Www.talbotpreservation.org 1 Our Mission To protect the precious environment and heritage of Talbot County, including its waterways, farmland and historic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
Advertisements

Chesapeake Bay Commission Meeting November 8, 2012 Vienna Community Center Protecting the Nanticoke River: Saving the Landscape Tim Brower Land Acquisition.
Talbot Preservation Alliance Hospital Information Forum April 2007.
Our Mission To protect the precious environment and heritage of Talbot County, including its waterways, farmland and historic.
WELCOME URBAN AND RURAL SERVICE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS AGENTS OF CHANGE John Day Center for Environmental Farming Systems, NC State University.
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
Best Local Land Use Practices A Project of the Ohio Lake Erie Commission The Countryside Program, Levin College of Urban Affairs Kirby Date, AICP Coordinator.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
ND Annual EDUCATORS RECRUITMENT FAIR The Eastern Shore Consortium for Diversity, Excellence and Equity invites you to its 2 nd Annual Educators.
City of Fitchburg, WISAA Design Group + Teska +Montgomery NORTH STONER PRAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Steering Committee Workshop: Plan Vision, Principles,
Community Planning Land Use Education Project Charlotte P. Burckhardt, AICP, PCP Principal Planner.
THE COSTS OF SUBURBAN SPRAWL AND URBAN DECAY. What is Suburban Sprawl? Sprawl is unsustainable development that wastes tax dollars, destroys farmland.
High Growth Counties: Opportunities for Pinal County Pinal County Comprehensive Plan Curt Dunham AICP Partners for Strategic Action, Inc. Comprehensive.
 FRLP Proposed Boundary Line Adjustment: Confluence Virginia What life have you if you have not life together? There is no life.
The Eastern Shore Conservation Center. Who We Are Our Mission: To preserve and sustain the vibrant communities of the Eastern Shore and the lands and.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
8th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Arlington, VA March 30, 2012 PlanMaryland Maryland Department of Planning.
Transfer of Development Rights
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Integration Of Stormwater Master Plans with Watershed Plans The Link between Flooding and Development September 23, 2008 Bob Murdock, P.E., CFM.
Bolton Economic Development Committee Why? 1.Master Plan, Sustainable Village Center Study (UMass study) refer to economic development. 2.Proactive approach.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
Comprehensive Plan August 13, Year Work Plan Update Report of Accomplishments
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
S.A.V.E. is a non-profit community organization whose aim is to sustain the southern Chester County region’s rural quality of life and community character.
FLORIDA 2060 A Research Project of 1000 Friends of Florida.
Community Development Department ISLAND WALK MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION #2648.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
1 Prepared by Les Knapp, Associate Director, MACo and Amanda Stakem Conn, Principal Counsel to MDP* for the Maryland State Bar Association,
Overview of Southern Ocean County Presented by David J. McKeon, Assistant Planning Director Ocean County Department of Planning Tuesday, January 11, 2005.
Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Visioning Process Counties and Towns of Culpeper, Fauquier, Madison, Orange and Rappahannock Bruce Dotson Tanya Denckla Institute.
Sustainable Development “Meeting needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.” World Commission on.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
KI 13-3 Why Do Inner Cities Face Distinctive Challenges?  Inner-city physical issues? Most significant = deteriorating housing (built prior to 1940) ○
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Cecil County, Maryland.
FOR CLERKS AND RECORDERS  Planning Commission – public meeting and a public hearing  City Council – public hearing  Must contain: - a map of expansion.
Joe Campbell, PhD Research Associate School of Environment and Natural Resources Adapting to Shale-Based Development through a Countywide Approach: Lessons.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
Presentation by Jon Laria, Chair to the Maryland Association of Counties Winter Conference January 6, 2011.
Best Local Land Use Practices A Project of the Ohio Lake Erie Commission The Countryside Program, Levin College of Urban Affairs Kirby Date, AICP Coordinator.
Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Visioning Process Counties and Towns of Culpeper, Fauquier, Madison, Orange and Rappahannock Bruce Dotson Tanya Denckla Institute.
13 th – 15 March, 2006 New Perspectives in Real Estate Development In Port of Spain Welcome.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
Why Plan? Unprecedented pressure for growth and change To identify development and preservation areas over next 20 years To recommend types of land uses.
N orth C entral W isconsin R egional P lanning C ommission 210 McClellan Street, Suite 210 Wausau, WI (715)
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
Lake Mary Jane Alliance Narcoossee Rd - Lake Barton Support if C-1 is changed to PO Board of County Commissioners January 26, 2010.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
The Cascade Agenda: A New Model for Land Conservation Narragansett Bay Estuary Program Conference May 1, 2009 John Howell Board Member Cascade Land Conservancy.
By: Theresa Foley. Taylor Foley Emergency Communications Director Ashland County Sheriff’s Department th Street East Ashland, WI Dottie Monroe.
Planes, Trains & Automobiles Oil & Gas Conference Fort Nelson, BC 2011.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
DUVALL 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE and SURVEY RESULTS 9:00 – 10:30 AM Survey Results 30 minutes (Lara) Comprehensive Plan, Density and Capacity, and.
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Comprehensive plan Discussion
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
November 16, 2016 Citizens Advisory Committee Brian Ambrette
Little Heaven Employment Center
Protecting the Shore through…
Bringing Towns and Counties Together to Plan for their Future – THE Steamboat springs and routt county Colorado case study Chad Phillips, A.I.C.P. Director,
FRLP Proposed Boundary Line Adjustment: Confluence Virginia
Presentation transcript:

