Literacy Corps MSU WRAC Research Cluster & Production.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coaching Data Teams DEVELOPED BY JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN & BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT.
Advertisements

Strand C – In Depth. Competencies 8 and 9: The teacher demonstrates a willingness to examine and implement change, as appropriate. The teacher works productively.
REVIEW OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH AND PRINCIPLES OF QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS SCWK 242 – SESSION 2 SLIDES.
Collecting Qualitative Data
Collecting Qualitative Data
College of Engineering Engineering Education Exploring Engineering Education Heidi Diefes-Dux, ENE Graduate Chair ASEE Student Chapter – November 15, 2005.
Overview Locating Teaching Case Studies Inheriting Teaching Cases and Integrating Them into a Curriculum Tailoring Teaching Cases for Particular Student.
Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educo Workshop autobiography and action learning.
Team Teaching Section 5: Parallel Instruction. The Parallel Instruction model In this setting, the class is divided into two groups and each teacher is.
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Collecting Data This is STEP 3 of the five steps.
Chapter 16 Narrative Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 18 Action Research Designs.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 The Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education In Collaboration.
Fiona Partridge Education Doctorate Research Candidate Currently in 2nd Phase of Research Research Methods… Div EAS Research Forum August 12th 2006.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Jack C Richards Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning Jack C Richards & Thomas.
Consumer and Career Education ACHS FCS. What are STAR Events? STAR Events (Students Taking Action with Recognition) are competitive events in which members.
Community Issues And Needs Associated With Microbicides Clinical Trials Presenter: John M. Mutsambi, Community Liaison Officer with University of Zimbabwe.
Transition Definition: movement, passage, or change from one position, state, stage, subject, concept, etc., to another change: 
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition Forrest W. Parkay Chapter 13 Becoming a Professional Teacher Parkay ISBN: © 2013, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education,
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
6 Unit Ethical Choices, Decisions, and Consequences Chapter 8: Critical Thinking in Citizenship Lesson 2: Ethical Choices, Decisions, and Consequences.
Growing Innovations in Rural Sites of Learning: Learning Together Elluminate meeting #2 – December, 2011.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland CLINICAL SKILLS Managed Educational Network Excellent skills for excellent care Exploring the role of Tactical.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 15: Capacity development and training on Maternity.
Problem Identification
Capacity development: Research rooted in community partner voice September 24, 2012 Patrick M. Green, Ed.D. Director, Center for Experiential Learning.
Presentation to DDA Day & Employment Providers March 26, 2015.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
1. 2 Collaborative Partnerships It’s that evolution thing again! Adult education has been partnering and collaborating for years.
Getting started obtaining and generating video data Carey Jewitt MODE multimodal methodologies FOR RESEARCHING DIGITAL DATA AND ENVIRONMENTS
1: Overview and Field Research in Classrooms ETL329: ENTREPRENEURIAL PROFESSIONAL.
Michigan’s Better Kid Care Project: Integrating Community Assets to Increase Home and Business Ownership and to Increase the Availability of Quality Child.
Leading Innovation 2011: Sanding the Edges - Tuning a Lesson STRUCTURED LESSON REVIEW BEGIN.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Coaching Data Teams JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATOR, LEARN.
Community-based Participatory Action
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Coaching Data Teams JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATOR, LEARN.
Module 2 Day 2 Transforming teaching, training and learning: focus on subject pedagogy.
University Education in Natural Resources March 15, 2008 Andrea Wirth and Janine Salwasser Oregon State University Libraries Oregon Explorer: natural resources.
Action Research Qualitative Inquiry in Practice AACTE ANNUAL MEETING 2007 New York Dr. Dorothy Valcarcel Craig Ms. Kathyrn.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
© (2015, 2012, 2008) by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 7: Collecting Qualitative Data Educational Research: Planning, Conducting,
Narrative Research Designs
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Community-based Participatory Action.
Action Research Designs
Family Classroom Museum Suzanne Hutchins Lonna Sanderson.
Teacher Refresher Course Professional Learning Program Program 1 Learning Leaders: Jill Flack Maureen O’Rourke.
Marine Corps Civilian Leadership Development Leadership Development Seminar Session Six Final Reflections 1.
Discuss the analytical skills, including systems thinking, needed for a systems analyst to be successful Describe the technical skills required of a systems.
Action Research Action. Pre-Assess (if appropriate) ► Before enacting your plan, gather data and information about the population you are teaching. ►
What Is Action Research? Action Research is : Action Research is : - A research methodology - Participative - Responsive - Cyclic “A cycle of posing questions,
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
Formulating a research problem R esearch areas and topics.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Using Community Asset Maps and Oral Histories in Your Teaching Felice Atesoglu Russell, KSU Amanda Richey, KSU Jan Anglade, Dekalb International Student.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Evaluating and Interpreting Oral History
Narrative Research Designs
Lesson 2: SBP Review Lesson 2: SBP Review February 2017
Enacted: Generating data in research events
Experts by Experience Group Observations.
Presentation transcript:

