ●No set date by which the summons will be issued. ●But if days late in responding to IDR, summons may be issued. 15 New IDR Enforcement Process

No ExtensionExtension and No Additional Response Extension and Additional Response Countdown to Summons IDR Due Date 555No Response or Incomplete Response N/A15 Extension Granted N/A 15Additional Information Provided & Reviewed 10 Delinquency Notice Issued 10 Response Date 10 Pre-Summons Letter Issued 10 Response Date Possible Summons Issuance – Number of Days Elapsed since IDR Due Date 16 Countdown to Summons

17 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● A summons is not self-enforcing. ●Note Circular 230, § ● If due date for response passes, the DOJ must petition the district court where taxpayer resides to compel compliance. ●Northern District of Texas ●Court proceeding likely involves substantial delay ●Additional burden on DOJ −Summons enforcement suits already make up 25% of all new lawsuits. 18 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply. ● Procedures may vary – some courts have local rules that apply to summons enforcement proceedings. ●Northern District of Texas Local Rule 16.1 exempts petitions for enforcement of IRS summons from scheduling and planning requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). ●Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) requires, as soon as practicable, the judge to issue a scheduling order, which limits the time to join other parties, amend the pleadings, complete discovery, and file motions. 19 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Proceedings generally involve all of the following: ●Complaint ●Order to show cause ●Taxpayer Answer, Responsive Pleadings and Motions ●Hearing ● These proceedings are public, so be careful if you want tax return information to remain private. 20 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Complaint ●Government files to institute the enforcement proceeding ●Alleges that summons satisfies the four requirements for enforceability ●Accompanied by an affidavit of the agent that issued the summons to support the allegations that the summons satisfies the four requirements for enforceability ●Affidavit makes out a prima facie case for enforcement, which shifts the burden of proof to the taxpayer to prove one of the requirements is not met 21 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Complaint: To be enforceable by the court, the complaint must allege that the summons ●Was issued in accordance with all the required administrative steps ●Was issued for a proper purpose ●Seeks information not already in the possession of the IRS ●Seeks information relevant to the investigation ● Probable cause is not required. 22 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Order to Show Cause ●Served on person summoned ●Provides deadline for filing an answer, affidavits, motions or other responsive pleadings ●Sets a hearing on the order to address issues raised by the pleadings 23 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Answer, Responsive Pleadings and Motions ●Taxpayer files an answer to respond to the allegations in the complaint. ●If taxpayer does not contest allegations in the complaint, they will be deemed admitted. ●A taxpayer should raise any objections to the summons enforcement in a pleading or motion before the hearing or they will be waived. ●The taxpayer bears the burden of proof on any objections raised. 24 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Common Taxpayer Objections ●Information requested is privileged −Attorney client, tax practitioner, or attorney work product −Required to submit privilege logs −Often submitted to special magistrate −Taxpayers are often successful −But time-consuming and expensive process ●Information requested is not relevant to the tax return −Very difficult to show −Taxpayers are not usually successful 25 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Common Taxpayer Objections ●The documents requested do not exist −Summons cannot be used to require the taxpayer to prepare or create documents, including a spreadsheet summarizing the taxpayer’s records. ●Compliance would be overly burdensome ●The government issued the summons for an improper purpose −to harass the taxpayer −to coerce settlement 26 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Hearing ●The government and taxpayer present arguments about the enforceability of the summons. ●After the hearing is completed, the district court will make the requisite findings of fact and conclusions of law, unless the court concludes further proceedings are necessary. −Evidentiary hearing −Discovery −Review by special magistrate 27 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Hearing ●Most summons enforcement proceedings are of a summary nature. ●Taxpayer can appeal the court’s decision to the circuit court −Fifth Circuit for cases filed in the Northern District of Texas 28 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Evidentiary Hearing ●District court can grant an evidentiary hearing. ●Circuits differ on the standard to determine when an evidentiary hearing should be granted. ●Clarke case pending in Supreme Court may resolve the circuit split. 29 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Clarke Case ●Facts −Taxpayer was under audit for its 2005 – 2007 tax years. −Taxpayer had agreed to extend the statute of limitations twice, but declined to do so a third time. −In September and October 2010, IRS issued summons to Michael Clarke, the taxpayer’s CFO. −In December 2010, just before the statute of limitations expired, IRS issued a FPAA that had been signed in August −In February 2011, the taxpayer challenged the FPAA in Tax Court. 30 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Clarke Case ●Clarke refused to comply with the summons, and the IRS sought enforcement in district court. ●Clarke asked the district court for an evidentiary hearing, alleging an improper purpose for issuing the summons related to (among other things) the −Possible use of the information in the examination of another taxpayer for which Clarke also served as CFO −Possible retaliation for the taxpayer’s refusal to extend the statute of limitations −Circumvention of the Tax Court’s rules on discovery 31 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Clarke Case ●District court rejected Clarke’s arguments and ordered enforcement of the summons. ●Clarke appealed, and the Eleventh Circuit reversed stating: −“in situations such as this, requiring the taxpayer to provide factual support for an allegation of improper purpose, without giving the taxpayer a meaningful opportunity to obtain such facts, saddles the taxpayer with an unreasonable circular burden, creating an impermissible ‘Catch 22.’” ●The Government appealed to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court granted cert. 32 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Clarke Case ●Government argues that the Eleventh Circuit’s rule allows taxpayers to delay summons enforcement with baseless allegations of an improper purpose. ●Because more summons enforcement proceedings are likely under new IDR procedures, the government is particularly concerned about possible delays in enforcement proceedings. ●The Supreme Court’s decision is expected by the end of June. 33 Summons Enforcement Proceeding

● Unfortunately, the New IDR Process is not optional. 34 How to Prepare Your Boss

● Document retention procedures become very important, as records need to be readily obtainable. 35 How to Prepare Your Boss

● Rigid deadlines apply throughout the process. ● The IRS may grant only one 15-day extension per IDR. ● A pre-summons letter will be sent to him or her. ● A summons may be issued days after you fail to respond to an IDR. ● You will be in court to defend. ● Court proceedings are public, so your tax return information may become public. 36 How to Prepare Your Boss

● A summons is difficult to quash, and you probably will lose. ● You will have the most success asserting privileges, but the process is expensive. ● The court proceeding may result in significant delay. ● The court proceeding becomes moot once you provide the requested information. 37 How to Prepare Your Boss

38 The New IDR Process

Thank You! Mary A. McNulty Emily A. Parker