1 Our Mission To protect the precious environment and heritage of Talbot County, including its waterways, farmland and historic small towns

Putting the Pieces Together Comprehensive Plans Annexation Hospital Relocation Regional Cooperation Welcome Talbot Preservation Alliance Annual Meeting April 2008

Maryland Law:  All municipalities and counties must have a Comprehensive Plan  The plans must be updated every 6 years  There are 3 new elements Water resources Priority preservation areas (county only) Municipal growth element (towns only) COMP PLAN 101

COMP PLAN 202 Step 1: Pass Comprehensive Plans to create a vision for the community Step 2: Enact Zoning Ordinances must be updated and enforced

Comprehensive Plan Example: EASTON The Town of Easton is currently updating its Comprehensive Plan Last plan completed in public meetings to date

Comprehensive Plan Statements: “overwhelming sentiment that we take steps to slow the rate of growth in our town” (page 2) “Many clearly feel that the rate is at best too fast and at worst out of control” (page 25) Comprehensive Plan Example: EASTON At that time Easton’s growth rate was 3%

Land must be added to Easton’s growth areas Comprehensive Plan update: Town will add 1,900 new dwelling units through Star Democrat Headline 3/21/08

Based on a 3% growth rate Using Smart Growth density of 3.5 units/acre Easton will have 31,000 residents in 2040 There are 15,000 today Easton’s Future?

Question: Must additional land be annexed during the next Comprehensive Plan period to accommodate reasonable growth? Comp Plan Math

Easton Growth: ,356 New Housing Permints 1 x 2.2 Persons Per House 2 2,983 New Easton Residents 1 : Easton Planning Office 2 : MD Dept of Planning (MDP)

Easton Growth: x 2.2 Persons Per House 2 2,200 New Easton Residents 1 : Easton Planning Office 2 : MD Dept of Planning (MDP) 1,000 New Houses Approved (Not Occupied) 1

Easton Growth: x 2.2 Persons per House 3 1,201 New Easton Residents 1 : Easton Planning Office 2 : MD Smart Growth Law 3 : MD Dept of Planning (MDP) 156 Residentially Zoned Acres 1 x 3.5 Houses per Acre 2

Easton Growth: ,201 New Residents from Land in Easton Today 2,983 New Easton Residents Added from ,200 New Residents from Approved Projects + 3,400 Potential New Residents

Cooke’s Hope 100 du Lakelands 145 du Ashby Commons 89 du Easton Village 250 du Douglass Landing 155 du Londonerry Annexation ?? Target/Retail Space 150,000ft 2 Lowe’s 168,000ft 2

