Feasibility of Cross-Jurisdiction Common Access Management Federation Agreements A Summary of Preliminary Findings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Criteria for the trustworthiness of data centres Jens Klump Helmholtz Centre Potsdam German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) DataCite Summer Meeting.
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
LEGAL AND REGULATORY REGIME FOR ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING IN KENYA Presented By: Anne N. Angwenyi National Environment Management Authority (Kenya)
Sustainability & Business Models Gill Joy – ESYS plc Oscar Struijve – Education for Change.
The e-Framework Bill Olivier Director Development, Systems and Technology JISC.
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Legal Framework for e-Research Professor Brian Fitzgerald (QUT Law Faculty) and Dr John Abbot (QUT Law Faculty)
Policy interoperability in electronic signatures Andreas Mitrakas EESSI International event, Rome, 7 April 2003.
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
Securitisation made simple
UNRESTRICTED Infrastructure Assessment as Viewed by Technology Holders IAEA Technical Meeting December 10-12, 2008 R. Godden.
Feasibility of Cross-Jurisdiction Common Access Management Federation Agreements A Summary of Preliminary Findings 1.
Data-Sharing and Governance Consultation ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES.
Training & research for academic newcomers A project of the King Baudouin Foundation © 2013 Gabriella Calderari1.
Martin Gregory Manager – EU Liaison University of Strathclyde
1 EFCA - 21th March 2002 Raul Mateus Paula. 2 This presentation underlines: The key objectives of the Relex Reform The division of the responsibilities.
Copyright JNT Association 20051OptionalCopyright JNT Association 2007 Overview of the UK Access Management Federation Josh Howlett.
A Robust Health Data Infrastructure P. Jon White, MD Director, Health IT Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
Project Human Resource Management
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
James Aiello PricewaterhouseCoopers Africa Utility Week 06 International Good Practice in Procurement.
Common Content Dominique Ledouble Chairman, Common Content Project.
10th Annual AIJA Tribunals Conference Melbourne Session 8: Current Practical Matters of Interest to Tribunals and Tribunal Members Lawyers in Tribunal.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J The OAK Law Project Legal Issues in Data Management: A Practical Approach.
How to write a good RESEARCH proposal
Legal aspects - Overview Ad hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform (ADP) New agreement: - form - substance Design features & legal techniques.
Introduction 1. Purpose of the Chapter 2. Institutional arrangements Country Practices 3. Legal framework Country Practices 4. Preliminary conclusions.
1 Self-Regulation in the EU Advertising Sector: A Best practice model.
National Quality Infrastructure TRTA3 Approach
1 WIPO – Geneva – April 2005 European Commission – Research DG D. Dambois European Patent Attorney IPR disputes in international.
South Carolina Health Information Partners October 13,2012 South Carolina Primary Health Care Association 2012 Annual Conference.
Project Management IV1021Fö5 Risk Management. Agenda Project Risk Project Risk Management The Risk Management Process Goal: get an understanding of basic.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
ISO (C)SR Standard: Implications from a market access perspective Tom Rotherham International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Slide 1 Recognition of Professional Qualifications in the European Single Market for Services Henri Olivier FEE Secretary General FEE (Fédération des Experts.
Outsourcing Arrangements John Sudano, Senior Associate Hall & Wilcox, Lawyers.
9-Oct-03D.P.Kelsey, LCG-GDB-Security1 LCG/GDB Security (Report from the LCG Security Group) FNAL 9 October 2003 David Kelsey CCLRC/RAL, UK
Workshop on Issues relevant for the Accreditation of the Current Quality Control Laboratories (QCL) Presentation and Discussion of General Issues Dieter.
New Services in Mobility: C-ITS
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup HIE Trust Framework: HIE Trust Framework: Essential Components for Trust April 21, 2010 David Lansky, Chair Farzad.
1 © The Delos Partnership 2004 Project Management Executing the Project.
Unfair Trade Practices: Conceptualisation, Significance and Regional Perspectives March 11, 2011.
Legal Issues in Health Information Technology Acquisition, Implementation and Cooperation Wednesday October 20,2005 The Health Information.
Article 28(2) USD Introduction. The Problem Fraud and Misuse scale Evolving risks Impact on end users –Direct financial impact –Direct inconvenience Indirect.
Slide 1 Federation des Experts Comptables Méditerranéens 4 th FCM Conference Capri, 3-4 May 2004 The Globalisation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
Rules of Participation in Framework Programme 7 Brussels Office Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres Rue du Trône 98 B-1050 Brüssel
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Connecting for Health Common Framework: the Model Contract for Health Information Exchange Gerry Hinkley com July 18, 2006 Davis Wright.
Protecting your Managed Services Practice: Are you at Risk?
Regulatory Networking A New Zealand perspective on the EEE regulatory networks evolving in the Asia Pacific area Sirma Karapeeva Peter Morfee Ministry.
GEO Implementation Mechanisms Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Best Practices for Competition Law Enforcement: March 18, 2016 Russell W. Damtoft Associate Director Office of International Affairs United States Federal.
A look into current and future trends in national policies for eHealth and Innovation in the WHO European Region Clayton Hamilton, eHealth and Innovation.
COBIT. The Control Objectives for Information and related Technology (COBIT) A set of best practices (framework) for information technology (IT) management.
European Life Sciences Infrastructure for Biological Information ELIXIR Collaboration Agreement Template ELIXIR/2014/10 Vera Herkommer.
Department of Computer Science Introduction to Information Security Chapter 8 ISO/IEC Semester 1.
Joint Seminar Brussels 2017.
Promoting Regional Capital Market Integration
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
23rd UN/CEFACT Forum UN/CEFACT Project Recommendation for ensuring legally significant trusted trans-boundary electronic interaction Aleksandr Sazonov.
Business cases on standardization
Internet Interconnection
Deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems Directive 2010/40/EU
1999 MOSAICC 2001 CBD BONN GUIDELINES
IAEA RER/9/141: Improving National Infrastructure for Safety   Regional Workshop on Regulatory Enforcement and Inspection Vilnius, Lithuania 11 September.
Presentation transcript:

