Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
ARRA Meaningful Use Update Mount Auburn Hospital Information Systems Update March 2011.
Meaningful Use Stage I Class III Menu Objectives
Meaningful Use Stage I Core Objectives
Meaningful Use Basics.  Demographics  Active Medication List  Active Allergy List  Vitals  Smoking Status  Problem List  Computerized Physician/Provider.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Eligible Hospitals (EH) & Critical Access Hospitals (CAH)
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
TWS July 2011 Stimulation. TWS July 2011 The ARRA Stimulus Reimbursement from an ifa Customer Perspective.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 2 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
Meaningful Use and the EHR Incentive Program Tribal Self-Governance Conference.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Meaningful Use Jacqueline L. Candelaria ABQ Area Program Analyst April 25, 2012.
Behavioral Health providers are being challenged to adopt health information technology with very limited resources. There is a need to prepare for increased.
Cornelius Dial, RPh Order Checks 1. 2 Learning Objectives Become familiar with the Order Checking feature and how it is triggered Examine the Order Check.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
WV HFMA January 23,  Understand Stage 1 changes starting in 2014  Understand Stage 2 Objectives & Quality Measures – changes from Stage 1 and.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 1 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
Meaningful Use Stage 1 & 2 Helping Colorado Providers Achieve Meaningful Use Tracy Rue Senior Consultant, Colorado Regional Extension Center.
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
Order Checks. Learning Objectives Become familiar with the Order Checking feature and how it is triggered Examine the Order Check Parameters where system.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use and Implementation Lecture a This material (Comp11_Unit8a) was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
GloStream and Meaningful Use August, Table of Contents Final rule from the ONC and CMS The gloStream path to truly meaningful use Medicare payment.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Meaningful Use Office Hours Focus: MU Reports – Patient Volume, MU Performance Measures, Clinical Quality Measures Moderators: Cecelia Rosales, Carmen.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Maine Health Information Technology (HIT)Status Report for MaineCare and Office of the State Coordinator for HIT Project Team: Andy Coburn Cathy McGuire.
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Electronic Access to Health Information Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
 By phone: 1) Dial ) Enter conference ID: # Join the audio conference:  Via internet: 1) Click the phone icon 2) Click “Connect”
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
MediSYS EHR About Meaningful Use
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Presentation transcript:

Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian Health Service

Goals At the end of this session, participants should be able to: –Run MU Performance Measure Report for EPs –Understand how to use the Summary Report for MU attestation requirements

What is Meaningful Use? Meaningful Use is using certified EHR technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce health disparities Engage patients and families in their health care Improve care coordination Improve population and public health All the while maintaining privacy and security

What it Means to Demonstrate MU ProfessionalsHospitals Report on 15 core objectives & 5 objectives from a menu set of 10 Must meet performance targets on most objectives Report on 14 core objectives & 5 objectives from a menu set of 10 Must meet performance targets on most objectives Report on 6 Clinical Quality Measures 3 core, 3 menu set No performance targets Report on 15 Clinical Quality Measures No performance targets Note: Reporting on Clinical Quality Measures meets one of the Performance Measures

Eligible Providers Performance Measures - Core NameMeasureTarget CPOE MedicationMore than 30% of all unique patients with at least on medication in their medication list seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period have at least one medication order entered using CPOE. >30% Drug Interaction Checks The EP has enabled this functionality for the entire EHR reporting period. Yes Maintain Problem List More than 80% of all unique patients seen by the EP have at least one entry or an indication that no problems are known for the patient recorded as structured data. >80% e-Prescribing (eRx) EP only More than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using certified EHR technology. >40% Active Medication List More than 80% of all unique patients seen by the EP have at least one entry (or an indication that the patient is not currently prescribed any medication) recorded as structured data. >80%

Eligible Providers Performance Measures – Core (cont.) NameMeasureTarget Medication Allergy List More than 80% of all unique patients seen by the EP have at least one entry (or an indication that the patient has no known medication allergies) recorded as structured data. >80% Record Demographics More than 50% of all unique patients seen by the EP have demographics recorded as structured data. >50% Record Vital Signs For more than 50% of all unique patients age 2 and over seen by the EP, height, weight, and blood pressure are recorded as structured data. >50% Record Smoking Status More than 50% of all unique patients 13 years old or older seen by the EP have smoking status recorded as structured data. >50% Clinical Quality Measures Successfully report to CMS (or, in the case of Medicaid EPs, the appropriate state agency) ambulatory clinical quality measures selected by CMS in the manner specified by CMS (or in the case of Medicaid EPs, the appropriate state agency). Yes

Eligible Providers Performance Measures - Core (cont.) NameMeasureTarget Clinical Decision Support Rule Implement one clinical decision support rule.Yes Electronic Copy of Health Information More than 50% of all patients of the EP who request an electronic copy of their health information are provided it within 3 business days. >50% Clinical Summaries EP Only Clinical summaries provided to patients for more than 50% of all office visits within 3 business days. >50% Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information Performed at least one test of certified EHR technology's capacity to electronically exchange key clinical information. Yes Protect Electronic Health Information Conduct or review a security risk analysis per 45 CFR (a)(1) of the certified EHR technology, and implement security updates and correct identified security deficiencies as part of its risk management process. Yes