Literacy Corps MSU WRAC Research Cluster & Production

Purpose To conduct longitudinal study of 4 MSU students identified as representatives of groups of concern for retention and persistence at MSU To learn not only about these students’ experiences of education, but to trace their histories with literacy sponsors.

Literacy Sponsors “any agents, local or distant, concrete or abstract, who enable, support, teach, model, as well as recruit, regulate, suppress, or withhold literacy—and gain advantage by it in some way” (Brandt, Literacy in American Lives 166).

Methodology: 5 Phases 1. Initial interviews with cohorts of 12+ participants on or near campus to gather general preliminary information in the form of oral histories related in some way to participants’ educational experiences and life plans. 2. Follow-up interviews with approximately half of the original cohort participants (in a nearby location of each participant’s choice) about more specific educational histories including reading and writing practices. 3. Follow-up meetings with each of the four cohort members to review footage, plot a course for further inquiry, and prepare for participation in Phases 4 & 5 (e.g., instruct participants in camera operations and direct participants to complete SIRB training when appropriate). 4. Video footage collected on location by each of 4 final cohort participants--without researchers immediately present. Each participant leads the inquiry in this phase, conducting interviews and making decisions about what aspects of her/his life to explore, and what footage to collect. 5. Video footage collected by researchers and participants on location in each of 4 final cohort participants' neighborhood or community and interviews with friends, family members, and/or educators.

Phase OnePhase One: past, present & future self artifacts Recruit first-year undergraduate students from classes and student-life programs at Michigan State University for a first round of interviews. Prior to the interview, we will ask participants to bring to the interview session three “artifacts” of their choice representing past, present, and future selves artifacts. These artifacts will facilitate the solicitation narrative recountings of life events, and serve as preliminary data set from which can be derived more direct questions about literacy experiences and practices. At least one of the members of the research team will be present during interview sessions. Phase One Interviews will be videotaped

Phase Two: scenes of literacy Select approximately 6 participants for interviews. Participants reflect further on the significance of their past, present, and future selves in relation to educational experience and literacy practices in particular. Participants view portions of P1 interview to serve as a prompt for further elaboration. Participants select the site of their interviews as a fourth artifact to solicit new stories and to further open opportunities for us to learn about literacy experiences and practices. As before, at least one of the members of the research team will be present during interview sessions. Phase Two Interviews will be videotaped.

Phase Three: the transition We will select the 4 cohort members who will participate in the final phases of the sequence. The Phase Three interview will include review of footage from Phases One and Two in order to facilitate a common course of inquiry. Phase Three moves participants from being subjects of inquiry to becoming collaborators in the inquiry. Phase Three interviews identify goals of common inquiry and give researchers the opportunity to prepare participants for the ethical and technical challenges of their continued participation. Phase Three Interviews will be videotaped.

Phase Four: participant- conducted, field inquiry Each of the 4 participants take camera and audio equipment to their home communities for community-based inquiry on location with persons who have emerged in their oral histories in the previous phases as significant potential contributors to the study. Expose visually and aurally people and places important to participants’ literate development. Participants conduct all of the interviews and testimonies on location and select the locations for documentary investigation. Each participant then adds her/his footage to the rest of the footage associated with her/his project. Each participant will review Phase Four footage with the researchers to identify important features and to establish a course of action for Phase Five.

Phase Five: participant & researcher field inquiry Researchers join participants as they return to their home communities for in depth study on location and with persons from their oral histories in the previous phases of interview. Participants & Researchers have collaborative agency to expose visually and aurally people and places important to their literate development. Participants act as both subjects and collaborators in the research on location and will select some of the locations for documentary investigation. Phase Five interviews feature focused follow-up questions about literacy practices, ecologies, and protocols situated in their home communities. Phase Five Interviews will be videotaped.

15-minute video: all 5 phases with Liberty C. Bellvideo

Roles Project Manager (1) Team Leaders (3) Team support (???) Research Cluster or Two (6-10 each?)

Production Teams

Research Cluster(s) Plan, observe, and theorize the moves of the production teams Identify possible venues for scholarly products