Feasibility of Cross-Jurisdiction Common Access Management Federation Agreements A Summary of Preliminary Findings

Jason Campbell Jason Campbell JISC Legal Service Manager

Objective To investigate the feasibility of cross- jurisdiction common access management federation agreements. Funded under the JISC’s Access Management Transition Programme

Scope Member agreements and interoperability agreements Does not include: –Technical provision –Finding agreement

Possibilities Single set of templates Set of adaptable templates Framework Certification Independently developed agreements Convergence

Benefits of Convergence Aids interoperability Minimises acceptance overhead Reinforces knowledge Minimises focus on law

Benefit of common templates 1.There is a substantial advantage in the standardisation of access management federation agreements across jurisdictions, both at the individual national federation level, and at the federation interoperability level.

Legal issues Intellectual property rights Contractual relationship issues Responsibility and liability issues Data protection issues Applicable law issues

Other issues Ownership Degree of formality Structure Language

Diversity of current agreements 2.Differences between current national federation agreements are generally insignificant in terms of content and structure. However, a diversity of approach to the legal formality of the agreements exists.

Nature of current agreements 3.Current agreements do not contain a substantial number of ‘active’ clauses. The majority of content states what the case would be by default, or state under a title ‘responsibilities’ what is needed for the infrastructure to operate.

International approaches 4.As yet, national federation agreements do not typically address issues related to out-of-jurisdiction members.

Ownership of convergence 5.In order to succeed, strong ownership of the process of convergence would need to be shown by participating federations. The feasibility of common agreements will depend on focus on the benefits to be achieved, and the ability to develop agreements proportionately to risk.

Law no barrier 6.There is no legal impediment to the development of common agreements. There are few significant differences between laws to make necessary differences in agreements. The most significant legal issues will be compliance with data protection requirements and selection of jurisdiction.

Disruptive effect 7.The adoption of common of common federation agreements is likely to be disruptive to federations in the short term. The requirement for existing federation members to agree to a new contract is likely to be seen as a distraction from other priorities, and in particular, the take- up by institutions and publishers.

Review 8.Any common agreements will need to be reviewed periodically to ensure their currency and relevancy in relation to legal and technological change. This should be undertaken by a body representative of the participating federations.

© JISC Legal 2008