Eligible Providers Performance Measures - Menu NameMeasureTarget Drug- Formulary Checks The EP has enabled this functionality and has access to at least one internal or external formulary for the entire EHR reporting period. Yes Clinical Lab Test Results More than 40% of all clinical lab test results ordered by the EP during the EHR reporting period whose results are either in a positive/negative or numerical format are incorporated in certified EHR technology as structured data. >40% Patient ListsGenerate at least one report listing patients of the EP, eligible hospital or CAH with a specific condition. Yes Patient Reminders EP only More than 20% of all unique patients 65 years old or older or 5 years old or younger were sent an appropriate reminder during the EHR reporting period. >20%

Eligible Providers Performance Measures – Menu (cont.) NameMeasureTarget Patient Electronic Access EP only At least 10% of all unique patients seen by the EP are provided timely (available to the patient within four (4) business days of being updated in the certified EHR technology) electronic access to their health information subject to the EP's discretion to withhold certain information. ≥10% Patient Specific Education Resources More than 10% of all unique patients seen by the EP are provided patient-specific education resources. >10% Medication Reconciliation The EP performs medication reconciliation for more than 50% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP. >50% Transitions of Care Summary The EP who transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 50% of transitions of care and referrals. >50%

Eligible Providers Performance Measures – Menu (cont.) NameMeasureTarget Immunization Registries Data Submission* Performed at least one test of certified EHR technology's capacity to submit electronic data to immunization registries and follow-up submission if the test is successful (unless none of the immunization registries to which the EP submits such information have the capacity to receive the information electronically.) Yes Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission* Performed at least one test of certified EHR technology's capacity to provide electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies and follow-up submission if the test is successful (unless none of the public health agencies to which EP submits such information have the capacity to receive the information electronically.) Yes

RPMS Roll and Scroll 1.Select IHS Kernel Option: CORE 2.Select IHS Core Option: PCC (Patient Care Component) 3.Selection Patient Care Component Option: ARP (PCC Management Reports) 4.Select PCC Management Reports Option: MUR (Meaningful Use Performance reports)

Establish Meaningful Use ‘Clean Date’ (MUCD) MUCD was created to allow sites to see EHR order check parameter settings related to MU PM Drug Interaction Checks, which are set incorrectly. Sites should use the data to correct any discrepancies. The MU PM Report will fail one or more of its core elements until the parameters are set properly. When site is configured correctly, the MU ‘Clean Date’ will be set equal to that day’s date. Running the option again doesn’t reset the date. The initial clean date’ remains the same.

Establish Meaningful Use ‘Clean Date’ (MUCD) Ten Order Checks to be enabled and set to mandatory: 1.Allergy-Contrast Media Interaction 2.Allergy-Drug Interaction 3.Critical Drug Interaction 4.Dangerous Meds for Patients >64 5.Estimated Creatinine Clearance 6.Glucophage-Contrast Media 7.Glucophage-Lab Results 8.No Allergy Assessment 9.Allergy Unassessible 10.Renal Functions Over Age 65

Establish Meaningful Use ‘Clean Date’ (MUCD)

Stage 1 MU Performance Report MU PM Report does not verify CMS Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program participation eligibility. Important: this report can indicate Meaningful Use has been achieved by an EP or facility that is not eligible (or not yet registered) to participate in the program. Please speak to your Area Meaningful Use Coordinator for guidance in determining eligibility.

Full or Summary Report Selection May generate full report or summary report. Full report includes the cover page and details on each Performance Measure along with corresponding logic. Full report also includes a summary report. Summary report does not include programming logic. Both reports display previous and current performance results as well as Stage 1 targets.

Report Period Selection May run report for full year or a 90-day period Both coincide with CMS program parameters The MU program for EPs runs on a calendar year Report can be run for any date; however, MU cannot be achieved with the RPMS EHR prior to its date of certification and installation. Example: if the certified version of RPMS EHR is installed at your site on July 27th, users may run this report for periods prior to this date, but MU can only be achieved on performance for a period that begins on or after July 28th.

Calculating Previous Period Option for 90-Day Report Period If user chooses to include previous period data, calculate data from the period immediately preceding the selected 90- day report period in the previous step. –If user selects June 1, 2011 – August 31, 2011, report will also display March 1, 2011 – May 31, –If user chooses not to include previous period, report will reflect “N/A” in the reports output.

Provider Selection IP: Individual Provider User is prompted to enter provider name Full or summary report generated for designated provider SEL: Selected Providers User is prompted to enter multiple provider names Full or summary report generated for each provider TAX: Provider Taxonomy List User is prompted for the taxonomy list name Full or summary report generated for each provider on the list

Output Selection Choose from the following output selections: P Print Report on Printer or Screen D Create Delimited output file (for use in Excel) B Both a Printed Report and Delimited File At the “Device” prompt, specify the device to print/display the report. Bug in deliminated report: exclusion column is returning inconsistent results

Summary Report for MU Attestation Requirements Summary report –for each measure: # of instances in Denominator and Numerator where measure was applicable, include exceptions. Must use EHR to calculate measure - no manual calculations. CMS currently does not have the capability to receive data electronically for all measures, and so is only requiring attestation in the meantime.