Preserve Sudbury 35 ARTICLE 35 SUDBURY CITIZENS' RESOLUTION TO POSTPONE ADVANCEMENT ON THE PROPOSED BRUCE FREEMAN RAIL TRAIL WHEREAS: the “Character of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEPA, CWA, THE FARM BILL, THE BAY ACT, ESC, ASA, WQIA Understanding Laws that Shape Virginia’s Soil and Water Conservation Districts defiance-county.com.
Advertisements

NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Shoreline Master Program Update. Shoreline Management Act approved by voters in the early 1970’s to: – Encourage water-dependent uses – Protect shoreline.
Regional Sewer Districts and IDEM Bruno Pigott Assistant Commissioner Office of Water Quality September 22, 2009 The Indiana Department of Environmental.
Stormwater, Wellhead Protection and Drainage Issues Public Hearing.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978) Strategic Delay in Derailing Public Policy.
BRUCE FREEMAN RAIL TRAIL ARTICLES 22, 23, & ANNUAL TOWN MEETING.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -NPDES Permit Process-
Conference on Environmental Assessments in Federations A Montana Perspective September 14, 2009 Tom Livers, Deputy Director Montana Department of Environmental.
Bring the Trail to Sudbury: Vision & Offer Friends of the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail September 22, 2011 Rail Trail Conversion Advisory Committee Meeting.
Community GPU Forums California Native Plant Society, Monterey Bay Chapter Carmel Valley Association Citizens for Responsible Growth Coalition to Protect.
Area Commissions Purpose Area commissions are established to afford additional voluntary citizen participation in decision-making in an advisory.
COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE OFFICE Giving small businesses a helping hand to overcome hurdles in Environment Regulations Genevieve Salmonson Compliance Assistance.
Protecting Water Resources: The U.S. Legal Framework Babette J. Neuberger, JD, MPH Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Environmental Assessment in Newfoundland & Labrador Environmental Assessment in Federations: Current Dynamics and Emerging Issues Conference Current Dynamics.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Permit.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Carrin Williams.  Purity of Waters Act  To assure supplies of clean drinking water  Clean Streams Law  To protect the streams from pollution.
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
APA OPC Planning Workshop Southington Township Comprehensive Plan: Vision 2060 November 18, 2011.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
CONSERVATION COMMISSION TRAILS come in all shapes and sizes based on community need and vision.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
The Safe Drinking Water Act By: Lexie Lewis Period: 2 Mr.Rall.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES HAMPTON BAYS 2011 GEIS FINAL DRAFT Mary Jean Green HBCA Board Member.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 29, 2010.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Compensation in Czech law Petra Humlickova Utrecht, Water and Oceans Law in Times of Climate Change 2013.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978) Strategic Delay in Derailing Public Policy.
Clark County’s Municipal Stormwater Permit Stormwater Manual and Code Update National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System & State Waste Discharge General.
ENVIRONMENTAL PRIORITIES PANEL Chris Korleski, Director, Ohio EPA Tom Easterly, Commissioner, IDEM Official Representing New KY Governor Beshear.
Open Space and Recreation Plan Committee Public Forum October 18, 2007.
LAFCO’s and CEQA Discussion Problem The City of San Garbanzo prepared an EIR in connection with a regional commercial project “Big Box Mall” to be located.
Confined and Concentrated Animal Feeding Permitting Indiana Soybean Alliance December 12, 2006.
Class I Overview EPA Class I determination. Basics regarding how Class I works. Importance of Tribal Class I status. EPA’s Handling of Michigan’s objections.
Prentice Hall © PowerPoint Slides to accompany The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce 5E, by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 25 Environmental.
Changes to Contested Case Hearing Requirements and Procedures Janis Hudson Environmental Law Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
Weston Town Center Planning Committee Request for Funds for Concept & Feasibility Study.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
By: Tyler Stevens Mikayla Stern-Ellis Zach Jones & Althea.
Central Valley Drinking Water Policy November 19, 2009 Holly Grover Environmental Scientist Sacramento River Watershed Unit Central Valley Regional Water.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (1974, 1984, & 1996) By: Cat Pittard, APES.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE Chatham. Charter Review Committee Section 8-2 Periodic Charter Review  At least once every five years a special.
CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.
Regulation of land use and building activities
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
Draft Strategy To Optimize Resource Management of Storm Water
Preservation of Historically Significant Buildings
Retail Marijuana committee
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Department Activities
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Water Law and Management
Presentation transcript:

Preserve Sudbury 35 ARTICLE 35 SUDBURY CITIZENS' RESOLUTION TO POSTPONE ADVANCEMENT ON THE PROPOSED BRUCE FREEMAN RAIL TRAIL WHEREAS: the “Character of Sudbury” Statement adopted by Town Meeting in 1998 states strongly the town voters desire to preserve Sudbury’s rural, historical, and agricultural roots ; WHEREAS: the Sudbury Master Plan dated 2001 promotes development that protects and preserves natural resources; WHEREAS: the Town of Sudbury relies solely on ground water wells for its drinking water;

Preserve Sudbury 35 WHEREAS: the Town of Sudbury residents and the majority of businesses rely solely on septic systems for waste water treatment; WHEREAS: it is a an undisputed scientific fact that the pervious surfaces and natural vegetation assist greatly in the removal of pollutants, including heavy metals and pathogens; from storm water runoff; WHEREAS: the Town of Sudbury must comply with its federal EPA Phase II MS4 permit requirements for treatment of runoff; WHEREAS: the Sudbury Town Manager refused to release the draft Feasibility Study to the permitting boards, in particular the Conservation Commission, for comment prior to the issuance of the final Feasibility Study;

Preserve Sudbury 35 WHEREAS: the final Feasibility Study lacked information that was presented at the 2005 ATM as part of the scope of the Feasibility Study, such information being crucial to the voter’s decision to proceed with subsequent funding for the BFRT; WHEREAS: the Sudbury Board of Selectmen have not as yet decided to subject the proposed Bruce Freeman Bike Trail to the same environmental standards, particularly the Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw; as any other project in Town; WHEREAS: the Sudbury Historical Commission has raised serious concerns for the aesthetics of the project as promoted in the Feasibility Study And,

Preserve Sudbury 35 WHEREAS: the Town of Sudbury continues to expend and request additional funds on preliminary work for the BFRT without an overall vision for the Trail that complies with the above THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: That the voters of the Town of Sudbury inform the Sudbury Board of Selectmen and Sudbury Town Manager that they do not wish to proceed with the BFRT until an overall vision acceptable to the voters exists and it is demonstrated that the ultimate conceptual design of the Trail will be in compliance with all local development laws and regulations.