What Can You Do? Get Involved Engage in the Comp Plan public hearings Let the town know a 3% growth rate is not “an acceptable level” Demand the Plan No new residential annexations for the next plan period ( )

FACT: Annexation is discretionary

Denton Current Town Planned Annexation

Ridgely Planned Annexation Current Town

Hebron Current Town Planned Annexation

Trappe Annexed Land Current Town Rt 50

FACT: The larger the town the higher the tax rate 22

FACT: Residential development costs more in tax dollars than it generates 23

24 FACT: Each home generates 10 vehicle trips/day

FACT: Water quality degrades quickly as impervious surfaces increase 25 Filtering Capacity Open Land: Excellent - Good Development: Fair - Poor

How Big is Too Big? What is the Real Benefit? % <$3M $2,781

St Michaels

Ask These Questions  Actual dollars to the town?  Actual costs to the town?  Traffic/road improvements?  Schools?  Impervious surface areas?  Storm water management?

Annexations to Alliances Blackwater Annexations: Trappe, Denton QA Proposed Business Development Land Conservation

QACA QUEEN ANNE’S CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION Dorchester Citizens for Planned Growth

Collaborative Advocacy Talbot Preservation Alliance Queen Anne’s Conservation Association Eastern Shore Land Conservancy State Leaders and Agencies WYE MILLS PLAN

WYE MILLS’ FUTURE? Previous (UMBI) Plan is off the table Rural Village / College Town? Major Employment / Commercial Growth Node? Regional Medical Center?

QAC Proposed Planning Area Major Employment Center CAC is considering development plans Kipp 2 was not in the original plan Talbot County not Included

Fundamental Flaws Improvements to Route 50 and 213 or 404 interchanges are not funded. The College has modest sewer capacity available. The Wye East River watershed is considered “impaired.” Other locations are available in County growth areas that could accommodate employment growth. The original plan market study indicates only modest demand for business (as opposed to warehousing and distribution). There is no proven synergy between a community college and employment spin-off businesses.

Who Benefits ~ Who Supports? Dr. Stuart Bounds, Former President Chesapeake College. The benefiting landowners:  Mr. Kimo Kipp, Mr. Michael Foster. QAC Commissioners:  Dr. Eric Wargotz, Paul Gunther, Courtney Billups. QAC Department of Economic Development and Agriculture. Business Queen Anne’s. QAC Economic Development Commission. QAC Chamber of Commerce. University of Maryland Health System?

A Better Plan: Rural Village / College Town A Planning Area not split by the freeway. Route 50 and 404 frontage remains rural. Limited expansion for the College, schools and research employment on the Foster property. Infill development and historic restoration in the Village of Wye Mills. Buffer on both sides of the Mill Pond.

What can you do to help? Support the Talbot Council that has opposed this proposal – saying not consistent with TC Comprehensive Plan. Attend CAC meetings and public hearings and speak against commercial sprawl. Write letters to the editor. Lobby the MD Department of Planning, MD Department of the Environment and MD Department of Natural Resources to withhold enabeling approvals. Support the advocacy organizations – TPA, QACA, ESLC. Write the new President of the College, Dr. Barbara Viniar.

Easton Airport Proposed Hospital Site 38 Geography: County’s Offered Hospital Site Community Center

Geography: Transportation Routes

Community Action TPA Actions Full House Avalon Forum and Commissioned Hospital Film >10,000 Signatures Petition Communication with SHS and UMMS boards Hospital Citizens Committee Broad based community leadership Public advocacy – newspaper and letters Local Government County Site and Town Services offer County Economic Impact Report Meetings with Gov and Sec planning

41 Smart GrowthNot-so-smart growth Proposed Easton Site Route 50/404 or 50/213 Available infrastructure (sewer, water, broadband) No available infrastructure (spray fields/septic) Multiple roadway accessesLimited access routes; high congestion Close, existing medical offices & related businesses Middle of nowhere; far from existing medical offices; induces sprawl What Alternative?

THANK YOU Comprehensive Plans Annexation Hospital Relocation Regional Cooperation